Fishers council approves rental caps as legislature moves to override action
The 9-0 vote came after real estate interest groups made a last-minute push to nullify the ordinance in the Indiana General Assembly. Lawmakers attached to an unrelated bill a provision that would prohibit cities from limiting rentals. The surprise addition to House Bill 1389, which was discussed in a conference committee Monday morning, would need lawmakers from both chambers to sign off on it before a vote.
At a packed Fishers City Hall meeting, residents were allotted 30 minutes to speak about the rental cap, with more than half saying they favored it but a sizable number clapping for those who opposed it. Those in support said they'd seen their subdivisions degraded by investors who paid high prices for lower valued homes, rented them, and neglected their maintenance,
'My job is to sell homes to people who want to buy them in desirable locations in the community,' said Fishers Realtor Jennifer Rice. 'All these rentals make neighborhoods undesirable. You have to be in the field to see this.'
Opponents said the ordinance illegally limited what homeowners could do with their hard-earned property.
'It is not your right to say if I move next year…I can't rent my home,' said Marti Brown, a Sandstone neighborhood resident. 'It is baloney. It is un-American.'
The administration of Mayor Scott Fadness and council worked one and a half years on the plan to address the local and national trend of outside investors gobbling up homes. Fadness said the rental cap would help keep lower-priced houses in the market because those are the ones most often targeted by Wall Street investors. That will give first-time buyers, who are typically younger with less wealth, a chance to own a home in Fishers and build equity.
The ordinance would also establish a registry for landlords to make them more responsive to renters or city complaints.
Opponents said Fadness and the council's work is outdated because the surge in institutional investors has subsided: the last one sold to an outside firm in Fishers was January of 2023. They also said it could severely limit the number of rentals available in county that already has an huge shortage and needs them for a growing number of lower-wage service workers.
'As we have shown, market conditions have changed and institutional investors have sold more homes over the last two years than they have purchased," said Chris Pryor, chief advocacy officer for the Metropolitan Indianapolis Board of Realtors, at the meeting. 'This is a trend that is likely to continue.'
MIBOR and the Indiana Association of Realtors opposed the rental caps while the One Zone Chamber of Commerce, covering Hamilton County, supported the ordinance and called it 'thoughtful and strategic approach to ensuring long-term neighborhood stability and housing market balance.'
Fadness said the corporate buyers could be back in the future and called the measure forward looking.
'What it means for the long-term ability of young people is to build wealth,' he said at the meeting. 'We want a viable stock of housing for starter homes.'
Most of the councilors, explaining their votes beforehand, said they have been swamped with calls from constituents in favor.
Councilor Todd Zimmerman said the city was taking a bold stand in the face of monied outside interests. Other cities have addressed the problem in various ways but Fishers officials found none that have used rental caps.
'As a nation, if somebody doesn't take a stand who will?' Zimmerman asked.' At some point somebody has to take a stand when there is land being bought up by foreign and domestic entities who are taking way the livelihood and opportunity for people to build their wealth within their homes, within their families.'
Fishers' 240 subdivisions have varying levels of rental rates, most lower than 10% but about 50 have rental rates much higher, some reaching 40%. But Vare said some of the city's numbers on high rental rates in misleading. For example, of the 17 Fishers neighborhoods exceeding 30% rentals, 11 are condo or townhome communities, including three that were recently built as for-sale units.
While some homeowners associations set their own rental caps, others don't address it all and still others don't bother because covenant rules usually require unreachable voting majorities
The ordinance has several exemptions for people who want to rent even though it would exceed neighborhood's cap, including having had the house on the market for at least six months.
Other exemptions include:
Job relocation
Renting to family members or legal dependents
Deployed military
Selling the property will cause undue burden.
The ordinance will take effect Jan. 1, 2026.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
Report: Trump invites Indiana lawmakers to the White House for redistricting talks
This article will be updated. President Donald Trump has invited all 110 Republican members of the Indiana General Assembly to the White House for an Aug. 26 meeting, Punchchbowl News is reporting. Indiana may well become the next front in a nationwide fight over how congressional districts are drawn ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The Trump administration hopes that lines can be redrawn to pad the Republican majority in the U.S. Congress. On Aug. 7, Vice President JD Vance discussed the prospect of redistricting in a meeting with Gov. Mike Braun and Indiana legislative leaders, but multiple members of Indiana's supermajority have already spoken out against the idea. "We are being asked to create a new culture in which it would be normal for a political party to select new voters, not once a decade — but any time it fears the consequences of an approaching election," State Sen. Spencer Deery, R-Lafayette, wrote in the most scathing statement yet on the subject. "That would clearly violate the concept of popular sovereignty by making it harder for the people to hold their elected officials accountable and the country would be an uglier place for it." To redraw the congressional maps in Indiana, Braun would need to call for a special session, bringing lawmakers back to approve new maps. Republicans already control seven of the nine congressional seats in Indiana. Spokespeople for the Indiana House Republicans and Indiana Senate Republicans did not immediately respond to confirm the invitation. Ryan Murphy is the communities reporter for IndyStar. She can be reached at rhmurphy@ Contact IndyStar Statehouse reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@ or follow her on X@kayla_dwyer17.

Indianapolis Star
3 days ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana and Texas Democrats are teaming up to block early redistricting. Will it work?
Democrats in the Indiana General Assembly are teaming up with Texas House Democrats in an attempt to block mid-decade redistricting efforts brewing in their states. Indiana Democrats don't have much power here in the legislature should Republicans pursue redistricting, but they showed their support for Texas Democrats in a joint press conference on Aug. 13 in Chicago, where Texas Democrats have fled the state to. Among the speakers were Rep. Ed Delaney, D-Indianapolis, Rep. Earl Harris Jr., D-East Chicago and Rep. Cherrish Pryor, D-Indianapolis, who called the efforts "unprecedented and morally corrupt." Legislators from both states also described the mid-cycle redistricting pushed by the White House as unwanted involvement from national leaders, with Texas Rep. Gene Wu characterizing the opposition effort as "stopping the D.C. swamp from dictating who we get to vote for." 'No Hoosier voters are asking for this," Delaney said in a press release. "This is D.C. politics invading our state.' Those comments follow Vice President JD Vance's meeting with Indiana Gov. Mike Braun and legislative leaders Sen. Rodric Bray, R-Martinsville, and Rep. Todd Huston, R-Fishers, in Indianapolis, where the group discussed redistricting. If Hoosier leaders agree to redraw lines, Braun will have to call a special session, though it may be difficult to muster the political will for it. Several Republican legislators including Rep. Danny Lopez, R-Carmel, and Rep. Jim Lucas, R-Seymour, have publicly said they oppose the early redistricting. At the press conference Delaney also pointed to former Indiana House Speaker Brian Bosma, who told Indiana Capital Chronicle that redistricting before the census was "bad form," but that legislative leaders are likely feeling pressure because other states, like Texas, have supported the move. Braun agreed that what happens in Texas will likely play into Indiana's decision-making. More: If Trump's redistricting war comes to Indiana, Indiana Democrats will have few weapons Texas' special session is set to come to a close at the end of this week, likely without much movement on redistricting because they cannot make quorum in the House as long as Democrats who fled the state stay in Illinois. But Texas Republicans have promised to continue calling special sessions until enough Democrats relent. If success in the Lone Star State tips the scales in Indiana, Democratic legislators here will not have the same options to fight back as their Texas peers. That's because Indiana has a Republican supermajority, which allows the party to achieve quorum even without a single Democrat.


Boston Globe
07-08-2025
- Boston Globe
Vice President JD Vance to visit Indiana as Trump pressures GOP states to redistrict
Vance's visit comes after Texas Democrats successfully stalled a vote there this week on a redrawn congressional map, part of a bid to secure five more GOP-leaning congressional seats at the expense of Democrats before the midterms. The White House's goal is to give Republicans an easier path to maintaining control of the House. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Indiana is staunchly Republican, but opponents of any redistricting attempt are planning to make their objections known Thursday with protests and a news conference by the two Democratic members of the state's congressional delegation. Advertisement Braun would have to call a special session if he chooses to start the redistricting process, but lawmakers have the sole power to draw up new maps. Braun's office has not responded to multiple emailed requests seeking more details about Vance's visit. Republican U.S. representatives outnumber Democrats in Indiana 7-2, limiting the possibilities of squeezing out another seat. The constitutionality of the move would also almost certainly be challenged in court. Advertisement Indiana lawmakers have been wary of the national spotlight in recent years, especially after a special session in 2022 resulted in lawmakers enacting a strict ban on abortions. Braun is a staunch ally of Trump in a state with a strong base of loyalists to the president. But Indiana is also home to Mike Pence, the former vice president and a past governor whose more measured approach to partisan politics still holds sway among many state lawmakers. The GOP would likely target Indiana's 1st Congressional District, a longtime Democratic stronghold that encompasses Gary and other cities near Chicago in the state's northwest corner. The seat held by third-term Democratic U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan has been seen as a possible pickup in recent years as manufacturing union jobs have left the area, said Laura Merrifield Wilson, a professor of political science at the University of Indianapolis. Lawmakers in Indiana redrew the borders of the district to be slightly more favorable towards Republicans in the 2022 election, but did not entirely split it up. The new maps were not challenged in court after they were approved in 2021, not even by Democrats and allies who had opposed the changes that also gave a boost to the GOP in the suburbs north of Indianapolis. Mrvan won reelection in 2022 by a respectable margin and easily retained his seat again in 2024. In a statement Tuesday, Mrvan said the Trump administration knows its policies are 'wildly unpopular.' 'They know that their only hope to maintain control is to pressure the Indiana General Assembly to violate the Indiana Constitution and redistrict U.S. House of Representative(s) seats mid-decade,' he added. The more dramatic option would be to zero in on Indiana's 7th Congressional District, composed entirely of Marion County and the Democratic stronghold of Indianapolis. Advertisement Indiana's legislative leaders, House Speaker Todd Huston and Senate President Pro Tem Rodric Bray, held their same positions four years ago when the Legislature finalized the new maps. Both expressed approval of the final product and said the borders fairly reflected the makeup of the state. 'I believe these maps reflect feedback from the public and will serve Hoosiers well for the next decade,' Bray said at the time. Both leaders have been quiet on the possibility of a special session. Bray and Huston's offices did not respond to multiple messages left over the phone and email Wednesday. Republicans hold a supermajority in the Indiana House and Senate, meaning Democrats could not stop a special session by refusing to attend. Julia Vaughn, director of Common Cause Indiana, said a costly redistricting process will not look good for Republicans who tightened the belt on the state budget this past legislative session due to revenue forecasts. Common Cause is one of the leading groups nationally opposing Trump's push to redistrict. 'I don't think there is any way they could rationalize spending taxpayer dollars to come back to Indianapolis to redraw maps that were just drawn four years ago for purely partisan purposes,' Vaughn said.