Decoding Air India 171 Crash Probe: Fuel Switches, Silence & Unanswered Questions In Our Defence S3
The two break down:
Why air crash investigations aren't about blame, but prevention
What the AI 171 preliminary report reveals (and what it doesn't)
How the fuel switches were turned off -- accident, error, or something else?
The intense public reaction -- is it okay to even suggest 'pilot error'?
Whether India's aviation investigators can resist the pressure
Will this become another unsolved mystery like MH370?
While we await the final report into the tragedy, tune in for the first impressions on a preliminary report that raises more questions than it answers.
Produced by Garvit Srivastava
Sound mixed by Aman Pal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 days ago
- News18
DGCA Conducted 146 Audits Of Leading Airlines In 2025 So Far, Says MoS Civil Aviation
Last Updated: The leading carrier Indigo underwent the most audits with 54 inspections so far in 2025, followed by Air India (33), Akasa Air (18), SpiceJet (26), and Air India Express (11). The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has conducted 146 maintenance audits of major Indian airlines in 2025 (up to July), Civil Aviation MoS Murlidhar Mohol informed the Lok Sabha on Thursday. Responding to a question raised by Congress MP Murari Lal Meena regarding aircraft maintenance oversight, the minister said the DGCA follows a 'structured surveillance and audit framework," comprising regular and spot audits, night surveillance, and ramp inspections to ensure aircraft safety. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has a structured surveillance and audit framework in place, i.e. planned and unplanned surveillance of organisations/aircraft, which includes regular and periodic audits, spot checks, night Surveillance and ramp inspections across all operators, including continuous oversight of maintenance practices, the minister said in response to the question. The Annual Surveillance Plan (ASP) for the year is prepared in advance, and the audits are conducted in a timely manner as per the Annual Surveillance Plan. The DGCA adheres to an audit calendar to ensure continuous oversight of all scheduled and non-scheduled airline/operators. Any deviation or rescheduling is addressed with urgency and reported accordingly, the minister added. Notably, Tata SIA Airlines Ltd (Vistara) had not undergone any audits in 2025 up to July, though it saw 35 audits in 2024. From 2023 to July 2025, the DGCA conducted a total of 683 maintenance audits of scheduled carriers, reflecting a steady oversight mechanism despite growing concerns over aircraft safety in recent months. The minister also addressed the June 12, 2025, Air India AI-171 accident in Ahmedabad, stating that a formal investigation is underway by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB). A preliminary report has been published, but it does not assign blame or confirm causes. Mohol emphasised that the government does not endorse speculative conclusions, especially by foreign media, which may harm the dignity and morale of Indian pilots. 'All investigations under Indian rules are impartial, aiming solely to prevent future accidents," he said. He further noted that operators must follow strict manufacturer-issued guidelines, including Service Bulletins, Airworthiness Directives, and Maintenance Planning Documents, to ensure safe operations. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
NDTV
2 days ago
- NDTV
"Why Target Air India Only": Supreme Court Junks Plea For Safety Audit
The Supreme Court on Friday refused to hear a plea to appoint a retired top court judge for examining Air India's safety practices among other aspects and asked the petitioner why target the airline that witnessed an "unfortunate tragedy". A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi told the petitioner in-person Narendera Kumar Goswami to withdraw his PIL and asked him to move the appropriate forum in case of grievances. "Don't give the impression that you are playing with other airlines. Why target Air India only which recently witnessed an unfortunate tragedy? If you want some regulatory mechanism in place, then why did you not make other airlines as party in your petition? Why only Air India?" the bench asked Goswami, a lawyer. The petitioner claimed to be a victim of "some unfortunate incident" with the airline. Justice Kant then told him, "We also travel every week and know what is the status. There was a tragedy, a very unfortunate one. This is not a time to run down an airline." Goswami in his PIL, which he filed in July, sought directions for constituting an independent committee, headed by a retired Supreme Court judge to examine Air India's safety practices, maintenance procedures, and operational protocols, with a report to be submitted within three months. He also sought a direction for a comprehensive safety audit of Air India's entire fleet by an international aviation safety agency accredited by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), addressing deficiencies identified in the 2024 ICAO audit report, to be completed within six months. Additionally, Directorate General of Civil Aviation was sought to be directed to implement and enforce a transparent, publicly accessible reporting system for all aviation safety incidents, including a centralized database, ensuring compliance with the Aircraft Rules, 1937, and international best practices. The PIL further sought a direction to Air India to provide compensation to the families of AI-171 crash victims in accordance with the Montreal Convention, 1999, and to offer ex-gratia payments or compensation to passengers of AI-143 for distress and inconvenience caused by the safety incident, as per applicable laws and industry standards. The London-bound Air India flight, Boeing Dreamliner 787-8, with 242 passengers and crew on board, crashed moments after taking off from the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport in Ahmedabad on the afternoon of June 12.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
'Why not all airlines?' SC junks plea for AI safety audit
NEW DELHI: Supreme Court rebuked an Air India passenger who moved the court on Friday for a safety audit of the airlines' entire fleet in the wake of AI-171 crash at Ahmedabad on June 12, saying it was unfair to target a single airline for a tragic incident. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The passenger had flown an Air India flight to Paris that experienced a fire incident five days before the Ahmedabad accident. Petitioner-advocate N K Goswami along with AI-143 flight passenger L P Goswami cited a series of incidents involving Air India flights to flag safety issues and sought a writ of mandamus from SC to address alleged "systemic safety lapses and deliberate negligence by Air India" which endangered passenger safety. A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi asked the petitioner-lawyer, "Why only Air India? Why not all airlines? For deficiency in service of an individual airline, you can always approach the jurisdictional consumer forum, Directorate General of Civil Aviation or even the Union govt". Justice Kant said, "...Do not give the impression that you are filing this petition at the behest of a rival airline. If you are genuinely concerned about passenger safety, then file a PIL with all airlines, both domestic and international, as parties". "If they do not take any action, then we can step in," the bench said. Mathura-based scientist L P Goswami was on the AI-143 flight from Delhi to Paris on June 7. According to him, the aircraft experienced a fire incident due to electrical error, and it had to make an emergency landing at Sharjah where he remained grounded for 16 hours.
