Trump to sign order allowing alternative assets in 401(k)s, White House official says
The order smoothes the way for private equity and other fund managers to tap into trillions of dollars of Americans' retirement savings. It could open up a vast new funding source to managers of so-called alternative assets outside of stocks, bonds and cash, though critics say it also could bring too much risk into retirement investments.
'The order directs the Securities and Exchange Commission to facilitate access to alternative assets for participant-directed defined-contribution retirement savings plans by revising applicable regulations and guidance,' the White House official said on condition of anonymity.
The order directs the Labor Secretary to consult with her counterparts at the Treasury Department, the SEC and other federal 'regulators to determine whether parallel regulatory changes should be made at those agencies,' the official said.
Such a move would be a boon for big alternative asset managers such as Blackstone, KKR and Apollo Global Management by opening the $12 trillion market for retirement funds, known as defined contribution plans, to their investments.
Analysis: The crypto irony – Trump's new laws for stablecoins will only reinforce U.S. dollar dominance
The president is scheduled to sign executive orders at 12 p.m. ET, according to a White House public schedule.
The new investment options carry lower disclosure requirements and are generally less easy to sell quickly for cash than the publicly traded stocks and bonds that most retirement funds rely on. Investing in them also tends to carry higher fees.
In defined contribution plans, employees make contributions to their own retirement account, frequently with a matching contribution from their employer. The invested funds belong to the employee, but unlike a defined benefit pension plan, there is no guaranteed regular payout upon retirement.
Many private equity firms are hungry for the new source of cash that retail investors could offer after three years in which high interest rates shook their time-honoured model of buying companies and selling them at a profit.
Whatever changes may come from Trump's order, it likely will not happen overnight, private equity executives say. Plaintiffs lawyers are already preparing for lawsuits that could be filed by investors who do not understand the complexity of the new forms of investments. BlackRock, which lobbied for the change, is not waiting. The world's largest asset manager plans to launch its own retirement fund that includes private equity and private credit assets next year.
However, CEO Larry Fink acknowledged in a recent call with analysts that the change may not be a panacea for the industry.
'The reality is, though, there is a lot of litigation risk. There's a lot of issues related to the defined contribution business,' Fink said. 'And this is why the analytics and data are going to be so imperative way beyond just the inclusion.'
CFO Martin Small said the industry may seek litigation reform before it can expand into the market.
The Department of Labor issued guidance during Trump's previous presidency on how such plans could invest in private equity funds within certain limits, but few took advantage, fearing litigation.
Proponents argue that younger savers can benefit from potentially higher returns on riskier investments in funds that get more conservative as they approach retirement.
Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote in June to the chief executive of annuity provider Empower Retirement, which oversees $1.8 trillion in assets for more than 19 million investors, asking how retirement savings placed in private investments could be safeguarded 'given the sector's weak investor protections, its lack of transparency, expensive management fees, and unsubstantiated claims of high returns.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
27 minutes ago
- National Post
NBA approves Celtics sale to private equity mogul Bill Chisholm for record $6.1B
BOSTON — The NBA on Wednesday unanimously approved the sale of the Boston Celtics to a group led by private equity mogul Bill Chisholm, a deal that values the franchise at more than $6.1 billion — the largest ever for an American professional sports team. Article content The league said the transaction is expected to close shortly. When it does, Chisholm will take ownership of at least 51% of the team, with full control coming by 2028 at a price that could bring the total value to $7.3 billion. Article content Article content The previous record for a U.S. sports franchise was the $6.05 billion paid for the NFL's Washington Commanders in 2023. The record price for an NBA team was the $4 billion mortgage firm owner Mat Ishbia paid for the Phoenix Suns in 2023. Article content A Massachusetts native and graduate of Dartmouth College and Penn's Wharton School of Business, Chisholm is the managing partner of California-based Symphony Technology Group. The new ownership group also includes Boston businessmen Rob Hale, who is a current Celtics shareholder, and Bruce Beal Jr. Article content Wyc Grousbeck led the ownership group that bought the team in 2002 for $360 million and presided over NBA championships in 2008 and '24. The franchise's 18 NBA titles is a record. Article content Chisholm outbid at least two other groups, one led by previous Celtics minority partner Steve Pagliuca. Pagliuca has since announced plans to buy the WNBA's Connecticut Sun for $325 million and move them to Boston, but the women's league has balked at the deal. Article content
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. Announces the Promotion of Jesse M. Parrish to Sr. Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer of Alliance Coal, LLC
Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (NASDAQ: ARLP) is pleased to announce the promotion of Jesse M. Parrish to Sr. Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer of ARLP's subsidiary, Alliance Coal, LLC ('Alliance Coal'), effective immediately. In Mr. Parrish's expanded role, he will oversee Alliance Coal's commercial strategy including oversight of the sales, marketing, and logistics functions as well as its government relation functions. Mr. Parrish will continue to report to Joseph W. Craft III, President and Chief Executive Officer of Alliance Coal and ARLP. Mr. Craft explained, 'Jesse's expanded role is a natural evolution of our vision for him as he assumes more of my day-to-day responsibilities allowing me more time to focus on strategic growth opportunities for ARLP. President Trump has declared his administration will do whatever it takes to ensure that the United States can build and maintain the largest, most powerful and most advanced AI infrastructure anywhere on the planet. To achieve global AI dominance, America has to maintain, extend and expand the current electric generating assets and invest significantly in new generation infrastructure. ARLP's aim is to pursue opportunities in the growing power infrastructure sector and preserve our nation's coal fleet.' Mr. Parrish joined Alliance Coal in April 2025 as Senior Vice President of Operations and previously spent over a decade in different senior capacities in the eastern U.S. coal industry. Timothy J. Whelan's role as Sr. Vice President of Sales and Marketing, will remain unchanged, and he and his team remain the primary contact for Alliance Coal's customers and other commercial partners. About Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. ARLP is a diversified energy company that is currently the second largest coal producer in the eastern United States, supplying reliable, affordable energy domestically and internationally to major utilities, metallurgical and industrial users. ARLP also generates operating and royalty income from mineral interests it owns in strategic coal and oil & gas producing regions in the United States. In addition, ARLP is positioning itself as a reliable energy partner for the future by pursuing opportunities that support the growth and development of energy and related infrastructure. News, unit prices and additional information about ARLP, including filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ('SEC'), are available at investorrelations@
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Judge weighs whether Trump violated federal law by deploying National Guard to Los Angeles
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A federal judge in San Francisco is weighing whether the Trump administration violated federal law by sending National Guard troops to accompany immigration agents on raids in Southern California. A three-day trial on the matter concluded Wednesday. California has argued the troops violated the Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits military enforcement of domestic laws. Lawyers for the administration said the law doesn't apply because President Donald Trump called up the National Guard under an authority that allows their deployment if 'the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' Federal and military officials were called to testify, and the trial's third day largely focused on weedy arguments about the 1878 law and whether the court even had a role in determining the limits of presidential power. Trump deployed 4,000 National Guard members and later 700 Marines to Los Angeles in June after protests in response to immigration raids around the city. They were originally deployed to protect federal property, including a detention center targeted by protesters. The Guard members later began guarding agents as they continued arresting people suspected of being in the U.S. illegally. Between 250 and 300 Guard troops remain and have been activated through November. Wednesday's arguments Deputy Assistant Deputy Assistant Attorney General Eric Hamilton said Wednesday that the Posse Comitatus Act does not apply because the Guard was deployed under a section of U.S. Code that allows the president to call any state's guard into federal service when the country 'is invaded,' when 'there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government,' or when the president is unable 'to execute the laws of the United States.' He said Guard members weren't engaged in law enforcement and were just providing backup security for federal agents. 'If the purpose is the protection of law enforcement officers, it isn't law enforcement in the first place,' he said. 'On top of that, there's the fact that a (president's) constitutional inherent protective power is at work. That is itself an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act.' California Deputy Attorney General Meghan Strong argued the troops' role went beyond providing protection to federal agents and buildings. The troops, she said, had 'an active, direct role' enforcing the law when they detained people at least in two occasions and set up roadblocks and perimeters blocking access to public streets. 'For all the pretense and wordsmithing defendants have tried to employ, the facts are inescapable: The activities defendants have ordered Task Force 51 troops to engage in across Southern California violate the Posse Comitatus Act,' she said. Task Force 51 was the name of the command post activated to coordinate the troops deployment deployment. The Trump administration, she said, broke the law by using the troops to illegally enforce civilian law and operate as a single force with federal immigration officers, who often don military garb. California is asking Judge Charles Breyer to order the Trump administration to return control of the remaining troops to the state and to stop the federal government from using military troops in California 'to execute or assist in the execution of federal law or any civilian law enforcement functions by any federal agent or officer.' Judge weighs whether troops crossed the line 'The question in this case is whether the troops that have been stationed in Los Angeles have or have not crossed that line,' said David Levine, a professor at UC College of the Law San Francisco. 'Are they acting as military or are they acting as police? They can't act as police. They can only act within their bounds.' Troops deployed to Southern California received at least 60 requests for assistance from federal officials and responded to the majority of them, Hamilton told the judge. Army Maj. Gen. Scott Sherman, who commanded Task Force 51, said there were some times when troops outnumbered federal officers. He said that during an immigration enforcement at an illegal marijuana growing operation in Mecca, a desert community about 140 miles (225 kilometers) east of Los Angeles, about 300 task force soldiers were present, compared to 200 federal law enforcement agents. National Guard troops also accompanied federal immigration officers on raids at two state-licensed marijuana nurseries in Ventura County and to an operation at MacArthur Park in downtown Los Angeles intended as a show of force against people in the U.S. illegally and those protesting the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Sherman testified during the second day of the trial that he raised concerns the deployment could violate the Posse Comitatus Act. He said soldiers were trained on the law and given materials that included a list of specific activities prohibited by the act, including doing security patrols and conducting traffic control, crowd control and riot control. Sherman said that while the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits troops from carrying out those actions, he was told by his superiors that there was a 'constitutional exception' that permitted such activities when the troops are protecting federal property or personnel.
