Retired police officer who was key in naloxone rollout honoured
Retired Police Scotland Assistant Chief Constable Gary Ritchie has been awarded the King's Police Medal, while the force's chief officer of Human Resources Nicky Page becomes an MBE.
Gary Ritchie joined what was then Strathclyde Police in 1991 and retired in April 2025 after more than three decades of police service.
He was appointed as an Assistant Chief Constable in 2019 and was instrumental in the rollout of naloxone, which is used to reverse the effect of opioids, to all frontline police officers in 2020.
He also played a key role during the Cop26 climate summit in Glasgow in 2021 and during the Covid-19 pandemic, acting as Gold Commander during both.
Mr Ritchie said: 'I am both delighted and humbled that I have been awarded the King's Police Medal.
'Any personal achievements which have led to me receiving this award have only been made possible by the many people inside and outside the service who have contributed to the successful initiatives, projects and operations that we have undertaken over the years.
'The award is much more a recognition of their contributions and, at times, wise counsel and advice.
'I will be forever grateful and proud of what we achieved together.'
Nicky Page becomes an MBE for services to policing, equality and health.
She joined Strathclyde Police in 2010 and has provided strategic human resources leadership for more than 22,000 people in Police Scotland.
This included playing a key role during the transition period that brought together eight legacy forces to form Police Scotland in 2013.
She led the Staff Pay, Reward and Modernisation Project, aligning pay and conditions across the organisation, which the force said contributed to a reduction in the gender pay gap.
Since 2017, she has also volunteered as a Community First Responder with the Scottish Ambulance Service, contributing more than 1000 hours of service while balancing the demands of her role and family life.
She said: 'I am both grateful and surprised to receive this honour.
'I'm deeply appreciative of the support I have received from my colleagues in policing, the Ambulance Service and fellow responders within the Bathgate Group.
'This honour reflects the shared commitment and teamwork that have made my contribution possible.'
Chief Constable Jo Farrell praised the pair.
She said: 'I want to warmly congratulate Gary and Nicky on this well deserved recognition of their outstanding careers in public service, leadership and collaboration across sectors.
'Police officers, staff and volunteers work hard to deliver for our communities and these awards are an opportunity to thank them and celebrate their huge contributions to society.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scientific American
2 hours ago
- Scientific American
Pessimistic Dogs Are Better at Smelling Cancer—And Other Keys to Disease-Sniffing Success
Billy, a floppy-eared little beagle, darts around a platform sniffing a series of holes. Each hole contains a used surgical-type mask bearing a different human's distinct mix of scents. But her sharp nose is hunting for just one such combination: the one that signals cancer. Cancer can change a person's 'volatilome,' the unique set of volatile organic compounds found in breath, sweat, blood and urine. Billy and her cohort have learned to sniff out these subtle scent cues in masks worn by people with cancer diagnoses. Researchers are also studying how dogs can detect diseases such as COVID and malaria, as well as psychological conditions, including post-traumatic stress disorder. Scientists discovered dogs' powerful disease-smelling skills in 1989, when a dog detected cancer in its handler. But clinicians still do not routinely use dogs for diagnosis. Besides the obvious logistical challenges, dogs vary greatly in their olfactory accuracy. Researchers are increasingly finding that disease-sniffing prowess may come down to individual dogs' personality—and how well their handlers know them. New research efforts are focused on figuring out which dogs would be best for the job and on interpreting dogs' behaviors during a smell test. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. Sharyn Bistre Dabbah, a veterinary scientist now at the University of Bristol in England, set out with colleagues at the U.K. charity Medical Detection Dogs to learn how the animals' personalities—especially their level of optimism or pessimism—affect disease-detection skills. Their results appeared recently in PLoS One. The researchers first showed the dogs what lay behind two screens at one end of a room: a 'positive' location with a tasty treat and a 'negative' one with an empty bowl. On subsequent visits to the room, the dogs typically bounded happily toward the former but trotted very slowly when they went to check out the latter—or simply didn't go there at all. The scientists then placed bowls behind two new screens between the positive and negative spots, and they classified the dogs as 'optimistic' or 'pessimistic' based on how quickly they investigated these new locations. Next, the team evaluated how accurately each dog could pick out a disease scent it was trained to detect among other smells. On average, the pessimistic dogs turned out to be more discerning. Pessimistic dogs are more cautious, and 'a more cautious dog might be better at not making mistakes,' Dabbah says. Other personality traits also play a role, says Clara Wilson, who researches disease- and stress-sniffing dogs at the University of Pennsylvania. Dogs that enjoy the thrill of a hunt—and thrive while searching for missing people or hidden bombs—might find sniffing through disease samples again and again rather repetitive. 'We want a dog that doesn't get frustrated. They [should] find it rewarding, even though it may be less exciting,' Wilson explains. Handlers' interpretations of dog behavior can also skew detection outcomes, says Akash Kulgod, co-founder of Dognosis, the Bengaluru-based start-up that trained Billy. Instead of teaching dogs to perform a specific behavior such as sitting or barking when they pick up an assigned scent—a process that takes extra time and can lead to dogs 'lying' for treats—Kulgod and his team directly analyze each dog's natural body language. Based on how confidently the dogs move, as analyzed with computer vision–based machine-learning tools, the team can spot successful detections. 'One of our dogs sniffs and then very confidently somersaults to go to the feeder,' Kulgod says. 'They each have their own unique quirks—but all of it can be quantified because it's all related to this reward expectation that you have from the past sessions.' In a pilot study with 200 test samples involving 10 cancer types, presented at this year's American Society of Clinical Oncology conference, Dognosis dogs detected 96 percent of cancers. Next, the Dognosis team will scale up its study with 1,500 test samples. Doctors currently diagnose many kinds of cancers by using a combination of blood tests and biopsies. Researchers are always on the lookout for less invasive methods—including options directly involving our canine companions, as well as electronic noses inspired by them. Dogs can currently outperform electronic sniffers. But this primacy may not last, according to Andreas Mershin, chief science officer at the Boston-based start-up He and his colleagues are developing electronic noses to sniff urine samples for prostate cancer and other diseases. If machine olfaction eventually surpasses dogs' abilities, it could help tackle the scalability problem—and give the animals a break. Mershin's team put mammalian smell receptors on an electronic chip and used machine-learning algorithms to interpret the output. The technique focuses on broader patterns among detected molecules rather than categorizing them individually. Dogs don't tick off a list of molecules in their heads, either; they just 'know' what cancer smells like. This helps them to sense it accurately no matter which organ it is from or what the patient ate before giving their breath sample. 'The dogs can generalize. They don't care about the font in which you write the scent; they just interpret it correctly,' Mershin says. In a study published in PLoS One, Mershin and his team used machine-learning models to spot and analyze patterns of different odorants in urine samples from confirmed prostate cancer patients. Their findings, which built on work with diagnosis data from Medical Detection Dogs, suggest that focusing on this type of 'scent character' might work as a scalable alternative to dogs, even if it's currently much slower. Meanwhile, back on the test platform, floppy-eared Billy quickly detects the subtle scent of cancer in one of the masks she has been sniffing—and confidently bounds back to get her reward. Such tests show strong potential, says postdoctoral researcher Amritha Mallikarjun of the University of Pennsylvania: 'The dogs, because of their amazing sense of smell and detection capabilities, are demonstrating to us what technology could look like 10 to 15 years from now.'
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
As COVID babies go to school, educators look for pandemic's impact
Babies born during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic are heading to preschool and kindergarten, and experts are waiting anxiously to see its impact on the young learners. Concerns about cognitive and social delays, such as difficulties sharing or following directions, have arisen, as conflicting studies and educators' anecdotes emerge about 4- and 5-year-olds. While devastating consequences were immediately noticeable for older students during the pandemic, it is too early to get a definitive answer on how it affected those born during the chaos, making vigilance from educators a necessary factor in the upcoming school year, experts stress. One study published recently in Infancy looked at data from 330 infants born from October 2016 to August 2021 and found there was little difference between negative effects on infants before and after pandemic onset, rather higher negative effects on infants were more closely associated with factors such as maternal stress. And stress on caregivers during the pandemic rose significantly with jobs losses and decreases in socialization, but those effects were different based on family income level. 'Kids with families with high socioeconomic backgrounds, they're actually seeing improvement in these kids' development, because caregivers might have been home more often than they were before, they might have had more time and attention and support and family meals and reading together, and all those things we know were really important,' said Rahil Briggs, national director of Zero to Three's HealthySteps program. Another study found that the lower the socioeconomic background, 'the more that decrease in kindergarten readiness showed up,' she added. But other studies showed more differences between the youngest learners before and after COVID-19, including a higher risk for social, cognitive, communication, motor and social delays among those born during the height of the pandemic. A study released in 2024 that examined a cohort of 3.5- to 5.5-year-olds found after the pandemic this age group tested 'significantly worse on several measures of false-belief understanding.' 'So for things to be affecting the kids now, it really has to be something that made a fundamental shift in their development those first couple of years and that can happen. We do know that the first three years of life are super important. What we haven't had is something that hits us over the head yet beyond anecdotal,' said Koraly Pérez-Edgar, a professor of psychology at the Pennsylvania State University. Pérez-Edgar cited a New York Times story from July 2024 that indicated 'the kids going into kindergarten last year were really messed up, or, like, really had a lot of trouble.' But she said such behavior hasn't been borne out in studies yet. 'It's not showing up in the data quite as strongly or quite as forcefully as some of the anecdotal reports say,' adding the concerns experts are worried about likely won't emerge or be discovered until they are in school. Older kids had immediate effects that were easy to see when the pandemic closed schools in 2020 and created restrictions in classrooms in 2021. Behavioral problems in classrooms, chronic absenteeism and anxiety went up, while academic performance went down in older students, with some of those effects still lingering today. But infants had time to live in a world without masks and restrictions for years before heading to kindergarten. 'So, the pandemic was 2020, five years ago, and things really the last three years, they would have had the opportunity to have a pretty normal socialization for most kids,' said Eileen Kennedy-Moore, a psychologist and podcast host of 'Kids Ask Dr. Friendtastic.' 'So, I don't think we have to assume that because of COVID these kids are warped. I think we deal with the child in front of us.' Experts and advocates caution vigilance and advise planning for a situation where these children begin to struggle in school, such as smaller class sizes and collaboration with families. 'We think a lower group size or maybe additional adult support in the classroom, like a teacher's aide, could be helpful for kindergarten programs. I do think significant family engagement is going to be really helpful to support these young children and families,' said Ginger Sandweg, senior director early learning at First Things First. But experts also note it is important to recognize children are able to bounce back from adversity well, even if some struggles occurred after the pandemic with socialization. 'I think if schools are aware of these particular areas, they can do more programming in terms of teaching kids like asserting yourself and talking, having conversations,' said Mary Alvord, psychologist and founder of Alvord, Baker & Associates. 'But my area is resilience, and I just feel like we also need to acknowledge the resilience of most kids,' she added.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
NYC proposes stricter rules to combat Legionnaires' disease as Harlem outbreak sparks concerns
New York City will launch stricter rules for cooling towers after one of the worst Legionnaires' outbreaks in years broke out in Harlem. The city Health Department plans on ramping up enforcement, penalties and reporting requirements for building water systems that are considered the source of many cases of Legionnaires' disease. There have been three deaths and 81 infections reported in Harlem over the prior two weeks, with 24 people hospitalized. 5 New York City is preparing to announce new rules for cooling towers after the Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Harlem. REUTERS Health Department officials, when contacted by The Post, insisted the amended rules for cooling towers were in the works before the Harlem outbreak, which they said has been brought under control. The beefed up rules are scheduled to go into effect next spring. In a notice posted in The City Record, regulators proposed amending current rules 'to provide penalties for failure to comply with reporting inspections that include test sampling for Legionella' and to 'define penalties for requirements previously added' to the city administrative code. The revisions will also add a new laboratory certification requirement for Legionella. Any such sampling must be conducted by a laboratory certified by the New York State Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program. The goal is to 'improve enforcement,' the Health Department's Bureau of Environmental Sciences and Engineering said. Jory Lange, one lawyer who specializes in Legionnaires' cases, said New York City already has the toughest rules for cleaning towers in the country 'but the building owners are not following them.' 5 The outbreak has led to three deaths and 81 infections reported in Harlem this summer. Michael Nagle Lange said the current level of fines are not stiff enough to force compliance in buildings worth tens of millions of dollars. He said it is troubling that 11 of the 43 towers inspected in Harlem — about 25% — tested positive for Legionella. Also, inspections for Legionella bacteria in the city's cooling towers plummeted in the months leading up to an outbreak in Harlem, according to a review of records by Gothamist. 5 The new rules on cooling towers are set to go into effect next spring. Michael Nagle The department inspected 5,200 cooling towers and issued over 48,000 violations to building owners in 2017 after a new law went into effect following a deadly Legionnaires' outbreak in The Bronx. This year, the city projected completing fewer than half that number of inspections, a record low when excluding the 2020 and 2021 COVID-19 pandemic years, the Gothamist review found. People can catch Legionnaires' disease from bacterial droplets that come from water systems like cooling towers. 5 Dr. Michelle Morse (left), Acting Health Commissioner and Chief Medical Officer of the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, speaking at a press conference on the Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Harlem along with Councilmember Yusef Salaam (center) and Assemblyman Jordan Wright (right) on Aug. 7, 2025. James Keivom 5 Assemblyman Jordan Wright speaking with a constituent after the conference sharing best practices for preventing the spread of Legionnaires' disease. James Keivom It can take between 12 and14 days from exposure to the droplets to start feeling sick, according to city Acting Health Commissioner Dr. Michelle Morse. The current rules for owners of buildings with cooling towers lay out a range of penalties covering 31 different categories. The maximum fine of $1,000 for a first offense and $2,000 for each additional offense include: failing to take immediate action for positive legionella results; failing to take samples for reporting them to the department;, not properly using recycle or rainwater; failure to minimize the release of water droplets that carry Legionella or having no maintenance program. Owners also currently face initial $500 fines for failing to routinely monitor and conduct inspections for Legionnaires' disease or cleaning the tanks, or failing to increase chlorine or other disinfectants during the summer months of July and August when Legionella is more of a threat. The city declined to provide any more details at this point about the beefed-up enforcement.
