Gold buyer who invested $30,000 this year says Costco's bars and coins were his 'gateway drug'
With the gold market surging — briefly topping $3,500 an ounce on Tuesday — Costco is again a hot spot for precious metal collectors hoping to make a near-instant windfall.
The market for gold often rises in times of uncertainty, and the current price moves are driven by interest in the commodity itself as a safe-haven investment and by the depreciation of the US dollar.
One collector who has bought more than $30,000 worth of gold this year told Business Insider there's growing concern in the precious metals community about gold prices rising so quickly.
"To me, it is the measuring stick for how bad things are going to get," he said.
The person requested anonymity because of concerns about personal safety, but he provided BI with receipts from recent Costco purchases and documentation of his additional gold holdings.
He said he owned no gold until this year and only began collecting as the political and economic environment became more unpredictable.
Costco, which sells gold bars and coins online and in some of its stores, made it easy for him to get started.
"Costco was the gateway drug to gold investing," he said.
It's no secret that Costco sells hundreds of millions of dollars worth of bars and coins for some of the lowest markups around, but there are times when the market moves a little faster than the company's price adjustments.
In particular, several product listings on Tuesday — namely a 100-gram bar and a 1-ounce bar — were listed at prices so close to the spot market price that Costco Executive Members using the Costco Citi credit card could see a net reward of about 1% to 2% of the purchase price.
In other words, Costco is basically giving some members money to convert their dollars into gold (up to certain limits on individual and annual transactions, of course). Executive rewards are capped at $1,250 a year, but the company's credit card rewards on purchases are not limited.
a key area of growth for the club's e-commerce business.
The company benefits from routing hundreds of millions of dollars in sales through Costco.com by simply buying a batch of gold and selling every ounce of it to members.
Other non-Costco credit card promos can make the math even more remarkable, as one gold flipper who bought more than $100,000 worth of gold last year attested to.
It's also important to note that Costco does not allow returns or price adjustments on gold purchases, and some buyers have found it unexpectedly difficult to quickly sell their bars and coins at a price that makes the flip worthwhile. Most collectors recommend building a relationship with a trusted local gold dealer to conduct transactions.
In general, the collectors BI spoke to are gold holders, not sellers, and the demand at Costco remains fairly steady.
"The price hasn't had much of an effect. The people who want it buy it," said one warehouse manager who requested anonymity because he's not authorized to speak to the media about sales.
The Costco manager said his location occasionally receives about 10 to 20 bars, which are usually sold within a week, and sometimes within a few days.
Costco executives have previously said that online sales can run through a batch of inventory " within a few hours."
As the price of gold dipped from Tuesday levels, Costco gold enthusiasts took to the Costco precious metals Reddit community on Wednesday to discuss the lag time between when the listed prices would be updated to reflect the market change.
"Costco doesn't real-time price like online bullion brokers," one Reddit user wrote. "Their pricing lags up to a day or two behind spot… which was great for customers buying when gold skyrocketed, sometimes Costco pricing was below spot BEFORE cash back… this is the other side of that coin."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
25 minutes ago
- CNBC
Uncertainty looms as 2025 nears the halfway mark. How to make sure your portfolio is prepared
Stocks have made a recovered from this year's lows, but uncertainty remains a key theme as the second half of the year approaches – and investors can prepare for it. President Donald Trump's rollout of sharply higher tariffs in April sent stocks on a wild ride, with the S & P 500 at one point dipping more than 20% from its all-time high. Traders' hopes for progress in trade negotiations, along with solid first-quarter earnings, helped the market recover since then, however. The S & P 500 is now less than 2% below its its all-time high. Don't just kick back and wait for a continued recovery, though. "Our little tagline here is 'diversifying for resilience,'" said Michael Arone, SPDR chief investment strategist at State Street Global Advisors. "The thought behind the theme for the second half, is that markets are in suspense," he said. Some of the issues for investors to cinsider now include trade policy, soft economic data and the chance that the Federal Reserve holds off on rate cuts for too long, Arone added. Here's how to get your portfolio ready for the remainder of the year Review and rebalance Ignoring your portfolio's asset allocation, particularly at a time when markets are strong, can result in lopsided positions. For starters, think about how large-cap tech stocks in the U.S. were responsible for the market's surge last year. Failure to prune some of those big positions now, and add to underweight sectors, could result in a portfolio that doesn't reflect your goals and risk appetite. This year, investors who shied away from international markets may have found themselves missing out on sizable appreciation. Consider that the Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) has returned 16% in 2025, while the S & P 500's return over the same period is a little more than 2%. VEU .SPX YTD mountain The Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) versus the S & P 500 in 2025 "If we look through a stock lens, U.S. allocation peaked at 67%, and today it's at 64%," said Arone. "I can tell you there are very few investors I meet with who have 36% of their portfolio invested outside of the U.S. from a stock standpoint." Diversifying into international funds also helps investors gain exposure to sectors outside of Big Tech, said Christine Benz, director of personal finance and retirement planning for Morningstar. "The U.S. is still very tech dominated and growth leaning, but broad non-U.S. indexes are dominated by financials and health care. It's a different set of market components relative to the U.S." Benz likes the idea of investors using a broad global stock benchmark as a guide to determine how much to invest overseas, noting that the split is generally about 60% toward the U.S. and 40% non-U.S. Reassess your goals and risk appetite The market's slide in April might have been a good chance for investors to do a gut check of whether their asset allocation reflects the risk they are willing to take. "My big [issue] is the value of derisking for people who are getting close to retirement," said Benz. "It might not have felt like a great idea to derisk in the throes of tariff-related market losses, but now stocks have clawed their way back into positive territory." Investors who are nearing retirement might want to consider adding safer assets to their portfolios to take advantage of today's higher yields, she added. "Consider taking advantage of the fact that yields are decent today and it will translate to better returns for fixed income versus when yields were very low," said Benz. For savers in retirement plans, this can also mean reviewing where you're directing your contributions. "Let's say you're not ready to retire, but retirement is in the next five to 10 years," said Marguerita Cheng, CFP and chief executive officer of Blue Ocean Global Wealth in Gaithersburg, Md. "You can have some of your existing dollars in something a little more conservative, and when you dollar-cost average you can be a little more growth oriented," she said. Dollar-cost averaging refers to making incremental investments into a certain asset at fixed intervals, say every two weeks, every month or every quarter. By spreading out these investments, you're buying into stocks at different prices over time, instead of trying to wait for the "right" time. Tax-loss harvesting Tax-loss harvesting opportunities may await investors who have taxable brokerage accounts. This involves selling losing positions and using the realized losses to offset gains elsewhere in the portfolio. Be sure to avoid violating the wash-sale rule, which involves selling an asset at a loss and then buying a "substantially identical" security within 30 days before or after the transaction. In such cases, the IRS can block you from taking the loss. Lagging stock sectors this year include energy, health care and consumer discretionary, which might all be solid contenders for tax-loss sales. "Investors with individual stocks, sector funds or ETFs might have an opportunity to take a tax loss in those areas," said Benz.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Woman alleges Costco cabinet display fell on her in $14M lawsuit
(NewsNation) — A California woman has sued Costco Wholesale Corporation for more than $14 million in damages after she says a cabinet display fell on her while shopping. Sadie Novotny said she was shopping at the big-box retailer's Santa Rosa, California, location on March 22 when a heavy liquor cabinet display fell on her, according to a lawsuit obtained by multiple outlets. The suit alleges the incident caused 'multiple, permanent and catastrophic' injuries, including some to her head and brain. Dip, dip hooray: Chipotle introduces 'bold' new sauce, first in five years Novotny is suing Costco for general negligence, premises liability and products liability. She alleges Costco 'negligently failed to adequately manage and or operate their store and or their merchandise' and 'negligently failed to train, manage and supervise their employees.' That negligence, paired with the cabinet's 'thin legs' and positioning on an 'inadequate wooden pallet,' caused the cabinet to fall, Novotny's lawsuit says. What is Labubu, and where can you buy them? The $14 million in damages includes $5 million for emotional distress and another $5 million for pain, suffering and inconvenience, according to the lawsuit. NewsNation has reached out to Costco for comment. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Higher ed reform shouldn't punish low-income students
Congress is understandably concerned about the return on federal investment in higher education and the $1.6 trillion in federal student loan debt. But in its rush to fix a system that too often fails low-income students, the Trump administration's 'one big, beautiful bill' would further reduce opportunity and access for those very students and jeopardize the work of colleges and universities doing the most to serve them. If passed, the bill would enact sweeping changes to federal financial aid and accountability rules. Some of its goals are worthy. Colleges should be transparent about student outcomes. They should be accountable for quality. And no student should graduate, or drop out, with insurmountable debt. But reducing access to loans for the students who face the steepest barriers to opportunity is not the way to achieve those goals. One provision of the proposed bill would eliminate subsidized federal loans, which currently prevent interest from accruing while undergraduates are still in school. For students from low-income backgrounds who already borrow more than their wealthier peers, this would significantly increase the cost of a college degree. Another proposal would cap the amount of aid a student could receive at a national median cost by program, without regard for the individual student's or family's specific economic need. The legislation would also eliminate PLUS Loans and raise the minimum course load required to receive full Pell Grant aid, even though many working students enroll part-time by necessity, not choice. Reducing Pell Grant access is counterproductive to lowering student debt. Pell Grant recipients already account for seven of every 10 federal student loan borrowers, and, on average, incur $4,500 more in debt than other non-Pell graduates Capping graduate student borrowing, especially in health and public service fields, would undercut workforce development just as we face national shortages of nurses, teachers and social workers. And the bill's 'risk-sharing' proposal, which would penalize colleges when student loans are forgiven, even through programs like Public Service Loan Forgiveness, would shift resources away from need-based aid and student support and discourage institutions from enrolling those most in need. That includes institutions like the University of Mount Saint Vincent, which I lead. Ours is a small, private, nonprofit university in the Bronx founded in 1847 to educate young women at a time when few others would. Today, we serve students of every background, and more than half are the first in their family to attend college. More than half of our undergraduates receive Pell Grants. Ninety percent of our graduate students are preparing for public service careers in education, nursing or healthcare. And like many mission-driven colleges, we make enormous investments in financial aid and academic support, precisely because we know what it takes for low-income and first-generation students to thrive. This bill threatens our ability to invest in students and potential. It would impose a six-figure penalty, rising annually, because we enroll the very students we were founded to serve. That's not accountability. That's a deterrent. And we are not unique. Hundreds of small, private colleges across the country, many of them religiously affiliated, offer intimate learning environments, close faculty support and flexible programs that enable students to work while pursuing their degrees. These institutions are among the most accessible and most responsive options for students who are otherwise being left behind in higher education. The better path forward is one that strengthens accountability for all institutions without dismantling the tools that low-income students need to access and afford college in the first place. That means preserving need-based aid, not narrowing it. And it means supporting colleges that produce teachers, nurses and public servants, not penalizing them. At a time when the U.S. risks falling behind in educational attainment and workforce readiness, we should be doubling down on institutions that help students rise. The question isn't whether reform is needed, but whether we're reforming the right things. Susan R. Burns, Ph.D., is president of the University of Mount Saint Vincent in the Bronx. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
