
Ontario launches $3.1-billion critical minerals plan
Ontario's new $3.1-billion plan for a critical minerals supply chain created in partnership with First Nations is raising concerns about weakened environmental protections and inadequate Indigenous consultation.
Announced Wednesday
, the provincial initiative will create a 'made-in-Ontario' supply chain and boost First Nations equity, according to the government. But critics say environmental protections and First Nations consultation will be sidelined in the rush to develop the Ring of Fire — a vast region about 500 kilometres northeast of Thunder Bay.
The new provincial funding includes $3 billion in loan guarantees through an expanded First Nations Opportunities Financing Program, $70 million over four years to strengthen First Nations capacity in mining-related regulatory processes, and $10 million in scholarships for First Nations students pursuing careers in resource development.
'Ontario's vast supply of critical minerals are at the heart of our plan to protect Ontario,' said Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy. 'By investing to unlock and process these minerals here in Ontario in partnership with Indigenous communities, we can make Ontario the top global hub of critical mineral development and protect our economy, workers and communities for decades to come.'
The Ford government says the investment will drive economic growth and support reconciliation by creating opportunities for First Nations communities and northern hubs, such as Thunder Bay, Sault Ste. Marie, Sudbury, North Bay, and Timmins.
The supply chain announcement comes just days after the province
introduced Bill 5 — legislation
to fast-track mining and infrastructure. However,
critics warn
the legislation will weaken the process of environmental reviews.
The province says its latest critical minerals investment
is part of its $230-billion budget
, tabled last week — a plan that drew criticism for prioritizing industrial expansion over affordability, climate action, and First Nations rights.
With a record $14.6-billion deficit, the budget focuses heavily on countering US President Donald Trump's tariffs.The Ontario government has launched a $3.1-billion critical minerals plan that includes Indigenous partnership, but critics say environmental protections and First Nations consultation will still be sidelined in the rush to develop the Ring of Fire.
Environmental concerns and First Nations rights Dayna Scott, professor and York University research chair in environmental law and green economy justice, argues that the government has yet to show how its promises of First Nations prosperity are being fulfilled.'The Ford government has been struggling to figure out just where the 'Indigenous prosperity' link is in its dream to build a fully 'in Ontario' critical minerals supply chain,' Scott said. 'Lots of other interests have benefitted – they have given out billions for battery gigafactories, they promise $1 billion to 'de-risk' a nickel mine for a privately-held Australian mining company by building their road, they are doling out mineral exploration tax credits.'Scott said remote First Nations communities in the Ring of Fire have yet to see real benefits from Ontario's mining push, with many still lacking clean drinking water, adequate housing and proper health services — and that offering loans for equity stakes in mining projects is not enough, especially when basic community needs remain unmet.Scott emphasized the cultural and ecological sensitivity of the Ring of Fire, which is home to globally significant peatlands and boreal forests that store massive amounts of carbon. 'It is a ticking carbon bomb, basically,' she said.She also questioned whether the investment respects the right to free, prior and informed consent as outlined in the
United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)
. 'When Indigenous nations have the power to provide — or withhold — consent to major projects proposed for their territories, then we will know whether they freely consent to extractive activities or not.'
Industry: 'A Strategic Opportunity' Since his election, Premier Ford has made developing the Ring of Fire a central part of Ontario's critical mineral strategy. The region holds a 5,000-square-kilometre deposit of key minerals needed for electric vehicles and renewable energy technologies. It also contains one of the world's largest peatlands — storing roughly 26 gigatons of carbon, and playing a key role in reducing global greenhouse gas emissions.Since US President Donald Trump announced tariffs on Canadian exports, Ford has doubled down on fast-tracking mineral projects, arguing Ontario must become more self-reliant in a time of economic uncertainty. The government says speeding up development is crucial to securing supply chains and shielding the province from global trade instability.As part of its 2025 budget,
the province is also investing $500 million
in a critical mineral processing fund to build strategically located facilities for processing key minerals like lithium, cobalt, and graphite, aiming to strengthen Ontario's role in the global clean tech and electric vehicle supply chains.Vince Beiser, journalist and author of
Power Metal
: The Race for the Resources That Will Shape the Future, welcomed the investment in principle and emphasized the importance of ensuring First Nations communities benefit from that development. 'It makes sense to develop and refine these resources at home, especially in a time of trade tension with the US,' he said. Beiser stressed that Canada has real leverage due to its mineral wealth and should strengthen its position in extraction and processing. 'Critical minerals are one of our leverage points. We're the biggest supplier of certain metals to the United States, and they really rely on us.'Beiser also praised the scholarships for First Nations students pursuing careers in resource development and said the mining sector will increase employment of First Nations workers. However, he warned the province must also invest in refining capacity, not just extraction.'Countries like Indonesia have shown how profitable it can be to process and refine minerals locally, not just export raw materials.'As for challenges to scaling up critical minerals projects in Ontario, Beiser pointed to two major barriers: regulation and infrastructure. 'The industry always complains about red tape, and sure, it might make sense to loosen some rules — but not all,' Beiser said. 'But the bigger issue is infrastructure. The Ring of Fire is incredibly remote and hard to access. That physical reality makes development difficult, no matter how much mineral wealth is in the ground.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signals fresh trade tensions with China
US President Donald Trump signaled renewed trade tensions with China on Friday, arguing that Beijing had "violated" a deal to de-escalate tariffs, at a time when both sides appeared deadlocked in negotiations. Trump's post on his Truth Social platform came hours after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that trade talks with China were "a bit stalled," in an interview with broadcaster Fox News. The world's two biggest economies had agreed this month to temporarily lower staggeringly high tariffs they had imposed on each other, in a pause to last 90 days, after talks between top officials in Geneva. But on Friday, Trump wrote that: "China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US," without providing further details. Asked about the post on CNBC, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer took aim at Beijing for continuing to "slow down and choke off things like critical minerals." He added that the United States' trade deficit with China "continues to be enormous," and that Washington was not seeing major shifts in Beijing's behavior. On Thursday, Bessent had suggested that Trump and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping could get involved in the situation. He said there could be a call between both leaders eventually. Since Trump returned to the presidency in January, he has imposed sweeping tariffs on most US trading partners, with especially high rates on imports from China. New tit-for-tat levies from both sides reached three digits before the de-escalation earlier this month, where Washington agreed to temporarily reduce its additional tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent to 30 percent. China, meanwhile, lowered its added duties from 125 percent to 10 percent. The US tariff level remains higher as it also includes a 20 percent levy that the Trump administration recently imposed on Chinese goods over the country's alleged role in the illicit drug trade -- an issue that Beijing has pushed back against. The high tariff levels, while they were still in place, forced much trade between both countries to grind to a halt, as businesses paused shipments to try and wait for both governments to reach an agreement to lower the levies. Trump's tariff plans are also facing legal challenges. A trade court ruled this week that the president overstepped his authority in tapping emergency economic powers to justify sweeping tariffs. It blocked the most wide-ranging levies since Trump returned to office, although this ruling has since been put on hold for now as an appeals process is ongoing. The ruling left intact, however, tariffs that the Trump administration imposed on sector-specific imports such as steel and autos. bys/st
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Needs to Get Real on Trade
U.S. President Donald Trump displays a signed executive order during a tariff announcement in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. Credit - Jim Lo Scalzo—EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images The roller coaster that is President Donald Trump's trade war steamed ahead this week. On Wednesday, a federal district court dealt a major blow to Trump when it ruled that his sweeping global tariffs were illegal. On Thursday, an appeals court ruled the levies could remain in place for now. And then, on Friday, Trump accused China of violating a preliminary trade deal and suggested he would respond. As all this unfolds and the U.S. legal system lumbers toward a final verdict, one thing is clear: the White House needs to get a real trade strategy, and fast. Read More: The Five Small Businesses That Helped Block Trump's Tariffs Few issues are more fundamental to Trump's worldview than trade. For Trump, trade is not merely an economic issue, but a litmus test of whether America is winning or losing on the world stage. Even matters of war and peace, such as Taiwan and the South China Sea, have seemingly taken a back seat to Trump's stubborn fixation on China's trade surplus with the U.S. During his first term, Trump launched a trade war against China with a goal, as he framed it, of punishing China's unfair trade practices. The trade war ended with a Phase-one deal wherein China promised to increase its future purchases of American products and enact structural reforms. Ultimately, this deal failed to deliver. The Chinese underperformed on their pledges. Trump blamed the Biden Administration for not enforcing the deal. Unbowed by the disappointment of his first trade war with China, Trump launched a second one when he returned to office earlier this year. This time, he surrounded himself with loyalists who supported his instincts for public confrontation and rapid escalation to force China to the negotiating table. Trump's approach appeared to be built on an assumption that China's economy was brittle, and Beijing would buckle under pressure. Read More: Why Trump Will Blink First on China That bet backfired. China retaliated with counter-tariffs. Beijing also implemented novel new export controls on critical minerals and magnets upon which U.S. industries depend. Chinese policymakers moved swiftly to shore up China's economy while expanding trade ties with other partners. Rather than fold, China punched back. As the economic costs of the trade war mounted on both sides of the Pacific, Trump designated his Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to negotiate a 90-day truce. The Chinese accepted. Trump's trade war with China is not over. It is merely paused. Trump will continue returning to the well of grievance about America's trade imbalance with China until he can secure a deal that he can sell as a win to the American public. But therein lies the rub. Based on my recent exchanges with Chinese officials and experts, it seems Beijing has taken America's measure in recent weeks and concluded that China has greater capacity to withstand economic pain than the U.S. China's leaders lack confidence that any agreement with the mercurial Trump will last. At a more fundamental level, China's leaders are unclear on what specifically Trump seeks—and what he would offer in return. On Thursday, Treasury Secretary Bessent said that U.S.-China talks were 'a bit stalled' and suggested Trump and Xi Jinping 'have a call.' But until the Trump Administration can articulate its concrete objectives, its strategy for achieving them, and its vision of a productive process for doing so, the U.S.-China trade war will stay stalemated. Read More: It's Time for Trump and Xi to Meet To be clear, the Trump Administration has legitimate grievances about China's unfair economic practices. China's market access barriers, forced technology transfers, and state-directed subsidies to preferred industries and businesses have created massive global trade distortions. But grievance is not a strategy. And daily improvisation is not a formula for progress in negotiations. The 90-day trade truce gives the Trump Administration time and space to do its homework. That means discarding the failed assumptions that Xi will cave under pressure and instead doing the hard work of homing in on what specifically Trump is aiming to achieve and what he is prepared to give in return. In the end, trade policy is not about scoring points or undermining competitors. It is about making America stronger, safer, and more prosperous. If Trump wants to succeed, he will need to move beyond theatrics and prepare for the grinding process of negotiating with China that awaits. Contact us at letters@

Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says China violated agreement with U.S.
-- U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday accused China of breaking a recent trade agreement, only a few weeks after the two nations announced a temporary truce aimed at de-escalating tensions. In a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote: 'China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US.' He added: 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' Trump said the deal had been struck to prevent further economic deterioration in China after his administration's tariffs took effect. 'We went, in effect, COLD TURKEY with China, and it was devastating for them,' he said in the post. 'I made a FAST DEAL with China in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation, and I didn't want to see that happen.' 'Everything quickly stabilized and China got back to business as usual.' However, he claims China has now violated the agreement. Earlier this month, the U.S. and China agreed to reduce or suspend several tariffs, with the U.S. lowering duties on Chinese imports from 145% to 30% and China cutting its retaliatory tariffs from 125% to 10%. The agreement also included a 90-day suspension of additional tariffs through May 14. However, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News on Thursday that trade talks had become 'a bit stalled' and may require further involvement from national leaders. He added that he expects more talks in the coming weeks and did not rule out a call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Related articles Trump says China violated agreement with U.S. Canada March GDP rises 0.1%; Q1 growth steady at 0.5% China to allocate $70 billion in capital for new infrastructure projects