We have another deal coming up 'maybe' with India, says Trump
Donald Trump suggests a potential trade agreement with India. This statement occurred during a meeting with Bahrain's Crown Prince and Prime Minister at the White House. Trump mentioned the possibility of another deal with India. Discussions are underway, signaling a positive outlook for economic cooperation. This development could strengthen ties between the two nations. Further details are awaited.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
India deal may mirror US-Indonesia template: Trump
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Concerns over 'lopsided' trade framework
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
US President Donald Trump on Wednesday hinted at the announcement of a possible trade agreement with India, saying 'maybe' another deal was on the horizon.He made the remarks during a bilateral meeting with the Crown Prince and Prime Minister of Bahrain at the White House."We have another deal coming up maybe with India," Trump was quoted as saying.The statement comes even as a fifth round of talks between Indian and US trade officials is underway in Washington, with the two sides working toward a proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA).Earlier this week, Trump had indicated that the India pact may follow the contours of the recently finalised trade agreement with Indonesia. Under that deal, the Southeast Asian country will offer complete market access to US goods, while its own exports will face a 19% duty in the US.In addition, Indonesia has committed to purchasing USD 15 billion in US energy, USD 4.5 billion in American agricultural products, and 50 Boeing jets.Speaking to reporters, Trump added, 'India is basically working along that same line. We are going to have access into India. You have to understand, we had no access to any of these countries. Our people couldn't go in, and now we are getting access because of what we are doing with the tariffs…'The US has been pressing India to reduce duties on a range of products, including dairy, automobiles (especially electric vehicles), wines, apples, and genetically modified crops. In return, India is seeking duty relief on key export items like textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, chemicals, and shrimp.Trade experts have warned that any agreement modelled too closely on the Indonesia deal could harm India's domestic sectors. The Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) raised concerns over the lack of reciprocity in the proposed terms.'A bad deal, especially one that removes India's tariffs without reciprocal benefits, could be worse than no deal at all,' said GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava. He added that India must 'negotiate transparently, guard against one-sided outcomes, and not succumb to pressure for quick, symbolic agreements that compromise long-term economic interests.'India has so far resisted giving tariff concessions in sensitive sectors such as dairy, which it has never opened to any FTA partner. It is also pushing the US to remove or reduce the additional 26% tariffs it has imposed, along with duties on steel (50%) and autos (25%). Washington, in turn, has postponed the imposition of new tariffs on India until August 1.The two nations are targeting an interim agreement in the coming months, with the aim to finalise the first tranche of the BTA by September–October.Bilateral trade between the two countries has remained robust, with India's merchandise exports to the US rising 21.78% to USD 17.25 billion in April-May this fiscal, while imports increased by 25.8% to USD 8.87 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
16 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Mughals in NCERT Class VIII textbook: An inaccurate retelling with a communal twist
The newly released NCERT history textbook for Class VIII, that covers the history of the Delhi sultans and the Mughals, is based more on gross factual errors and communal prejudices than on sound academic research. Take, for instance, the jizya, the protection tax paid by non-Muslims under some rulers of medieval India. It is described as a tool for 'public humiliation' and a financial incentive for the non-Muslim population to convert to Islam. This interpretation is, however, not found in any primary source of medieval Indian history. Levied by Caliph Umar as early as 634 AD in the newly conquered regions of the Levant, Iraq and Iran, the tax was paid by non-Muslims to be exempt from military service and be recognized as zimmis/dhimmis of the Islamic state entrusted with the responsibility (zimma) to protect the non-Muslim population. Nowhere in any Islamic literature produced in India or beyond is the tax associated with conversion of any form. Mughal emperor Akbar, who banned the tax during his reign, is regarded by the new NCERT textbook as having done so in his later years after consolidating his kingdom. Having lost his father, emperor Humayun, in 1556 AD, young Akbar was kept under the regency of his guardian Bairam Khan and assumed the throne only in 1560 AD. He abolished the jizya a few years later (1563-64 AD), regarding it as a discriminatory tax. Apart from such glaring factual inaccuracies, the textbook also re-introduces discarded labels such as 'dark periods of history' for the Sultanate-Mughal period. 'Dark Age' was first used for the Early Middle Age in Europe that was inaccurately regarded as a period of only ignorance and barbarity. Judged from a contemporary lens, terms such as 'dark period' oversimplify and decontextualise a period of history and are no longer used in academic parlance. Further, labels such as 'cruel' and 'brutal' have been casually used to describe Mughal rulers such as Akbar, whose reign, the book says, was a 'blend of brutality and tolerance'. Akbar's siege of Chittor in 1567 AD where 30,000 civilians were killed earned him the 'brutal' epithet from the NCERT. However, instances of war brutality are a feature of most royal reigns. For instance, the famous Chola ruler Rajendra Chola's 1042 AD inscription recording his victory over the Chalukyas details how the entire town of Kollipakkai was burnt to ashes and many Jain temples destroyed. Similarly, his Karandai Prashasti extols another victory over the Chalukyas and records how the capital of the Chalukya kingdom, Manyakheta, was burnt down and many women and children perished in the great fire. Yet, none of these instances are mentioned in the NCERT's Class VII history textbook, in which this period of history is covered. Multiple instances of killing of the civilian population during wars have also not earned Rajendra Chola the epithet of 'brutal' or 'cruel'. When it comes to temple destruction in Indian history, the Class VIII textbook only discusses it in the context of the Sultanate-Mughal period, even when numerous instances of temple destruction can be found in periods preceding them. The wanton destruction of all except two temples in Kashmir by 11th century ruler Harsha, recorded in the Sanskrit history of Kashmir, Kalhana's Rajatarangini, or the destruction of multiple Jain shrines by followers of Virashaivism in 12th-13th century Karnataka, or the burning and looting of multiple Buddhist viharas by rulers such as Kshemagupta, Mihirakula and Pushyamitra Shunga are nowhere to be found in the NCERT's textbooks. If the aim is to truly correct past omissions, then these should also find mention. Otherwise, it gives an incomplete and deliberately communal twist to temple destruction when it was a practice followed by many rulers of India, and not just by the Islamic rulers of the Sultanate or the Mughal dynasty. Factual inaccuracies, blatant communalism, incomplete histories and oversimplification are not merely a feature of the new Class VIII history textbook. They can also be found in other subject textbooks that have recently been revised by the NCERT. These include Class XI and Class XII political science textbooks, in which references to Babri Masjid demolition, the 1992 Bombay riots as well as the Gujarat riots 2002 have been erased. The reason cited for such changes has been to foster 'positive citizens'. Given the state of NCERT textbooks today, it can only mean students and future citizens are being discouraged to think critically, argue logically and understand impartially. The writer is a Delhi-based historian and professor. She runs a Youtube channel on Indian history called Eyeshadow and Etihaas
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Rahul Gandhi slams Election Commission over Bihar Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Thursday (July 17, 2025) claimed that the Election Commission has been caught "red handed" stealing votes in the name of Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar and asked whether the poll body has completely become BJP's 'Election chori branch'. The EC has all along maintained that the revision, being held after 22 years, will cleanse the voters' list of ineligible people, duplicate entries and include those eligible as per law to vote. Mr. Gandhi shared a post by Ajit Anjum, whose YouTube channel is running a series on special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. "Election Commission in Bihar has been caught red handed stealing votes in the name of 'SIR'. And FIR will be lodged against the one who exposes it!" Mr. Gandhi said in a post in Hindi on X. 'Is EC still 'Election Commission' or has it completely become BJP's 'Election Chori' branch?" the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha said. Mr. Anjum has been accused of spreading communal tensions in Begusarai district by the local administration. He had denied the allegation and shared a screenshot of an FIR lodged against him. Opposition parties have asserted that the ongoing exercise will disfranchise crores of eligible Indian citizens for the want of citizenship documents. On Wednesday (July 16, 2025), Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar thanked the eligible voters of Bihar for their active participation in the "much-needed" cleaning of the electoral rolls during SIR. Mr. Kumar's remarks came in the backdrop of the Supreme Court hearing a clutch of pleas questioning the intent behind the SIR ahead of the assembly polls in the state later this year.
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Elon Musk's India pitstop: ‘Make in India' is off the cards for now, but are Teslas going to be at least made for India?
Tesla's first retail showroom might be as good as it gets for India, given the hoops that the country's policymakers jumped to get the marque automobile brand here. A brand new policy was pushed through early last year, dubbed by the industry as the 'Tesla Policy' to effectively yield to what CEO Elon Musk was pushing for: easing imports into India without an explicit guarantee to Make in India. What makes it worse is that Tesla would be importing its Model Y saloon units from its Shanghai gigafactory in China, with no guidance on manufacturing in India. Tesla has no plans of starting production in India for the time being, Union Heavy Industries Minister H D Kumaraswamy had said last month. It is unclear whether Musk has given any further guidance to the Indian government on its manufacturing plans in India, but sources in the government indicate that there is nothing on that front. Navigating Indian roads There are also issues around whether the car would be tweaked in any way to better suit Indian conditions, which could be far more challenging than in most other countries where Tesla sells. Take full self driving (FSD) as an example, for which the company proposes to charge Rs 6 lakh extra, over and above its duty-laden price of Rs 59-68 lakhs – double the saloon's sticker price in the US. What is unclear is whether the company has examined if FSD would work in India's traffic conditions, and where the data from its Indian customers would be stored. In China, for instance, Musk has made multiple unannounced visits to Beijing discuss the rollout of FSD software and permission to transfer data overseas. Tesla has been offering FSD for subscription in China for over four years, but with a restricted set of features that limit the system to operations such as automated lane changing or parking assist. Since 2021, Tesla has stored all data collected by its Chinese fleet in the country, as required by the ciuntry's regulators, and has not transferred any data back to the US. Musk has been desperately lobbying for an exemption on this. In India, there is little clarity on what Tesla's terms of use of the data are. In the US too, auto safety regulators had opened an investigation into whether Tesla's recall in December 2023 of more than 2 million vehicles to install new 'Autopilot safeguards' was adequate following a series of crashes. 'The activation and use of these features are dependent on achieving reliability far in excess of human drivers as demonstrated by billions of miles of experience, as well as regulatory approval, which may take longer in some jurisdictions. As these self-driving features evolve, your car will be continuously upgraded through over-the-air software updates,' Tesla said on FSD. Then there is the hardware of the car itself. Despite its 19-inch alloys, whether the ground clearance of the Model Y would be enough to negotiate India's pothole ridden roads remains to be seen. The versions sold in other markets has a ground clearance of 167 mm, which is pretty low for a car that is really long (4,797 mm in length). There are more features that are out of sync with India's driving conditions. The version of the Model Y to be sold in India would have heated rear seats – definitely not a feature needed in Mumbai, or for that matter Delhi and Gurugram, the three places where the company hopes to retail its cars. The car has heated and cooled front seats. Add to that the fact that the full-glass roof of the Model Y with no inside cover to cut the sun off is unlikely to fare well against India's summer heat. The company plans to install 16 DC superchargers in Mumbai, but that could be inadequate even if they sell a moderate number of cars. The company will give home chargers with the car. It has adopted the direct route to sell in India, and not the franchisee route, as is the case in other markets too. China, global sales slumping The company's entry into India also comes at a time when it is struggling in China, one of its key markets. Tesla's vehicle sales in China dropped 18% year-over-year between January and May 2025, with key rivals like BYD seeing a surge, and newer rivals like Xiaomi launching cars that can match Tesla's capabilities at a lower price point. While India is expected to be a small sales market for the company, relatively, it is no surprise that it is looking to expand to the one of the world's biggest automotive markets in hopes of finding new buyers. A majority of Tesla's sales come from the US, with China contributing around 20%. In the recently concluded second quarter, Tesla's deliveries fell 13.5%, with the company seemingly headed towards a second year of shrinking sales, also dragged down by Musk's political affiliation. Besides, for many buyers, Tesla's lineup has become old, with no fresh model updates. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More Soumyarendra Barik is Special Correspondent with The Indian Express and reports on the intersection of technology, policy and society. With over five years of newsroom experience, he has reported on issues of gig workers' rights, privacy, India's prevalent digital divide and a range of other policy interventions that impact big tech companies. He once also tailed a food delivery worker for over 12 hours to quantify the amount of money they make, and the pain they go through while doing so. In his free time, he likes to nerd about watches, Formula 1 and football. ... Read More
