logo
When the world 'likely' ends you can blame these three people, expert says

When the world 'likely' ends you can blame these three people, expert says

Metroa day ago
There are many, many, many ways the world could end, from nuclear explosions to meteors and global pandemics.
But if and when Armageddon comes, there are three men you could probably blame, an expert has revealed.
US President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and China's top leader, Xi Jinping, are 'a walking version of the dark triad', said Dr Luke Kemp, of the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk at the University of Cambridge.
The trinity consists of narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism, a word for the cunning of the Italian leader Niccoló Machiavelli.
These toxic traits have long been found in the ruling classes behind civilisations that now lie in ruin, Dr Kemp found.
He told The Guardian: 'Trump is a textbook narcissist, Putin is a cold psychopath and Xi Jinping came to rule [China] by being a master Machiavellian manipulator.'
He added: 'We can't put a date on Doomsday, but by looking at the 5,000 years of [civilisation], we can understand the trajectories we face today – and self-termination is most likely.'
The academic combed through the histories of 400 societies for his new book, Goliath's Curse, many of which ended the same way: The demise of civilisation by power-hungry elites.
In our case, a powerful but small 'oligarchy' is working against our interests by ignoring threats like climate change and nuclear weapons, Dr Kemp said.
Food shortages, mass extinctions, insufferable heat and droughts are just some of the consequences of rising global temperatures, scientists say.
Dr Kemp added: 'All the threats we face today are far worse than in the past.'
To the academic, any of our ancestors reading this wouldn't be too surprised to learn we're poised for global collapse.
'History is best told as a story of organised crime,' he said. 'It is one group creating a monopoly on resources through the use of violence over a certain territory and population.'
Over time, inequality throws a spanner into these uneven kingdoms and empires, such as the Romans or the Han dynasty, as elites gobble up wealth and land and make societies fragile and riddled by infighting.
Dr Kemp prefers to call these fallen civilisations 'Goliaths', which have three ingredients – grain, weapons that are controlled by one group and 'caged land', areas where people cannot flee to.
Dr Kemp pointed to Cahokia, the Native American 'Manhattan' of early America, dominated by priests after the advent of maize. Or the first Goliaths of Mesopotamia, who ruled using bronze swords and axes.
While in Egypt, the Red Sea and Nile meant people had little choice but to be ruled over by tyrannical pharaohs.
When these Goliaths collapse, what follows isn't Armageddon but prosperity for the common people.
'After the fall of Rome, people actually got taller and healthier,' he said.
If the modern world crumbles, however, things might not be as favourable. The ruling classes may try to regain their control with nuclear weapons, rather than swords or muskets, as they did centuries ago.
Fears around nuclear warfare have been high this year, between multiple World War Three scares and growing authoritarianism. More Trending
Such fears are a big reason why the Doomsday Clock, which tracks how close humanity is to annihilation, is only 90 seconds to midnight.
Yet, if humanity creates 'genuine democratic societies to level all the forms of power that lead to Goliaths', the end of the world could be avoided.
'Today, people find it easier to imagine that we can build intelligence on silicon than we can do democracy at scale, or that we can escape arms races. It's complete bulls**t,' Dr Kemp said.
'Of course, we can do democracy at scale. We're a naturally social, altruistic, democratic species and we all have an anti-dominance intuition. This is what we're built for.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Donald Trump gives major update on if he'll run for president again
MORE: Chinese students at UK universities are being 'pressured to spy on classmates'
MORE: Donald Trump rushes to Sydney Sweeney's defence after voting controversy
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: Brazil's Lula says he will discuss Trump tariffs with BRICS group
Exclusive: Brazil's Lula says he will discuss Trump tariffs with BRICS group

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Exclusive: Brazil's Lula says he will discuss Trump tariffs with BRICS group

BRASILIA, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva presented himself as a torchbearer for multilateralism in a fractured world in an interview with Reuters on Wednesday, revealing plans to call the leaders of India and China to discuss a joint BRICS response to tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump. "What President Trump is doing is tacit — he wants to dismantle multilateralism, where agreements are made collectively within institutions, and replace it with unilateralism, where he negotiates one-on-one with other countries," Lula said. "What bargaining power does a small Latin American country have against the United States? None." Lula said he will initiate a conversation at the BRICS group of developing nations about how to tackle Trump's tariffs. He said he planned to call Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday, and China's Xi Jinping and other leaders after. The group also has Russia and other emerging economies among its members. "I'm going to try to discuss with them about how each one is doing in this situation, what the implications are for each country, so we can make a decision," he said. "It's important to remember that the BRICS have ten countries at the G20," he added, referring to the group that gathers 20 of the world's biggest economies. Lula stressed that Brazil now holds the presidency of the BRICS and said that he wants to discuss with allies why Trump is attacking multilateralism and what his goals may be. Trump called the BRICS "anti-American" and threatened the bloc's nations with additional 10% tariffs last month, while the group gathered in a summit in Rio de Janeiro.

Trump describes meeting with Russia as ‘constructive'
Trump describes meeting with Russia as ‘constructive'

Channel 4

time3 hours ago

  • Channel 4

Trump describes meeting with Russia as ‘constructive'

After previous visits to Moscow, Steve Witkoff described Vladimir Putin as 'gracious' and 'super smart', recounting how the Russian President even prayed for Donald Trump. Trump, though, has expressed growing frustration with Russia's attacks on civilian targets in Ukraine and today slapped tariffs on their biggest oil customer, India. Although he described today's meeting as 'constructive', Trump has yet to confirm whether or not he'll go ahead with imposing sanctions on Russia this Friday as he's threatened to if a peace deal isn't agreed.

Rayner orders China to explain secret basement under London ‘mega-embassy'
Rayner orders China to explain secret basement under London ‘mega-embassy'

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Rayner orders China to explain secret basement under London ‘mega-embassy'

Angela Rayner has ordered China to explain why it has redacted blueprints of a basement and other areas in a 'mega-embassy' to be built in London. Ms Rayner, who as Housing Secretary is tasked with deciding whether the project in the Royal Mint Court can go ahead, has given Beijing two weeks to explain why certain parts of its floor plans have been 'greyed out'. It comes amid fears the complex could effectively become a nest of espionage in the heart of London, with reports China could convert basement rooms into 'spy dungeons'. The demands from Ms Rayner are set out in an update from her department sent to DP9, the planning consultancy representing the Chinese embassy. It suggests a possible change of tone in the Government's approach to the project. Sir Keir Starmer was lobbied directly over the proposals by Xi Jinping, the Chinese premier, and has previously refused to intervene in the project, despite pressure from the US to block it on security grounds. Ms Rayner's letter, sent on Wednesday, was also addressed to Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, and David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary. Other key players including the local council and Metropolitan Police were copied in. It revealed that Ms Rayner has asked Beijing to explain why some drawings submitted as part of the embassy plans have been marked as redacted. These include a proposed basement 'master plan', which contains two suites of anonymous rooms and a tunnel previously flagged up by critics as a potential 'modern-day dungeon' for spies. A note attached to the diagram states: 'This drawing has been redacted for security reasons.' The letter also notes that the 'internal physical arrangements' of two buildings, the Cultural Exchange Building and Embassy House, both of which have basements, have been 'greyed out'. It goes on to ask for representations on whether Ms Rayner can reach a 'lawful determination' on planning permission on the basis of the redacted plans. The update was shared on social media by Luke de Pulford, the head of the Interparliamentary Alliance on China, which was copied into the correspondence. It is likely to reignite widespread concerns over the proposed 'mega-embassy', with critics having repeatedly warned that it could pose a threat to Britain's national security. The US is said to have urged the UK to reject the proposals on security grounds given the site's proximity to a hub of sensitive data near key financial centres. Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the former Tory leader, wrote to Ms Rayner last month to reiterate these concerns, saying it would be 'inappropriate' to approve the application pending a plan to address such a 'serious matter'. The proposed 'mega-embassy' at the former Royal Mint site, near the Tower of London, has been locked in a planning battle for years, with the decision called in for review by Ms Rayner last year. Following a public inquiry, the Planning Inspectorate has reportedly given the development the green light, with the Deputy Prime Minister to make a final decision by September. Mr de Pulford said he was hopeful the 'tough' demands set out in the letter indicated the Government had 'seen the light' and would put a stop to the plans. He told The Telegraph: 'This development is a disaster for national security, residents, and UK interests. It should never have got this far. 'I can't see how Beijing is going to meet the Secretary of State's conditions. So, either a deal has already been done – and the Government is trying to look tough – or they've genuinely seen the light. After a long, hard fight, we're certainly hoping the latter.' 'Greyed-out' The Ministry of Housing refused to comment while the decision-making process was ongoing. All parties have been given a deadline of Aug 20 to make further representations. There is some confusion about whether the drawings in question are supposed to be redacted or not. In some cases, the Government says other documents obtained as part of the public inquiry appear to fill in some of the gaps. The letter states: 'The Secretary of State has noted that the Planning (Addendum 2) Drawing List dated 31 Jan 2025 identifies drawings which are said to be redacted. 'Some of those drawings are marked on their face as being 'redacted for security reasons', and it appears that this may refer, at least principally, to the internal physical arrangements of the Cultural Exchange Building and Embassy House, both of which have been 'greyed-out'. 'However, other plans which are identified as being redacted in the Drawing List are not marked on their face as such, and contain no obvious redactions. 'Furthermore, in some cases, documents which were before the inquiry... appear to show, indicatively at least, information which was redacted on the drawings (e.g. the internal physical arrangements of some of the buildings).' As a result, Ms Rayner has asked China to 'identify precisely and comprehensively' what has been redacted, what the nature of the redactions are, and the rationale and justification for them. The letter also requests an update from Ms Cooper and Mr Lammy on two conditions they set for the 'mega-embassy' in February. The first was to consolidate all Chinese consular premises in London in the new complex, and the second was for a hard perimeter to be built around part of the site so people can still access some historic ruins. If Ms Cooper and Mr Lammy refuse to budge on their demands, Beijing will need to agree to the adjustments or abandon the plans, which have been years in the making. Meeting the condition on the hard perimeter would be difficult because the local planning authority has said it would constitute a 'material amendment' to the application that would require further consultation. The embassy plans were initially rejected in 2022 by Tower Hamlets Council owing to health and safety concerns. The proposal was then withdrawn by China, before being resubmitted a month after Labour came to power. Mr Xi is said to have personally sought Sir Keir's support for the plan in a phone call between the two leaders. Ms Rayner then used her powers as Housing Secretary to take control of the planning decision, after reportedly being urged by Mr Lammy to do so. The Conservatives have warned it is 'likely' the embassy will be used as a base for Chinese espionage and urged the Government to block it. Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, told Sky News in June: 'We've seen the Chinese government cracking down on dissidents, running secret police stations in the UK, even putting bounties on the heads of dissidents, some of whom I've met. We should not be giving permission to this.' Ms Rayner also faces a backlash from her own party if she waves through the application, with one Labour MP telling The Telegraph in June they thought it would be wrong to approve it. The row presents an awkward dilemma for Sir Keir Starmer, who has pursued a strategy of engagement with Beijing while attempting to maintain a positive relationship with Donald Trump, a prominent China sceptic. Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, has said the UK will offer a 'fulsome response' to any security fears raised. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, has said he would support a judicial review into the decision if the plans are approved. This would involve challenging the lawfulness of the decision, raising the prospect of it being overturned in the courts. The Chinese embassy has always waved away criticism of the proposals and the claims about national security being in jeopardy. In response to previous reports about the basement rooms being used as 'spy dungeons', a spokesman said: 'Anti-China elements are always keen on slandering and attacking China.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store