
National Defence considering purchase of fighter drones that could fly with F-35
OTTAWA — The Department of National Defence is looking at the possibility of complementing its incoming F-35 fleet with uncrewed combat aircraft.
Unclassified documents obtained by The Canadian Press show the department is researching various options for acquiring the emerging technology.
The documents suggest that purchasing a fleet of aerial combat drones that could fly alongside fighter jets could cost as much as $16 billion and would require hundreds of staff.
That cost estimate is in the upper range. The price tag and other aspects of the emerging technology remain uncertain, and the fact that the government is researching combat drones doesn't guarantee that Canada will buy any.
David Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, said Canada's allies are already headed in this direction, so at a minimum Ottawa will want to better understand how its closest military partners will use similar technology.
He said combat drones could give the air force more flexibility to contribute to allied operations and could act as a force-multiplier that would beef up the 'mass' of the air force.
They're also cheaper than fighter jets.
'There's been a trade-off, particularly in the West, with investing in expensive things. It can have super high levels of precision and survivability ... and we've been moving towards having increasingly expensive fighter aircraft that can do phenomenal things, but they're so expensive that you can't build all that many of them,' Perry said.
'The broad thrust of the idea of having an unpiloted vehicle that would be able to operate with a piloted vehicle is that you provide additional numbers in a way that could potentially help provide enough quantity to overwhelm opposition forces.'
Perry pointed to the war in Ukraine, where Russia has been launching massive volleys of drones and missiles.
'If you have a whole bunch of targets to track, it makes it much more difficult for any kind of defensive system to be able to deal, at the same time, with all the incoming,' he said.
Canada and its allies have never deployed unmanned aerial combat drones that operate in tandem with fighter jets.
Daniel Norton is a senior management systems analyst with the RAND Corporation who has done modernization studies for the U.S. air force for more than three decades. He said drones of the type Canada is looking at tend to be smaller than crewed fighters, cost a fraction of a conventional jet if bought in bulk — and can be used in situations where the military wouldn't want to put a pilot at risk.
Known as 'collaborative combat aircraft,' the vehicles are designed to act autonomously in some ways — such as targeting and flying — but with humans managing their actions. Future versions of the technology could engage in fully autonomous operations.
The drones could be used to carry sensors, jammers or weapons to support normal fighter jets. They could even be used as decoys.
Norton said new platforms like these probably won't be deployed in battle by any country before 2030 at the earliest.
'I'd be surprised if it happened sooner,' he said.
National Defence vaguely alluded to such platforms in the most recent defence policy update as something the government would 'explore.'
The 2024 policy update, titled 'Our North, Strong and Free,' committed to exploring 'options for acquiring a suite of surveillance and strike drones and counter-drone capabilities.'
An internal preliminary analysis of the various options for the 'autonomous collaborative platform' ruled out buying completely Canadian-made fighter drones.
The analysis said one possible path would have Canada work with partner nations on developing new systems like this, and pointed to several such craft being developed for Australia, the U.S. and European nations.
The analysis said such a procurement project 'could provide Canadian aerospace firms with an entry point into development and production of advanced weapons systems.'
There are no current off-the-shelf versions but several are being developed, such as Boeing's MQ-28A 'Ghost Bat' for Australia, General Atomics' YFQ-42 in the U.S. and the Anduril YFQ-44A.
Boeing's aircraft is undergoing flight testing, while Anduril's is expected to start testing this year.
Both the U.S. and Australian air forces use F-35s. There are also several initiatives underway in Europe for autonomous collaborative aircraft.
When The Canadian Press asked Lt.-Gen. Jamie Speiser-Blanchet, the new commander of the Royal Canadian Air Force, how the RCAF might change in response to the rapid developments in drone warfare, she said the military is 'already looking at those kinds of future capabilities.'
'It is absolutely something that is on our radar and something that we need to be prepared for in the future,' she said.
In March, in response to the trade war with the U.S., Prime Minister Carney ordered a review of Canada's plan to purchase a fleet of F-35 fighter jets.
The federal government is expected to render a decision on the procurement project by the end of summer.
Canada's planned purchase of 88 of the U.S.-made stealth jets is expected to cost $27.7 billion, according to the auditor general. At this point, Canada has only financially committed to purchasing the first 16 jets.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 12, 2025.
Kyle Duggan, The Canadian Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Canada reportedly planning to purchase unmanned fighter drones
Watch CTV military analyst retired Maj.-Gen. David Fraser speaks about the benefits of Canada purchasing unmanned drones for the military.


CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
What to make of Donald Trump's latest tariff threats?
Watch Economist DT Cochrane reacts to Trump's latest tariff threat and how Canada should be responding.


CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
1 year after Trump assassination attempt, changes at U.S. Secret Service but questions remain
In many ways, the assassination attempt against Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania campaign stop was a perfect storm of failings coming together that allowed 20-year-old Michael Thomas Crooks to climb on top of a nearby building and take eight shots at the once and future U.S. president. One attendee was killed, two others wounded and a bullet grazed Trump's ear before a U.S. Secret Service counter-sniper opened fire on Crooks and killed him. That day jolted an already chaotic race for the White House and solidified Trump's iconic status in his party and beyond. It also became a turning point for the agency tasked with protecting the president. As more details emerged about what went wrong, questions multiplied: What happened to the Secret Service's planning? Why was a rooftop with a clear line of sight to Trump left unguarded? What motivated the shooter? Another incident in September where a gunman camped in the shrubbery outside one of Trump's golf courses before being spotted and shot at by a Secret Service agent also raised questions about the agency's performance. A year after Butler, multiple investigations have detailed the breakdowns that day. Under a new leader hired by Trump, the agency has been pushing to address those problems but key questions remain. "This was a wake-up call for the Secret Service," said retired supervisory agent Bobby McDonald, who's now a criminal justice lecturer at the University of New Haven in Connecticut. Here's a look at what went wrong, what's been done to address problems and questions still unanswered. How did he get on that roof? Who was talking to whom? All the investigations zeroed in on a few specific problems. The building in Butler, Pa., with a clear sight line to the stage where the president was speaking only 135 metres away was left unguarded. Crooks eventually boosted himself up there and fired eight shots with an AR-style rifle. The Secret Service's investigation into its own agency's conduct said that it wasn't that the line-of-sight risks weren't known about ahead of time. It was that multiple personnel assessed them as "acceptable." Supervisors had expected large pieces of farm equipment would be situated to block the view from the building. Those ultimately weren't placed, and staffers who visited the site before the rally didn't tell their supervisors that the line-of-sight concerns hadn't been addressed, the report said. Another glaring problem: fragmented communications between the Secret Service and the local law enforcement that the agency regularly relies on to secure events. Instead of having one unified command post with representatives from every agency providing security in the same room, there were two command posts at the rally. One investigation described a "chaotic mixture" of radio, cellphone, text and email used to communicate that day. 'Ensure such an event can never be repeated' The Secret Service issued a report Thursday about what it has done to address problems laid bare at Butler. "Since President Trump appointed me as director of the United States Secret Service, I have kept my experience on July 13 top of mind, and the agency has taken many steps to ensure such an event can never be repeated in the future," said Sean Curran, whom Trump tasked with leading the agency. Curran was one of the agents standing next to Trump as he was hustled off the stage after the shooting. The agency said it had implemented 21 of the 46 recommendations made by Congressional oversight bodies. The rest were in progress or not up to the agency to implement. WATCH | What went wrong in Butler: 'Preventable': How the Secret Service failed to protect Trump | About That 10 months ago Duration 13:47 How was a gunman able to come so close to assassinating former U.S. president Donald Trump during a campaign rally in Butler, Pa.? Andrew Chang breaks down a new report published by a bipartisan U.S. Senate committee that found the Secret Service's lack of organization and technical planning failed to keep Trump safe. Some of what they've done involves new equipment and a greater emphasis on addressing threats from above. They've created a new aviation division to oversee aerial operations like drones. The agency said it has two armoured ATVs for use on golf courses and is producing another three. And they're purchasing mobile command vehicles that will be pre-positioned around the country. But much of what the agency says it has done is about changing policies and procedures to address those July 13 lapses — things like revising their manual to "advance procedures and communication practices" when it comes to co-ordinating with local law enforcement or clarifying who's responsible for events where protectees are appearing. They've updated their procedures about documenting line-of-sight concerns and how those concerns are going to be addressed. So far it doesn't appear that anyone has been or will be fired, although the agency's director at the time, Kim Cheatle, swiftly resigned. The agency said Thursday that six staffers have been disciplined with suspensions ranging from 10 to 42 days without pay; the six were placed on restricted duty or nonoperational positions. Their identities and positions were not released. What we still don't know In many ways, Crooks and his motivations are still a mystery. He was killed by a Secret Service counter-sniper and did not leave much information about why he did what he did. Investigators say they believe he acted alone and they didn't find any threatening comments or ideological positions on social media that shed light on his thinking. And while it's clear what went wrong in Butler, questions linger about how things that were so clearly problematic — like that open roof — weren't addressed ahead of time. Anthony Cangelosi, a former Secret Service agent who is now a lecturer at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City, said that without being able to read the interviews with the agents involved in the Butler planning it's hard to know exactly why they did what they did. A year later, he still struggles with how so many things went wrong. "I can't understand how many errors were made on that site that day," he said. "If they agreed to leave that roof unoccupied, I can't ... understand it for the life of me." The widow of Corey Comperatore, who died during the Butler assassination attempt, echoed some of that sentiment during an interview with Fox News this week. "Why was that such a failure? Why weren't they paying attention? Why did they think that that roof didn't need [to be] covered? I want to sit down and talk to them," Helen Comperatore said. Cangelosi said he still questions whether the agency asked for additional personnel to cover a busy election year and if they did, whether those requests were granted. He thinks the Secret Service needs better pay to retain agents tempted to leave the agency for other federal government jobs. McDonald said he suspects part of the problem ahead of the Butler rally was that the Secret Service might have had a hard time understanding that the type of protection Trump needed wasn't the same as for other former presidents. He said it "boggles the mind" how Crooks was able to get on that roof and said that "communication" and "complacency" are the two issues that he thinks really went wrong in Butler. But he also said that he feels the agency is moving in the right direction. "A lot of good people doing a lot good work there," he said, "and I hope they continue to move in the right direction."