Gulf sovereign fund assets set to hit $18 trillion by 2030
Spearheaded by the UAE's three major funds, Gulf Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are emerging as key players in the global investment arena.
With total assets under management projected to soar from $12 trillion at the end of 2024 to $18 trillion by 2030, these funds are set to redefine the global investment landscape.
At the forefront are five formidable entities: the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (Adia), Mubadala, Abu Dhabi Developmental Holding Company, Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF), and the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA). Together, they dominate regional investment activities, showcasing the Gulf's growing influence on the global stage.
A remarkable trend accompanying this growth is the rise of Royal Private Offices (RPOs), which now control around $500 billion in assets. According to a Deloitte report, these RPOs have become essential in shaping the future of sovereign wealth funds in the region. They often mirror the activities of established funds, blurring the lines between state-controlled entities and private family offices. This trend has led to the creation of new funds linked to influential families, further diversifying the Gulf's investment portfolio.
The report highlights that Gulf SWFs have been on an aggressive investment spree, deploying $82 billion in 2023 alone and another $55 billion in the first nine months of 2024. With approximately 40 per cent of global SWF assets under their control, and six of the ten largest funds worldwide, these entities are not just participants — they are reshaping investment strategies amid intensifying competition.
Julie Kassab, Deloitte's sovereign wealth fund leader for the Middle East, underscores the Gulf region's pivotal role: 'We are witnessing these funds not only expand their geographical footprint but also significantly enhance their internal capabilities. They are setting new standards for performance and governance.'
A significant shift in focus is evident as Gulf funds increasingly invest in fast-growing markets outside traditional Western economies. With an eye on Asia, they are establishing offices in the Asia-Pacific region and ramping up allocations to burgeoning economies such as China, India, and Southeast Asia. Notably, Gulf SWFs have invested an estimated $9.5 billion in China in the year ending September 2024, positioning themselves as key players in a market where Western investors are pulling back.
Africa is another frontier of interest, particularly in the mining sector, as Gulf states look to capitalise on high-risk extractive ventures. The UAE and Saudi Arabia are actively investing in this area, both directly and through multinational mining firms, signaling their readiness to explore new opportunities.
As competition intensifies, Gulf SWFs are under pressure to enhance their performance and risk management practices. Many are adopting a more proactive stance, seeking better reporting from portfolio companies and asserting influence at the board level. This drive for excellence has also intensified the competition for talent, with Gulf funds employing around 9,000 professionals and offering attractive packages to lure seasoned experts from established global funds.
However, the global landscape is shifting towards protectionism, particularly in developing economies. Governments are reassessing their strategies regarding strategic assets, leading to the emergence of domestically focused funds that aim to co-invest alongside international partners rather than compete directly with Gulf players.
Deloitte also notes a growing trend toward protectionism globally, particularly in developing economies, where governments are reassessing their approach to strategic assets. This shift has led to the creation of new domestically focused funds, often designed to co-invest alongside international partners rather than compete directly with established Middle Eastern players.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
21 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Afreximbank downgrade dispute raises questions on loan categorisation
African Union's African Peer Review Mechanism has challenged Fitch Ratings' downgrade of the African Export‑Import Bank, arguing the move rests on a misinterpretation of its sovereign loan portfolio. On 4 June, Fitch lowered Afreximbank's long‑term foreign‑currency issuer rating from BBB to BBB‑—a notch above junk—with a negative outlook. The agency attributed the downgrade to elevated credit risk, citing an estimated non‑performing loan ratio of 7.1 %, primarily due to sovereign exposures to Ghana, South Sudan and Zambia classified as NPLs. The APRM asserts that Fitch's classification is flawed and inconsistent with Afreximbank's own disclosure of an NPL ratio of 2.44 % as of end‑March. The AU‑established body emphasises the bank's status as a multilateral lender created under a 1993 treaty, which binds member governments—including Ghana and Zambia—as signatories, shareholders and founding members. APRM contends such loans are grounded in intergovernmental cooperation rather than standard commercial terms, so treating them as NPLs misrepresents their nature. Fitch defended its methodology, stating that its supranational rating decisions adhere to globally consistent and publicly available criteria, and highlighting that their analysis clearly identified rating drivers and sensitivities. The agency maintains sovereign exposures showing delayed repayments meet its threshold for classification as non‑performing, irrespective of legal structures or treaties. In that sense, the downgrade aligns with accepted analytical standards. ADVERTISEMENT APRM's critique zeroes in on that threshold. It argues that sovereign repayment negotiations are routine diplomatic engagements, not signs of default. It remains concerned that Fitch's decision conflates financial dialogue with credit impairment. The body has formally called on Fitch, Afreximbank and other African institutions to convene technical consultations and reassess the rating, emphasising the importance of contextually intelligent credit assessments. Beyond the immediate dispute, this episode resonates with a broader continental debate over the relevance and fairness of global credit‑rating frameworks applied to African multilaterals. Africa's longstanding concerns that Western rating methodologies fail to grasp local realities and may unfairly inflate borrowing costs have sparked momentum for alternative mechanisms. Among these, an Africa‑led credit‑rating agency is under development, envisaged to begin operations by September 2025, aimed at providing sovereign ratings that reflect regional economic and institutional contexts. Central to the debate is Afreximbank's evolving lending strategy. Under outgoing president Benedict Okey Oramah, the Cairo‑based lender has aggressively expanded its footprint, increasingly financing private sector projects across the continent and taking calculated sovereign exposure. Supporting growth in under‑served markets like Zimbabwe and Nigeria, the bank grew its asset base from around US$7 billion in 2015 to approximately US$40 billion in 2024, with deposits rising to US$37 billion. That growth has attracted scrutiny. Fitch has highlighted what it sees as elevated concentration of corporate and sovereign risk, pointing to an NPL ratio that exceeds its internal threshold. Observers note that up to 92 % of Afreximbank's lending is directed at commercial businesses, and certain sovereign loans carry interest rates as high as 6.875 % over benchmark rates—much higher than traditional development finance institutions. Proponents of the APRM's position, including lead credit‑ratings expert Misheck Mutize, argue that supplementary indicators such as capital adequacy, collateral density and profitability should carry mitigating weight. Mutize points to a strong equity ratio of 19 %, risk‑weighted capital at 21 %, internal capital generation through profits, and loan collateral cover for 84 % of the portfolio. These factors, he suggests, are downplayed in the rating downgrade despite being explicitly acknowledged in Fitch's own analytic framework. He warns that over‑reliance on contested NPL figures can breach the methodology's balance principles. ADVERTISEMENT Not everyone supports APRM's framing. Analysts note that countries like Zambia officially halted repayments to Afreximbank in 2021, and South Sudan failed to honour its obligations, prompting legal recourse in London. Zambia's treasury has openly stated its debt will be restructured. Against this backdrop, Fitch's interpretation that certain sovereign debt has become non‑performing appears defensible under global standards. This dispute underscores a tension: Afreximbank's assertive growth strategy has boosted its developmental reach and institutional clout, yet it must reconcile that dynamism with risk and transparency expectations imposed by global credit agencies. With Oramah set to step down later this month, the new president will face a pivotal choice: maintain aggressive expansion as the bank charts an independent path, or recalibrate operations to conform more closely with multilateral development bank norms—a course change that could preserve borrowing benefits but limit growth prerogatives. Beyond institutional implications, the outcome has broader financial consequences. A downgrade to BBB‑ tightens Afreximbank's borrowing costs, heightens the risk premium for countries swayed by its lending, and complicates its mission to finance intra‑continental trade. That may squeeze African exporters and traders relying on the bank's funding. Policy stakeholders are paying attention. The APRM's call for dialogue and transparency signals a pushback against the perceived hold of Western agencies over African financial destiny. Meanwhile, the African Development Bank is developing a Continental Financial Stability Mechanism that may borrow under a regional rating—another step towards financial sovereignty.
Fintech News ME
2 days ago
- Fintech News ME
Global Islamic Finance Grows 14.9%, Reaches US$3.9 Trillion in Total Assets
In 2024, the global Islamic financial services industry continued to expand, growing by 14.9% year-on-year (YoY) to reach US$3.88 trillion in total assets, according to a new report by the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB). Growth was observed across all major sectors, including Islamic banking, Islamic insurance, and sukuk, which are Islamic financial certificates, similar to bonds in Western finance, highlighting deepening market participation, and expanding geographic reach, especially in non-traditional markets. In 2024, total assets in Islamic banking grew by 17.05%, marking a significant increase. The segment remained the cornerstone of the industry, accounting for 71.6% of Islamic finance assets. Although assets remained concentrated in mature, systemically significant jurisdictions, there were signs of growing momentum in emerging markets, particularly in Africa and Central Asia. The Islamic capital markets also delivered strong gains, driven primarily by a surge in sukuk issuance. Global sukuk issuances rose by a remarkable 25.6% to reach US$230.4 billion, making it the fastest-growing segment in 2024. Sukuk outstanding accounted for 23.3% of total Islamic finance assets, further reflecting favorable financing conditions and growing demand from both sovereign and corporate issuers Within the Islamic capital markets still, the Islamic funds industry also recorded growth, with total assets under management (AUM) increasing by 9.2% to US$193.6 billion. This increase was largely supported by robust performance in global equity markets, and marked a recovery following a decline in 2023. Islamic insurance, referred to as takaful, recorded asset growth of 16.9% and an increase of 15.4% in gross written contributions. Despite the significant increase, the industry continued to account for a small portion of the market, accounting for 1.4% of the global Islamic finance assets. The report highlights that while traditional markets continue to dominate Islamic finance, the industry is steadily expanding into non-traditional regions. As of the end-of-year 2024, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region accounted for the largest share of global Islamic finance assets at 53.1%. This was followed by East Asia and the Pacific (EAP) with 21.9%, driven by Malaysia and Indonesia's well-established Islamic finance ecosystems. The Middle East and North Africa (MENA, excluding GCC) contributed 16.9%, while other regions such as Europe and Central Asia (ECA), South Asia (SA), and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) held relatively small shares, but represent emerging growth frontiers. The rise of Islamic fintech In addition to traditional growth drivers, fintech is another trend that's driving structural shifts within the Islamic finance, offering new avenues for growth, efficiency, and financial inclusion. For example, digital financing platforms, including Islamic equity crowdfunding and peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, are emerging as important sources of financing, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and underserved market segments. Cryptocurrency-related activity is also growing in popularity within the Islamic finance landscape covering trading, investments, and tokenization. Examples include Rain and CoinMENA, two crypto exchanges licensed by the Central Bank of Bahrain which offer crypto trading and custodial services that meet Islamic standards. Artificial intelligence (AI) is also gaining ground in Islamic finance, with institutions increasingly deploying the technology. An IFSB survey as part of the report highlighted identity verification (67%), chatbots and virtual assistance (56%), and digital footprint analysis (44%), as the most common uses of AI among Islamic banks. Despite benefits including improved operational efficiencies, customer experiences, and new business opportunities, technology also introduces new risks. Digital financing platforms and crypto-related solutions, for example, require close attention to issues of investor protection, sufficient transparency and disclosure, and appropriate Sharia governance frameworks. Finally, the adoption of AI introduces a unique set of risks. One particular concern is the potential lack of interpretative judgment in AI systems when applied to complex Sharia rulings and jurisprudential differences across jurisdictions. Moreover, the opaque and evolving nature of AI models poses significant challenges for supervisory authorities and Sharia boards in exercising effective oversight and informed judgment. Islamic finance outlook The Islamic fintech sector was valued at US$138 billion 2024. It's projected to exceed US$300 billion by 2027. Standard Chartered projects that the global Islamic finance sector will grow by 36% between 2024 and 2028, with sukuk outstanding expected to surge 54.5% and Islamic banking by 30%. The bank, which surveyed 26 leaders from various Islamic banking providers in Q1 2025, revealed a positive outlook for the industry, with 87% of respondents holding an optimistic view of the sector over the next five to ten years. The majority expect significant growth and expansion, along with increased adoption and innovation of Islamic finance products and services. Economies including China, the Middle East, and Africa are expected to offer the greatest opportunities over the next two to three years.
Dubai Eye
2 days ago
- Dubai Eye
Rwanda quits Central African bloc in dispute with Congo
Rwanda has said it would withdraw from the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS), underscoring diplomatic tensions in the region over an offensive this year by Rwanda-backed M23 rebels in eastern Congo. Kigali had expected to assume the chairmanship of the 11-member bloc at a meeting on Saturday in Equatorial Guinea. Instead, the bloc kept Equatorial Guinea in the role, which Rwanda's foreign ministry denounced as a violation of its rights. Rwanda, in a statement, condemned Congo's "instrumentalization" of the bloc and saw "no justification for remaining in an organization whose current functioning runs counter to its founding principles." It wasn't clear if Rwanda's exit from the bloc would take immediate effect. The office of Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi said in a statement that ECCAS members had "acknowledged the aggression against the Democratic Republic of Congo by Rwanda and ordered the aggressor country to withdraw its troops from Congolese soil." M23 seized eastern Congo's two largest cities earlier this year, with the advance leaving thousands dead and raising concerns of an all-out regional war. African leaders along with Washington and Doha have been trying to broker a peace deal. Congo, the UN and Western powers accuse Rwanda of supporting M23 by sending troops and weapons. Rwanda has long denied helping M23, saying its forces were acting in self-defence against Congo's army and ethnic Hutu militiamen linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide that killed around 1 million people, mostly ethnic Tutsis. US President Donald Trump's administration hopes to strike a peace accord between Congo and Rwanda that would also facilitate billions in Western investment in the region, which is rich in minerals including tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper and lithium. ECCAS was established in the 1980s to foster cooperation in areas like security and economic affairs among its member states.
