Gulf sovereign fund assets set to hit $18 trillion by 2030
Spearheaded by the UAE's three major funds, Gulf Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) are emerging as key players in the global investment arena.
With total assets under management projected to soar from $12 trillion at the end of 2024 to $18 trillion by 2030, these funds are set to redefine the global investment landscape.
At the forefront are five formidable entities: the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (Adia), Mubadala, Abu Dhabi Developmental Holding Company, Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF), and the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA). Together, they dominate regional investment activities, showcasing the Gulf's growing influence on the global stage.
A remarkable trend accompanying this growth is the rise of Royal Private Offices (RPOs), which now control around $500 billion in assets. According to a Deloitte report, these RPOs have become essential in shaping the future of sovereign wealth funds in the region. They often mirror the activities of established funds, blurring the lines between state-controlled entities and private family offices. This trend has led to the creation of new funds linked to influential families, further diversifying the Gulf's investment portfolio.
The report highlights that Gulf SWFs have been on an aggressive investment spree, deploying $82 billion in 2023 alone and another $55 billion in the first nine months of 2024. With approximately 40 per cent of global SWF assets under their control, and six of the ten largest funds worldwide, these entities are not just participants — they are reshaping investment strategies amid intensifying competition.
Julie Kassab, Deloitte's sovereign wealth fund leader for the Middle East, underscores the Gulf region's pivotal role: 'We are witnessing these funds not only expand their geographical footprint but also significantly enhance their internal capabilities. They are setting new standards for performance and governance.'
A significant shift in focus is evident as Gulf funds increasingly invest in fast-growing markets outside traditional Western economies. With an eye on Asia, they are establishing offices in the Asia-Pacific region and ramping up allocations to burgeoning economies such as China, India, and Southeast Asia. Notably, Gulf SWFs have invested an estimated $9.5 billion in China in the year ending September 2024, positioning themselves as key players in a market where Western investors are pulling back.
Africa is another frontier of interest, particularly in the mining sector, as Gulf states look to capitalise on high-risk extractive ventures. The UAE and Saudi Arabia are actively investing in this area, both directly and through multinational mining firms, signaling their readiness to explore new opportunities.
As competition intensifies, Gulf SWFs are under pressure to enhance their performance and risk management practices. Many are adopting a more proactive stance, seeking better reporting from portfolio companies and asserting influence at the board level. This drive for excellence has also intensified the competition for talent, with Gulf funds employing around 9,000 professionals and offering attractive packages to lure seasoned experts from established global funds.
However, the global landscape is shifting towards protectionism, particularly in developing economies. Governments are reassessing their strategies regarding strategic assets, leading to the emergence of domestically focused funds that aim to co-invest alongside international partners rather than compete directly with Gulf players.
Deloitte also notes a growing trend toward protectionism globally, particularly in developing economies, where governments are reassessing their approach to strategic assets. This shift has led to the creation of new domestically focused funds, often designed to co-invest alongside international partners rather than compete directly with established Middle Eastern players.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fintech News ME
14 hours ago
- Fintech News ME
Global Islamic Finance Grows 14.9%, Reaches US$3.9 Trillion in Total Assets
In 2024, the global Islamic financial services industry continued to expand, growing by 14.9% year-on-year (YoY) to reach US$3.88 trillion in total assets, according to a new report by the Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB). Growth was observed across all major sectors, including Islamic banking, Islamic insurance, and sukuk, which are Islamic financial certificates, similar to bonds in Western finance, highlighting deepening market participation, and expanding geographic reach, especially in non-traditional markets. In 2024, total assets in Islamic banking grew by 17.05%, marking a significant increase. The segment remained the cornerstone of the industry, accounting for 71.6% of Islamic finance assets. Although assets remained concentrated in mature, systemically significant jurisdictions, there were signs of growing momentum in emerging markets, particularly in Africa and Central Asia. The Islamic capital markets also delivered strong gains, driven primarily by a surge in sukuk issuance. Global sukuk issuances rose by a remarkable 25.6% to reach US$230.4 billion, making it the fastest-growing segment in 2024. Sukuk outstanding accounted for 23.3% of total Islamic finance assets, further reflecting favorable financing conditions and growing demand from both sovereign and corporate issuers Within the Islamic capital markets still, the Islamic funds industry also recorded growth, with total assets under management (AUM) increasing by 9.2% to US$193.6 billion. This increase was largely supported by robust performance in global equity markets, and marked a recovery following a decline in 2023. Islamic insurance, referred to as takaful, recorded asset growth of 16.9% and an increase of 15.4% in gross written contributions. Despite the significant increase, the industry continued to account for a small portion of the market, accounting for 1.4% of the global Islamic finance assets. The report highlights that while traditional markets continue to dominate Islamic finance, the industry is steadily expanding into non-traditional regions. As of the end-of-year 2024, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region accounted for the largest share of global Islamic finance assets at 53.1%. This was followed by East Asia and the Pacific (EAP) with 21.9%, driven by Malaysia and Indonesia's well-established Islamic finance ecosystems. The Middle East and North Africa (MENA, excluding GCC) contributed 16.9%, while other regions such as Europe and Central Asia (ECA), South Asia (SA), and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) held relatively small shares, but represent emerging growth frontiers. The rise of Islamic fintech In addition to traditional growth drivers, fintech is another trend that's driving structural shifts within the Islamic finance, offering new avenues for growth, efficiency, and financial inclusion. For example, digital financing platforms, including Islamic equity crowdfunding and peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, are emerging as important sources of financing, particularly for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and underserved market segments. Cryptocurrency-related activity is also growing in popularity within the Islamic finance landscape covering trading, investments, and tokenization. Examples include Rain and CoinMENA, two crypto exchanges licensed by the Central Bank of Bahrain which offer crypto trading and custodial services that meet Islamic standards. Artificial intelligence (AI) is also gaining ground in Islamic finance, with institutions increasingly deploying the technology. An IFSB survey as part of the report highlighted identity verification (67%), chatbots and virtual assistance (56%), and digital footprint analysis (44%), as the most common uses of AI among Islamic banks. Despite benefits including improved operational efficiencies, customer experiences, and new business opportunities, technology also introduces new risks. Digital financing platforms and crypto-related solutions, for example, require close attention to issues of investor protection, sufficient transparency and disclosure, and appropriate Sharia governance frameworks. Finally, the adoption of AI introduces a unique set of risks. One particular concern is the potential lack of interpretative judgment in AI systems when applied to complex Sharia rulings and jurisprudential differences across jurisdictions. Moreover, the opaque and evolving nature of AI models poses significant challenges for supervisory authorities and Sharia boards in exercising effective oversight and informed judgment. Islamic finance outlook The Islamic fintech sector was valued at US$138 billion 2024. It's projected to exceed US$300 billion by 2027. Standard Chartered projects that the global Islamic finance sector will grow by 36% between 2024 and 2028, with sukuk outstanding expected to surge 54.5% and Islamic banking by 30%. The bank, which surveyed 26 leaders from various Islamic banking providers in Q1 2025, revealed a positive outlook for the industry, with 87% of respondents holding an optimistic view of the sector over the next five to ten years. The majority expect significant growth and expansion, along with increased adoption and innovation of Islamic finance products and services. Economies including China, the Middle East, and Africa are expected to offer the greatest opportunities over the next two to three years.
Dubai Eye
a day ago
- Dubai Eye
Rwanda quits Central African bloc in dispute with Congo
Rwanda has said it would withdraw from the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS), underscoring diplomatic tensions in the region over an offensive this year by Rwanda-backed M23 rebels in eastern Congo. Kigali had expected to assume the chairmanship of the 11-member bloc at a meeting on Saturday in Equatorial Guinea. Instead, the bloc kept Equatorial Guinea in the role, which Rwanda's foreign ministry denounced as a violation of its rights. Rwanda, in a statement, condemned Congo's "instrumentalization" of the bloc and saw "no justification for remaining in an organization whose current functioning runs counter to its founding principles." It wasn't clear if Rwanda's exit from the bloc would take immediate effect. The office of Congolese President Felix Tshisekedi said in a statement that ECCAS members had "acknowledged the aggression against the Democratic Republic of Congo by Rwanda and ordered the aggressor country to withdraw its troops from Congolese soil." M23 seized eastern Congo's two largest cities earlier this year, with the advance leaving thousands dead and raising concerns of an all-out regional war. African leaders along with Washington and Doha have been trying to broker a peace deal. Congo, the UN and Western powers accuse Rwanda of supporting M23 by sending troops and weapons. Rwanda has long denied helping M23, saying its forces were acting in self-defence against Congo's army and ethnic Hutu militiamen linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide that killed around 1 million people, mostly ethnic Tutsis. US President Donald Trump's administration hopes to strike a peace accord between Congo and Rwanda that would also facilitate billions in Western investment in the region, which is rich in minerals including tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper and lithium. ECCAS was established in the 1980s to foster cooperation in areas like security and economic affairs among its member states.
Arabian Post
3 days ago
- Arabian Post
Middle East Debt Surges as External Influence Deepens
The debt burden across the Middle East and North Africa has escalated markedly over the last decade, with many governments relying heavily on borrowing to sustain public spending amid economic challenges. This growing fiscal strain, combined with an increasing dependence on external donor funding, has amplified the influence of foreign actors on both domestic policies and regional geopolitics, raising concerns about the long-term economic sovereignty of these states. State borrowing in the MENA region has expanded substantially due to a combination of declining oil revenues, rising public expenditures, and the economic fallout from global disruptions. Countries that historically relied on hydrocarbon wealth to finance budgets have faced persistent pressures to diversify revenue sources, but with uneven success. The persistence of conflict, political instability, and the lingering impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have exacerbated fiscal deficits, pushing governments to turn to international lenders and multilateral institutions more frequently. The Gulf Cooperation Council members, traditionally seen as relatively debt-resilient, have witnessed a gradual uptick in sovereign borrowing. For instance, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have issued substantial sovereign bonds in international markets to fund large infrastructure projects under their economic diversification agendas. Nonetheless, their debt-to-GDP ratios remain relatively contained compared to other MENA nations. Meanwhile, countries like Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon have accumulated debt at levels that alarm economists and credit rating agencies. Egypt's public debt has exceeded 90% of GDP, while Lebanon remains mired in a sovereign debt crisis, with its economy contracting sharply and international lenders demanding stringent reforms. ADVERTISEMENT The rise in borrowing often comes with conditions attached by international creditors, including the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, as well as bilateral donors such as the European Union, the United States, and Gulf allies. These conditions frequently mandate structural reforms, austerity measures, and adjustments in subsidy programmes that affect large segments of the population. Such fiscal tightening has stirred public discontent and occasionally sparked protests, underscoring the delicate balance governments must strike between fiscal responsibility and social stability. The reliance on donor funding has widened the scope for foreign influence in national decision-making. Some nations find themselves aligning their foreign policies to appease key donors, ensuring continued financial assistance. This alignment manifests in diplomatic stances, regional alliances, and participation in international coalitions, sometimes at odds with local priorities or public opinion. For example, the strategic partnerships between Gulf states and Western powers have intensified, with financial aid often linked to military cooperation or counterterrorism initiatives. Beyond geopolitics, the conditionality of donor funding can limit the policy options available to governments, constraining economic strategies and reform agendas. This external pressure has raised questions about sovereignty and the capacity of states to chart independent development paths. Economists warn that a cycle of debt dependence could undermine the very economic growth that these countries seek, trapping them in a cycle of borrowing and reform fatigue. The structural challenges that fuel debt accumulation in MENA are multifaceted. Demographic pressures, with a large youth population entering the job market, heighten the demand for public services and employment opportunities. However, the private sector remains underdeveloped in many countries, unable to absorb the expanding labour force or generate sufficient revenue to alleviate public finances. High unemployment rates and income disparities compound the strain on state budgets, forcing governments to maintain subsidies on essentials such as fuel, electricity, and food, which constitute significant fiscal burdens. Energy transition trends and volatile global markets further complicate the fiscal landscape. The drive towards renewable energy and reduced reliance on fossil fuels threatens to erode the traditional income bases of hydrocarbon-exporting countries. While some Gulf states have embraced ambitious clean energy projects and economic diversification, the transition carries upfront costs that add to borrowing needs. Non-GCC nations that rely on oil and gas revenues for budgetary support face more acute vulnerabilities, with fluctuating commodity prices directly impacting their fiscal stability. ADVERTISEMENT Policy experts advocate for enhanced fiscal reforms focused on broadening the tax base, improving public financial management, and fostering private sector growth. Greater regional cooperation on debt restructuring and coordinated economic policies could also alleviate pressures. Yet, political instability and entrenched governance challenges hamper implementation efforts in several countries. Transparency and accountability deficits remain a significant obstacle to efficient debt management and the effective use of external funds. International financial institutions have called for a balanced approach to lending and aid, one that supports immediate fiscal needs while promoting sustainable development. This includes encouraging greater domestic resource mobilisation and reducing reliance on donor funding in the medium term. Failure to address these issues risks escalating debt distress and diminished policy autonomy, with potentially destabilising repercussions for the entire region.
