Fires rage 2 days after Iran port blast killed 46
The blast took place on Saturday at Shahid Rajaee Port in Iran's south near the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a waterway through which one-fifth of global oil output passes.
'The death toll in the Shahid Rajaee Port fire has reached 46,' the official IRNA news agency reported, quoting Mehrdad Hassanzadeh, the crisis management director for Hormozgan province.
Officials had said more than 1,000 people were injured but Hassanzadeh said most have now been released after treatment.
Only '138 wounded are still in hospital,' he said.
Iran's state TV showed images of firefighters dousing the flames, and said the damage will be assessed after the fire is fully brought under control.
Death toll from blast at Iran's Bandar Abbas port rises to 40
Heavy charcoal-black smoke continued to billow over low flames at part of the site, above which a firefighting helicopter flew, pictures from the Iranian Red Crescent showed.
It was not immediately clear what caused the explosion but the port's customs office said it likely resulted from a fire that broke out at the hazardous and chemical materials storage depot.
Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ordered a probe into the incident to determine if there was 'any negligence or intent'.
Smoke, then a fireball
CCTV images on social media showed the incident began gradually, with a small fire and orange-brown smoke before a fireball erupted.
The images appeared to show the small fire starting among a few containers stacked outside across from a warehouse. A small forklift truck drove past the smoking area and men walked nearby.
About one minute and eight seconds after the small fire and smoke were visible, a fireball erupted as vehicles passed nearby. Men ran for their lives.
President Masoud Pezeshkian on Sunday visited hospitals treating the wounded in the nearby city of Bandar Abbas. Since the explosion, authorities have ordered all schools and offices in the area closed and urged residents to avoid going outside 'until further notice' and to use protective masks.
The New York Times quoted a person with ties to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss security matters, as saying that what exploded was sodium perchlorate – a major ingredient in solid fuel for missiles.
Defence ministry spokesman Reza Talaei-Nik later told state TV that 'there has been no imported or exported cargo for military fuel or military use in the area'.
Russia dispatched specialists to help battle the blazes.
Authorities have declared Monday a national day of mourning, while three days of mourning began Sunday in Hormozgan province, where the port is located.
The blast occurred as Iranian and US delegations met in Oman for high-level talks on Tehran's nuclear programme, with both sides reporting progress.
While Iranian authorities so far appear to be treating the blast as an accident, it also comes against the backdrop of years of shadow war with regional foe Israel.
According to The Washington Post, Israel launched a cyberattack targeting the Shahid Rajaee Port in 2020.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
UAP railway line: ‘Suez Canal' of Asia?
The Suez Canal changed the geopolitical and geo-economic landscape of the world. Before the Suez Canal, South Africa was vital as a pit stop for every ship going to Europe - Asia route. After the Suez Canal, South Africa's prominence fell in favour of Egypt. Today, Iran is in shoes of South Africa, and after construction of Uzbekistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan (UAP) Railway Line, Pakistan can become Egypt for Central Asia. UAP promises to cut five days journey to the Arabian Sea as compared to the current Iranian route taken by Central Asian Republics. But there is a fine print, a technical hitch you may say, which can prevent this. Every time a train crosses a border, it literally falls off the tracks. That's the fate of cargo when two mismatched gauges meet—a phenomenon called 'break of gauge.' For the Uzbekistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan (UAP) Railway, gauge choice isn't a dry technicality: it's the very fulcrum of who wins the next Great Game in Central Asia. When two rail networks of different widths collide, freight must be unloaded from one set of wagons and shifted onto another. That process adds labour, equipment and handling time at every border crossing. For a single container, transshipment can tack on 12–24 hours and 10–20 percent extra cost before it even rolls on to the next country. Today's proposed trans-Afghan link threads through three incompatible systems: Uzbekistan's 1520 mm Russian gauge, Iran's 1435 mm standard gauge in western Afghanistan and Pakistan's 1676 mm broad gauge. At each frontier lies a breakpoint where goods stall and wallets bleed. In the 19th-century Great Game, break of gauge was weaponized to define imperial spheres of influence. Afghanistan, determined to remain neutral, refused rail construction altogether—so neither Britain nor Russia could rush troops or supplies across Herat or Kandahar. The result was freedom from invasion, but also from the trade boom rails brought elsewhere. Fast-forward to today: Iran has laid standard-gauge track into Herat and is pressing Kabul to adopt 1435 mm nationwide (including UAP railway line). From Bandar Abbas and Chabahar, Iranian exports could slide uninterrupted over Afghan steel all the way to Central Asia. Gwadar and Karachi would be sidelined. With no break of gauge, Iranian goods will undercut Pakistani exporters by virtue of lower handling fees and faster delivery. Afghan and Uzbek/Central Asian markets—hungry for textiles, machinery and staples—would shift their sourcing to Tehran. A standard gauge in Afghanistan for UAP railway line would be most detrimental to Pakistani interests as unloading/loading of cargo from trains would be done twice at TWO break of gauge points, i.e. between Pakistan-Afghanistan and Afghanistan-Uzbekistan border crossing points. This would make our trading goods uncompetitive to Iran and Pakistan's historical trading links would fray, and our ports' promise as regional gateways would dim. Some propose instead a full Russian-gauge corridor from Peshawar through Kandahar to Tashkent. That vision courts seamless freight to Moscow and beyond. But we must ask: did Pakistan invest in UAP railway line to feed Russia, or to empower our exporters in Punjab and Sindh for Central Asia and Afghanistan? Ambitions of a Russia-Europe freight pipeline risk burying Pakistan's immediate interests under distant geopolitical dreams. China and Turkey already dominate Eurasian corridors—our few wagons would be lost in the avalanche of cargo from the north. By contrast, extending Pakistan's broad gauge straight through Afghanistan creates a single uninterrupted artery from Karachi's port terminals to Uzbekistan's markets. No off-loads at Quetta or Mazar-i-Sharif; no extra crew shifts at Kabul; just one continuous steel ribbon to Termez (Uzbekistan). Broad gauge also carries heavier axle loads—up to 25 tonnes per axle, versus 22 tonnes on standard gauge—boosting per-train payloads by 10–15 percent. Eliminating break-of-gauge can cut per-ton freight costs by at least 20 percent, according to World Bank estimates for similar corridors. Those savings translate into cheaper fertiliser for Punjab farmers, cheaper cotton for our industry and more competitive textiles for European buyers. Rail corridors aren't just tracks—they are instruments of influence. A broad-gauge UAP railway positions Pakistan as the indispensable gateway to Central Asia, deepens Islamabad's diplomatic clout, and anchors Kabul within our economic orbit. It strengthens our ambition of integrated regional prosperity, linking Gwadar, Karachi and Lahore to Central Asia. Gauge choice is never just steel and sleepers—it's a statement of intent. Enforcing broad gauge railway line cements Pakistan's role as the region's commercial hub, preserves our competitive edge and ensures that UAP rail serves Pakistani trade interests first. As the Great Game enters its 21st-century chapter, let's not let another strategic detail, or hitch, derail our future. Let's make this Suez Canal work for us, instead of serving others. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Global condolences pour in as floods devastate Pakistan
A woman walks past a damaged vehicle following heavy rain and floods in Buner district in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, Pakistan, August 16, 2025. Photo: Reuters Several countries, including Saudi Arabia, Iran, Russia and Kuwait, have extended condolences and expressed solidarity with Pakistan in the wake of catastrophic monsoon floods that have left at least 313 people dead and caused widespread devastation in parts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P). In a statement issued on Saturday, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia conveyed the Kingdom's "sincere condolences and sympathy" to the government and people of Pakistan over the loss of lives caused by floods and torrential rains. The ministry reaffirmed Riyadh's solidarity with Pakistan during this difficult time and expressed its support for the bereaved families, wishing the injured a swift recovery. Read More: PDMA warns of more rains after 313 dead in K-P floods Separately, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian also expressed his country's solidarity with Pakistan following the deadly floods. In an official message to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, President Pezeshkian extended 'the sincere sympathy of the Iranian government and people' and emphasised Tehran's readiness to provide humanitarian aid and relief assistance to help alleviate the suffering of those affected. Russia has also expressed deep sorrow and condolences over the loss of lives caused by recent floods in Pakistan. Russian President Vladimir Putin, in a letter addressed to President Asif Ali Zardari, expressed sorrow over the tragic loss of life in K-P. He conveyed heartfelt condolences to the families of the deceased and wished the injured a speedy recovery while extending his best wishes to the affected communities. Meanwhile, Kuwait's Foreign Minister Abdullah Al-Yahya called Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Senator Mohammad Ishaq Dar to convey the condolences of Crown Prince Sabah Al-Khalid Al-Sabah over the tragic loss of lives and damage caused by the recent floods. The Kuwaiti foreign minister assured that the government and the people of Kuwait stood ready to extend all possible support to Pakistan during this challenging time. Read: Curfew imposed in parts of Bajaur amid anti-terror operation Senator Dar expressed gratitude for Kuwait's gesture and noted that both leaders looked forward to meeting during the upcoming Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) Council of Foreign Ministers (CFM) session in Jeddah later this month. The current monsoon spell has led to widespread flash flooding, landslides, and infrastructure damage across several districts of K-P, prompting emergency response measures by the military, Frontier Corps, and disaster management authorities. The K-P Relief Department has declared an emergency in the districts of Swat, Battagram, Bajaur, Torghar, Mansehra, Shangla, Lower Dir, Upper Dir, and Kohistan, which will remain in effect from August 15 to August 31, 2025.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Iran's rulers face existential choice
Photo: Iranian flag flies in front of the UN office building, housing IAEA headquarters, in Vienna, Austria, May 24, 2021. REUTERS Weakened by war and diplomatic deadlock, Iran's clerical elite stands at a crossroads: defy pressure to halt its nuclear activity and risk further Israeli and US attack, or concede and risk a leadership fracture. For now, the Islamic Republic establishment is focusing on immediate survival over longer-term political strategy. A fragile ceasefire ended a 12-day war in June that began with Israeli air strikes, followed by US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. Both sides declared victory but the war exposed the military vulnerabilities and punctured the image of deterrence maintained by a major Middle East power and Israel's arch regional foe. Three Iranian insiders told Reuters the political establishment now views negotiations with the US — aimed at resolving a decades-long dispute over its nuclear ambitions — as the only way to avoid further escalation and existential peril. The strikes on Iranian nuclear and military targets, which included killings of top Revolutionary Guard commanders and nuclear scientists, shocked Tehran, kicking off just a day before a planned sixth round of talks with Washington. While Tehran accused Washington of "betraying diplomacy", some hardline lawmakers and military commanders blamed officials who advocated diplomacy with Washington, arguing the dialogue proved a "strategic trap" that distracted the armed forces. However, one political insider, who like others requested anonymity given the sensitivity of the matter, said the leadership now leaned towards talks as "they've seen the cost of military confrontation". President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Sunday that resuming talks with the United States "does not mean we intend to surrender", addressing hardliners opposing further nuclear diplomacy after the war. He added: "You don't want to talk? What do you want to do? ... Do you want to go (back) to war?" His remarks were criticised by hardliners including Revolutionary Guards commander Aziz Ghazanfari, who warned that foreign policy demands discretion and that careless statements could have serious consequences. Ultimately, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei holds the final say. Insiders said he and the clerical power structure had reached a consensus to resume nuclear negotiations, viewing them as vital to the Islamic Republic's survival. Iran's Foreign Ministry said no decision has been made on the resumption of nuclear talks.
