Scoop: Sponsors drop out of Columbus Pride
Why it matters: Once-proud corporate America is pivoting. The impacts of diversity, equity and inclusion rollbacks nationwide are being felt locally, involving businesses big and small.
By the numbers: The Columbus sponsor losses total over $100,000, or about a fifth of the budget needed to put on next month's Pride events, executive director Densil R. Porteous tells Axios.
A $276,000 grant from the Franklin County Commission awarded in February will fill the gap.
The latest: An official 2025 sponsor list will likely be posted on Stonewall's website within the next week.
Porteous confirmed Anheuser-Busch, Nissan, Lowe's and Walmart— all of which supported Pride events in 2024 — are not sponsors this year.
Organizers were optimistic earlier in 2025 that companies would continue their support.
Some smaller businesses are also withdrawing due to the political climate, Porteous says.
Between the lines: Anheuser-Busch and the others have publicly scaled back their DEI commitments in the past year amid pressure from the federal government.
What they're saying: Porteous called Anheuser-Busch's departure "a little bit heartbreaking."
But he noted that corporate moves don't necessarily reflect how a company's local employees feel about the LGBTQ+ community — and associates of any company are still welcome at Pride, representing themselves.
Anheuser-Busch did not return an email from Axios seeking comment.
The big picture: Stonewall Columbus is a year-round community center that relies on partners for support beyond just one-time parade advertisers, and many are sticking around.
What we're watching: Organizers still expect 700,000 people to attend festivities over the June 13-14 weekend, themed "United in Power."
The current climate — including anti-LGBTQ+ policies at the state and federal level — is a reminder of why Pride events originally started after the 1969 Stonewall Uprising, Porteous says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
The Spectator to double print for U.S. edition
The Spectator's U.S. edition plans to double its print output to 24 issues annually as part of a broader relaunch this fall, its deputy editor Kate Andrews tells Axios. Why it matters: It's part of an industrywide print revival in the U.S. as publishers look for more ways to upsell jaded digital advertisers in the AI era. It also comes after other U.K.-based publishers like The Guardian, Reach, Financial Times, Hello! magazine, The Sun and The Daily Mail look to expand deeper into the U.S. Zoom in: For The Spectator, which launched a U.S. print version in 2019, reader demand for more print products has been significant, per Andrews. "We find that when we offer print as part of a package (or events for our subscribers), it tends to attract new readers," Andrews said. In addition to doubling its subscription print offering, The Spectator U.S. will also bring its print product to newsstands this fall. Between the lines: For advertisers, subscription print magazines offer a highly engaged audience that's hard to come by in the AI era. Like other digital-first outlets, The Spectator U.S. has seen advertising demand increase as the digital universe becomes crowded. "We do find that in marketing, some kind of print product helps us in every other aspect," Andrews said, referring to the ability to upsell advertisers. Zoom out: Andrews said the outlet has upsized its New York and Washington, D.C., offices in preparation for a significant increase in hiring and events. The big picture: Several publishers, including The Onion, The Cut, Complex, Nylon, Spin, Us Weekly, Swimming World, Sports Illustrated, Saveur and Ebony, have all launched or relaunched print editions amid reader and advertiser demand.
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
How North Korea's IT army is hacking the global job market
Nearly every Fortune 500 company is hiding the same uncomfortable secret: they have hired a North Korean IT worker. Why it matters: Despite how widespread the issue is, few companies are willing to talk publicly about it. Experts say reputational risk, legal uncertainty, and embarrassment all contribute to the silence — which in turn makes the problem harder to solve. Dozens of resumes, LinkedIn profiles, and fraudulent identity documents shared with Axios lay bare the scale and sophisticated of the scams. The big picture: For North Korea, this is a precious revenue stream that evades American sanctions — capitalizing on the wealth of high-paying remote worker roles in the U.S. to route cash back to Pyongyang. In the past two years, companies and their security partners have begun to grasp the scale of the problem — and now, they're sounding the alarm about where it's headed next. "They've been stealing intellectual property and then working on the projects themselves," Michael "Barni" Barnhart, principal investigator at DTEX Systems, told Axios. "They're going to use AI to magnify exponentially what they're already doing — and what they're doing now is bad." Between the lines: It sounds easy to simply weed out North Korean job applicants. But some of the world's biggest firms have found it devilishly difficult. That's because the North Korean operation has become as complex as a multi-national corporation. It involves several North Korean government offices, dozens of China-based front companies and Americans willing to facilitate the fraud. And the undercover North Korean IT workers are often exceptional at their jobs — at least until they start stealing sensitive data or extorting companies that try to fire them. Google Threat Intelligence VP Sandra Joyce recalled the response of one employer when told they likely had a North Korean fraudster on staff: "You guys better be right, because that is my best guy." The groups running the show North Korea has invested years into building up its remote IT labor force, providing training not just for remote job fraud but also corporate espionage and IP theft. Workers are selected and trained at elite institutions such as Kim Chaek University of Technology and the University of Sciences in Pyongsong — some with specializations in software development, AI or cryptography. Research from DTEX shows that the most advanced worker scams are often coordinated with units like APT 45, a notorious government hacking group known for infiltrating companies, running scams and laundering money. Other participants in the scheme include the Lazarus Group, which typically leads the regime's cryptocurrency hacks and has positioned insiders within crypto companies, and Research Center 227, a new AI research unit inside North Korea's intelligence agency. The intrigue: Cybersecurity companies have been discovering and naming new groups running these hacks, with names like Jasper Sleet, Moonstone Sleet and Famous Chollima. The scale Driving the news: Nine security officials who spoke with Axios all said they've yet to meet a Fortune 500 company that hasn't inadvertently hired a North Korean IT worker. Google told reporters at the RSA Conference in May that it had seen North Koreans applying to its jobs. SentinelOne and others have said the same. KnowBe4, a cybersecurity training company, admitted last year that it hired a North Korean IT worker. A smaller cryptocurrency startup told the WSJ that they accidentally had North Korean workers on their payroll for almost two years. In one case, Sam Rubin, senior vice president of Palo Alto Networks' Unit 42 consulting and threat intelligence team, told Axios that within 12 hours of a large client posting a new job, more than 90% of the applicants were suspected to be North Korean workers. "If you hire contract IT workers, this has probably happened to you," Rubin said. The intrigue: Even small-to-mid-sized companies that rely on remote IT talent or outsource their IT needs to a consulting firm have encountered this problem, Adam Meyers, senior vice president of counter adversary operations at CrowdStrike, said. CrowdStrike has investigated more than 320 incidents where North Korean operatives landed jobs as remote software developers, according to the company's annual threat hunting report published earlier this month. How it works Getting a job at a U.S. company — and going undetected — is a team effort that involves several North Korean IT workers, China-based companies and even a handful of Americans. Some of the North Korean workers are even stationed in China and other nearby countries to keep suspicions low. First, the workers identify potential identities they can assume. Those are often stolen from a real person, or even from a dead U.S. citizen. To pull off this deception, they create fake passwords, Social Security cards and utility bills. Many of them use the same recognizable tablecloth in the background of fake ID photos, Meyers said. For instance, in a December indictment of 14 North Koreans, the workers were found using stolen identities to apply to dozens of jobs. Second, the workers find open jobs in software development, technical support and DevOps posted on Upwork, Fiverr, LinkedIn, and third-party staffing platforms. Much of this is streamlined through AI tools that help track and manage their job applications. Many of them will use AI tools to help generate passable resumes and LinkedIn profiles, according to Trevor Hilligoss, senior vice president at SpyCloud Labs. "There's a hierarchy: There's a group of people who are the interviewers, and they're the ones with the really good English specialties," Hilligoss told Axios. "When they get hired, that gets turned over to somebody that's a developer." Those developers will often juggle several jobs and multiple different personas. Zoom in: Job interviews would seem like the obvious time to catch a fraudulent application. But the "applicants" — whether they're using their real faces and voices or AI-enabled personas — are practiced interviewers with the skills necessary to complete technical coding assignments. In multiple cases, hiring managers only realized something was wrong weeks later when employees looked or behaved differently than during the interview, Barnhart said. After landing the job, the developers step in and request that their company laptop be shipped to a U.S. address — often citing a last-minute move or family emergency. That address often belongs to an American accomplice, who typically operates what's known as a "laptop farm." These facilitators are told to install specific remote desktop software onto the laptops so the North Korean worker can operate the laptop from abroad. In July, the FBI said it executed searchers of 21 premises across 14 states that were known or suspected laptop farms, seizing 137 laptops. Then there's the challenge of ensuring the salaries actually reach the North Korean regime. That often requires the facilitators forward the paychecks to front companies across China or funnel it through cryptocurrency exchanges. In a report published in May, researchers at Strider Technologies identified 35 China-based companies linked to helping North Korean operations. Challenges Hiring processes are so siloed that it's difficult for managers to see all the signs of fraud until the North Korean workers start their roles, Kern said. Even if a company suspects something is wrong, the forensic signals can be subtle and scattered. Security teams may detect unusual remote access tools or strange browser behavior. HR might notice recycled references or resumes that reuse the same phone number. But unless those insights are pooled together, it rarely raises alarms. "There's not one giant red flag to point to," said Sarah Kern, a leading North Korea analyst at Sophos' Counter Threat Unit. "It is multiple technical forensic aspects and then such a human aspect of small things to pick up on that aren't necessarily going to be in telemetry data from an endpoint detection standpoint." Yes, but: Even when these workers are detected, they're not easy to fire. Many of them are so talented that managers are reluctant to even believe they could actually be in North Korea, Alexandra Rose, director at Sophos' Counter Threat Unit, told Axios. If these workers are caught, employers then face a litany of problems: Some workers will download sensitive internal data and extort the companies for a hefty sum in a last-ditch effort to bleed the company of whatever money they can. Some workers have filed legal complaints, including workers' compensation claims, Barnhart said. In one case, Barnhart said he had a worker try to claim domestic violence protections as they were being fired just to buy time. "There is a lot of focus on companies that cybersecurity shouldn't just be for the CISO," Rose said. "You want a bit of that security feel throughout the company, and this is the kind of case that really demonstrates why that is." The bottom line: Some companies also hesitate to report these incidents, fearing they could be penalized for unknowingly violating U.S. sanctions — even though law enforcement officials have said they're more interested in cooperation than prosecution. What's next Right now, the operations are predominantly focused on making money for North Korea's regime. Threat level: But the hacking groups involved are evolving into something more sophisticated and dangerous — including by potentially building their own AI models and feeding in sensitive U.S. company data. That's a particular concern in the defense sector. Barnhart says his teams have seen North Korean IT workers increasingly studying information about AI technologies, drone manufacturing and other defense contract work. What to watch: As U.S. companies become more alert, North Korean IT workers are shifting their focus abroad as they seek employment at other companies and set up laptop farms throughout Europe — suggesting the operation is only just now ramping up, instead of slowing down.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Budweiser maker invests $15 million in St. Louis brewery
American beer maker Anheuser-Busch, which produces Budweiser, Bud Light, and Michelob ULTRA, is spending $15 million on its flagship St. Louis brewery as part of its larger $300 million U.S. manufacturing investment. The capital will fund supply-chain infrastructure to bring 'American-grown ingredients' to its brewery and transport its beers to customers, Anheuser-Busch said in a release Tuesday. The brewer is owned by AB InBev, which is headquartered in Leuven, Belgium. Its stock is up more than 1% as of 10:40 a.m. Eastern on Tuesday. President Donald Trump has repeatedly said he wants companies to move manufacturing to the U.S., and Apple, IBM, and Amazon have already promised to spend billions towards U.S. production. Anheuser-Busch's announced in May that it would spend more than $300 million in 2025 to create and sustain manufacturing jobs in the U.S. Its $15 million investment comes days after a manufacturing production report from the Federal Reserve showed no growth in July, hinting at a potential future decline in U.S.-based manufacturing production as tariffs squeeze costs. Anheuser-Busch has already poured some of its planned $300 million investment into its operations in Baldwinsville, NY; Houston, TX; Columbus, OH; Ft. Collins, CO; and Williamsburg, VA. "This latest investment not only supports local jobs and opportunities for our hardworking families, but also reinforces Missouri's position as a leader in American innovation and industry,' Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe said in the release. He added, 'With the passage of the American Beer Act, we've created an environment that empowers brewers like Anheuser-Busch to thrive, expand, and strengthen our economy." The American Beer Act in Missouri lowered the tax on malt liquors manufactured in U.S. breweries from $1.86 per barrel to $0.62 per barrel starting next year. Kehoe signed the act into law at Anheuser-Busch St. Louis brewery, the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association said. Alongside its $15 million investment, the beer maker said it's expanding access to its Technical Excellence Center training facility in St. Louis to local trade schools and groups, thanks to a partnership with the National Association of Manufacturers' Manufacturing Institute. It said this is the first time anyone other than its own workforce will use its training facility. The facility opened in 2022 and offers over 35 courses. Anheuser-Busch said it has trained more than 2,000 workers since then. The brewer added that it is 'expanding its adoption' of a digital credentialing system to help veterans acquire manufacturing skills. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
