From Ukraine to migration - four European Parliament debates to follow this week
Military aid to Ukraine, migrant returns and reduction of bureaucracy on the table for MEPs.
ADVERTISEMENT
Amid growing tensions between Europe and the US, and between two crucial summits of EU leaders on defence, MEPs are heading to Strasbourg for a plenary session packed with controversial debates. Here is a selection of the most interesting topics to follow.
Military aid to Ukraine
On Wednesday, March 12, MEPs will vote on a resolution urging the EU to maintain its support for Ukraine, even if the United States withdraws its backing. The resolution, which is non-legislative, also focuses on European contributions to the security guarantees needed to ensure peace in Ukraine after the war—an issue on which EU Member States remain deeply divided.
Beyond this vote, several debates related to the Russian war in Ukraine are scheduled. On Tuesday morning, MEPs will assess the outcome of the March 6 Special European Council, while in the afternoon, discussions will centre on the upcoming white paper on the future of European defence, set to be unveiled soon by the Commission.
Wednesday's agenda includes two debates: one on the use of frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine and another on the phase-out of Russian energy in EU countries.
While resolutions in favour of Ukraine generally receive broad support in the chamber, debates on the topic remain nuanced. 'We are completely against deploying European troops in Ukraine,' a spokesperson for the Patriots for Europe group said during a press conference.
Return of migrants
On Tuesday, March 11, the European Commission is set to present the so-called 'Return Directive' in Strasbourg—a new legal framework aimed at speeding up processes for repatriating rejected asylum seekers to their countries of origin.
On the same day, MEPs will give a first assessment of the proposal, which seeks to increase the return rate of third-country nationals who are not entitled to stay in the EU. Currently, only about one in four foreign nationals ordered to leave an EU member state is actually deported.
A source familiar with the matter told Euronews that the Commission's proposal will not include discussion of 'return hubs'- centres outside the EU where migrants would be hosted while awaiting repatriation. The idea has been circulating after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen raised the issue.
However, the debate is expected to be tense, with radical right-wing parties calling for swifter procedures and stricter policies to combat irregular migration, while left-leaning groups emphasise the need to uphold migrants' fundamental rights.
Reducing bureaucracy at a faster pace
On Monday, March 10, Parliament will discuss the so-called 'Omnibus Package', a recent Commission proposal aimed at cutting red tape and simplifying legislation for EU businesses and citizens.
Last week, the European People's Party (EPP), the largest group in the chamber, sent a letter to the Parliament President Roberta Metsola—seen by Euronews—requesting a fast-track procedure. The EPP's goal is to quickly approve a specific part of the package, the so-called 'Stop the Clock' proposal, which seeks to postpone certain requirements on corporate sustainability and due diligence reporting.
Metsola will announce the EPP's request at the session's opening, and the vote will take place in the next plenary session in April. However, the debate is expected to be heated, as the Socialists & Democrats (S&D) and Renew Europe are in no hurry to approve the new rules.
A possible outcome could be an alliance between the EPP and the right-wing groups European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) and Patriots for Europe (PfE)—a coalition sometimes referred to as the "Venezuela Majority."
Cross-border recognition of parenthood
On Wednesday, March 12, Parliament will debate a European Commission proposal to ensure that parenthood established in one EU member state is automatically recognised in all the others.
However, the issue remains contentious due to concerns about children born via surrogacy and those of same-sex couples. Since surrogacy and same-sex unions are regulated differently across member states, some governments resist being required to recognize parenthood established under the laws of another country.
ADVERTISEMENT
As a result, an estimated two million children risk having their parents' legal status downgraded when they move to another EU country, according to Commission data.
The proposal requires unanimous approval by the Council, but its not yet there. MEPs will press Council and Commission representatives in the chamber to explain why.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
French Senate approves ‘anti-fast-fashion' bill chiefly targeting Shein, Temu
Louwagie said that the government will notify the European Commission of this bill even before the end of the joint parliamentary committee work that will start soon, and that the government will also work on the decrees regulating the bill's application, and notably define the thresholds that will formally identify an operator as 'ultra-express' or 'ultra-fast-fashion'. Before the vote, the representatives of the various Senate groups spoke to explain their positions on the vote. An opportunity to underline for some the positive amendments made to the bill, and its weaknesses for others. Many senators welcomed the removal of a provision of the 2022 anti-waste law on unsold goods, which allowed ultra-fast-fashion operators to benefit from tax allowances when donating unsold goods to charitable associations. The re-introduction of a blanket ban on advertising for ultra-express fashion operators was also appreciated. 'This law does not prohibit, it protects by defining what is abnormal. It protects our environment and that of our children. It protects the economy and our textile industry. We can be happy we are giving ourselves the means to achieve our goals,' said Nicole Bonnefoy, representing the Socialist, Ecologist and Republican group, adding that 'we welcome the re-introduction of article three, which will form a negotiation basis for requesting an amendment to the European e-commerce directive, so that these restrictive measures can be made to apply to companies based for example in Ireland.' Although the amendments have been approved by the groups, several points still prompted strong reservations. The introduction of the term 'ultra-express fashion' has led to much teeth-gnashing among environmental associations and sustainable fashion brands, which believe that the aim of fencing in all types of fast-fashion practices is no longer being pursued. Jacques Fernique of Ecologist group Solidarité et territoires insisted on this aspect, emphasising that the various laws will not enter into force for many months yet, since they have to be examined again by the European Commission and the joint parliamentary committee, something which won't happen before the autumn. 'Today's vote is a relatively positive step. Shein, Temu and Amazon are pushing to the extreme a business model that destroys local jobs and our city centres' appeal. But both ultra-express fast fashion and fast fashion adopt the same approach, selling transient, low-cost disposable products. This bill is targeting the ultra-fast fashion explosion, but we can't see why the penalties shouldn't potentially apply to everyone.' Fernique is campaigning for provisions that would 'push back against the kind of disposable fashion sold by foreign platforms but also by French and European companies. It's sustainable fashion that we ought to promote, regardless of the nationality of who sells it.' An issue which the majority of senators did not endorse. 'This bill has set a course. It doesn't pretend to solve everything, but it intends to draw boundaries,' said Valente Le Hir, who is affiliated with the Republican group and is the bill's rapporteur in the Senate. She has advocated for the middle ground in various issues, asserting that the Senate wants to draw up a 'stronger bill, not a travesty of it. We have said it's time to limit the excesses of express fashion without penalising those who are working towards greater sustainability in the industry. [The bill] has distinguished, within a poorly understood sector, what constitutes planned overconsumption and what constitutes sustainable innovation. We've clarified the target. We've drawn a clear line between what we want to regulate, ultra-express fast fashion as embodied by platforms like Shein and Temu, and what we want to preserve, in other words affordable, locally rooted fashion that generates jobs in France, that anchors our communities, creates connections and boosts local industry.' After the government will have sent the text over to the European Commission, the latter will have three to four months to comment. And while French MPs and senators will be working within the joint parliamentary committee, the Commission's analysis and observations will play a key role in the bill's final wording and provisions. In the meantime, the lobbying efforts that have been ongoing for months are set to continue.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Clothes at what cost? French fast fashion bill puts onus on Chinese brands
France's senate passed a bill to curb advertising and tax pollution on fast fashion, with lawmakers even talking up the distinction of ultra fast fashion - garments made in a hurry - more and more using polyester and other polluting plastics, shipped at warp speed by plane and which fall apart after only a few washes. Has the bill been partially stripped bare though? The new version seems to include a carve-out for European giants that peddle cheap clothes with the focus mostly now on China. In fact, Europeans like the Trump administration are working to close the tax loophole on the kind of small parcels that go out by the millions from small garment factories in China. And while the likes of Shein and Temu enroll big names to lobby, including a former European Commissioner and a former interior minister of Emmanuel Macron, we asked who's winning the hearts and minds of consumers in this battle over an industry that represents up to ten percent of humanity's carbon footprint.
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
EU, Britain strike deal on Gibraltar's post-Brexit status
The European Union and Britain on Wednesday, June 11, sealed a "historic" deal on the status of the territory of Gibraltar, five years after Brexit. The deal will ease the flow of people and goods over the Gibraltar-Spain border, forming part of London's much-vaunted "reset" in ties with Brussels. When Britain left the EU in 2020, the relationship between Gibraltar – historically an important military base for Britain due to its position at the mouth of the Mediterranean Sea – and the bloc remained unresolved. Talks between London, Madrid, Brussels and Gibraltar on a deal had made halting progress during several rounds of negotiations under Britain's previous Conservative government, but the arrival of Labour last summer gave new impetus. EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said it was "a truly historic milestone for the European Union, including Spain, as well as for the United Kingdom and Gibraltar." "This agreement benefits everyone and will bring legal certainty and confidence to the people and businesses across the region," he said during a news conference in Brussels. He added that he was "absolutely convinced" it would be ratified by the parties because "it's a good agreement." In a statement, the four parties said the agreement would create a fluid border between Gibraltar and Spain, with no physical barriers or checks between the territory and the border town of La Linea. People arriving in the territory by air or sea would undergo dual border checks at Gibraltar port and airport, to be carried out by Gibraltar and Spanish officials. "Spanish officials will be responsible for ensuring the integrity of the Schengen Area," said a UK statement, which likened the arrangement to the system at London's St Pancras station, where French police carry out border checks for passengers bound for the EU. "Immigration and law and order in Gibraltar will remain the exclusive responsibility of Gibraltar's authorities," said the statement from Britain's Foreign Office. 'Delighted' Gibraltar "Today's breakthrough delivers a practical solution after years of uncertainty," British Foreign Minister David Lammy said in a statement. The agreement "protects British sovereignty, supports Gibraltar's economy and allows businesses to plan for the long-term once again," he added. Chief Minister of Gibraltar Fabian Picardo said he was "delighted" about the agreement that will bring "legal certainty to the people of Gibraltar, its businesses and to those across the region who rely on stability at the frontier." The deal, he said, "will protect future generations of British Gibraltarians and does not in any way affect our British sovereignty." Around 15,000 people – over half of Gibraltar's workforce, according to London – cross the land border between Spain and Gibraltar every day. Britain and Spain have disputed control of the tiny territory since it was ceded to Britain in the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht.
