From Ukraine to migration - four European Parliament debates to follow this week
Military aid to Ukraine, migrant returns and reduction of bureaucracy on the table for MEPs.
ADVERTISEMENT
Amid growing tensions between Europe and the US, and between two crucial summits of EU leaders on defence, MEPs are heading to Strasbourg for a plenary session packed with controversial debates. Here is a selection of the most interesting topics to follow.
Military aid to Ukraine
On Wednesday, March 12, MEPs will vote on a resolution urging the EU to maintain its support for Ukraine, even if the United States withdraws its backing. The resolution, which is non-legislative, also focuses on European contributions to the security guarantees needed to ensure peace in Ukraine after the war—an issue on which EU Member States remain deeply divided.
Beyond this vote, several debates related to the Russian war in Ukraine are scheduled. On Tuesday morning, MEPs will assess the outcome of the March 6 Special European Council, while in the afternoon, discussions will centre on the upcoming white paper on the future of European defence, set to be unveiled soon by the Commission.
Wednesday's agenda includes two debates: one on the use of frozen Russian assets to support Ukraine and another on the phase-out of Russian energy in EU countries.
While resolutions in favour of Ukraine generally receive broad support in the chamber, debates on the topic remain nuanced. 'We are completely against deploying European troops in Ukraine,' a spokesperson for the Patriots for Europe group said during a press conference.
Return of migrants
On Tuesday, March 11, the European Commission is set to present the so-called 'Return Directive' in Strasbourg—a new legal framework aimed at speeding up processes for repatriating rejected asylum seekers to their countries of origin.
On the same day, MEPs will give a first assessment of the proposal, which seeks to increase the return rate of third-country nationals who are not entitled to stay in the EU. Currently, only about one in four foreign nationals ordered to leave an EU member state is actually deported.
A source familiar with the matter told Euronews that the Commission's proposal will not include discussion of 'return hubs'- centres outside the EU where migrants would be hosted while awaiting repatriation. The idea has been circulating after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen raised the issue.
However, the debate is expected to be tense, with radical right-wing parties calling for swifter procedures and stricter policies to combat irregular migration, while left-leaning groups emphasise the need to uphold migrants' fundamental rights.
Reducing bureaucracy at a faster pace
On Monday, March 10, Parliament will discuss the so-called 'Omnibus Package', a recent Commission proposal aimed at cutting red tape and simplifying legislation for EU businesses and citizens.
Last week, the European People's Party (EPP), the largest group in the chamber, sent a letter to the Parliament President Roberta Metsola—seen by Euronews—requesting a fast-track procedure. The EPP's goal is to quickly approve a specific part of the package, the so-called 'Stop the Clock' proposal, which seeks to postpone certain requirements on corporate sustainability and due diligence reporting.
Metsola will announce the EPP's request at the session's opening, and the vote will take place in the next plenary session in April. However, the debate is expected to be heated, as the Socialists & Democrats (S&D) and Renew Europe are in no hurry to approve the new rules.
A possible outcome could be an alliance between the EPP and the right-wing groups European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) and Patriots for Europe (PfE)—a coalition sometimes referred to as the "Venezuela Majority."
Cross-border recognition of parenthood
On Wednesday, March 12, Parliament will debate a European Commission proposal to ensure that parenthood established in one EU member state is automatically recognised in all the others.
However, the issue remains contentious due to concerns about children born via surrogacy and those of same-sex couples. Since surrogacy and same-sex unions are regulated differently across member states, some governments resist being required to recognize parenthood established under the laws of another country.
ADVERTISEMENT
As a result, an estimated two million children risk having their parents' legal status downgraded when they move to another EU country, according to Commission data.
The proposal requires unanimous approval by the Council, but its not yet there. MEPs will press Council and Commission representatives in the chamber to explain why.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
19 minutes ago
- Euronews
14-year-old kills staff member in French middle school knife attack
A 14-year-old pupil fatally stabbed a school staff member during a routine bag check on Tuesday at a middle school in eastern France, officials said. The teenager was arrested at the scene. The incident occurred at Françoise Dolto School in Nogent, near Dijon. A police officer assisting with the bag checks sustained minor injuries while apprehending the suspect, who used the same knife in both attacks, according to the National Gendarmerie. President Emmanuel Macron condemned the act as "senseless violence," writing in a post on X: "While she was looking after our children in Nogent, an educational assistant lost her life. The nation is in mourning and the government is mobilised to reduce crime." Though deadly incidents in French schools are rare, there is growing concern about violence on campuses. In response, the Education Ministry introduced bag checks earlier this year. Over two months this spring, officials confiscated 186 knives and detained 32 individuals, the Interior Ministry reported. Prosecutor Denis Devallois confirmed that the suspect had no prior criminal record. Education Minister Élisabeth Borne said the boy had been involved in the school's anti-bullying initiative and was previously suspended briefly for classroom disruption. The stabbing occurred just outside the school gate, where the 31-year-old educational assistant was standing alongside police officers conducting checks. Classes were suspended for the day and counselling was made available for pupils and staff. A fellow classmate described the 14-year-old as "normal" but occasionally "a little bizarre," adding that they never thought he would be capable of such an attack, according to local media reports. The incident follows a similar tragedy in April, when a student stabbed four classmates in western France, killing one. That attack prompted the prime minister to call for stricter measures to combat knife violence in schools. The road to a diplomatic reset in EU-China relations is paved with escalating tit-for-tat trade measures, casting a shadow over efforts to ease long-standing disputes. On Tuesday, Chinese authorities announced a six-month extension of their anti-dumping investigation into pork imports from the EU, citing the complexity of the case as justification for the delay. Initially launched in June 2024, the probe will now run until the end of the year, targeting more than €1.75 billion in pork exports, particularly from Spain, the Netherlands, and Denmark. The announcement came as Brussels and Beijing are seeking to stabilise relations despite years of friction, exacerbated by US president's trade war against China and a shifting global order. A crucial milestone in this process will be the EU-China summit, now confirmed for the second half of July 2025 in Beijing. But China's extension of the investigation into pork imports show that the trade relationship between the EU and China is still fraught, with each side using sensitive sectors, such as electric vehicles for the EU and agriculture for China, as leverage in their negotiations. Pork is a strategically important product for both sides: China is the world's largest consumer, and EU farmers export significant quantities of offal products like ears, feet, and snouts, which are highly valued in Chinese cuisine but have little value in other markets. Pork is a strategically important product for both sides: China is the world's largest consumer, and EU farmers export significant quantities of offal products like ears, feet, and snouts, which are highly valued in Chinese cuisine but have little value in other markets. However, the pork investigation is viewed less as a genuine trade concern and more as a bargaining chip in wider trade negotiations. The pork probe is widely interpreted as China's response to the EU's recent decision to impose tariffs of up to 45% on Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs). Brussels argued the tariffs were necessary to counteract state subsidies and prevent market distortion, as Chinese EV manufacturers rapidly increase their presence in Europe. At the time of their announcement, China sharply criticised the EU's EV tariffs as protectionist, warning of 'necessary measures' to defend national interests, signalling that Tuesday's extension of the pork probe might now be part of a broader strategic play. Key discussions on EV tariffs recently took place in Paris, where Chinese commerce minister Wang Wentao met with EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič in talks that covered also broader concerns such as rare earth export controls and public procurement access. At the heart of the negotiations is a potential shift from punitive tariffs to a system of minimum prices for Chinese EVs. This approach aims to address the EU's concerns about unfair competition while avoiding outright trade barriers, potentially serving as a model for future high-tech trade frameworks. 'Negotiations for an agreement on a price undertaking, which would then replace the existing duties we have in place, are continuing at both technical and political level,' a European Commission spokesperson confirmed on Tuesday. This latest clash echoes earlier episodes in China-EU trade relations. Last week, the EU hit back with restrictions on Chinese medical device makers, limiting their access to public procurement contracts in response to Beijing's 'Buy China' policy, which disadvantages EU firms in Chinese markets. All these moves reflect an established pattern of reciprocal measures, with both sides targeting politically sensitive industries to gain a negotiating advantage. Another potential flashpoint is China's restriction of rare earth mineral exports, which are critical components for many EU manufacturing sectors. Though initially aimed at the United States, these restrictions have implications for Europe and are now part of a wider toolkit of Chinese leverage. The EU now hopes that these restrictions will soon be lifted and addressed the topic in Paris' talks last week. 'All we have so far is an indication from the Chinese government via a statement by the spokesperson for their Commerce Ministry that they are indeed looking at this issue and that they're going to find a way to address it,' said a European Commission spokesperson on Tuesday. 'As far as we know, nothing has been formally communicated to us in a structured way,' the spokesperson continued, adding that once the bloc receives such communication, it will need time to assess it. Amid the back-and-forth, there have also been signs of goodwill. China recently expanded market access for certain Spanish food products in an apparent signal that it remains open to negotiation. A crucial milestone in this process is the EU-China summit, now confirmed for the second half of July 2025 in Beijing. Both sides hope it will serve as a platform to recalibrate their economic ties and potentially defuse one of the most complex and consequential trade disputes of the decade.
Euronews
30 minutes ago
- Euronews
Pork, EVs, and diplomatic reset: EU-China trade fight heats up
The road to a diplomatic reset in EU-China relations is paved with escalating tit-for-tat trade measures, casting a shadow over efforts to ease long-standing disputes. On Tuesday, Chinese authorities announced a six-month extension of their anti-dumping investigation into pork imports from the EU, citing the complexity of the case as justification for the delay. Initially launched in June 2024, the probe will now run until the end of the year, targeting more than €1.75 billion in pork exports, particularly from Spain, the Netherlands, and Denmark. The announcement came as Brussels and Beijing are seeking to stabilise relations despite years of friction, exacerbated by US president's trade war against China and a shifting global order. A crucial milestone in this process will be the EU-China summit, now confirmed for the second half of July 2025 in Beijing. But China's extension of the investigation into pork imports show that the trade relationship between the EU and China is still fraught, with each side using sensitive sectors, such as electric vehicles for the EU and agriculture for China, as leverage in their negotiations. Pork is a strategically important product for both sides: China is the world's largest consumer, and EU farmers export significant quantities of offal products like ears, feet, and snouts, which are highly valued in Chinese cuisine but have little value in other markets. Pork is a strategically important product for both sides: China is the world's largest consumer, and EU farmers export significant quantities of offal products like ears, feet, and snouts, which are highly valued in Chinese cuisine but have little value in other markets. However, the pork investigation is viewed less as a genuine trade concern and more as a bargaining chip in wider trade negotiations. The pork probe is widely interpreted as China's response to the EU's recent decision to impose tariffs of up to 45% on Chinese-made electric vehicles (EVs). Brussels argued the tariffs were necessary to counteract state subsidies and prevent market distortion, as Chinese EV manufacturers rapidly increase their presence in Europe. At the time of their announcement, China sharply criticised the EU's EV tariffs as protectionist, warning of 'necessary measures' to defend national interests, signalling that Tuesday's extension of the pork probe might now be part of a broader strategic play. Key discussions on EV tariffs recently took place in Paris, where Chinese commerce minister Wang Wentao met with EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič in talks that covered also broader concerns such as rare earth export controls and public procurement access. At the heart of the negotiations is a potential shift from punitive tariffs to a system of minimum prices for Chinese EVs. This approach aims to address the EU's concerns about unfair competition while avoiding outright trade barriers, potentially serving as a model for future high-tech trade frameworks. 'Negotiations for an agreement on a price undertaking, which would then replace the existing duties we have in place, are continuing at both technical and political level,' a European Commission spokesperson confirmed on Tuesday. This latest clash echoes earlier episodes in China-EU trade relations. Last week, the EU hit back with restrictions on Chinese medical device makers, limiting their access to public procurement contracts in response to Beijing's 'Buy China' policy, which disadvantages EU firms in Chinese markets. All these moves reflect an established pattern of reciprocal measures, with both sides targeting politically sensitive industries to gain a negotiating advantage. Another potential flashpoint is China's restriction of rare earth mineral exports, which are critical components for many EU manufacturing sectors. Though initially aimed at the United States, these restrictions have implications for Europe and are now part of a wider toolkit of Chinese leverage. The EU now hopes that these restrictions will soon be lifted and addressed the topic in Paris' talks last week. 'All we have so far is an indication from the Chinese government via a statement by the spokesperson for their Commerce Ministry that they are indeed looking at this issue and that they're going to find a way to address it,' said a European Commission spokesperson on Tuesday. 'As far as we know, nothing has been formally communicated to us in a structured way,' the spokesperson continued, adding that once the bloc receives such communication, it will need time to assess it. Amid the back-and-forth, there have also been signs of goodwill. China recently expanded market access for certain Spanish food products in an apparent signal that it remains open to negotiation. A crucial milestone in this process is the EU-China summit, now confirmed for the second half of July 2025 in Beijing. Both sides hope it will serve as a platform to recalibrate their economic ties and potentially defuse one of the most complex and consequential trade disputes of the decade. The United Kingdom is placing sanctions on far-right Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced on Tuesday. Lammy said the ministers had "incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights." Smotrich and Ben-Gvir will have their assets frozen and face travel bans, a move that is expected to be matched by other international allies as well. In a statement, the UK Foreign Office said they are acting "alongside partners Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway." Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called it an "unacceptable decision" and said the cabinet will meet next week to decide on a response. Smotrich and Ben-Gvir have repeatedly called for Israel to conquer Gaza and re-establish Jewish settlements there. Last month, Smotrich said "Gaza will be entirely destroyed" and has campaigned against allowing aid into the territory. Ben-Gvir has also called for the permanent resettlement of Palestinians from the territory. Referring to the construction of settlements in the occupied West Bank, Smotrich said in a post on X that "Britain has already tried once to prevent us from settling the cradle of our homeland, and we will not allow it to do it again. We are determined to continue building." "Extremist rhetoric advocating the forced displacement of Palestinians and the creation of new Israeli settlements is appalling and dangerous,' the statement from the UK Foreign Office said. It also said that "the rising violence and intimidation by Israeli settlers against Palestinian communities in the West Bank must stop." Settlement growth and construction in the occupied West Bank have been promoted by successive Israeli governments stretching back decades, but it has exploded under Netanyahu's far-right coalition, which has settlers in key Cabinet posts. There are now well over 100 settlements and around 500,000 Israeli settlers sprawling across the area. Rights groups argue that the settlements, illegal under international law, are a hurdle to an eventual two-state solution.
Euronews
35 minutes ago
- Euronews
UK to impose sanctions on two Israeli ministers over Gaza comments
The United Kingdom is placing sanctions on far-right Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced on Tuesday. Lammy said the ministers had "incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights." Smotrich and Ben-Gvir will have their assets frozen and face travel bans, a move that is expected to be matched by other international allies as well. In a statement, the UK Foreign Office said they are acting "alongside partners Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway." Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called it an "unacceptable decision" and said the cabinet will meet next week to decide on a response. Smotrich and Ben-Gvir have repeatedly called for Israel to conquer Gaza and re-establish Jewish settlements there. Last month, Smotrich said "Gaza will be entirely destroyed" and has campaigned against allowing aid into the territory. Ben-Gvir has also called for the permanent resettlement of Palestinians from the territory. Referring to the construction of settlements in the occupied West Bank, Smotrich said in a post on X that "Britain has already tried once to prevent us from settling the cradle of our homeland, and we will not allow it to do it again. We are determined to continue building." "Extremist rhetoric advocating the forced displacement of Palestinians and the creation of new Israeli settlements is appalling and dangerous,' the statement from the UK Foreign Office said. It also said that "the rising violence and intimidation by Israeli settlers against Palestinian communities in the West Bank must stop." Settlement growth and construction in the occupied West Bank have been promoted by successive Israeli governments stretching back decades, but it has exploded under Netanyahu's far-right coalition, which has settlers in key Cabinet posts. There are now well over 100 settlements and around 500,000 Israeli settlers sprawling across the area. Rights groups argue that the settlements, illegal under international law, are a hurdle to an eventual two-state solution. In 2024, 19.5 million children in the EU were at risk of poverty or social exclusion, according to the latest Eurostat figures. Between 2023 and 2024, the percentage of children at risk of poverty or social exclusion in the EU slightly decreased from 24.8% to 24.2%. At the country level, Bulgaria reported the highest rates in 2024, at 35.1%, followed by Spain at 34.6% and Romania at 33.8%. By contrast, Slovenia (11.8%), Cyprus (14.8%) and the Czech Republic (15.4%) recorded the lowest figures. Italy was the only EU country that did not experience any change, remaining steady at 27.1%. "Welfare state institutions play a major role in protecting children from poverty," said Alba Lanau Sánchez, a researcher from Universitat Pompeu Fabra. "Countries with robust social protection systems tend to have lower child poverty rates." The risk of poverty or social exclusion was also higher for children than for adults in 2024. Children in the EU were at a higher risk of poverty or social exclusion (24.2%) compared with adults (20.3%), resulting in a difference of 3.9 percentage points. Across the EU countries, 20 of them experienced a higher risk among children, with the largest differences recorded in Spain (10.5%), Malta and Romania (both 7.3%) and France (7.2%). Children whose parents attained a higher education level were less likely to be at risk of poverty or social exclusion. In 2024, 61.2% of children in the EU living with parents who had at most lower secondary education were at risk of poverty or social exclusion. For those with parents who attained tertiary education, the proportion was 11.0%. This resulted in a risk gap of 50.2 percentage points based on parents' education levels. At the national level, the gap was above 50% in 16 EU countries. The lowest gaps were observed in Denmark, Portugal and Estonia, while the largest differences were recorded in Romania, Czechia and Bulgaria. Despite Spain having a higher GDP than Bulgaria or Romania, the country's tax-benefit system is often pointed out as one of the main reasons for its high child poverty rates, according to researchers. In 2021, Spain spent just 1.3% of its GDP on family policies, compared to the OECD average of 2.3%. "Direct financial support to families was particularly modest," said Lanau Sánchez. "Child-contingent cash benefits schemes in Spain have traditionally provided support to higher deciles through tax relief, which poorer households cannot benefit from, but little or no support went to low-income households." Spain has also introduced the Minimum Living Income (IMV) in 2021 and the Child Support Supplement in 2022, reaching 502,310 households, according to Spain's Social Security. However, it remains unclear how much these programs have improved living conditions for families with children. "Current critiques highlight the IMV shortcomings, including administrative barriers (resulting in high non-take-up rates), legal restrictions on access affecting certain groups, such as young people, the homeless, undocumented and recently arrived migrants, and limited potential coverage for low-income but not severely poor households," said Lanau Sánchez. "However, we lack in-depth academic research on how the IMV has more thoroughly transformed the social protection system, ultimately crowding out other forms of support, like regional minimum income schemes," she concluded.
