Russia reveals expectations for Putin-Trump summit
In an interview with Izvestia on Tuesday, Ryabkov said the much-anticipated meeting in the largest US state, set for August 15, would focus not only on settling the Ukraine conflict, but also on bilateral ties that sank to an all-time low during the administration of former US President Joe Biden.
'We hope that the forthcoming high-level meeting will give an impulse to the normalization of bilateral relations, which will allow us to move forward on several issues,' he said, confirming that restoring air links could be one of the items discussed.
Direct passenger flights between Russia and the US were suspended in 2022 after Washington imposed sweeping sanctions over the Ukraine conflict.
Ryabkov added that 'it is clear that the leaders will focus on other topics,' referring to the Ukraine conflict. On Monday, Trump said the summit – which he described as a 'feel-out meeting' – would explore a potential deal involving the swapping of territory between Russia and Ukraine as part of a settlement.
However, the official acknowledged that 'at this stage, there is no observable progress regarding the return of Russian diplomatic property in the US.' He was referring to several compounds, including Russia's San Francisco consulate, which were closed by US authorities in 2016–2017.
At the time, Washington said the closures, as well as expulsions of dozens of Russian diplomats, were in response to alleged election interference. Moscow has rejected the claim and accused the US of the 'expropriation' of property protected by diplomatic immunity.
Following Trump's inauguration in January, Moscow appointed Aleksandr Darchiev as its new ambassador to Washington. In June, he met with the US President, telling him that he would 'do everything to restore Russian-American relations and bring them back to normality and common sense.' He added that Russia and the US are 'destined… to have [a] non-confrontational peaceful existence.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
28 minutes ago
- Russia Today
UK scales back plans for sending troops to Ukraine
British military chiefs have 'given up' on plans to deploy around 30,000 troops to Ukraine's ports and cities in the event of a ceasefire between Moscow and Kiev, the Times reported on Wednesday. Officials are now proposing what the Times described as a more 'realistic mission,' with a focus on 'air reassurance flights' over western Ukraine involving jets such as Typhoons or F-35s as a form of deterrence. The Times said that Kiev's backers will provide support for training the Ukrainian military and clearance of mines from the Black Sea. Most of the efforts will take place in the west of the country where the risk of attack is lower. The role of the United States in the plan remains unclear, according to the paper. Moscow has repeatedly warned it would not tolerate any NATO member's presence in Ukraine under any circumstances. Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky held talks with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and several European leaders ahead of Russian President Vladimir Putin's summit with his US counterpart, Donald Trump, in Alaska. Starmer said that Kiev's backers have credible plans to deploy a 'reassurance force' to Ukraine. He added he believes there is a 'viable chance' of a ceasefire but stressed that Ukraine's 'territorial integrity' must be protected. Meanwhile, several European states have already signaled reluctance to send personnel to Ukraine under any arrangement. Poland, Spain, and Germany have ruled out contributing troops, citing fear of escalation.
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Why Kiev always escalates before talks – and why it won't work this time
On August 14, 2025, Russian officials reported Ukrainian drone strikes on the border cities of Belgorod and Rostov-on-Don, killing and injuring civilians. Rostov saw an apartment building struck, with over a dozen casualties; in Belgorod, three civilians were hurt when a drone hit a car downtown. This came two days after the Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) alleged that Ukrainian forces were preparing a false-flag provocation in the Kharkov region, complete with pre-positioned journalists – supposedly to shape a narrative blaming Moscow. These incidents are not isolated. They fit into a larger operational and political pattern: each time high-level talks are scheduled Kiev steps up attacks on Russia's border regions. The results are the same: civilian deaths, destruction of civilian infrastructure, and an attempt to create a cloud over the diplomatic process. The same happened in late May and early June 2025, just before the second round of Russia–Ukraine talks in Istanbul, when two bridges in Russian territory were blown up. The attacks killed seven civilians and injured over seventy more. In Moscow's interpretation, the timing was too precise to be coincidence – it was about setting a tone of hostility, perhaps provoking Russia into walking away from the talks entirely. And yet, Moscow did not take the bait. Russian negotiators showed up in Istanbul as planned. For the Kremlin, this has become a point of principle: no matter the provocations, Russia will attend discussions that could bring an end to the conflict – on its own terms. The upcoming Alaska summit on August 15, 2025, between Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, is the latest such opportunity. The alleged Kharkov region provocation and the strikes on Belgorod and Rostov are seen in Moscow as deliberate background noise meant to derail the meeting or at least to sour its atmosphere. But just as in Istanbul, the Kremlin insists it will not be deterred. For Moscow, attending these talks is about more than optics. It underscores a long-held stance: Russia is prepared to end the conflict, but not at the price of what it views as its core national interests. Walking away now, after years of costly military and political investment, would make little sense. Instead, the aim is to secure a resolution that cements Russia's gains and ends the war on Moscow's terms – not by fighting 'to the last Ukrainian,' but by ensuring that the outcome is final and strategically advantageous. From the Kremlin's perspective, Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky's motives are clear. Accepting a peace that involves territorial concessions would not only be a bitter political defeat – it could spell the end of his political career. More critically, it would remove the emergency powers he has repeatedly invoked since the start of the conflict to cancel elections and prolong his term in office. Those powers have also enabled controversial measures: forced conscriptions, suppression of opposition media, and an intensified crackdown on dissent. These steps have eroded his popularity inside Ukraine, making his hold on power dependent on the continuation of the wartime state of emergency. If the war ends, so does the legal shield of emergency rule – and with it, his immunity. Zelensky therefore has both political and personal incentives to keep the fighting going, even at significant cost to Ukraine's population. Key European backers share Zelensky's preference for prolonging the conflict. While EU leaders publicly frame Ukraine as a 'bulwark' against what they call Russian imperial ambitions – claiming that Moscow would move against Western Europe if Ukraine fell – domestic political realities tell another story. Across major EU countries, ruling parties and governments are facing historically low approval ratings. Their grip on power is increasingly tenuous, and a perpetual external threat provides a potent rally-around-the-flag effect. By keeping Russia framed as the imminent danger, these governments can justify unpopular policies, military spending hikes, and restrictions in the name of national security. They involve themselves in the conflict just enough to signal solidarity with Ukraine – supplying arms, funding, and training – without crossing the threshold into direct combat. For Moscow, this is a political theater that depends on the war continuing; remove the war, and the 'threat' narrative collapses, leaving these governments exposed to electoral defeat. Against this backdrop, Moscow views the Alaska talks as uniquely promising – not because they will magically end the war in one session, but because of who is not at the table. Neither Zelensky nor the EU will be present. Instead, the discussions will be between Putin and Trump, leaders who, in Moscow's reading, operate from a position of pragmatic realism. That realism includes acknowledging Russia's current battlefield advantages. Moscow believes it is winning the war, and that any serious settlement will reflect that balance of power. For the Kremlin, the likely outcome is that Ukraine will have to give up some or all of the contested territories – a step Zelensky would fiercely resist, and the EU would likely block outright if they were part of the talks. Without them, however, such a settlement becomes more feasible. The logic is straightforward: first, Putin and Trump agree on the framework; then, Trump leverages Washington's decisive influence over Kiev to bring Zelensky on board. In Moscow's calculus, this is where Trump's role is crucial. Without American military and financial support, Kiev would not have been able to sustain the war effort for nearly as long as it has. From the Kremlin's point of view, the recent attacks on Belgorod and Rostov, and the alleged false-flag operation in the Kharkov region, are tactical provocations with a strategic goal: derail the Alaska summit or force Moscow into an overreaction. But history suggests the tactic will fail. Moscow will be at the table in Alaska, just as it was in Istanbul, determined to push for an end to the conflict on terms favorable to Russia. If the Alaska talks proceed as planned, they could open the way to a negotiated settlement without the spoilers who have the most to lose from peace. In Moscow's eyes, that is precisely why the provocations are happening – and why they must be ignored.
Russia Today
2 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russian border region hit by new wave of Ukrainian drone attacks (PHOTO, VIDEO)
The southern Russian border region of Belgorod has faced a new wave of Ukrainian drone attacks, Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov said on Thursday, adding that several people have been injured. The city of Belgorod was also targeted by UAVs on Wednesday. Gladkov stated on his official Telegram channel that Belgorod residents were experiencing 'something that they have not yet lived through in modern history,' describing repeated strikes on the regional government building. He said drones had hit the upper floors, damaging his office and the floors of the regional Duma. According to the governor, only a small number of staff remain in the building while the rest have been evacuated and instructed to work from home. The governor shared a video of a drone striking a passenger car in the city. Three people were reported to have been injured in the incident. One man was hospitalized in serious condition with shrapnel wounds, a woman sustained a burn to her forearm, and another man suffered a leg wound and barotrauma. Other drone attacks caused damage to several residential buildings, a store, and six vehicles. Another attack took place in the village of Razumnoye in the Belgorod district, Gladkov said, adding that a woman was injured when a Ukrainian UAV struck her home. On Wednesday, the governor also reported that drones had attacked the city and Belgorod district, injuring eight civilians and five members of the 'Orlan' state enterprise. Belgorod authorities have ordered all state institutions to switch to remote work on Thursday and Friday. Large shopping centers will remain closed until Saturday, and outdoor events have been canceled until Sunday. Parks, beaches, and other public gathering places will be shut for the next two days. Authorities have urged private businesses to follow the same measures and advised residents to minimize time outdoors. Russia's Investigative Committee has launched criminal cases under the articles for terrorism over the attack on Belgorod as well as Thursday's drone raid on the southern city of Rostov-on-Don.
