logo
Judge Dennis Davis blasts government over climate inaction, says courts alone can't save the planet

Judge Dennis Davis blasts government over climate inaction, says courts alone can't save the planet

Daily Maverick6 days ago
At a recent climate law discussion at Stellenbosch University, former judge Dennis Davis took aim at government inertia on both the environment and the economy, saying the real work lies not in the courts, but in politics.
South Africa's climate crisis is not just about emissions – it's about accountability. And the courts, for all their power, cannot substitute for the political will of a government that has failed to rise to the challenge.
This was the message delivered with characteristic candour by former judge Dennis Davis in a keynote address at Stellenbosch University's Faculty of Law on 28 June 2025.
Speaking at a colloquium on climate change law and green finance, Davis gave a blistering critique of government policy, warning that while civil society and the judiciary have done their part to uphold constitutional rights, it is ultimately the legislature and the executive who must 'just do their job'.
'The South African growth story is nothing more than absolutely disastrous,' he said.
He traced the country's failure to strike a suitable balance between economic growth and environmental protection to a deeper absence of political leadership – and urged a 'serious debate' on the kind of policy South Africa actually needs.
Legal dimensions of sustainable development
The event was jointly hosted by two research chairs in the faculty – the Chair in Urban Law and Sustainability Governance, held by Professor Anél du Plessis, and the Gys Steyn Chair in Financial Regulation, held by Professor Johann Scholtz. Both chairs underscore the university's growing focus on the legal dimensions of sustainable development.
Introducing the keynote, Scholtz described Davis as uniquely qualified to speak on the subject – a jurist, scholar and former director of the Centre for Applied Legal Studies, who handed down landmark judgments on socioeconomic rights, including the seminal Grootboom decision in 2000, which confirmed that socioeconomic rights are not merely aspirational but legally enforceable.
Constitutional prescience
Davis opened with a reminder of South Africa's own legal promise – section 24 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to an environment that is not harmful to health or wellbeing, and mandates protection of the environment for present and future generations.
'That was in 1996,' he said, 'and I'm not sure anyone drafting it then grasped the immensity of the challenge we face today.'
Citing a 2023 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, he highlighted the disproportionate toll of climate change on vulnerable populations. 'Between 2010 and 2020, human mortality from floods, droughts and storms was 15 times higher in highly vulnerable regions than in regions with very low vulnerability.'
'Rolls-Royce framework lacking traction'
But recognising rights on paper is not the same as enforcing them. 'One of the great problems in South Africa,' Davis noted, 'is that we're very good at having Rolls-Royce regulatory proposals without the foggiest idea as to how they should be implemented, or what their traction is going to be in practice.'
So where does that leave the courts?
'Lawfare' not enough
Davis pointed to a series of landmark judgments in South Africa as reasons for hope. These decisions, he said, showed that section 24 was more than symbolic – it could be a tool for real change. But that tool had its limits.
'There's a significant limitation to the process of 'lawfare',' he said. 'As attractive as it may be for lawyers to march into court, relying on the judiciary alone will not suffice.'
Civil society, he argued, had played an essential role. The NGOs who brought these cases were 'brave' and 'not prepared to shut up'. But their success only highlighted the failures elsewhere.
Shell case 'a milestone'
A case that looms large for Davis is Sustaining the Wild Coast, in which the courts found in 2022 that Shell's proposed seismic surveys for offshore gas deposits had been authorised without adequate consultation. The court's insistence on meaningful engagement with affected indigenous communities – in their own languages and cultural context – was, for Davis, a milestone in recognising both environmental and human rights.
But he questioned the broader system that allowed such authorisations in the first place. 'To what extent are we talking about intergenerational justice? To what extent are we actually grappling with these issues in economic policy?'
Deep divisions
To illustrate the gap, Davis recounted his recent interview with Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Gwede Mantashe for his television programme Judge for Yourself – a follow-on from his earlier Future Imperfect, the show that first made him a household name for probing some of South Africa's toughest policy questions.
He argued that post-apartheid economic policy had consistently failed to address inequality and unemployment. Instead of inclusive growth, he said, the benefits of development had disproportionately flowed to a small elite, leaving the majority of South Africans 'not just historically disadvantaged but presently disadvantaged'.
According to Davis, Mantashe defended South Africa's pursuit of fossil fuel projects, pointing out that the country's northern neighbour, Namibia, was forging ahead with offshore exploration. By Davis's account, Mantashe argued that if South Africa embraced similar projects, economic growth could have reached 3% or 4%, easing many of the concerns raised by environmental critics.
What troubled Davis most was the minister's proposal for some kind of environmental panel – à la a similar tribunal in Namibia – to expedite approvals and sidestep litigation. 'That is now being considered by Cabinet,' Davis warned. 'It raises profound questions about the extent to which the executive is committed to the rights enshrined in section 24.'
This exchange starkly illustrates the deep division between judicial expectations and executive priorities regarding climate action and economic development.
'Challenge political, not legal'
Davis returned to the principle of intergenerational justice – and the need for politics, not just litigation, to uphold it. He praised the Deadly Air judgment in 2022, in which High Court Judge Colleen Collis compelled the government to improve air quality in Mpumalanga, where most of South Africa's coal-fired power stations are situated. Crucially, the ruling was upheld by the Supreme Court of Appeal in April 2025, with Justice Mahube Betty Molemela confirming that the Constitution could be invoked to protect future generations and that the state bore a positive duty to act.
'And that's the point,' Davis concluded. 'The real challenge is not legal. It's political.'
If South Africa is serious about leaving its children 'a society that's worth living in', he said, it must adopt an economic policy that confronts inequality, poverty and environmental degradation together.
'Presently disadvantaged'
'We have failed to achieve a balance between green growth and the socioeconomic needs of an emerging economy. The vast majority of South Africans are not just historically disadvantaged – they're presently disadvantaged. The question is: what would an economic policy look like if we took these things seriously?'
For now, at least, Davis's answer is clear: 'It's not for the judiciary to manage the process. It's for the legislature and the executive. The rest of us are just squealing at the margins.' DM
Desmond Thompson is a freelance journalist.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IEC blocks 'Sharia law' party's registration
IEC blocks 'Sharia law' party's registration

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

IEC blocks 'Sharia law' party's registration

The Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) has confirmed that the application for registration of the Islamic State of Africa (ISA) as a political party has been rejected. IEC spokesperson Kate Bapela said the chief electoral officer (CEO), Sy Mamabolo, rejected the application by ISA on three grounds: The first is that the party failed to meet the threshold of prescribed details of registered voters who support the formation of the party. The prescribed details are the signatures of 300 registered voters, together with their full names and signatures. Secondly, the party published the notice of its application in a newspaper which enjoys circulation only in parts of the municipal area. The publication in only some parts of the municipal area is not sufficient to create awareness of the application. 'The purpose of publishing the application is to alert persons in the geographic area linked to the sphere of registration the party is applying for. In the present case, the area of eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality,' Bapela explained. The third reason is that the IEC CEO received over 200 objections from individuals and organisations who argued that the constitution of ISA espouses 'the intention to develop policies based on Sharia law'. 'It is the submission of the objectors that part of ISA's constitution is 'antithetical to the secular and inclusive nature of the principles underpinning the South African constitutional order and registering ISA would cause serious offence to a section of the population,' she added. Furthermore, Bapela said the Islamic State of Africa may, within 30 days, appeal the decision of the CEO not to register it as a party to the IEC. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

Turning declarations into deliverables: South Africa's BRICS 2025 Challenge
Turning declarations into deliverables: South Africa's BRICS 2025 Challenge

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

Turning declarations into deliverables: South Africa's BRICS 2025 Challenge

For South Africa, the BRICS 2030 horizon offers not just hope, but a promising future, writes Ayanda Holo. Image: IOL / AI By Ayanda Holo Beneath the glittering chandeliers of the Bank of China building in Johannesburg, Chinese Ambassador Wu Peng addressed a gathering of investors, policymakers, and technocrats. At his side sat South Africa's Deputy Finance Minister Dr David Masondo, a key architect of the government's economic recovery and structural reform agenda. The occasion marked the release of the Chinese Investor Survey, a moment that revealed not only the depth of Sino-South African relations but also the lingering bottlenecks that continue to hinder what could be a transformative partnership. Ambassador Wu's tone was both celebratory and cautionary. Over 200 Chinese enterprises have injected more than $11 billion into South Africa, creating jobs, taxes, and valuable industrialisation footprints. Yet, despite this progress, the Ambassador pointedly highlighted recurring frustrations: the slow and sometimes opaque processing of work visas for essential engineers and managers and the heightened security threats to Chinese nationals. These issues, he suggested, could jeopardise investor confidence unless addressed with urgency and sincerity. At the heart of his speech was a subtle but potent reference to Declaration 42 of the BRICS 2025 Strategy, which states: "We welcome the results of the Strategy for BRICS Economic Partnership 2025… and look forward to the conclusion and implementation of the Strategy for BRICS Economic Partnership 2030, which will… guide cooperation on issues relating to the Multilateral Trading System, Digital Economy, International Trade, Financial Cooperation and Sustainable Development." This strategy is not just a document, but a roadmap to our future. This forward-looking blueprint aims to deepen the ties that bind BRICS nations, with South Africa poised to benefit as a regional gateway for Asia–Africa trade. But such ambitions rest precariously on domestic execution. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The Visa Conundrum: When Policy Fails Practice A compelling case in point emerged from a significant $200 million investment project in the Eastern Cape, a region with great potential for economic growth. The project procured high-grade industrial equipment from Yangzhou Metal Forming Machine Tool Co. The firm dispatched three highly skilled engineers to oversee installation and training. Despite submitting complete documentation to VFS Global, including verified invitation letters from their South African host, the engineers were denied work visas for several months. This delay was not only an administrative embarrassment but also a tangible blow to investor confidence. The engineers were essential to commissioning a production line that was central to the project's ROI timeline. The months-long delay undermined the "open the way" vision of Operation Vulindlela, a flagship reform programme by the South African Presidency and Treasury designed to reduce red tape for investors. Is Operation Vulindlela truly living up to its name? According to a recent SA Government News release dated March 2025, the Department of Home Affairs has introduced improvements to fast-track visa applications for investors and critical skills workers. A new "Trusted Employer Scheme" was also piloted with large multinationals and BRICS-partner firms in mind. Yet the Eastern Cape incident underscores a gap between policy and implementation, a chasm where projects stall, costs rise, and goodwill wanes. From Zero-Tariffs to Zero-Tolerance on Inefficiency China's recent announcement to provide zero-tariff treatment to 53 African countries via the Framework Agreement on Economic Partnership for Shared Development is a tectonic shift in global trade patterns. It gives African manufacturers and agricultural producers unprecedented access to the world's second-largest economy. And South Africa, with its mature logistics, industrial base, and financial institutions, is uniquely positioned to lead this integration. But it must not allow procedural inertia to squander strategic advantages. This is particularly critical in sectors like automotive components, green energy infrastructure, and advanced manufacturing, where Chinese investment has surged. Each of these sectors requires the temporary importation of technical personnel, often on tight deadlines to transfer knowledge and integrate systems. Ambassador Wu's call for smoother visa processes is therefore not a favour to China, but a necessary step if South Africa is serious about its BRICS role. It's not just about accommodating Chinese investors, but about creating an environment where all BRICS nations can thrive, boosting South Africa's economy and global influence. A Catalogue of Cooperation It is worth reminding readers of the many bilateral and multilateral agreements that underpin this evolving relationship. These include: The China-South Africa Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Agreement (2010).The FOCAC Beijing Action Plan 2019–2025 The Belt and Road MOU, signed in 2015, focuses on infrastructure Investment Treaties and Double Taxation Agreements, protecting investor rights The Annual SA-China High-Level People-to-People Exchange Mechanism, encouraging cultural, academic, and tech innovation links. Each of these frameworks, including the 2025 BRICS Economic Strategy, calls for the removal of administrative and logistical barriers that impede the flow of capital, of people, of ideas. What Must Change? If Pretoria is to maintain credibility within BRICS and its reform agenda, several actions are urgent: Mandate real-time escalation channels for work visa cases tied to investment projects over R50 and enforce the Trusted Employer Scheme beyond pilot status. Include a BRICS Investor Fast Lane under the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC).Publish quarterly Operation Vulindlela scorecards, with measurable impact on investor facilitation. As Ambassador Wu concluded, "Challenges are part of development." But challenges left unaddressed become liabilities. For South Africa, the BRICS 2030 horizon offers not just hope, but a promising future. Whether that promise becomes reality depends not on declarations from abroad, but on decisions made at home. * Ayanda Holo is the President of TV BRICS AFRICA ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.

Will forcing MPs to use public healthcare make it better?
Will forcing MPs to use public healthcare make it better?

The Citizen

time3 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Will forcing MPs to use public healthcare make it better?

If somebody important gets rushed into a government hospital, throwing somebody out of ICU to make way for them wouldn't be an issue. Another day, and yet another suggestion from ActionSA that public officials should be forced to use public services, as if that will somehow make those services better. If it's not public officials being forced to use public transport, it's that they must send their kids to public schools. The latest from the Herman Mashaba camp is that public servants should use public healthcare services. One can nearly hear the internal laughter of Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi at the idea (one that he has publicly supported). Presumably, he has no problem supporting it, given that he's doubling down on the National Health Insurance (NHI). It would be pretty silly to advocate for the eventual blending of private and public healthcare, but demand that his ilk continue to be allowed to use private healthcare. Perhaps that was the strategy of ActionSA all along: getting Motsoaledi to admit a personal lust toward private healthcare. If that was the reason, it's gone down as well as a quirky Helen Zille tweet. ALSO READ: Bara hospital: The good, bad and ugly However, the actual idea of forcing public officials to use public services to create some sort of political investment incentive is not just stupid, it's divorced from any South African context. Maybe that would work in a country where there's some sort of honour, even if it's among thieves, but this is South Africa. This is the country where we dare not even introduce self-service checkouts at grocers because we know how disastrous that would be. So not only do we have to embrace the imposed moniker of 'Plastique?' but we also have to accept that for the right people, the public purse will get them anything from a fire pool to a trip to the Cannes Film Festival. How is it that despite the Department of Health never having any money, there are still so many awesome doctors in public hospitals? There may be no medicine for the plebeians, but the lights are still on, and if somebody important or a friend of a friend gets rushed in, throwing somebody out of the ICU to make way for them wouldn't be an issue. The problem has never been that we don't have the facilities to deal with sick people. The problem has always been that we don't have enough facilities to deal with all the sick people who are not politically important. ALSO READ: 'I could die before surgery': Cancer patient lost in Gauteng hospitals backlog I don't think Motsoaledi cares which hospital he ends up in. He could be in a rural clinic in Limpopo, but if they had to fly in the best medical team and equipment, best believe they'll do it. Whether they'd do that for Sam Nje is less likely. You're dealing with a class of people who can walk into any school and bump their kids straight into the classroom on the day school starts, while the rest of us have to apply in utero just to get on the waiting list. This is why forcing them to use public services is hardly going to make the public services any better. Remember that strange aunty in your family? The one whose house had a great lounge that nobody was allowed in because it had to be preserved in case the Queen, Nelson Mandela and the Pope decided to come visit — simultaneously. That's all you'll create when you force public servants to use public services: the white elephant room that will remain vacant in case the deputy minister of transport gets hit by a taxi nearby. It's a sad state of affairs that one feels the need to incentivise public servants to serve the public. It's an even sadder state of affairs when trying to create those incentives is a losing battle. Maybe the answer should be to appoint public servants who are enthusiastic about public service in the first place. I wonder if they thought about that. NOW READ: Tshwane mayor faces outrage for Weskoppies Hospital power cut

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store