
Judge Dennis Davis blasts government over climate inaction, says courts alone can't save the planet
South Africa's climate crisis is not just about emissions – it's about accountability. And the courts, for all their power, cannot substitute for the political will of a government that has failed to rise to the challenge.
This was the message delivered with characteristic candour by former judge Dennis Davis in a keynote address at Stellenbosch University's Faculty of Law on 28 June 2025.
Speaking at a colloquium on climate change law and green finance, Davis gave a blistering critique of government policy, warning that while civil society and the judiciary have done their part to uphold constitutional rights, it is ultimately the legislature and the executive who must 'just do their job'.
'The South African growth story is nothing more than absolutely disastrous,' he said.
He traced the country's failure to strike a suitable balance between economic growth and environmental protection to a deeper absence of political leadership – and urged a 'serious debate' on the kind of policy South Africa actually needs.
Legal dimensions of sustainable development
The event was jointly hosted by two research chairs in the faculty – the Chair in Urban Law and Sustainability Governance, held by Professor Anél du Plessis, and the Gys Steyn Chair in Financial Regulation, held by Professor Johann Scholtz. Both chairs underscore the university's growing focus on the legal dimensions of sustainable development.
Introducing the keynote, Scholtz described Davis as uniquely qualified to speak on the subject – a jurist, scholar and former director of the Centre for Applied Legal Studies, who handed down landmark judgments on socioeconomic rights, including the seminal Grootboom decision in 2000, which confirmed that socioeconomic rights are not merely aspirational but legally enforceable.
Constitutional prescience
Davis opened with a reminder of South Africa's own legal promise – section 24 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to an environment that is not harmful to health or wellbeing, and mandates protection of the environment for present and future generations.
'That was in 1996,' he said, 'and I'm not sure anyone drafting it then grasped the immensity of the challenge we face today.'
Citing a 2023 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, he highlighted the disproportionate toll of climate change on vulnerable populations. 'Between 2010 and 2020, human mortality from floods, droughts and storms was 15 times higher in highly vulnerable regions than in regions with very low vulnerability.'
'Rolls-Royce framework lacking traction'
But recognising rights on paper is not the same as enforcing them. 'One of the great problems in South Africa,' Davis noted, 'is that we're very good at having Rolls-Royce regulatory proposals without the foggiest idea as to how they should be implemented, or what their traction is going to be in practice.'
So where does that leave the courts?
'Lawfare' not enough
Davis pointed to a series of landmark judgments in South Africa as reasons for hope. These decisions, he said, showed that section 24 was more than symbolic – it could be a tool for real change. But that tool had its limits.
'There's a significant limitation to the process of 'lawfare',' he said. 'As attractive as it may be for lawyers to march into court, relying on the judiciary alone will not suffice.'
Civil society, he argued, had played an essential role. The NGOs who brought these cases were 'brave' and 'not prepared to shut up'. But their success only highlighted the failures elsewhere.
Shell case 'a milestone'
A case that looms large for Davis is Sustaining the Wild Coast, in which the courts found in 2022 that Shell's proposed seismic surveys for offshore gas deposits had been authorised without adequate consultation. The court's insistence on meaningful engagement with affected indigenous communities – in their own languages and cultural context – was, for Davis, a milestone in recognising both environmental and human rights.
But he questioned the broader system that allowed such authorisations in the first place. 'To what extent are we talking about intergenerational justice? To what extent are we actually grappling with these issues in economic policy?'
Deep divisions
To illustrate the gap, Davis recounted his recent interview with Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Gwede Mantashe for his television programme Judge for Yourself – a follow-on from his earlier Future Imperfect, the show that first made him a household name for probing some of South Africa's toughest policy questions.
He argued that post-apartheid economic policy had consistently failed to address inequality and unemployment. Instead of inclusive growth, he said, the benefits of development had disproportionately flowed to a small elite, leaving the majority of South Africans 'not just historically disadvantaged but presently disadvantaged'.
According to Davis, Mantashe defended South Africa's pursuit of fossil fuel projects, pointing out that the country's northern neighbour, Namibia, was forging ahead with offshore exploration. By Davis's account, Mantashe argued that if South Africa embraced similar projects, economic growth could have reached 3% or 4%, easing many of the concerns raised by environmental critics.
What troubled Davis most was the minister's proposal for some kind of environmental panel – à la a similar tribunal in Namibia – to expedite approvals and sidestep litigation. 'That is now being considered by Cabinet,' Davis warned. 'It raises profound questions about the extent to which the executive is committed to the rights enshrined in section 24.'
This exchange starkly illustrates the deep division between judicial expectations and executive priorities regarding climate action and economic development.
'Challenge political, not legal'
Davis returned to the principle of intergenerational justice – and the need for politics, not just litigation, to uphold it. He praised the Deadly Air judgment in 2022, in which High Court Judge Colleen Collis compelled the government to improve air quality in Mpumalanga, where most of South Africa's coal-fired power stations are situated. Crucially, the ruling was upheld by the Supreme Court of Appeal in April 2025, with Justice Mahube Betty Molemela confirming that the Constitution could be invoked to protect future generations and that the state bore a positive duty to act.
'And that's the point,' Davis concluded. 'The real challenge is not legal. It's political.'
If South Africa is serious about leaving its children 'a society that's worth living in', he said, it must adopt an economic policy that confronts inequality, poverty and environmental degradation together.
'Presently disadvantaged'
'We have failed to achieve a balance between green growth and the socioeconomic needs of an emerging economy. The vast majority of South Africans are not just historically disadvantaged – they're presently disadvantaged. The question is: what would an economic policy look like if we took these things seriously?'
For now, at least, Davis's answer is clear: 'It's not for the judiciary to manage the process. It's for the legislature and the executive. The rest of us are just squealing at the margins.' DM
Desmond Thompson is a freelance journalist.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Political leaders raise questions over who knew about allegations against Senzo Mchunu
There has been mixed reaction to the question of whether President Cyril Ramaphosa might have been aware for some time of the allegations of political interference against Police Minister Senzo Mchunu, made public on Sunday by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Mkhwanazi accused Mchunu of obstructing critical investigations by dismantling the Political Killings Task Team. Mkhwanazi made explosive claims during a press briefing claiming that Mchunu ordered the unilateral disbandment of the team and transferred 121 politically sensitive dockets to Deputy National Commissioner for Crime Detection, Shadrack Sibiya's office, where they have since been allegedly "neutralised". 'These actions constitute political interference of the highest order and are a direct threat to the rule of law…This kind of conduct undermines the entire South African Criminal Justice System,' Mkhwanazi said during the explosive briefing. Mkhwanazi highlighted communications between Mchunu and a businessman as a crucial piece of evidence. Despite Mchunu's parliamentary denial of knowing the businessman, Mkhwanazi asserts that a widely circulated social media phone recording contradicts this claim. This recording is considered one of the most damning pieces of evidence. Both Mchunu and Sibiya have denied the allegations. His allegations also implicate senior police officials in corruption and political interference which have since set-off calls for Ramaphosa to immediately investigate and get accountability at the highest levels of government. A party official from the GNU, who requested anonymity, said the Phala Phala saga was coming back to haunt Ramaphosa, because it was left unsolved. "It's really dangerous for us right now to assume that President Ramaphosa knew of this. But the person (Mchunu) who is accused here is the same person who was defending him during the Phala Phala scandal. So we can't take it away from anyone who would say Ramaphosa is involved in a cover-up," the official said. Another senior politician from the EFF said Ramaphosa was surrounding himself with allies that could succeed him to protect him from being prosecuted on the Phala Phala matter as soon as he leaves office in 2029. "If he (Ramaphosa) is not succeeded by someone who is in his corner then it could be his political enemy who would want him to be prosecuted, so he has to be involved in protecting his political ally (Mchunu)," the EFF source said. uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela claimed Ramaphosa knew of the accusations towards Mchunu and was planning to cover it up. "What is happening in this country pertaining to national security has gone far beyond a 'grave concern'. If Ramaphosa can cover up Phala Phala, would it not be surprising if he was involved in covering up Mchunu's alleged shenanigans?" Ndhlela asked. He said Ramaphosa had a tendency of covering-up high profile matters. 'We have written many times regarding political killings in KZN and Ramaphosa has since done nothing to curb that situation and now it has come to light that there is also a cover-up there,' he said. However, Build One SA (BOSA) leader Mmusi Maimane warned against jumping to conclusions before an investigation is launched. "I'm wary of us taking the way of the president having been involved in this new matter because this might limit his ability to act if we take it that way and we would then have to leave it to the Deputy President Paul Mashatile to make pronouncements," Maimane said. "I say we wait for the Special Investigation Unit's proclamation and give it 30 days for us to be able to move forward. However, Maimane added that if there were any truth that there are people who knew about the allegations Mkhwanazi brought forward, they should be put on special leave or suspended, regardless of who it was. Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya did not respond to questions on whether Ramaphosa knew about the allegations. However on Sunday after Mkhwanazi's bombshell, the presidency noted the statements made by Mkhwanazi and said it is a matter of grave national security concern that is receiving the highest priority attention. President Ramaphosa will outline the actions to be taken on this matter on his return from the BRICS Leaders' Summit. ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula said the party took these allegations in a serious light. "These allegations touch on the very integrity of the criminal justice system and the constitutional obligation of the state to protect South Africans. "We call upon president Cyril Ramaphosa to act with the urgency and seriousness this matter demands. The ANC reaffirms its commitment to give full protection to whistle-blowers, investigators and officers of the law," Mbalula said. Allegations made by Mkhwanazi have brought the work of the Political Killings Task Team into focus. This unit was established in 2018 in response to a surge in political assassinations within KZN. Its formation followed a directive from an Inter-Ministerial Committee, initiated after Ramaphosa's visit to the family of ANC activist Musawenkosi Qashana Mchunu, who was fatally shot in Plessislaer. Since its inception, the task team has investigated 612 cases, leading to 436 arrests and the recovery of 156 firearms. Of these, 55 firearms have been ballistically linked to politically motivated killings. Mkhwanazi also disclosed that 35 police officers were arrested for attempting to obstruct these investigations. [email protected]


eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
US to impose 30% tariff on all SA goods
JOHANNESBURG - South Africa is just three weeks away from a major trade blow. From 1 August, the US will impose a 30% tariff on all South African goods. This has been announced by US President Donald Trump in a letter to President Cyril Ramaphosa. The Trump administration says South Africa sells more to the US than it buys, and claims this trade imbalance justifies the penalty. The tariffs follow Trump's global 'reciprocal tariff' policy, which many critics say is based on flawed reasoning, not real economics.


The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
BREAKING: Donald Trump hits South Africa with 30% tariffs
South Africa is set to face a significant trade setback as US President Donald Trump has confirmed that 30% tariffs will be imposed on all South African goods starting 1 August 2025. The announcement was made in a letter from Donald Trump to President Cyril Ramaphosa. The tariffs are a result of the Donald Trump administration's stance on global trade imbalances, claiming that South Africa sells more to the US than it buys, a disparity that the US says justifies the imposition of a hefty tariff. This move is part of Donald Trump's broader 'reciprocal tariff' policy, which has sparked debate worldwide. Critics argue that the policy is based on flawed economic reasoning, with concerns over its long-term impact on international trade relations. 'South Africa's trade imbalance with the US has reached a point where it can no longer go unaddressed,' Donald Trump's letter stated. 'These tariffs are necessary to ensure fairer trade practices.' With just three weeks until the tariff implementation, South African exporters are bracing for the economic fallout. Key industries, including mining, agriculture, and manufacturing, are likely to be hit hard by the new tariff regime. Experts warn that the increased cost of doing business with the US could lead to reduced exports, putting pressure on local businesses already struggling with the global economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic. South African officials have expressed concern over the sudden move and its potential to harm their economy, urging Trump's administration to reconsider the punitive tariffs. Economic analysts and trade experts have widely criticised the tariffs, arguing that the trade imbalance with South Africa is not due to unfair practices, but rather structural and historical economic factors. They claim that the imposition of tariffs could lead to retaliatory measures from other countries, further exacerbating global trade tensions. 'The reciprocal tariff policy fails to account for the complexities of international trade,' said Dr. Thabo Mbeki, former South African president and economist. 'It's a short-sighted approach that risks worsening trade relations and harming economies on both sides.' With the August 1 deadline looming, South African officials are seeking diplomatic channels to resolve the issue before the tariffs take effect. However, with the Donald Trump administration's firm stance, it remains uncertain whether a last-minute resolution can be reached. The upcoming trade blow is a pivotal moment in South Africa's relationship with the US, and exporters will be watching closely to see how this affects their ability to access the lucrative American market. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.