Rohingya refugees need to be deported if held foreigners: SC
A bench of Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta and N Kotiswar Singh referred to a top court's order and remarked the identity cards issued by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees may not be of any help to them under the law.
"If they are foreigners as per the Foreigners Act, then they have to be deported," Justice Datta told senior advocate Colin Gonsalves and advocate Prashant Bhushan appearing for different Rohingya petitioners seeking various reliefs.
The top court was informed that some refugees having UNHCR cards, including women and children, were arrested by police authorities late last night and deported, despite a hearing slated on Thursday.
Justice Datta said, "If they are all foreigners and if they are covered by the Foreigners' Act, then they will have to be dealt with as per the Foreigners' Act."
The court decided to hear the matter finally and posted the hearing on July 31.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, referred to the April 8, 2021 order of the court and said it bound the government to take deportation action in accordance with law.
Gonsalves said last night's events were "alarming" and "shocking" as it amounted to overreach of the court's decisions.
Referring to the UNHCR cards, Mehta said India was not a signatory to the refugee convention.
The April 2021 order said the rights guaranteed under Articles 14 and 21 are available to all persons who may or may not be citizens but the right of not to be deported, is ancillary or concomitant to the right to reside or settle in any part of the territory of India guaranteed under Article 19.
During the hearing, Bhushan urged the bench to finally hear the matter saying it was not the Refugee Convention alone which needs to be seen, but also the Genocide Convention which has been ratified by India.
Justice Kant said, "It would be better that instead of passing interlocutory orders of any nature, we take up these matters and decide either way. If they have a right to stay here, that should be acknowledged, and if they don't have a right to stay here, then they will have to follow the procedure and deport as per the law."
When Gonsalves again expressed apprehension of further deportations, Justice Kant said Mehta had assured deportations would happen in line with Indian laws.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
5 minutes ago
- Time of India
US, China and Russia: Navigating the superpower trilemma
Today, Indian foreign policy discourse is mired in an important debate. Two key assumptions govern this debate: that New Delhi's ties with the US arguably constitute its most important relationship in the 21st century, and that any negotiations with Beijing are a signal of weakness. India-US relations are undergoing a tense phase. The tensions have primarily been instigated by US President Donald Trump's decision to impose a 25% tariff on India, and an additional, 'unspecified penalty' for continuing to buy energy resources from Russia. His social media comments have gone so far as to refer to both India and Russia as 'dead economies.' Naturally, this has called into question the time-tested nature of the partnership in the face of the 'China challenge'. With the US-China equation changing, India has to balance ties with both as well as work towards its own national interests Speaking of China, after a long period of severed dialogue, postures on both sides have slightly relaxed, though the road to stability vis-à-vis the border issue, or even China's backing of Pakistan, is long and winding. Nonetheless, communication and negotiation between the two neighbours is underway, and is perhaps a welcome break from the silent-but-violent treatment. Besides the volatility in New Delhi's ties with the two superpowers, there exists a bilateral dynamic between the US and China, which vitally impacts India. An intense back-and-forth of escalating tariffs ensued between the two economic giants earlier this year. Yet, Trump's recent statements seem to suggest that a trade deal with Beijing is in the works. So how does that affect India? So far, India has believed that Trump's continued dissatisfaction with Beijing will be a core aspect of mutual convergence between itself and the US. This definitely was the case under the Joe Biden administration. But if anything is certain about Trump, it is that nothing, indeed, is certain. So, the US and China may not be entering a friendly phase, but they sure are inching toward some semblance of stability. The dynamics of this fateful triangle require that India think in its national interests— sustained economic growth and security of its territory from both external and internal threats. And as PM Modi himself remarked in an interview in 2023, '[The] foremost guiding principle in foreign affairs is our country's national interest.' This begs the question: How should New Delhi balance the nuances of its ties with the US and China and the repercussions of their own thaw, while working to achieve its national interests? One way is not to believe that negotiations with China signal weakness. This anxiety is likely to play up as New Delhi and Beijing negotiate. Most recently, India has eased tourism rules, while China has opened up access for Indians to undertake the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra. To a great degree, India's geographical, economic and military constraints require that communication with Beijing continue for sustainable security to be achieved. This is not to say that India should give up its confident posture, or discontinue investments in de-risking or border security. It is also not a call for it to shed its affinity for the US. But the steps toward a thaw with Beijing — high-level political conversations, ministerial-level dialogues, and working mechanism consultations on the border — are necessary. And at a time when Trump seems to be prepared to meet the 'China challenge' alone, India must figure its own way out to do the same. Second, is to evaluate costs when it comes to fulfilling its energy requirements through purchases from Russia. The affordability of such purchases, and the historic nature of ties with Moscow (especially in defence), make it a vital partner to New Delhi. However, Trump is prioritising reciprocal access to the Indian market over having a vital partner in the Indo-Pacific. And in a world where the US is vastly more powerful than India — or in most aspects, even China — much of what Trump says, goes. So the question is, where is the common ground between India not shedding its friendship with Russia, not risking insurmountable tariffs from the US, and not enabling China's unchecked regional power? The intertwined interests of economic growth and stable security seem orthogonal in this situation. But it is important to face facts. If it wasn't buying oil from Russia, India would still get the tariff slap. If there was great openness in the Indian dairy and agricultural markets, which Trump consistently demands, there would still be an 'unspecified penalty' for trading with Russia. So, the acknowledgement that there is no absolute win-win, is essential. It boils down to assessing what is more harmful — not making any adjustments to the trade numbers with Russia, or the US. It is also important to acknowledge the trade-offs — if there is a significant reduction in the imports of oil and/or defence equipment from Russia, and the US becomes the preferred alternative source of imports, Moscow may become unabashed in its support for China in its disputes with India. If trade with Russia continues as is, India shall face agonistic tariffs under Donald Trump and an overall lack of support in regional geopolitics. It is indeed true that India's tariffs continue to remain high, market openness is low, and domestic innovation and production capability face challenges. Hence, is the first step to addressing the above mentioned dilemma to take difficult steps towards phased openness? Most likely. It may assuage Trump's concerns about the US's trade deficit, without creating many troubles in India-Russia relations. Finally, the worrisome trend of self-reliance across the globe is leaving fewer alternatives for India to replace its dependencies on the US, China, or Russia. Where it gets affordable imports, it faces controversial dilemmas. Where it sees a strong partner, it faces chiding and deriding. So, moving forward, even as the willingness to negotiate diplomatically must continue, India must invest in its own trajectory toward economic and military modernisation. Illustration credit: Illustration by Chad Crowe (USA) Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trumped: Indian basmati may lose out to Pak, as 25% tariff gives neighbour 6% edge
1 2 Amritsar: US President Donald Trump's 25% tariff on all things Indian has dealt a double blow to Indian basmati exporters. Not only does it give Pakistan basmati a 6% tariff advantage, but it also comes at a time when the India-UK Free Trade Agreement talks offered no relief for basmati. US tariff on Pakistan stands at 19%. This widened gap threatens India's competitiveness against its traditional rival in international markets. "Pakistan has already got the 6% edge, which will make it difficult for us (Indian basmati exporters) to compete in the international market," said Tejinder Singh, CEO of Amar Singh Chawla Wala, makers of the Lal Qila basmati brand. "It makes it tough for us to compete globally, erasing any level playing field," he said. The US hardly consumes more than 10% of the basmati that is cultivated and exported from Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan, he said. But the 6% gap is "significant" in commodity trade and is likely to drive up prices for consumers abroad as Indian exporters will struggle to maintain market share against their traditional rival, he pointed out. Indian basmati trade was on the upswing till now. India exported 52.4 lakh metric tons of basmati, compared to 5.45 lakh metric tons by Pakistan in the 2023-24 fiscal. In 2024-25, Indian exports rose to 60.7 lakh metric tons, while Pakistan's saw a nominal increase, said Taranjit. The 25% traffic may prove to be a speedbreaker. Arvinderpal Singh, president of Punjab Rice Miller Exporters Association, said that the imposition of a 25% tariff by US will have a widespread impact — from growers to consumers. "We are directly competing with Pakistan, and they will be in a position to supply at lower rates than Indian exporters due to the lower tariff," he pointed out, adding that consumer nations are likely to opt for Pakistani basmati, with Thailand as the second preference. "If our sales decline, we will have to reduce our purchases, which will ultimately affect farmers, and they too will bear the brunt," he said. Singh suggested that the Indian govt should urge US administration to reduce the tariff on basmati, or at least ensure a level playing field with Pakistan so that Indian exporters can compete fairly in the international market. Taranjit said that Indian basmati exporters are already suffering with no relief in the India-UK Free Trade Agreement, and the recent imposition of a 25% tariff by the US will only leave a lasting impact on the Indian basmati rice exports. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC stays Oranland allocationfor solar projectsin Jaisalmer
Jaisalmer: Rajasthan High Court has stayed the allocation of thousands of bighas of Oran pasture land in Jaisalmer district for large-scale solar power projects, directing the state govt and district administration to respond to concerns about the protection of these ecologically and culturally significant lands. In an order issued on July 30, Justices Pushpendra Singh Bhati and Sandeep Taneja, stayed the land allocation following a PIL by advocates Manas Ranchhod Khatri and Sunil Paliwal on behalf of petitioner Shyam Singh Sodha. The petitioner challenged the allocation of Oran and Aagor land in the Fatehgarh subdivision, particularly in Sitodai village, for the establishment of a 12,500 megawatt solar park by Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited (RVUNL). According to the petitioner, the Jaisalmer district collector, acting on state govt directives, proceeded with land allocation without proper physical verification or site inspection. The land includes ancient Oran, Talai, embankments, and Aagor areas, which, while not officially recorded in revenue documents due to clerical errors, are recognized by villagers as sacred and protected spaces. These lands are traditionally safeguarded by local communities, who prohibit encroachment, tree cutting, and hunting, and regularly worship at these sites. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Health Insurance for Senior Citizen Living in India Policybazaar Get Quote Undo The petition highlighted that the allocation process overlooked several significant areas, including Malan Baisa Oran, various Talais (water bodies), embankments, and Aagor lands that exist on ground but were not accounted for in official records. In Sitodai village, the Oran of Tanot Mata and Malan Baisa is particularly revered, featuring trees like Khejri, Jal, Kumat, Ker, and Ber, which play a vital role in wildlife conservation and maintaining local ecology. In response to these concerns, the high court issued notices to Jaisalmer district collector, Rajasthan Renewable Energy, and the director of the Arid Forest Research Institute, ordering that status quo be maintained on site and in official records until further orders. The court also referenced a Dec 18, 2024, Supreme Court directive, which instructed the Rajasthan forest department to conduct detailed ground and satellite mapping of all sacred forests, including Orans, and to consider granting them protection under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, as community reserves. The Supreme Court further directed the ministry of environment, forest and climate change to form a five-member committee, in collaboration with the Rajasthan's forest department, to oversee the identification and protection of these areas. The high court stay order mandates compliance with the apex court's instructions and has sought submission of a report regarding the committee's formation and progress. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
