Violence marks ‘Partition horrors day'
The State government had on Wednesday issued a directive to the universities and colleges against organising any events related to the day on campuses citing the possibility of disturbance of communal harmony.
The ABVP organised events at the Central University of Kerala (CUK) in Kasaragod, Government College, Kasaragod, Govinda Pai Memorial Government College, Manjeswaram, on the Calicut University campus at Tenhipalam, and at VTM NSS College at Dhanuvachapuram in Thiruvananthapuram. While the event held at the VTM NSS College went peacefully, SFI activists turned up in big numbers to resist the event organised at the Government College at Kasaragod. The SFI activists tore down the posters put up by ABVP, leading to clashes between the two groups, before the police intervened to stop them.
The SFI also burned the Governor in effigy outside the college campus. Later, the ABVP attempted to again put up the posters on the college campus, when activists of the Muslim Students Federation (MSF), the student outfit of the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML), attempted to resist the move.
On the Calicut University campus, the pro-Sangh Calicut University Employees' Centre attempted to hold an event to mark the day. However, activists of the SFI, Kerala Students Union (KSU), and the MSF tried to prevent them. This led to clashes and raising of slogans between the two groups. A large posse of police personnel, who were present on the campus, removed the student activists from the place to avert further trouble.
At the Government Law College, Kozhikode, it was the ABVP which tried to conduct a programme outside the campus. However, since they had not taken permission to hold the event outside, the police took the activists into custody. Activists of the SFI, KSU and the MSF, meanwhile, raised slogans against them.
Skirmishes were also reported from the CUK in Kasaragod.
The ABVP, in a statement, claimed to have organised related events at the Institute of Human Resources Development (IHRD) College at Kumbala and the Chendayad MG College in Kannur.
At the Cochin University of Science and Technology (Cusat), an online seminar was held as part of the observance of the day with G. Gopakumar, former Vice-Chancellor of the CUK, delivering an address. Cusat Vice-Chancellor M. Junaid Bushiri attended.
SFI State secretary P.S.Sanjeev said the very fact that it was organised in a surreptitious manner exposes the fact that the organisers were convinced that the event was unacceptable to society and would have invited stiff opposition.
(with inputs from Kozhikode and Kannur bureaus)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Undemocratic', ‘exclusionary': Student outfits condemn move mandating DUSU poll candidates to deposit Rs 1 lakh bond
Major students' groups have condemned a move mandating candidates in fray for the Delhi University Students Union (DUSU) elections to deposit a Rs 1 lakh bond, to be eligible to contest. From the Aam Aadmi Party's Association of Students for Alternative Politics (ASAP) to the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) to the Congress-backed National Students' Union of India (NSUI) — all student bodies have termed the move as 'undemocratic' and 'exclusionary'. This comes weeks before the DUSU elections, scheduled for next month. Calling it a 'Tughlaqi farman', ASAP leaders said it is aimed at keeping middle-class students out of the race. 'It is nothing but a conspiracy to directly block middle-class students from contesting elections,' said Kuldeep Bidhuri, ASAP's Delhi state president. He also said that if a student were to contest for all four posts, 'how will they arrange Rs 4 lakh for the bonds?' ASAP's Praveen Chaudhary called the decision 'a huge wall erected against aspiring candidates', and asked how an 'ordinary student' could afford the deposit for what, he said, is meant to be a 'platform for service'. ABVP national media convenor Harsh Attri said the group had met with the DU Registrar and submitted a memorandum against the decision and urging that no such decisions should be taken without consulting the students. The NSUI, too, issued a statement opposing the order. It said: 'In DUSU elections, @UnivofDelhi has put a condition of paying a bond of Rs 1 lakh. Will you not allow children from ordinary families to contest elections?' 'The bond for MP elections in the country is only Rs 25,000. The (Narendra) Modi government is so afraid of students and their leaders that it is hell-bent on ending student union elections.' 'NSUI supports clean and fair student elections as per the Lyngdoh Committee and court rulings — but this notification is nothing more than a political weapon to help the ruling BJP's student organisation ABVP and target opponents,' said its national president Varun Choudhary. Speaking to The Indian Express, Registrar Vikas Gupta said, 'This was part of the guidelines laid down by the (Delhi) High Court.' Last year, the high court had rapped the university for defacement during the students' elections and had postponed the declaration of results by a month. After summoning 15 DUSU poll candidates last year for allegedly defacing public and private property while campaigning, the high court had directed them to give an undertaking that 'they shall not deface or mutilate any public property' in the future. A bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela recorded the appearances of the 15 candidates who were summoned on October 21, the last date of hearing. After referring to photos and videos from last year's campaign showing jammed roads, luxury cars, posters, graffiti, etc, Chief Justice Manmohan, in an oral remark to ABVP's former presidential candidate Rishabh Chaudhary, said: 'It seems you have a lot of funds at your disposal. You'll clean up.' 'We don't want to punish them as such but they must clear up the mess,' he added. The bench recorded in its order that the summoned candidates should remove the posters, hoardings or graffiti from the campus as well as other places in Delhi, at their own expense. In its order dated November 11, 2024, the high court had recorded that DU, vide notification dated October 30, 2024, had constituted a 'DUSU Election Reforms Committee', which submitted its report on November 8, that year. DU's counsel had informed the court that the report was accepted 'in principle' by the Vice-Chancellor. Among reforms listed in the report was a bond 'to be executed at the time of filing nomination paper to contest any post of office-bearer of College Union/DUSU for Rs. 1 lakh by the student for the act of any defacement during the course of study/election'.
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Tricolour raised in Toronto as Canada marks India's Independence Day
Toronto: As India's Independence Day was celebrated across Canada on Friday, there was signs of incremental change in the bilateral relationship, as a Federal Minister hoisted the tricolour at an event in the Greater Toronto Area or GTA and functions were held at the provincial and municipal levels. Canada's Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson at the Independence Day celebration, on Friday. (Vedic Cultural Center) Canada's Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Tim Hodgson participated in a ceremony at the Vedic Cultural Centre in the GTA township of Markham as the guest of honour. He hoisted the flag and later posted on X, 'Happy India Independence Day! Honoured to join the Indo-Canadian community at the Vedic Cultural Centre for a vibrant celebration of music, dance, and pride. Grateful for the Indian-Canadian community's rich history and contributions that continue to shape Markham–Thornhill for the better.' The post was shared by Canada's Minister of Foreign Affairs Anita Anand. The Center is part of the Arya Samaj Mandir. Its president Yash Kapur said, 'We were honoured to have him here today.' He said that Hodgon's participation came about as a result of a request from the Minister's office. Kapur described Hodgson, also the local MP, was a friend of the temple and the Indo-Canadian community. Hodgson was the first Federal Minister to take part in an I Day event since 2022. Relations between India and Canada cratered in 2023 when then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stated in the House of Commons that there were 'credible allegations' of a potential link between Indian agents and the killing of pro-Khalistan figure Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Surrey, British Columbia, three months earlier. While those accusations came over a month after I Day, a chill was already evident as Ministers had stayed away from such functions that August. That absence continued in 2024. Meanwhile, a celebration was organised at the rotunda of the Manitoba Legislative building and the flag raised by the city of Mississauga in the GTA. The Mayor of Fredericton, capital of the province of New Brunswick, joined the Indo-Canadian community in a celebration there. The iconic Ottawa sign in the Canadian capital was lit up in the colours of the Indian flag, which was also hoisted at the City Hall in Kingston, Ontario. Unlike the previous two years, there were no large protests outside India's missions in the country. While a handful of pro-Khalistan protestors gathered outside India's High Commission in Ottawa, the official ceremony was held without any incident. No protestors were visible near India's Consulate in Toronto and no untoward incident was reported from the Consulate in Vancouver. The gradual thaw started with the formation of the Government under Mark Carney this year and was confirmed by his bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the margins of the G7 summit in Kananaskis in Alberta in July.
India Today
9 hours ago
- India Today
In Alaska, Putin emerges as Csar of geopolitics
It was hyped as a game of chicken between two global titans. But the Trump-Putin Alaska summit was a poultry-geist, with both players strutting and clucking, laying no eggs. The world, cooped up in anticipation, waited all night. Yet the cocks crowed no peace at dawn—no deal the hen in the crossfire, breathes a cautious sigh of relief; uninvited to the table, it escapes further plucking—for now. The global flock, meanwhile, pecks at rumours and scraps, wondering if the bluster will ever hatch anything but chaos, and PR for Peace, No Deal, Only OpticsIf the substance remained unsettled, notes the New York Times, the atmospherics were extraordinary. 'The president rolled out a literal red carpet and even applauded as he welcomed Mr. Putin, who is under US sanctions and faces an international arrest warrant for war crimes. The two laughed and spoke warmly with each other, and Mr. Trump even invited Mr Putin to ride with him in the armored presidential limousine to their meeting.' The summit ended in a haze of ambiguity. Trump vaguely mentioned 'agreement' on some unspecified issues but not others, while Putin cryptically noted an 'understanding,' inviting the US president to Moscow. Neither elaborated nor faced reporters' questions. Trump promised to follow up with NATO leaders and Ukraine's president Volodymyr Putin's The WinnerAs Putin flies back to the Kremlin from the island his ancestors sold to the US for less than two cents an acre, his chest is puffed, his crow louder than ever. Before the summit, he was billed as the winner—Friday's events confirmed with his diplomatic strut, secured a propaganda triumph without conceding an inch, establishing himself as an exponent of the Sun Tzu doctrine. The mere fact that the US president met Putin one-on-one elevates Russia's global standing and signals the failure of Western efforts to isolate over three years, Putin has faced sanctions, an International Criminal Court arrest warrant for war crimes, and exclusion from major forums like the G7. This summit breaks that isolation, placing Putin 'back at the top table of international diplomacy' and allowing him to bully Ukraine and thumb his nose at Europe. It provides Putin with a platform to be seen as an equal to the US, using diplomatic tools to achieve what his military has struggled to fully accomplish on the state media and pro-Kremlin outlets are already framing the event as a "victory," highlighting Ukraine's dismay and portraying it as validation of Russia's resilience.'Western media are in a state that can be called insanity, bordering on complete madness: for three years they were talking about Russia's isolation, and today they saw a red carpet, which was used to greet the Russian president in the United State,' said Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria The Eager PeacenikadvertisementDuring his campaign, Trump promised an end to the Ukraine war within 24 hours. The self-anointed greatest deal-maker of the world, was desperate for some peace crumbs. Only he knows what he got from hosting Putin like a victorious king on the US later told Fox News the meeting was a '10' for personal rapport, conceding the Russia-Ukraine conflict was harder to resolve than expected, but insisted a deal could come 'fairly short' if Ukraine the opposition was livid. 'The photo-op in and of itself essentially legitimizes war crimes, telegraphs to other autocrats or evil men around the world that they can get away with murdering civilians and still get a photo-op with the president of the United States,' Senator Chris Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, said earlier on Friday on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe.'CNN host and analyst Fareed Zakaria called the bilateral meeting 'cringeworthy,' breaking down how Trump's theatrics—applauding Putin and sharing laughs—played into Russian propaganda, sidelining Ukraine and eroding US leverage.'Sickening. Shameful. And in the end, useless,' the Kyiv Independent thundered in an editorial. 'On our screens, a blood-soaked dictator and war criminal received a royal welcome in the land of the free — as his attack drones headed for our cities.'advertisementUkraine's Toast, Europe's RoastThis setup raises alarms in Ukraine and European capitals, as it could lead to deals involving land swaps or ceasefires that favor Russia, such as recognising Moscow's control over annexed regions like Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and dynamic gives Putin leverage, as the absence of Ukrainian representation inherently tilts the scales toward Russian demands, portraying the war as a US-Russia bilateral issue rather than an act of aggression against a sovereign nation. For Ukraine, the summit heightens fears of abandonment, while Europe braces for reduced US Road Ahead: War of AttritionOn the battlefield, Russia has made incremental advances despite significant losses, while Ukraine grapples with manpower shortages, delayed Western aid, and constant aerial bombardments. Putin views this as evidence that victory is 'within reach,' making him unlikely to compromise substantially at the Russia's economy adapted to sanctions—bolstered by alliances with China, Iran, and North Korea for weapons and resources—Putin can afford to prolong the conflict while appearing open to talks. This 'war of attrition' strategy benefits Verdict: Trump's The LoserTrump's desire to act as a 'global peacemaker' and his history of praising Putin create opportunities for Russia. His urgency for a quick 'win' to fulfill campaign promises on ending the war contrasts with Putin's patience, giving the Russian leader an upper hand in dictating the pace and terms. The pivot toward realpolitik at the cost of moral commitments to Ukraine risks emboldening aggressors worldwide by demonstrating that sustained military pressure can force diplomatic concessions. China and Taiwan would be watching Trump's move with glee and the summit yields even partial agreements, such as a ceasefire without Russian withdrawals, it would legitimise Moscow's gains. Conversely, a stalemate still benefits Putin by maintaining the status quo, potentially fracturing transatlantic alliances if Trump blames Ukraine for the Kyiv Independent warned: 'But there's a lesson Trump still hasn't learned: The Russian leader doesn't really make deals— he takes. He takes what is offered to him, and then takes some more— he keeps taking until stopped by force. That is the Russian art of the deal.'The optics alone normalise US-Russia relations at Europe's expense, damaging perceptions of American reliability among allies. Putin's gains highlight how the summit's very existence validates Russia's strategy of combining force with selective diplomacy, positioning him as the dominant player before any agreements are Putin acting as Papa of geopolitics, Trump—the old chicken in a hurry— will have to wait for the egg he is so desperate to hatch.- EndsTune InMust Watch
