logo
Europe Inc's trade deal relief tempered by tariff reality

Europe Inc's trade deal relief tempered by tariff reality

Reuters28-07-2025
LONDON, July 28 (Reuters) - European companies were on edge on Monday as corporate leaders tried to unpick the real impact of a hard-won U.S. trade deal and lamented a sharp jump in tariffs versus those in place before President Donald Trump's second term.
The trade deal announced on Sunday imposes a 15% import tariff on most EU goods. After an initial rally on relief that some sort of deal had been reached, shares of carmakers and alcohol firms fell.
Leading the way lower were BMW (BMWG.DE), opens new tab, Volkswagen (VOWG.DE), opens new tab, Mercedes-Benz (MBGn.DE), opens new tab and Stellantis (STLAM.MI), opens new tab, along with Pernod Ricard (PERP.PA), opens new tab and Anheuser-Busch InBev (ABI.BR), opens new tab, all down between 1-2%.
The falls reflect how the deal is being seen as lopsided, more a win for U.S. President Donald Trump, as well as ongoing uncertainties about the fine print of the final agreement.
The 15% rate is better than the 30% once threatened by Trump and will bring clarity for European makers of cars, planes and chemicals, but it's well above initial hopes of a zero-for-zero agreement and an average rate last year of around 2.5%.
"The price is high for both sides. European exports are losing competitiveness. U.S. customers are paying the tariffs," said Wolfgang Große Entrup, head of the German Chemical Industry Association VCI, adding though that it could have been worse.
"Those who expect a hurricane are grateful for a storm."
The deal, which also includes $600 billion of EU investments in the United States and $750 billion of EU purchases of U.S. energy over Trump's second term, includes some exemptions, even if details are still to be ironed out.
For carmakers, the 15% tariff is down from more than 25% under the global levy imposed by Trump in April. The EU is also cutting its tariff on U.S.-made cars to 2.5%, a senior European Commission official involved in the talks said.
Car parts makers were amongst the strongest stock market performers. Valeo (VLOF.PA), opens new tab was up around 4% while French supplier Forvia (FRVIA.PA), opens new tab, which also announced robust results earlier on Monday, was up over 10%.
"Tariffs are lower than those imposed by the U.S. administration in recent months, and if it reduces volatility and uncertainty, it's better for all economic players," Forvia's CFO Olivier Durand said on an earnings call.
Aircraft and aircraft parts will be exempt - good news for French planemaker Airbus (AIR.PA), opens new tab - as will certain chemicals, some generic drugs, semiconductor equipment, some farm products, natural resources and critical raw materials.
Shares in pharmaceutical companies Sanofi (SASY.PA), opens new tab, Roche (ROG.S), opens new tab and Novo Nordisk (NOVOb.CO), opens new tab all edged up, while generics maker Sandoz (SDZ.S), opens new tab rose strongly.
"It's definitely better than 200%. Most had 25% factored. But I don't think anyone believes it until it's signed," an industry source told Reuters, referring to previous threats from Trump to tax pharmaceutical imports.
Shares in the world's biggest supplier of computer chip-making equipment ASML (ASML.AS), opens new tab also rose more than 4%, among the biggest gainers on the pan-European STOXX 600 (.STOXX), opens new tab index.
Dutch brewer Heineken (HEIN.AS), opens new tab cheered the deal, with CEO Dolf van den Brink welcoming the certainty it brought.
The world's No.2 brewer sends beer, especially its namesake lager, to the U.S. from Europe and Mexico, and has also suffered from the indirect effect on consumer confidence in important markets like Brazil.
The rate on spirits that could impact firms such as Diageo (DGE.L), opens new tab, Pernod Ricard and LVMH (LVMH.PA), opens new tab is still being negotiated though.
"It seems that in coming days there could be negotiations for certain agricultural products, zero for zero, which is what the European and U.S. sectors have been calling for," said Jose Luis Benitez, director of the Spanish Wine Federation.
Benitez added that a 15% rate could put Europe at a disadvantage versus other wine exporting regions subject to 10% tariffs.
"If there are any exceptions, we hope that the (European) Commission understands that wine should be one of them."
Lamberto Frescobaldi, the president of Italian wine body UIV, said on Sunday that 15% tariffs on wine would result in a loss of 317 million euros ($372.63 million) over the next 12 months, though the group was waiting to see the final deal text.
Others said that the agreement- which followed on the heels of a similar one with Japan - helped bring greater clarity for company leaders, but could still hurt European firms.
"While this agreement puts an end to uncertainty, it poses a significant threat to the competitiveness of the French cosmetics industry," said Emmanuel Guichard, secretary general of French cosmetics association FEBEA, which counts L'Oreal (OREP.PA), opens new tab, LVMH (LVMH.PA), opens new tab and Clarins among its members.
($1 = 0.8507 euros)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The row between Barcelona and Marc-Andre ter Stegen explained
The row between Barcelona and Marc-Andre ter Stegen explained

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

The row between Barcelona and Marc-Andre ter Stegen explained

Barcelona has stripped goalkeeper Marc-Andre ter Stegen of the club captaincy due to a deepening rift. The club sought to classify Ter Stegen as a long-term injury to comply with La Liga 's Financial Fair Play rules and free up salary space. This classification would have allowed Barcelona to clear 80 per cent of his wages from their registration to make space in their wage bill for Garcia and Manchester United loanee Marcus Rashford. Ter Stegen's public announcement of a three-month recovery period contradicted La Liga rules, which require a minimum of four months for long-term injury status. Ronald Araujo, the current vice-captain, will temporarily assume the duties of first-team captain.

Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners
Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners

President Donald Trump 's plans for 100% tariffs on computer chips that aren't made in the U.S. are stoking confusion among businesses and trading partners — boosting stocks for leading semiconductor companies while leaving smaller producers scrambling to understand the implications. The U.S. imports a relatively small number of chips because most of the foreign-made chips in a device — from an iPhone to a car — were already assembled into a product, or part of a product, before it landed in the country. "The real question everybody in the industry is asking is whether there will be a component tariff, where the chips in a device would require some sort of separate tariff calculation,' said Martin Chorzempa, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Trump said Wednesday that companies that "made a commitment to build" in the U.S. would be spared the import tax, even if they are not yet producing those chips in American factories. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said in the Oval Office while meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.' Wall Street investors interpreted that as good news not just for U.S. companies like AMD, Intel and Nvidia, but also for the biggest Asian chipmakers like Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company that have been working to build U.S. factories. But it left greater uncertainty for smaller chipmakers in Europe and Asia that have little exposure to the AI boom but still make semiconductors inserted into essential products like cars or washing machines. These producers "probably aren't large enough to get on the map for an exemption and quite probably wouldn't have the kind of excess capital and margins to be able to add investment at a large scale into the United States,' Chorzempa said. The announcement came more than three months after Trump temporarily exempted most electronics from his administration's most onerous tariffs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of computer chips increased the price of autos and contributed to higher inflation. Chorzempa said chip tariffs could again raise prices by hundreds of dollars per vehicle if the semiconductors inside a car are not exempt. 'There's a chip that allows you to open and close the window," Chorzempa said. "There's a chip that is running the entertainment system. There is a chip that's kind of running all the electronics. There are chips, especially in EVs, that are doing power management, all that kind of stuff.' Much of the investment into building U.S. chip factories began with the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022, providing more than $50 billion to support new computer chip plants, fund research and train workers for the industry. Trump has vocally opposed those financial incentives and taken a different approach, betting that the threat of dramatically higher chip costs would force most companies to open factories domestically, despite the risk that tariffs could squeeze corporate profits and push up prices for electronics.

Reeves could unlock £30bn with defence loophole in fiscal rules
Reeves could unlock £30bn with defence loophole in fiscal rules

Telegraph

time12 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Reeves could unlock £30bn with defence loophole in fiscal rules

Rachel Reeves could give herself an extra £30bn headroom next year if she follows Gordon Brown's advice to take increased defence spending outside the fiscal rules. The former prime minister said the Chancellor should follow Germany and declare that 'exceptional' increases in defence spending can be paid for by borrowing more. This is currently banned under Ms Reeves's fiscal rules, which say borrowing should never pay for day-to-day spending, and that debt should fall as a share of the economy by 2030. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) says the defence spending change could give the Government another £30bn next year. However, the economic think tank warned it would increase borrowing costs for households with mortgages. It comes as Ms Reeves comes under huge pressure to figure out how to fill a £50bn hole in the public finances, with tax rises seemingly increasingly likely. Mr Brown told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme that he would like the Chancellor to scrap the two-child benefit cap, raising the money to do so by increasing taxes on the gambling industry. He said another option was to treat a commitment to ramping up defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP by the 2030s as 'exceptional' and as 'outside the fiscal rules'. 'When you come to the fiscal position, there is one thing that has happened over the last few months which has been quite unprecedented: to spend 5 per cent on defence expenditure as we want to spend by 2030,' said the former prime minister. 'But this is a Nato initiative, this is a European initiative, we should be doing this jointly, we should have either jointly issued bonds or a Nato defence fund and we should be sharing the cost across the Continent. 'That should be regarded as something extraordinary and exceptional, outside the fiscal rules and that would create the kind of headroom that Rachel Reeves needs.' Ben Zaranko, associate director of the IFS, said that if defence spending increased from 2.5 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent, this would be equivalent to around £30bn. He said: 'If the UK needs to spend a lot more on defence, and it needs to do so quickly, there could be a case for borrowing more in the short term to make that happen, and to smooth the path towards the new higher spending equilibrium. 'Some sort of one-off joint bond issuance with Europe or Nato could be part of that. 'But that extra borrowing wouldn't be free: we would expect it to push up borrowing costs for the Government and households with mortgages. 'And, importantly, more borrowing cannot be a permanent solution. Ultimately, if we need to spend more on defence on a recurring, permanent basis, we will need to either raise more in tax or spend less on something else.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store