logo
NC Senate gives initial approval to budget plan with cuts to programs and taxes

NC Senate gives initial approval to budget plan with cuts to programs and taxes

Yahoo17-04-2025

The North Carolina Senate took the first of two votes to advance its proposed two-year, $66 billion budget Wednesday, blending tax cuts, modest raises for teachers and state workers, increased reserves for Helene recovery and cuts to programs.
The budget also includes funding for a school teacher leadership program, for agriculture disaster crop loss and projects like a new children's hospital being developed by Duke Health and UNC Health.
Senate Republicans plan to spend $32.6 billion in the first year and $33.3 billion in the second year, while aiming to restore the state's rainy-day fund to $4.75 billion, its pre-Helene level.
The Senate proposal adds $700 million to the Helene reserve fund. Separately, lawmakers made temporary and permanent cuts in the transportation budget to support recovery efforts, providing another $633 million over the biennium, said Sen. Ralph Hise, a top budget writer who represents various Western North Carolina counties.
The budget proposal would accelerate income tax cuts. Past budgets set the rate at 4.5% in 2024, 4.25% in 2025 and 3.99% after. The Senate plan speeds that up — dropping it to 3.49% in 2027 and 2.99% in 2028 — while scrapping rate cuts tied to state revenue. Further reductions could follow if other triggers are met.
It also would double the tax paid by sports betting operators from the current rate of 18% to 36%.
After a debate that lasted more than five hours, the Senate voted to approve the budget with Sen. Dan Blue, a Raleigh Democrat and the former leader of Senate Democrats, joining Republicans in voting in favor of the bill. Three other Democrats also supported the plan, while one Republican voted against it.
Over the course of the debate, Democrats urged delaying further tax cuts, citing a projected decline in revenue. They also pushed for higher pay for state employees and criticized proposed agency cuts.
Democrats proposed more than two dozen amendments, all of which except one failed, including one to freeze the state's corporate income tax phaseout. Sen. Julie Mayfield, an Asheville Democrat, proposed more Helene relief, including for mental health services for first responders and grants to help local businesses recover.
One amendment that did pass, offered by Democratic Sen. Dan Blue of Raleigh, would give Wake County five additional assistant district attorneys. Blue said he raised the issue with Republican budget writers in committee on Tuesday, and Republicans quickly recommended the amendment's adoption.
Another amendment, introduced by Republican Sen. Bobby Hanig of Currituck County, would've cut a provision the Senate GOP included in their budget to end free rides on the state's coastal ferries and start charging tolls board the boats.
Sen. Todd Johnson, a Union County Republican, asked Hanig if he would withdraw his amendment and continue discussions about ferry rides as the budget process move forward. Hanig refused to do so, prompting Republicans to make a motion to table the amendment.
The motion appeared to fail by a single vote before Sen. Buck Newton stood to say he accidentally hit the wrong button and wanted to change his vote to 'yes.'
Hanig and Democrats questioned if Newton could change his vote once the time allotted for voting on the amendment had elapsed, but Lt. Gov. Rachel Hunt, who was presiding over Wednesday's session, said that the rules allowed Newton to change his vote at any point on the day the vote took place.
The amendment was ultimately defeated 24-23.
Hanig then voted with Democrats against the full budget.
Sen. Kandie Smith, a Greenville Democrat, introduced various amendments, including one to reinstate the Earned Income Tax Credit, which helps low- to moderate-income workers and families get a tax break. That would have been done by eliminating two income eligibility tiers under the state's Opportunity Scholarship program, a Republican priority that provides private school vouchers. The amendment failed.
A second and final vote on the spending plan will take place Thursday. The House is working on its own budget proposal, which it is expected to release next month.
Legislative leaders have said they hope to negotiate a plan Republicans in both chambers can agree on by the end of the current fiscal year on June 30, but budget talks have often gone on longer in the past.
If Republicans can finalize a budget to send to Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, he'll have 10 days to sign, veto or let it become law without his signature.
In a statement Wednesday, Stein said the Senate's spending plan is inadequate.
'We should be making investments in what makes North Carolina a great place to live: educating the next generation of North Carolinians, growing a strong workforce that drives our economy, and keeping communities safe. Unfortunately, the Senate budget falls short,' Stein said.
Stein said the budget will 'need to do much more to compensate teachers, support community colleges, and protect public safety.'
'I look forward to working with the legislature to improve this budget and to appropriate additional funds for western North Carolina in the weeks ahead,' the governor said.
Under the Senate's plan, teachers would see a new salary schedule, with starting pay at $41,510, rising to $56,650 for those with 25 or more years of experience. Teachers would receive a $3,000 bonus over two years and raises of 2.3% in year one and 3.3% over the two years.
Most state employees would receive a 1.25% raise and a $3,000 bonus split over two years, while law enforcement officers would receive additional raises on top of this.
Notable cuts include dissolving the Office of Historically Underutilized Businesses, which aids minority-owned firms in securing state contracts, and the Innocence Inquiry Commission, an agency created in 2006 that investigates wrongful convictions. The proposal also reduces funding for the state's community college system by about $50 million and eliminates nearly 800 jobs throughout state government that have been vacant for more than two years.
About 14,000 vacant positions would remain under this budget.
The budget proposal also includes policy provisions, such as the language of a Senate bill that has already passed expanding the office of Republican State Auditor Dave Boliek. His office would be tasked with identifying waste in state programs and agencies and reporting back to the General Assembly. The budget proposal appropriates $6 million to Boliek's office.
Other policy provisions include requiring K-12 schools to adopt policies restricting cellphone use in classrooms, repealing state laws that control where hospitals can open or expand and increasing transparency in health care billing.
Dawn Baumgartner Vaughan contributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials

time26 minutes ago

Michigan House Republicans sue the secretary of state over election training materials

KALAMAZOO, Mich. -- Michigan Republicans are suing the battleground state's top elections executive over access to election training materials. The lawsuit filed Thursday is the latest escalation in a brewing dispute that began when the GOP took majority control of the state's House of Representatives last year. Since winning control of the chamber in the 2024 election, statehouse Republicans have repeatedly scrutinized the state's election processes and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor in 2026. The conflict comes as some state Republicans echo past false claims of election fraud in Michigan, which was a prime target of President Donald Trump and his backers after his 2020 election loss. Republicans on the chamber's Oversight Committee subpoenaed Benson in April, seeking access to training materials for local clerks and staff who administer elections, including access to the Bureau of Elections' online learning portal. Benson's office released some requested materials in response to the subpoena, but not all, citing cybersecurity and physical security concerns related to administering elections and the voting process. The office has said it needs to review the online portal for 'sensitive information" and make redactions. 'Since the beginning of this saga, Secretary Benson has asked lawmakers to let a court review their request for sensitive election information that, in the wrong hands, would compromise the security of our election machines, ballots and officials,' Michigan Department of State spokesperson Cheri Hardmon said in a statement Thursday. House Republicans say the goal of reviewing the material is to ensure clerks are trained in accordance with Michigan law. The House voted along party lines in May to hold Benson in contempt for not completely complying with the subpoena. The request for training materials originally came from GOP state Rep. Rachelle Smit, who has pushed false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. Smit is the chair of the House elections committee, which was renamed to the Elections Integrity Committee with the new Republican majority. 'Secretary Benson has proven she is unwilling to comply with our subpoena and Michigan law,' Rep. Smit said in a statement Thursday. 'She's skirted the rules and done whatever she could to avoid public scrutiny. It's become overwhelmingly clear that she will never release the training materials we're looking for without direction from a court." The lawsuit asks the Michigan Court of Claims to intervene and compel Benson to comply with the subpoena. 'The public interest is best served if the constitutional order of the State of Michigan is preserved and the Legislature can properly perform its duty to regulate the manner of elections in the state and, if deemed necessary, enact election laws for the benefit of Michigan residents,' the lawsuit says. Benson gained national attention for defending the results of the 2020 election in the face of Trump's attempts to undercut the outcome nationwide and in Michigan. Multiple audits — including one conducted by the then-Republican-controlled Michigan Senate — concluded former President Joe Biden won the state in 2020 and that there was no widespread or systemic fraud. Benson has remained a subject of GOP scrutiny this year. A Republican state representative introduced three articles of impeachment against Benson on Tuesday, and several of the accusations continue to cast doubts on the results of the 2020 election. With Democrats in control of the state Senate, it's unlikely the impeachment articles will result in a conviction.

What Trump ordering an investigation into Biden's actions might mean legally and politically

time35 minutes ago

What Trump ordering an investigation into Biden's actions might mean legally and politically

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into pardons and other executive actions issued by his predecessor, Joe Biden — launching an extraordinary effort to show that the Democrat hid his cognitive decline and was otherwise too mentally impaired to do the job. Trump, who turns 79 this month, has long questioned the mental acuity and physical stamina of Biden, and is now directing his administration to use governmental investigative powers to try and back up those assertions. Biden, 82, and now undergoing treatment for prostate cancer, dismissed Trump's actions as 'ridiculous.' Here's a look at what Trump is alleging, what impact it could have, and why the country may never have seen anything like this before. Trump directed his White House counsel and attorney general to begin an investigation into his own allegations that Biden aides hid from the public declining mental acuity in their boss. Trump is also casting doubts on the legitimacy of the Biden White House's use of the autopen to sign pardons and other documents. It marks a significant escalation in Trump's targeting of political adversaries, and could lay the groundwork for arguments by leading Republicans in Congress and around the country that a range of Biden's actions as president were invalid. 'Essentially, whoever used the autopen was the president,' Trump said Thursday. He then went further, suggesting that rogue elements within the Biden administration might have effectively faked the president's signature and governed without his knowledge — especially when it came to pushing policies that appeased the Democratic Party's far-left wing. 'He didn't have much of an idea what was going on,' Trump said, though he also acknowledged that he had no evidence to back up those assertions. A Trump fundraising email released a short time later carried the heading, 'A robot ran the country?' Legal experts are skeptical about that the investigation will do much more than fire up Trump's core supporters. 'I think it's more of a political act than one that will have any legal effect,' said Richard Pildes, a constitutional law scholar at New York University School of Law. He added: 'I think it's designed to continue to fuel a narrative that the administration wants to elevate, but courts are not going to second-guess these sorts of executive actions' undertaken by Biden. Trump has long questioned the legitimacy of pardons his predecessor issued for his family members and other administration officials just before leaving office on Jan. 20, people whom Biden was worried could be targeted by a Trump-led Justice Department. But Trump has more recently suggested Biden was unaware of immigration policies during his own administration, and said Thursday that aides to his predecessor pushed social issues like transgender rights in ways Biden might not have agreed with. It is well-established that a president's executive orders can easily be repealed by a successor issuing new executive actions — something Trump has done repeatedly since retaking the White House. That lets Trump wipe out Biden administration policies without having to prove any were undertaken without Biden's knowledge — though his predecessor's pardons and judicial appointments can't be so easily erased. 'When it comes to completed legal acts like pardons or appointing judges,' Pildes said, a later president 'has no power to overturn those actions.' Autopens are writing tools that allow a person's signature to be affixed automatically to documents. The Justice Department, under Democratic and Republican administrations, has recognized the use of an autopen by presidents to sign legislation and issue pardons for decades — and even Trump himself acknowledges using it. 'Autopens to me are used when thousands of letters come in from young people all over the country and you want to get them back,' Trump said Thursday. Michigan State University law professor Brian Kalt said the 'consensus view is that, as long as the president has directed the use of the autopen in that particular instance, it is valid.' 'The only issue would be if someone else directed the use of the autopen without the President's approval,' Kalt, an expert on pardons, wrote in an email. Yes. Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution bestows the president with the power 'to grant Reprieves and Pardons.' 'A president's pardons cannot be revoked. If they could, no pardon would ever be final,' American University politics professor Jeffrey Crouch, author of a book on presidential pardons, said in an email. 'There is no legal obstacle I am aware of to a president using an autopen on a pardon.' Kent Greenfield, a Boston College law professor, said, 'Once you pardon somebody, you can't go back and un-pardon them.' 'If it's done with a president's authority, I don't think it matters whether it's done with an autopen or not,' Greenfield added. 'The president's authority is the president's authority.' Trump's suggestions that Biden's administration effectively functioned without his knowledge on key policy matters go beyond questions about pardons and the president using the autopen. Even there, though, the Supreme Court ruled in 2024 that former presidents have broad immunity from prosecution. At the time, Trump celebrated the ruling as a 'BIG WIN' because it extended the delay in the Washington criminal case against him on charges he plotted to overturn his 2020 election loss. Such immunity would likely cover Biden as a former president. It might not extend to Biden administration officials allegedly acting without his knowledge — though Trump himself acknowledged he's not seen evidence of that occurring. Biden has dismissed Trump's investigation as 'nothing more than a mere distraction.' 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' he said in a statement. In a word, no. There have been allegations of presidents being impaired and having their administrations controlled by intermediaries more than the public knew — including Edith Wilson, who effectively managed access to her husband, Democratic President Woodrow Wilson, after his serious stroke in 1919. Wilson's critics grumbled about a shadow presidency controlled by his wife, but the matter was never formally investigated by Congress, nor was it a major source of criticism for Wilson's Republican successor, Warren G. Harding. More recently, some questioned whether President John F. Kennedy struggled more than was publicly known at the time with Addison's Disease and debilitating back pains while in office. And there were questions about whether dementia might have affected Ronald Reagan during his second term, before he was diagnosed with Alzheimer's in 1994, five years after he left office.

High court ruling on reverse discrimination a no-brainer: Chuck Rocha
High court ruling on reverse discrimination a no-brainer: Chuck Rocha

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

High court ruling on reverse discrimination a no-brainer: Chuck Rocha

(NewsNation) — The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously rejected legal precedent that people in a majority group have a higher standard for proving discrimination. Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha agrees with the high court decision. 'Discrimination doesn't say, 'Oh, you have to be black,' or, 'You have to be a woman,' or, 'You have to be gay.' … Discrimination means you're treating me different,' he says on 'CUOMO.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store