Funding a challenge for some Adams Co. projects
Adams County Engineer Scott Yaeger said federal funding is still allocated for two bridges across the canal and the first phase of the Schoonover Road project, between Rosenoff Road and Rehn Road.
Commissioner Dan Blankenship said county officials worked on securing funding for about 18 months and thought they had it.
"Back to the drawing board and start over," Blankenship said. "It's a little disappointing."
Yaeger said funding for the second phase of Schoonover Road, about $2 million, was on a list of projects requested by former Representative Cathy McMorris-Rodgers.
"This extension project made it on the appropriations project list but all projects on that list were not funded," Yaeger wrote in response to an email from the Columbia Basin Herald.
The first phase of the Schoonover Road project is scheduled to start in late June and be completed by October. The total cost is about $3.13 million.
Blankenship said the request was included in appropriations packages that were awaiting a final vote by Congress, but Congressional leaders didn't vote on the bill. They opted to pass a continuing resolution instead.
"Any new requests that were in those appropriations bills disappeared like they never happened," Blankenship said.
That also meant the end of a request from Washington Senator Patty Murray to change the requirements for a program that would've paid for work on the four bridges, he said.
Extending the bridges is the first step to widening the canal. That would allow the conversion of farms in the Odessa area to surface water for irrigation; currently, those farms use groundwater. The goal is to reduce water use from the aquifer that supplies water to the Columbia Basin, according to earlier interviews with officials from the Columbia Basin Development League.
Murray had requested the change so that the four remaining bridges would qualify for a different funding source. That program would not have required any matching money from Adams County.
"That all disappeared as well," Blankenship said.
All the bridges that require widening are northeast of Othello, and funding was secured for two of them. Sackman Road will be the first one upgraded. Cost is about $4.8 million, and work will start after the irrigation season ends in October.
Design is complete for the new bridge, which will span the canal without piers in the water. It will be supported by abutments anchored to shore instead. The abutments and the bridge deck will be precast and assembled onsite. The bridge deck is made of precast panels that will be installed separately and joined with concrete and a tie system.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Amid bitter partisanship, permitting reform is a golden opportunity for bipartisanship
With states now fighting over redistricting maps, America's two political parties will need an opportunity to work together again. Permitting reform is one issue that is just right for this, even amidst an apparent trifecta. Strengthening American energy production has long been a bipartisan issue, as it fosters economic growth, protects national security, and increases the energy supply to drive down or stabilize utility costs for U.S. households in the face of growing demand. There has never been a better time for it. Done right, it secures American global leadership for another century. While recent debates around tax credits have made this issue seem increasingly partisan, reforming our existing energy permitting process is something on which lawmakers on both sides of the aisle largely already agree. Congress should capitalize on consensus to pass comprehensive permitting reform legislation. Debates surrounding energy tax credits in the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, in particular, brought energy production back into the spotlight this year. Reconciliation can leave bitter feelings, but permitting reform has a chance to offer both parties something they dearly want — energy dominance, reduced emissions, fewer arcane rules, and less back and forth political games undermining the development of new energy projects. All energy production would benefit from permitting reform. America's permitting system should be a gateway for energy projects. Right now, it's a bottleneck. Unpredictable processes and delays in approval are bringing new developments to a grinding halt. With the rise of AI and a digital world that increasingly relies on data centers, global energy demand has spiked. Congress is now tasked with ensuring that American energy production can keep pace with this demand and not fall behind foreign adversaries vying for our position as the global leader in innovation and technology. But as of late, lawmakers have remained stagnant on addressing permitting reform. Yet, while demand for all energy production is on the rise, Democrats have a lot less to fear from loosening rules than they may think. The vast majority of projects stuck in grid connection queues are renewable — over 95 percent of proposed new generation capacity is solar or wind. Much-needed reform to the approval process could free up all new projects, strengthen American energy dominance and unleash clean energy all at once. Permitting reform has long been a bipartisan issue. Last year, Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), then-ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, and then-Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Joe Manchin ( introduced the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 aimed at streamlining and expediting the approvals process. While this legislation was not ultimately passed, it is a prime example of members reaching across the aisle to drive movement on this front. Most recently, a bipartisan group of governors made an urgent call for permitting reform. 'It shouldn't take longer to approve a project than it takes to build it,' said Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt (R). He also highlighted the bipartisan nature of the issue, 'Democrats and Republicans alike recognize permitting delays weaken U.S. economic growth, security and competitiveness. Governors from both parties are working together to inject some common sense into our permitting process.' Voters in both parties agree. Recent polling conducted by Cygnal found that two-thirds of respondents agree that Congress should modernize permitting rules to accelerate completion of energy projects and reduce long-term cost pressures. Some conservative stalwarts will never support anything they see as helping clean energy, while some environmental activists are more concerned with punishing fossil fuel companies than they are with actually addressing climate change. These short-sighted visions represent the horseshoe of scarcity, decline and pessimism that has plagued American energy politics for decades. They believe we can succeed only by taking from the other side. America cannot afford delay. A dangerous world requires energy dominance in all industries, including new ones like clean energy. Moreover, Americans deserve to know that they will have reliable, accessible energy needed to power their businesses and residences. Permitting reform will make energy access more reliable, more abundant, cheaper and much cleaner. All Americans, and our planet, will win. The only losers will be those profiteering from political polarization. With some energy tax credits phasing out sooner than originally planned, many energy producers want to act swiftly to get new projects up and running. The permitting process, as it stands, is their biggest obstacle. As we head into the fall, our lawmakers should keep the cross-partisan opportunity on permitting reform top of mind. Liam deClive-Lowe is the co-founder of American Policy Ventures, an organization that builds projects to help policymakers collaborate and get things done.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kevin Kiley rips Newsom's redistricting plan, says governor's out for personal gain
Rep. Kevin Kiley's rise as a Republican congressional force could be threatened by Gov. Gavin Newsom's redistricting plan — and Kiley Thursday fought the proposal with both personal and policy weapons. The Roseville Republican talked about how he's asking House Speaker Mike Johnson to set up a bipartisan commission on redistricting reform. Kiley is also pushing legislation that would bar mid-decade redrawing of congressional district lines, a plan that has some bipartisan support. There was also a personal touch from Kiley at his news conference following the Newsom-led rally promoting the creation of new California congressional districts. Currently Democrats hold 43 of the state's 52 House seats but see the potential to pick up a net of five more seats in the state, including Kiley's. Redrawing his district to make it more likely to elect a Democrat, Kiley said Thursday, is 'no surprise. Governor Newsom has been targeting me for some time.' The reason for that, Kiley said, is 'he is trying to silence and indeed eliminate political opposition.' The congressman said that if his district is redrawn 'I would nevertheless be in a position to win whatever district they create,' he said. A solid Republican district Kiley's district includes part of the eastern Sacramento area and winds from Lake Tahoe to Death Valley. He won by 11 percentage points last year, and independent analysts regard his seat as 'likely Republican' if the lines remain the same. Newsom wants the Legislature to pass an amendment that would set a special election Nov. 4. Voters would be asked to approve new congressional lines that would be used in the next three congressional election cycles, starting next year. Currently, those decisions are up to a nonpartisan Citizen Redistricting Commission, approved by voters in 2010. It would get its power back after the 2030 census. Newsom's action is a reaction to the fast-developing effort by President Donald Trump and lawmakers in Texas, and possibly other Republican-run states, to redraw their maps to give the GOP advantages in the 2026 election. Currently Democrats need a net gain of three seats to win control of the House, and typically in mid-term elections the party running the White House loses seats. In 2018, during Trump's first term, Republicans had a net loss of 40 seats and Democrats regained control. 'An attack on the voters' Kiley, speaking from his district office in Rocklin, explained that redrawing lines, no matter who they favor, is a bad idea. Because California's line-drawing commission was approved by voters, he said, trying to overturn its decision is 'an attack on the voters of California, an attack on democracy in California and across the country.' He cited a POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll taken in late July and early August showing state voters favored the independent commission as line-drawers by a 2 to 1 margin. 'That should be the end of the story, right?' asked Kiley. Kiley vs. Newsom He also maintained that Newsom was using the issue for personal gain. The governor 'has been posturing to run for president since his very first day in office as our governor. The problem is he doesn't have any record to run on,' said Kiley. 'He's trying to find some issue, any issue to create a spectacle' to center attention on himself, Kiley said. 'That's what it's all about.' The redistricting fight is the latest chapter in a bitter series of skirmishes between the ambitious up and coming Republican and a governor who appears to have his sights on bigger things himself. Before being elected to the House in 2022, Kiley was a leader in the ultimately unsuccessful bid to recall Newsom, authoring a book titled, 'Recall Newsom: The Case against America's Most Corrupt Governor.' Once he arrived at the Capitol in 2023, Kiley kept firing away in floor speeches, tweets and whatever form of communication he could find. Pouring gas on the political fire Kiley got his biggest win this spring, when Congress passed legislation that overturned California's bid to phase out gasoline-powered vehicles. After final passage of the bill, Kiley told reporters, 'This is a very clear example of one person in this case, the governor, Gavin Newsom, issuing an order trying to dictate the choice of an automobile for millions and millions of Californians, actually tens of millions across the country,' Kiley, 40, could move quickly into positions of influence because House Republicans are not as closely tied to the seniority system for promotion as Democrats. The median age of House member is 57.5. He chairs the Education and Workforce Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education Subcommittee, a watchdog on those issues. Kiley maintained that his own ambitions are not what's driving his efforts on redistricting. Whatever happens, he said, 'I feel at the end of the day we'll be fine.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Blue states plan new tax hikes on wealthy residents in response to Trump's federal tax legislation
Blue states around the U.S. are planning tax hikes on wealthy residents to bring in additional revenue through a variety of proposals, including one state's so-called "Taylor Swift tax." The moves come after the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) by President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress, which permanently extended many of the 2017 tax cuts and included other new tax relief provisions as well as spending cuts to programs such as Medicaid. Democrats argue these tax hike proposals are needed to help plug gaps in state budgets and offset any lost federal dollars for Medicaid and other programs. The state of Rhode Island enacted a new tax this summer that will impose a special levy on vacation homes valued at $1 million or more, which has become known as the "Taylor Swift tax" due to the music star owning a home in an affluent part of Westerly, Rhode Island, The Wall Street Journal reported. Taylor Swift: Here's How The Pop Superstar Achieved Billionaire Status Rhode Island's "Taylor Swift tax" imposes a tax of $2.50 for every $500 of assessed value above $1 million, which a analysis estimated would result in an additional $136,000 in property taxes on her luxury home in the Watch Hill neighborhood that's valued at $17 million. Read On The Fox Business App Montana wants to increase property taxes on non-primary residences, adopting a new reform that will reduce property tax rates for owner-occupied primary homes while hiking the rate to 1.9% for second homes or short-term rentals, with industrial properties also set to face higher levies. Lawmakers want to provide not only a tax break to about 230,000 homeowners, but incentivize owners of vacation properties or second homes to sell those properties to inject more inventory into a tight real estate market, reported. Mamdani's Rise In Nyc Mirrors Economic Flight To The South, Study Shows This spring, Maryland enacted a new tax policy that raises income tax rates on residents earning over $500,000 a year to narrow the state's budget deficit. Another state in the Northeast is also mulling a tax hike on wealthy residents, with lawmakers in Connecticut considering legislation that would raise income tax rates on individuals earning $250,000 or more, or twice that amount for couples, to help offset an anticipated decrease in federal funding. How Much Can People Save On Taxes By Moving To Florida? The state of Washington this spring passed a budget that will raise its capital gains tax from 7% to 9%, though the tax's structure excludes real estate sales and focuses on other transactions like those involving stocks, bonds or business interests. Washington doesn't have an income tax, and the state constitution prohibits one. Washington has in the past seen wealthy residents depart the state to avoid the high tax burden, such as when Amazon founder Jeff Bezos left for low-tax Florida. That phenomenon has occurred in other high-tax states, such as California, New York, New Jersey and Illinois, which have seen wealthy residents and corporations leave in favor of states with lower article source: Blue states plan new tax hikes on wealthy residents in response to Trump's federal tax legislation Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
