Lloyds expands help for first-time buyers borrowing more than 4.5 times their income
Lloyds Banking Group will make an extra £4 billion available to first-time buyers borrowing at high loans-to-incomes, following recent mortgage lending reforms.
The banking group is expanding its first-time buyer boost scheme, which is available through Lloyds Bank and Halifax. Since launching the initiative in August 2024, 11,000 first-time buyers have already been helped to get on the ladder by borrowing more than 4.5 times their income, the bank said.
To qualify for the first-time buyer boost, and subject to affordability, customers must have a total employed household income of £50,000 and a deposit of at least 10 per cent, among other criteria.
Based on typical borrowing trends, around an extra 13,500 more first-time buyers could potentially be helped by Lloyds' extra cash injection.
Many banks have recently updated their affordability assessments, following clarification from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
Lloyds said that in the two months since updating its affordability assessments, it has helped more than 1,000 first-time buyers access a mortgage that they would not have qualified for before.
Andrew Asaam, homes director at Lloyds Banking Group, said: 'Recent affordability changes have already started to help would-be homeowners get on the property ladder sooner and lending an extra £4 billion means we can help even more customers get the keys to their first home.'
More mortgages in general are set to be available at more than 4.5 times a buyer's income following recent Bank of England recommendations that some lenders can offer more high loan-to-income mortgages if they choose to.
Britain's biggest building society - Nationwide - announced last week that it is aiming to increase its high loan-to-income lending limit.
Eligible first-time buyers can now apply for Nationwide's Helping Hand mortgage with a £30,000 salary, down from £35,000, and joint applicants with a £50,000 combined salary - down from £55,000.
The UK Government has been looking to cut red tape around financial services as part of its drive for economic growth.
Meanwhile, Barclays announced cuts on rates across 32 mortgage products on Thursday, coming into effect from July 18.
They include a two-year fixed rate for borrowers with a 40 per cent deposit at 3.76 per cent, down from 3.89 per cent previously. The loan has an £899 product fee.
A two-year fix with no product fee will see its rate cut from 4.09 per cent to 4.03 per cent. The deal is available to borrowers with a 40 per cent deposit.
For people with a 25 per cent deposit, Barclays is offering a two-year fix from Friday at 3.93 per cent with an £899 product fee and a two-year fix at 4.15 per cent with no product fee.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
14 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Bank a tidy profit by swerving the Big Four: Our shares guru's expert advice on the smaller fish financial firms to invest in - including one that's up 80% since she first tipped it two years ago
Banks are a bit of a hobby horse for me. My first job in journalism involved international banking and finance; I was a banking correspondent for years, and I've maintained a keen interest in the industry ever since. It's been a bumpy ride, particularly for the so-called Big Four – Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds and NatWest. Pummelled by the Global Financial Crisis, prodded and poked by online start-ups and squeezed by years of low interest rates, mainstream lenders disappointed investors for years.
The Guardian
19 hours ago
- The Guardian
Time over for banker remorse? Labour must beware relying on the City for economic growth
'There was a period of remorse and apology for banks and I think that period needs to be over.' So said Bob Diamond, the eight-figure-earning Barclays chief executive more than a decade ago. 'We need our banks willing to take risks, to be confident and to work with the private sector in the UK to create jobs and improve economic growth.' Back in 2011, with the wounds still fresh from the worst financial collapse in a century, there were deafening howls of outrage and anger in UK political circles over the brash American's choice of words. Time though, is clearly a healer. Had Diamond waited 14 years, presumably the response in Westminster today would be a nod of agreement. Kier Starmer's government has embraced the City, seeing the Square Mile as a ticket to faster economic growth. It is not natural territory for Labour – but with a faltering economy, a febrile bond market to keep onside, and tight constraints on tax and spending, needs must. Earlier this month Rachel Reeves could have been channelling Diamond in her Mansion House address. The clean-up job after the crash had gone 'too far in seeking to eliminate risk', the chancellor said. Regulation was a 'boot on the neck of business' that needed lifting. The message certainly landed with the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, David Solomon, who met the chancellor in 11 Downing Street last week. 'I'm encouraged,' he told Sky. However, the head of the bank dubbed the Vampire Squid warned the government still needed to be careful on tax and regulation. Other senior bankers, including the head of Lloyds Banking Group, have followed suit. Almost two decades on from the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the multibillion-pound UK taxpayer bailouts, memories of the 2008 crash are wearing increasingly thin. The banks have regrouped, and scent a Labour government prepared to consider the period of remorse is now over. To some extent, the vibe shift is justified. Britain's biggest banks have built up significantly more capital to guard against financial shocks, have exited riskier lines of business, and City rulebooks stretching to thousands of pages are in place. Lawmakers elsewhere are considering if risk aversion has gone too far – including in the EU, after the Draghi report. Could years of nugatory growth post 2008 be linked to overregulation? The Treasury is willing to consider the connection. For years the priority was ending 'too big to fail'. Now safety limits are viewed as a millstone around the neck of the City golden goose, complicated further by Brexit trashing London's prized status as a world-beating financial centre. It is clear to see why there is appeal in boosting the City. Britain has serious comparative advantages; London has been a global trading hub for centuries, with the legacy of empire giving it the prime spot on the meridian and use of the English language and legal system worldwide. Top universities and a vibrant startup culture help further. Financial services contribute £200bn to the economy and 5% of all tax receipts, employing more than a million people – two-thirds of whom work outside the capital in big regional financial centres from Edinburgh to Leeds, Manchester and Belfast. It is no coincidence Reeves dubbed her big bang 2.0 plan as the 'Leeds Reforms' to make this point. Finance is more than just the City. The chancellor is right that a strong economy needs financing. The drying up of liquidity after the 2008 crash – when banks cut back on lending to focus on repairing their balance sheets – showed what happens when borrowing is harder for households and businesses. However, hosting an oversize financial centre with assets worth £27tn – 10 times the value of everything produced in the UK each year – has serious risks. Labour ought to know this better than most, having been on the hook in government the last time the music stopped. The Bank of England governor, Andrew Bailey, remembers – having led the central bank's recovery operations during the 2008 crisis. Lest we forget, he warned the Treasury committee last week: 'There isn't a trade-off between financial stability and growth. We've had that experience.' Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Back then, taxpayer guarantees worth more than £1tn were required to stop the banking collapse turning into a second Great Depression. Still, the damage was monumental: millions of businesses failed, unemployment hit 2.7 million, tens of thousands of homes were repossessed. Alongside the obvious financial stability risks for a small, open economy, the reinflation of the banking industry could also hurt the government's other priority sectors if handled poorly. Alongside finance in the government's industrial strategy there are seven other sectors: advanced manufacturing, clean energy, creative industries, defence, digital, life sciences, and professional services. All need access to growth capital, and so a strong banking sector makes sense on paper. In practice, however, there is a risk the banks use their newfound freedoms to pump more money into speculative or overseas activities. The lesson from history are not particularly encouraging. Before the 2008 crash, banks were heavily criticised for prioritising speculative activity over lending for the production of goods and services; contributing to the inflation of the biggest property market bubble in history. Mortgages still account for more than half of all UK bank lending, whereas outstanding credit to non-financial corporations – and for manufacturing in particular – is worth a pittance in comparison. Hosting mega banks servicing the needs of global investors and corporates brings valuable flows of capital into Britain, sustaining jobs and wealth creation. But there are two-sides to the coin: since the 1980s big bang Britain has suffered from a 'finance curse', or Dutch disease, as the banking sector exploded beyond a useful size for the rest of the domestic economy, crowding out other activity and stoking inequality. The danger of relying on banks to do the heavy lifting on economic growth is best summed up by the US financial sage Warren Buffett's observation : 'We were promised that a rising tide would lift all boats. [Instead] a rising tide has lifted all yachts.' For the chancellor, a City big bang is only advisable with enough checks and balances to ensure the same does not happen again. The period of remorse might be over. But 2008 should not be forgotten.
The Sun
21 hours ago
- The Sun
All the bank branch closures including Lloyds and NatWest in August – is your local affected?
BANK branches continue to close across the UK at pace, with 17 more planning to shut their doors this August alone. In fact, so far in 2025, 423 branches have closed already from January through July. 1 A further 127 are expected to close between September and December as banks cut costs and push customers toward online services. According to consumer champion Which?, banks and building societies have closed 6,443 branches since January 2015, at a rate of around 53 closures each month. This represents 64% of the branches that were open at the start of 2015. The figures cover branches from 20 major current account providers, showing how widespread the cuts are. NatWest Group, including NatWest, Royal Bank of Scotland and Ulster Bank, has closed the most, with 1,477 branches shut since 2015. Lloyds Banking Group, which includes Lloyds Bank, Halifax and Bank of Scotland, shut 1,391 in the same period. Barclays alone has reduced its network by 1,236 branches, the most for any individual bank. Branch closures peaked in 2017, when 867 sites closed across the UK, more than 70 each month, followed closely by 792 closures in 2018. How Link is helping with cash access Thanks to pressure from campaigners, including Link, some banks have agreed to open voluntary banking hubs that offer face-to-face banking services for customers in areas affected by branch closures. These hubs let you: Pay and withdraw cash Check your balance Pay utility bills Top up gas and electricity Link recommends hubs in areas with at least 10,000 people and 70 shops, also considering local demographics, digital skills and transport links. A full list of operating banking hubs is available on the Cash Access UK website. If you think your area is under-served you can request a hub. First, you need ask Link for a 'cash access review' to check if services in your area are good enough. Who can ask? Anyone can make a cash access request, individuals, groups or organisations. You just need to make your request in writing, and help is available if you need it. You can complete the request form online or print it and post it to: LINK Scheme Ltd (Cash Access Request) Central House, Otley Road, Harrogate, HG3 1UF. When might a review not happen? If there's already an ongoing or recent review covering your area and the same cash services If there isn't a good reason to review the cash access services where you live If you are made aware of existing services nearby and decide there's no problem If you cancel your request in writing or by email Before asking for a review, check if there's a bank branch, Post Office or ATM near you. Post Offices offer Everyday Banking services including cash deposits, withdrawals and balance checks for many banks and building societies. Using the Cash Locator tool can help you find the nearest place to get or pay in cash. Link wants to make sure everyone can easily access and manage their money, so don't hesitate to ask for help if you think cash access in your area isn't good enough. Which banks are closing? Here are all the closures planned for August 2025: Bank of Scotland – one closure North Berwick: August 20 Barclays - one closure Hull: August 22 Lloyds Bank – one closure Leeds Crossgates: August 20 Santander – 14 closures Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@
