Apple escapes Trump's 100% tariff on chips
Cook was alongside Trump when he announced the new chip tariffs. | Image credit-Apple
Yeo Han-koo, South Korea's Trade Minister, stated that chips imported into the U.S.made by Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix also will not be hit by the 100% U.S. chips tariff. Both of those firms have announced plans to invest in the U.S. Interestingly, Trump said that Cook was not told in advance of the announcement in the Oval Office about his plan to impose a 100% chip tariff. The president did say that Apple's investments should be seen by other companies as an example of how they can avoid getting hit by the import tax on chips.
Apple plans on investing some of the $100 billion it pledged to spend on a new U.S. manufacturing program that will include a Kentucky-based factory run by Corning to produce glass for future iPhone models. Corning has been a glass supplier for the iPhone since the very first model was released in 2007.
Apple had previously said it would spend $500 billion to improve its domestic manufacturing facilities. Some of that money will be spent on a new factory in Houston to build servers, a Michigan-based supplier academy, and additional facilities for suppliers in the States.
None of these investments results in Apple building the iPhone in the U.S., which is exactly what Trump wants. However, the president seemed to be happy with Apple's promises. The president said this about Tim Cook : "Look, he's not making this kind of an investment anywhere in the world, not even close. He's coming back. I mean, Apple's coming back to America." Currently, most of the new iPhone models sold in the U.S. are assembled in India. However, Trump recently doubled the tariffs on imports from that country to 50% from the previous 25%.
Even if Apple wanted to produce the iPhone in the U.S., it would take years to build the factories needed to have the device assembled in the United States. Apple would have to train workers willing to take low-paying assembly jobs. The hardest and most important task of all would be assembling a supply chain close to the U.S. that would be able to deliver the supplies Apple needs to build the iPhone in the U.S. in the quantities and with the quality that Apple demands.
As part of its $600 billion investment in the U.S., Apple will work with Samsung's Austin fab on an innovative new way to manufacture chips that has never been used anywhere in the world. Apple says, "By bringing this technology to the U.S. first, this facility will supply chips that optimize power and performance of Apple products, including iPhone devices shipped all over the world." In addition, Apple plans on buying chips from Samsung produced from one of the latter's Texas fabs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
3 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Defying Apple, Jon Prosser is back with more iPhone 17 renders
Last month we told you that Apple had sued Jon Prosser from Front Page Tech, also known as FPT. Apple claimed that Prosser had obtained information about iOS 26 by allegedly breaking into a developmental iPhone belonging to an Apple employee. Apple claims that Presser used this ill-gotten information by leaking some of the new iOS 26 app designs via renders he posted online. In a series of tweets, Prosser denied Apple's claims. The tech giant said that there was more information in the developmental phone that Prosser and pal allegedly gained access to. Personally, I figured Prosser and FPT would hold off releasing more renders related to Apple devices for a while as this played out. So frankly, I was dumbfounded when I received a notification the other day that a new FPT video had dropped. Yes, it contained renders of the iPhone 17 Pro. Latest iPhone 17 Pro render from Jon Prosser. | Image credit-FPT Prosser might not be taking Apple's legal action seriously considering some of the jokes he threw into the latest FPT video. While discussing why Apple added a camera bar to the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max, Jon was about to speculate on a reason when a warning appeared on the screen that said, "Speculation, don't sue me or anything lol." Prosser's speculation actually makes sense. From right to left, renders of the iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Air, and iPhone 17 Pro. | Image credit-FP He believes that Apple is including the side-to-side camera bar with the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max to extend the range of the periscope lens well past the current 120mm focal length, which delivers 5x optical zoom. Prosser says to expect a 48MP Telephoto camera for the iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max, up from the 12MP sensors used for the Telephoto cameras found on the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max. Considering Apple's lawsuit and claims, it is interesting to hear the face of FPT say that the iPhone 17 Pro render he shows off in the new video is "near final" with mass production starting soon. Interestingly, the iPhone 17 Pro will be 8.73mm thick according to Prosser, which is nearly half a millimeter thicker than the 8.25mm thickness of the iPhone 16 Pro . He also says that one of the colors that Apple is testing for the 2025 Pro models is orange, which dovetails with a recently released dummy unit. Prosser is the kind of personality you either love or hate, and his constant insulting of Bloomberg's Mark Gurman comes off as petty jealousy. Keep in mind that he has had some bad calls. For example, a few years ago he released renders of a flat-edge Apple Watch Series 7 that ended up looking nothing like the watch that was released by Apple. But Jon couldn't have been that upset since Gurman was also blindsided when Apple didn't release a flat-edge iPhone Series 7 timepiece. The bogus Apple Watch 7 render with flat edges that never materialized. | Image credit-Jon Prosser Some believe that Apple set up both Prosser and Gurman by circulating fake photos of the Apple Watch Series 7 in order to make both of them look bad. If Apple did pull off such a thing, hoping that both would have their reputation knocked down a peg or two, it was a failure. Gurman has gone on to provide the best Apple leaks since the days when TF International analyst Ming-Chi Kuo could announce the soup of the day at the cafeteria in Cupertino six months in advance. As for Prosser, he was still riding high, backed by the infamous FPT Toilet Squad, until Apple decided to sue him. I can't say I know Jon personally, but it seems perfectly within his character to pick himself up off the ground, wipe the dust off his pants, challenge the suit, and stick his tongue out at Apple by continuing to show renders of the iPhone 17 Pro. Get 50% off – try it for 3 months today! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
GSM Arena
6 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Weekly poll: do you still have your ringer on or is your phone on vibrate all the time?
Peter, 10 August 2025 A long, long time ago, polyphonic ringtones were a noteworthy feature. Years later, the iPhone ringtone (Marimba) became instantly recognizable. Before that it was the Nokia Tune. Even to this day smartphone makers put a lot of effort into making ringtones – e.g. Samsung rented out a concert hall to add Vivaldi's The Four Seasons for One UI 8. But do people still leave their ringer on? Do you? Speaking of Apple, it recently removed the Ring/Silent switch, which was present even on the very first iPhone. It replaced it with an Action Button and Camera Control. Similarly, OnePlus axed its Alert Slider. Goodbye, Alert Slider All of this suggests that people set up their phone one way and leave it that way – no need to silence the ringer for class or a meeting if it's already on silent, right? You may as well have a shortcut key instead. Additionally, the rise in popularity of smartwatches and bands means that you don't need the phone to make noise – a wearable buzzing on your wrist is more than enough. What do you do with your phone – do you have the ringer on all the time, off all the time, do you switch manually or do you do something else? If you have an interesting or unusual setup, let us know in the comments. And while we're at it, if you do use the ringer, have you picked out a custom ringtone or do you just use one of the ringtones that came with the phone? Maybe even the default ringtone?
GSM Arena
6 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Weekly poll: do you still have your ringer on or is your phone on vibrate all the time?
A long, long time ago, polyphonic ringtones were a noteworthy feature. Years later, the iPhone ringtone (Marimba) became instantly recognizable. Before that it was the Nokia Tune. Even to this day smartphone makers put a lot of effort into making ringtones – e.g. Samsung rented out a concert hall to add Vivaldi's The Four Seasons for One UI 8. But do people still leave their ringer on? Do you? Speaking of Apple, it recently removed the Ring/Silent switch, which was present even on the very first iPhone. It replaced it with an Action Button and Camera Control. Similarly, OnePlus axed its Alert Slider. Goodbye, Alert Slider All of this suggests that people set up their phone one way and leave it that way – no need to silence the ringer for class or a meeting if it's already on silent, right? You may as well have a shortcut key instead. Additionally, the rise in popularity of smartwatches and bands means that you don't need the phone to make noise – a wearable buzzing on your wrist is more than enough. What do you do with your phone – do you have the ringer on all the time, off all the time, do you switch manually or do you do something else? If you have an interesting or unusual setup, let us know in the comments. And while we're at it, if you do use the ringer, have you picked out a custom ringtone or do you just use one of the ringtones that came with the phone? Maybe even the default ringtone?
