Moms for Liberty Is Going After Public Schools to Promote Christian Education and Undermine Students' Rights
As a mom in Santa Barbara, California, I witnessed a program of fundamentalist religious indoctrination force its way into my kids' public elementary school. The more I learned about the program and the people behind it, the more it became clear that the leaders of the program hated public education precisely because public schools are supposed to be nonsectarian — neither affirming nor denigrating any form of religion — and because they objected to the principles of pluralism and equality that public schools are supposed to respect. They believed that any school that does not have their reactionary version of the Christian faith as its foundation is "a consequence of evil." That was 16 years ago. As I continued to delve deeper into this topic, it soon became clear to me that the attack on public education was just one part of a broader attack on America as a modern constitutional democracy.
This selection from my book, which describes my attendance at a Moms for Liberty convention, speaks to how this movement plays off the idea that it is just a group of ordinary moms fighting for their kids. But I want to convey how ideological this group really is, along with the fact that Moms for Liberty is a thoroughly partisan political operation. These "moms" aren't fighting to improve the schools; they are spreading lies and deploying the politics of outrage in order to lay the groundwork for a wholesale assault.
Stay up-to-date with the politics team. Sign up for the Teen Vogue Take
It's the late spring of 2023, I'm relaxing in Santa Barbara, and I can hear the rumble of the school board wars like distant thunder across the landscape. Books are tumbling off shelves, librarians are running scared, and a tiny population of kids who identify as nonbinary are being told they represent the greatest threat to civilization. At the center of the conflicts is a group that grandly calls itself Moms for Liberty. I learn that the Moms are planning a National Summit in Philadelphia for July. I immediately buy a ticket and pack my suitcase.
Outside the Philadelphia hotel, small clumps of protesters clog the sidewalk. It's the tail end of the Pride festival, and the brand-name stores lining the streets of City Center are still festooned with colorful flags and glitter. A number of homeless people rest on the edges of the festive sidewalks, like extras from the wrong film set. The air, hazy from the Canadian wildfire plumes raging a thousand-plus miles away, parches the throat; overhead the sun appears orange. Donald Trump has just been indicted on seven counts in the classified documents probe regarding alleged mishandling of classified material. The vibe is slightly apocalyptic.
The first event at the Moms for Liberty conference is an evening tour of the Museum of the American Revolution. To my astonishment, a police escort accompanies the bus that takes us there. A small but noisy group of protestors have gathered outside the museum; presumably the police and event organizers are taking no chances. The police form a protective corridor from the bus to the museum. The organizers appear to welcome the security theater. 'Thank the police officers for protecting us, okay?' says a staffer as we stream inside.
The Joyful Warriors National Summit, as it is billed, properly begins the following morning in the conference center. Joining me is my friend and fellow journalist Annika Brockschmidt, the German author of Die Brand-Stifter (The Arsonists) and Amerikas Gottes-Krieger (America's Godly Warriors). A historian by training, she is tall, blond, and stylishly attired in a pale-green suit.
The atmosphere in the lobby is militantly cheerful. Groups of women in four or five chat excitedly and compare notes. Every fingernail looks carefully polished, every cheek is bronzed. Dressed in flowing trouser suits or dresses with stylish heels, the women look well prepared to take on the photographers who roam the event in search of promotional material for social media channels.
The origin myth of Moms for Liberty says that it all started in sun-dappled Florida during the pandemic, when three conventional suburban moms bonded over complaints about mask mandates and school closures. The reality is that the Moms had high-level connections to the Florida GOP from the beginning, and 'conventional' is not always the best way to describe them. Cofounder Bridget Ziegler is married to Christian Ziegler, the former chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, and a few months after the Philadelphia conference, it was revealed that the couple engaged in three-way sexual adventures with other women—one of whom accused Christian of rape in another incident. (In January 2024 police cleared Christian of the rape allegation but asked prosecutors to charge him with illegally recording a sexual encounter. The state attorney general declined to pursue video voyeurism charges.)
In any event, the group appears more focused on money than sex. It reported $2.1 million in total revenue in 2022, including hundreds of thousands from Publix supermarket chain heiress Julie Fancelli and the George Jenkins Foundation, of which Fancelli is the president and sole funder. (The George Jenkins Foundation also contributes substantially to reactionary and Christian nationalist groups such as Judicial Watch, Patriot Academy, and Moms for America; Fancelli was a prominent financial backer of the January 6 rally that preceded the attack on the Capitol.)
The Moms funneled a portion of that rich haul to a company funded and operated by Christian Ziegler. His firm, Microtargeted Media, specializes in targeted text messages and takes in hundreds of thousands of dollars from right-wing political campaigns. Their motto: 'We do digital & go after people on their phones.' (Christian Ziegler has applied a digital strategy to his own legal defense; he used a phone video he made of himself engaging with his accuser to argue that the sex was consensual.)
The framing of the Moms' activism has all the hallmarks of what author Michelle Nickerson calls 'housewife populism.' In Mothers of Conservatism: Women and the Postwar Right (Princeton University Press, 2012), Nickerson points out that conservative women's political engagement in the postwar era was a powerful tool in the battle against communism and moral degeneracy. 'Capitalizing upon cultural assumptions about women and motherhood, they put themselves forward as representatives of local interests who battled bureaucrats for the sake of family, community, and God,' she writes. The challenge to public school policies and curricula here is based on the idea that the Moms have a unique moral authority—superior to that of professional educators and administrators (whom the Moms often deride as the 'K-12 mafia').
The photographers begin circling my friend Annika, having apparently mistaken her for a populist übermom. She ducks a bit, and they move on. The social media feeds begin to fill with images of mama-bear solidarity. The smiles are those of sisterhood and sacrifice: We're just in it for the kids.
Tickets start at $249 for the three-day event, excluding transportation and lodging. All meals are catered, and several trips by bus to museums and other local attractions are included. I dip into the spread of fancy appetizers that greets us at the Museum of the American Revolution, and it is delicious. I have been attending right-wing conferences for about fifteen years, and this one is among the most lavish. These are moms with deep-pocketed sponsors.
To be fair, it is very hard to know where the proselytizing ends and the profit making begins. One speaker at the event turns out to be Erika Donalds—the Florida-based education entrepreneur who happens to be the wife of Republican congressman Byron Donalds, from Florida's nineteenth congressional district. A close ally of Florida governor Ron DeSantis and Donald Trump, Byron Donalds frequently speaks at right- wing conferences and events touting privatization as the cure for the nation's woes. Privatization certainly appears to enhance his own household. His wife is the founder of two for-profit companies that are sure to stand first in line for the school privatization gravy train. Her for-profit company OptimaEd is explicitly dedicated to expanding the network of schools associated with Hillsdale College, the Christian nationalist Michigan school that members of the DeSantis administration have richly praised.
She has also founded Classical Schools Network Inc., a charter management company, which is poised to cash in on the Hillsdale expansion. Erika Donalds was also savvy enough to set up a nonprofit, the Optima Foundation, which, as the journalist Keira Butler reported in Mother Jones, fundraises for the same academies that her companies help manage. But the profit-making is frequently ignored when packaged in a protective layer of sanctimony, and from the podium at Moms for Liberty, Erika Donalds delivers it sweetly. 'Lord, you have elevated this organization to do your good work in this country,' she preaches. 'We're grateful that the truth is being exposed, that parents are being able to see what's really going on in education in our country.'
A section of the conference area is given over to lively booths from an extraordinarily large number of right-wing organizations. I wander through and pick up a few of the resources on offer. Parents Defending Education offers free booklets and other materials with tendentious allegations about the content of public school curricula and instructions for parents on how to root it out. EpochTV, a division of the conspiracist right-wing media company the Epoch Times, which is associated with the Falun Gong religious movement, is promoting a documentary titled Gender Transformation: The Untold Realities.The Pennsylvania Family Institute is hosting a 'biblical' leadership conference for teens that promises a 'unique experience of using the political process as a means of cultivating leadership skills.'
The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) and the Southeastern Legal Foundation are giving away guidebooks and other tools for 'saving America's Public Schools.' The California-based organization Protect Our Kids, which adheres to the 'biblical truth which teaches that God created mankind in His image, male and female,' offers detailed instruction on how to force schools to allow parents to 'observe and volunteer' in classrooms, examine curriculum materials, and access student records and policy materials, as well as opt out of 'anti-bullying' lessons.
Everywhere, parents are urged to submit open records requests, inspect instructional materials for any hint of critical race theory (CRT), complain volubly and disruptively if schools take issue with any of their findings, and threaten legal action. In short, it's a school administrator's nightmare.
In the main conference room at the Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, the speakers begin beating their drums. Public schools have become gender distortion academies, or so everyone here seems to believe. They exist to turn girls into boys and boys into freaks, all for the pleasure of a sick, woke elite.
Another repeated talking point, it soon becomes clear, is that we are all supposed to be joyful. The people out there—the speakers keep gesturing toward the streets, which are presumably crawling with leftover Pride marchers—may think that we are angry, bigoted fanatics. But we are joyful! So keep smiling.
Originally Appeared on Teen Vogue
Check out more Teen Vogue education coverage:
Affirmative Action Benefits White Women Most
How Our Obsession With Trauma Took Over College Essays
So Many People With Student Debt Never Graduated College
The Modern American University Is a Right-Wing Institution
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
3 minutes ago
- USA Today
Gabbard: ODNI to slash costs by 40% as part of major intelligence agency overhaul
Gabbard said ODNI 'must make serious changes' to combat 'abuse of power, unauthorized leaks ... and politicized weaponization' of U.S. intel agencies. WASHINGTON – Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced Aug. 20 that her office overseeing all U.S. intelligence agencies will undergo a massive reorganization and slash its spending by 40% to combat "abuse of power" and "politicized weaponization of intelligence." Gabbard called the overhaul ODNI 2.0 in a news release, and its broad contours suggest it is the biggest restructuring of the agency since it was created after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist acts to improve intelligence sharing and operations. One of its goals is "reduce bloat by nearly 50%," in a reference to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence's workforce. The move is expected to save taxpayers over $700 million annually, and better enable ODNI to focus on 'fulfilling its critical role of serving as the central hub for intelligence integration, strategic guidance, and oversight over the Intelligence Community,' said the late afternoon news release. 'Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence,' Gabbard said in the release. 'ODNI and the IC must make serious changes to fulfill its responsibility to the American people and the U.S. Constitution by focusing on our core mission: find the truth and provide objective, unbiased, timely intelligence to the President and policymakers.'


The Hill
3 minutes ago
- The Hill
Pesticides put MAHA's power to the test
The New York Times reported last week that a draft of the Trump administration's upcoming MAHA report does not call for new restrictions on pesticides and describes existing procedures as 'robust.' MAHA-aligned activists recoiled. 'The MAHA draft report stating that the EPA's [Environmental Protection Agency] pesticide review process is 'robust' is the biggest joke in American history. And it's not funny. It's deadly,' Zen Honeycutt, founder of the activist group Moms Across America, wrote in a post on the social platform X. Meanwhile, a Republican-authored House Appropriations bill seeks to block pesticide labels that go beyond what the EPA uses based on its current human health risk assessment. During a markup last month, Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho), who chairs the Interior-Environment Appropriations subcommittee, said the measure says 'states cannot require a pesticide label that is different from the EPA label.' 'The language ensures that we do not have a patchwork of state labeling requirements. It ensures that one state is not establishing the label for the rest of the states,' Simpson said, adding that his comments were meant to be clarifying for all the ' MAHA moms that are out there that are concerned about this that have been calling.' But critics say such a move could prevent the use of updated science on pesticide labels. 'The language in here … says that EPA should only update labels according to the human health risk assessment. EPA, by law, is required to do those human health risk assessments every 15 years, but they often don't complete those in time,' said Geoff Horsfield, policy director at the Environmental Working Group. 'The way the law works currently is states have the power to do additional addendums, and that's where you see, say, a state requires an additional setback so that you can't spray within 250 feet of a school, or you're required to wear additional types of PPE [personal protective equipment],' he continued. 'Those types of restrictions are usually included in a label addendum … and those types of tweaks would be essentially prohibited by this language.' Also causing controversy is another provision related to 'forever chemicals,' toxic substances linked to diseases including cancer and have become widespread in the environment. The measure seeks to bar the EPA from enforcing a draft report that found that food from farms contaminated with these chemicals may pose cancer risks. MAHA activists have slammed both provisions, saying in a letter to President Trump that GOP support for the measures is 'unconscionable.'


The Hill
3 minutes ago
- The Hill
Gabbard to slash offices, nearly half of staff at ODNI
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard plans to slash 40 percent of the agency's staff by October in a move she said would help transform the head of the intelligence community into 'ODNI 2.0.' Gabbard's cuts would reassign roles or eliminate various centers within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), including those that monitor foreign efforts to influence Americans, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, including biological weapons, and a team monitoring for cyberattacks. A fact sheet from ODNI boasts the department has already slashed 500 jobs and that the future cuts would save an estimated $700 million from the agency that helps coordinate among the 18 different agencies that make up the sprawling U.S. intelligence community. Targeted in the restructuring is the Foreign Malign Influence Center, which has dedicated itself to tracking the efforts of U.S. adversaries to influence the U.S. public through social media and disinformation campaigns designed to sow division and shift votes. The Trump administration argues the center has been used 'to justify the suppression of free speech' and cited its work in responding to the Hunter Biden laptop. ODNI also accused the Foreign Malign Influence Center of 'falsely alleging Putin 'aspired' to help President Trump win the 2016 election,' though that conclusion is shared by most reports that have evaluated Russia's efforts in the 2016 contest, including in a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee. Gabbard argued that other elements of the intelligence community already monitor foreign influence campaigns, 'making FMIC redundant' — the same argument used for the National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center. The fact sheet argues it biosecurity mission is no longer needed after the COVID-related national emergency. 'It has become apparent that taking action to address global health issues falls well outside of ODNI's core mission,' ODNI states. Gabbard said the need for the shift was part of 'ending the weaponization of intelligence and holding bad actors accountable.' 'Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence,' Gabbard said in a statement. 'ODNI and the IC must make serious changes to fulfill its responsibility to the American people.' The shift comes a day after Gabbard revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former intelligence officials, many with ties to prior Democratic administrations. Even as a top Democrat agreed ODNI could use a revamp, he argued Gabbard was not the person to deliver it. 'Twenty years after it was established, there is broad, bipartisan agreement that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is in need of thoughtful reform. The Intelligence Authorization Act directs Director Gabbard to submit a plan to Congress outlining her proposed changes, and we will carefully review her proposals and conduct rigorous oversight to ensure any reforms strengthen, not weaken, our national security,' Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement. 'But given Director Gabbard's track record of politicizing intelligence — including her decision just yesterday to revoke security clearances from career national security officials — I have no confidence that she is the right person to carry out this weighty responsibility.' Mark Zaid, a longtime national security lawyer, said the redesign was a clear effort to cut staff that might push back against the Trump administration 'This isn't about reform. It isn't about strengthening our intelligence agencies. It is about the Installation of loyalists & getting rid of anyone who opposes the patrimonialistic/authoritarian policies of Trump, regardless of whether DEM or GOP,' he wrote on X. Gabbard also proposes eliminating a number of other offices she accused, without evidence, of leaking intelligence of political biases. Among those slashed is the External Research Council, which Gabbard said amounted to 'politically appointed partisans who brought their external biases,' as well as the Strategic Futures Group, responsible for long-term forecasting on threats, which Gabbard accused of being used 'to push a partisan political agenda.' It's not entirely clear how many staff work at ODNI, but that figure has been a target of Senate Intelligence Chair Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) who earlier this year said the office had nearly 2,000 staff. 'The ODNI staff is measured in the thousands, when it should be measured in the dozens, maybe a few hundred,' Cotton said at a hearing at the beginning of the year. 'I promise, that's going to change.' Cotton on Wednesday praised the move, even as he referenced the need for congressional review. 'Congress created the ODNI to be a lean organization that used small staffs to coordinate across the Intelligence Community and execute specific, important tasks. Today's announcement is an important step towards returning ODNI to that original size, scope, and mission. And it will help make it a stronger and more effective national security tool for President Trump,' he said in a statement. 'I look forwarded [sic] to working with Director Gabbard to implement these reforms and provide the ODNI with the legislative relief necessary to ensure our Intelligence Community can focus on its core mission: stealing secrets from our adversaries.'