logo
Elizabeth Warren's Hilarious Response To Taxing Billionaires Is Going Viral

Elizabeth Warren's Hilarious Response To Taxing Billionaires Is Going Viral

Yahoo5 days ago
Elizabeth Warren was on CNBC on Monday to talk about NYC mayor contender, Zohran Mamdani.
The Senator from Connecticut got into it with CNBC host David Faber about making things more affordable by taxing the rich.
Related:
Here's that interaction:
CNBC/atrupar/Twitter: @atrupar
"The issue is affordability. Do you know how many working families are chased out of New York City every day because they can't afford housing, they can't afford groceries, they can't afford child care?" she said. "What Zohran is saying is, 'I want people to be able to afford to live in New York City.' That's what keeps it a vibrant city. That's what makes people want to live here.'"
'Nobody disagrees with that, Senator, but raising taxes in order to do it? Why is that the answer?' Faber replied back.
Related:
"Oh my goodness! Oh dear! Are you worried the billionaires are going to go hungry?" she quipped.
"No, I'm worried that they're going to leave and spend their money elsewhere," he said back.
Related:
"You know they've threatened to do that over and over. You want to have a workable city? You want to have a city that's vibrant? You want to have a city where the streets are full, where there are things for sale 24 hours a day, then you need people who can live here or work here. Not people who have to take an hour and a half in."
People in the replies are loving her explanation and in agreement that billionaires will, in fact, not leave NYC.
"New York City is the cultural and financial capital of the country they are not going anywhere listen to yourself… talking about fucking Austin lmaooo," one person said.
Related:
"Rich people in new york city want to be rich in new york city. They aren't moving to Dallas be so fucking for real!" another person replied.
And this person joked, "'They'll leave' So tax them everywhere."
Thoughts, feelings, concerns?
Also in In the News:
Also in In the News:
Also in In the News:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

My wife and I paid off the mortgage, want to ramp up savings — but home insurance is now $7.2K. Can we go without it?
My wife and I paid off the mortgage, want to ramp up savings — but home insurance is now $7.2K. Can we go without it?

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

My wife and I paid off the mortgage, want to ramp up savings — but home insurance is now $7.2K. Can we go without it?

Picture this: Scott and Lisa, who are in their 50s, live in Colorado and recently paid off their home. Together they make about $130,000 a year, but since they're now mortgage free, they're using that extra cash to boost their retirement savings. While they don't have any debt, they're trying to save as much as possible for an early retirement. So far, they have about $250,000 stashed away in retirement savings and investments. But a wrench was thrown into their retirement plans when they found out their home insurance will increase from $3,400 to $7,200 next year. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Scott and Lisa can afford to make the increased payments, but it means diverting their extra money from savings to insurance. And since they've already paid off their mortgage, they're no longer required by their mortgage lender to carry home insurance. With this in mind, the couple can't help but wonder: should they keep paying for it, or does the crazy idea of living in a house without home insurance make some sense? While Lisa wants to shop around for a better rate, Scott is worried that the options in Colorado are limited and wonders if it makes more sense to self-insure. The state of home insurance in Colordo Over the past three years, American homeowners have seen their insurance premiums increase by an average of 24%, according to a report from the Consumer Federation of America. From 2021 to 2024, annual premiums increased by an average of $648, according to the report, which means homeowners were paying, on average, $3,303 annually by 2024. While the rate differs from state to state, premiums increased in 95% of ZIP codes, with one-third of ZIP codes seeing an increase of more than 30%. In Colorado, premiums are expected to jump by 11% in 2025, increasing rates from an average of $5,984 to $6,630, according to Insurify. Across the country, premiums will increase by 8% to a national average of $3,520. The culprit? Insurify says severe weather is 'putting pressure' on insurers to raise rates. 'Western wildfires, Southern hurricanes, and Midwestern hail have continued to increase in intensity and frequency, leading to larger losses and higher claim payouts,' says Insurify. In Colorado, homes are at particular risk of wildfire damage. While the 2022 Marshall Fire was the most destructive, the 10 largest fires in the state's history have all occurred since 2002, according to the Western Fire Chiefs Association. That has helped in making insurance premiums less affordable — and, in disaster-prone areas, homeowners may not be able to get coverage at all. Nearly one in seven homes in the U.S. is uninsured, according to a recent study, which translates to 11.3 million owner-occupied homes throughout the country. Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. To insure or self-insure Scott and Lisa wouldn't be alone in their predicament, as 44% of American policyholders find home insurance harder to afford than in previous years, according to a ValuePenguin survey. To save money, 58% of survey respondents said they've shopped around for a better home insurance premium, with those who successfully switched providers saving an average of $1,034 yearly. In addition, 56% of respondents said they requested a discount from their insurance provider, and those who got one saved an average of $781 annually. However, 34% said they saved money by downgrading or reducing their coverage. Furthermore, 24% said they don't believe home insurance is worth the cost, while 31% have considered self-insuring. Scott and Lisa will have to consider how forgoing home insurance could impact their financial plan. If some unfortunate event were to destroy their home, would they have the cash to rebuild it, and how would that impact their retirement savings? Say they lost their home and had to rent. Would the cost of renting a place — which averages $1,977 a month for a two-bedroom apartment in Colorado — outpace their current housing costs, including property tax and the higher insurance rate? Would renting eat into their retirement savings? These are things that Scott and Lisa should consider before making a decision. What are their options? For the argument of keeping their home insurance, Scott and Lisa may want to consider shopping around to see what their options are. An independent agent, who sells policies from multiple insurers, could provide them with a comparison of rates. If they've been loyal to the same insurer for years, they could also try to negotiate a better price or reduce their rate by bundling home and auto insurance. If those options don't work, they could also consider raising their deductible (the amount you have to pay upfront if you make a claim). A higher deductible will lower their premium, but they'll want to make sure they have enough cash in an emergency fund to cover that higher deductible. Scott and Lisa could also talk to their insurer about discounts for making their home more resilient to natural disasters. This could include reinforcing their roof or installing storm shutters. Those retrofits come with an upfront cost, though it's a cost that may be worth it if it saves their home during a natural disaster. Scott and Lisa should talk to their insurer first about what it recommends and how much they could save. Another reason for a high insurance rate? If Scott and Lisa have poor credit, then they may have a low credit-based insurance score, which some insurers use to determine your premium. While improving your credit has many benefits, one of those benefits could be improving your credit-based insurance score, which could help lower your premium. As a last resort (for those who've been denied coverage), Scott and Lisa could choose to go through their state's Fair Access to Insurance Requirements plan. 'FAIR plans offer coverage even in areas where insurance companies have decided not to sell policies,' according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. 'Through FAIR plans, everyone can have a basic level of protection from catastrophes. However, it typically costs more than a standard policy.' Since Scott and Lisa don't have millions stashed away for retirement and can't afford to rebuild their home from scratch, it may be in their best interest to shop around and find out what their options are before canceling their home insurance. What to read next Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Ask an Economist: Between Inflation and Tariffs, Is America Headed for an Economic Downturn?
Ask an Economist: Between Inflation and Tariffs, Is America Headed for an Economic Downturn?

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ask an Economist: Between Inflation and Tariffs, Is America Headed for an Economic Downturn?

Since Trump's 'Liberation Day' back on April 2, when he announced sweeping tariffs, inflation has remained in check. But the recent release of the consumer price index (CPI) for June showed a rise of 2.9% year over year. Read More: Learn More: That has people wondering whether Trump's tariff policy is finally showing itself in the form of higher prices and inflation. And if so, does all this mean a recession is in our near future? Here are three decisive factors and what economists think they show. Also see key indicators of a recession and what it means for you. Tariffs There have been many machinations in the past several months of threatened tariffs, imposed tariffs, deadlines and extended deadlines. But, as of August 7, per CNBC, there is a blanket tariff on all countries of 10%; a 30% tariff on Chinese goods; a 25% tariff on all Mexican imports, with some exceptions; and a 35% tariff on Canadian imports, again with some exceptions. There's also a 25% tariff on all automobiles, except U.S.-made ones, as well as many other tariffs. But are tariffs inflationary? The simple answer is yes. They are a tax a business must pay to import a good, said Raymond Sfeir, Ph.D., economics professor and director of the Anderson Center for Economic Research at Chapman University. And while it might not be the full amount, usually companies pass a significant portion of that tax onto the consumer in the form of higher prices, he said. In addition, similar goods produced in America will also increase due to the laws of markets. And our current situation has an added wrinkle, according to Rebecca Homkes, Ph.D., economist and lecturer at London Business School. It's the way the tariff policy has been executed. 'The bigger impact on economic activity is not the tariff level, it is the tariff uncertainty. Markets hate bad news, but they hate uncertainty more,' she said. When businesses can't plan, she said, often they slow spending, curtail hiring and pull back on investing. This can lead to a 'doom loop' — one that consumers can fall victim to as well. When this happens, it can spiral into a slowdown. Check Out: Inflation There were many factors that led to Trump's victory last November, but it's inarguable that high inflation during the Biden era was one of the top ones. However, one of his signature policies could be inflationary. So, many say, where are the higher prices? Just wait, say many economists. They argue that it takes time for tariffs to filter through the system and be passed onto consumers. In the past months, many businesses have been selling goods they imported before tariffs kicked in. But many economists say inflation will be seen in the July and August numbers, Reuters reported. That could spell trouble, according to Sfeir. 'As prices increase, consumers' income is stretched thin, that is, consumers will purchase fewer goods as each dollar buys less. This decrease in consumption may lead to a slowdown,' he said. Further, if other countries impose retaliatory tariffs on the U.S., exports could decrease and unemployment could rise. That would worsen any slowdown. The Fed Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has been clear in his assessment of the current economic situation, which he sees as one of uncertainty over whether Trump's economic policy will be inflationary. He and his peers are taking a wait-and-see approach when it comes to any action, despite Trump's continued pressure on them to lower rates. Both Homkes and Sfeir believe Powell is doing the right thing here. If inflation kicked in and the Fed slashed rates, it would only add fuel to the fire, as rate cuts are used to stimulate the economy and can be inflationary. Homkes anticipates more 'wait and see' from the Fed, with one or two cuts possible later in the year if inflation stays in check. 'That said, if any level of tariffs go through at their extreme, and inflation becomes a reality versus a threat, we may be back in a rate-hiking scenario later this year,' she added. Bottom line: The chances of a recession are real, but because of the chaotic tariff policy, no one knows how real. That's reflected in J.P. Morgan's fluctuating assessment. Shortly after the Liberation Day tariff announcement, it set the chance of a recession at 60%; in late May, it lowered the chance to 40%. Only one thing is 100% certain: We are in a time of economic uncertainty. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact Retirees6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on Ask an Economist: Between Inflation and Tariffs, Is America Headed for an Economic Downturn?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store