Seattle to pay nearly $1M in settlement with police captain who alleged discrimination
According to the suit, Greening has been with SPD since 1994 and became assistant chief in 2017.
Captain Eric Greening sued both the city and Diaz, claiming that he was retaliated against for bringing up concerns about gender and racial discrimination within the department.
Greening, a Black man, claimed Diaz rejected his re-application to be an assistant chief and demoted him. Greening claimed, that in a nationwide search for command staff, Diaz required all of his existing staff to reapply for their roles, except Greening.
Diaz and the city previously denied Greening's claims about the retaliation in court filings.
As a part of the settlement, Greening has agreed to dismiss his complaints.
The settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing.
Greening will receive:
$73,000 of back wages
$250,000 in non-economic compensation
$65,000 in wage damages when he resigns
$250,000 in non-economic compensation upon resignation
Over $300,000 in attorneys fees
Greening will be allowed to continue to take paid administrative leave until Feb. 1, 2026.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Germany should consider Israel sanctions, senior lawmaker says after trip
By Markus Wacket BERLIN (Reuters) -A senior lawmaker in German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's coalition on Monday said Berlin should consider sanctions on Israel including a partial suspension of weapons exports or the suspension of a European Union-wide political agreement. The call by Siemtje Moeller, the deputy leader of the Social Democrats (SPD) parliamentary faction, reflects a sharpening of rhetoric from Berlin against Israel which has yet to yield any major policy changes however. Moeller, whose SPD joined a coalition with Merz's conservatives this year, wrote a letter to SPD lawmakers after returning from a trip to Israel with Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul last week. "My assessment is that the Israeli government will move little without pressure. If such concrete improvements fail to materialize in the near future, there must be consequences," she said in the letter, seen by Reuters. Recognition of a Palestinian state should not be "taboo", she said, adding that Israeli statements that there were no restrictions on aid to Gaza were not convincing. At the same time, Moeller demanded the immediate and unconditional release of the hostages held by Hamas. She said Hamas must no longer play a role in a political future in Gaza. "It must be disarmed, its reign of terror must end." Western nations have intensified efforts to exert pressure on Israel, with Britain, Canada and France signalling their readiness to recognise a Palestinian state in Israeli-occupied territory at the United Nations General Assembly this September. Israel has criticised France, Britain and Canada, saying their decision will reward Hamas. Critics argue that Germany's response remains overly cautious, shaped by an enduring sense of historical guilt for the Holocaust and reinforced by pro-Israel sentiment in influential media circles, weakening the West's collective ability to apply meaningful pressure on Israel. The Gaza war began when Hamas killed more than 1,200 people and took 251 hostage in a cross-border attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, according to Israeli figures. Israel's air and ground war in densely populated Gaza has since killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to enclave health officials. A growing number of civilians are dying from starvation and malnutrition, Gaza health authorities say, with images of starving children shocking the world and intensifying criticism of Israel over its curbs on aid into the enclave. Israel blames Hamas for the suffering in Gaza but, in response to a rising international outcry, it announced steps last week to let more aid reach the population, including pausing fighting for part of the day in some areas, approving air drops and announcing protected routes for aid convoys. (Writing by Matthias Williams; Editing by Alex Richardson) Solve the daily Crossword
San Francisco Chronicle
5 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Parents of man shot and killed by Colorado officer after scuffle sue
Taushica Carter, whose son Rashaud Johnson was fatally shot during a confrontation with a police officer in Aurora, Colo., speaks at a news conference in Denver on Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2025. Thomas Peipert/AP In this image taken from provided police body camera footage, Officer Brandon Mills aims a gun at Rashaud Johnson in Aurora, Colo., May 12, 2025. (Aurora Police Department via AP) AP DENVER (AP) — The parents of a man who was shot and killed by an officer after the two had scuffled are suing the officer and accusing police in the Denver suburb of Aurora failing to end a pattern of racially discriminatory policing. The lawsuit, announced Tuesday, said Officer Brandon Mills shot Rashaud Johnson, 32, twice in the chest on May 12 when he posed no threat. Mills held him at gunpoint as Johnson bled on the ground, waiting about five minutes for another officer to arrive without trying to help, the lawsuit said. When the other officer arrived, Mills told him Johnson did not have a gun but said Johnson had tried to disarm him several times, according to police body camera footage. Mills put a single hand on one of Johnson's wounds after the officers handcuffed him, the lawsuit said. Advertisement Article continues below this ad The lawsuit said Johnson, who was Black and a standup comedian, was having a mental health crisis when he was killed at a vast remote airport parking lot near where he lived. Employees had called 911 five times over about two hours asking for police to check on Johnson as he walked barefoot on the lot's hot pavement, according to the lawsuit and information previously released by police. Mills responded alone after the employees reported that Johnson was 'trying to fight them.' Johnson did not respond to Mills' questions and rushed toward the officer, according to body camera footage. Mills swung his baton and then fired his Taser before they ended up on the ground in a struggle, the footage showed. Johnson pulled one of Mills' spare ammunition magazines from his belt, the lawsuit said. After Mills pushed Johnson off him and ordered him to move back, Mills pulled out his gun and said he would shoot Johnson if he didn't get on the ground. Johnson stood still, not far from the lot's fence, before he slowly began walking toward Mills, according to the footage. Mills then shot him from about 15 feet (5 meters) away. District Attorney Brian Mason has not yet decided whether the shooting was justified or criminal charges should be filed following an investigation by other area law enforcement agencies, his spokesperson, Christopher Hopper, said. The Aurora Police Department is reviewing the shooting, city attorney Pete Schulte said. Advertisement Article continues below this ad 'Like any critical incident, there are important facts that will be revealed by these investigations that are not depicted in a single body camera video. Now that this lawsuit has been filed my office will defend the city and the officer in this case,' Schulte said. Mills could not be located for comment. An email message sent to the union representing Aurora police officers was not immediately returned. At a May 29 press conference on the shooting, Aurora police Chief Todd Chamberlain said that 'the absence of a weapon does not mean there is an absence of danger.' Johnson's mother, Taushica Carter, said that as a military veteran, she has trouble understanding how someone who took an oath to uphold the law killed her only child. 'Someone who thought they were God, basically, took my baby's life,' she said at a news conference with her lawyers, tears running down her face. His father, Christopher Johnson, said he wanted people to know that his son was not a troublemaker and had parents who loved him. 'We want his memory to be positive and the community to understand the loss that did not have to happen,' he said.
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Prince Harry 'Devastated' as Charity Probe Concludes: 'Damaging Dispute'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Prince Harry took aim at a charity watchdog that cleared him of bullying following a "damaging dispute" after a rival was allowed to continue on as chair. Harry and a number of trustees in March dramatically quit Sentebale, a charity that helps children with HIV and AIDS in southern Africa that the prince cofounded with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho. The move was heartbreaking for the prince because it was set up partly in memory of Princess Diana and was, according to a source who spoke to Newsweek, "his life's work." However, there had been a major rift with Sophie Chandauka, Sentebale's chair, who had been asked by the trustees to step down, and the argument was set to explode into public consciousness after Chandauka sued the charity in March. Prince Harry, center, poses with Sentebale charity chair Sophie Chandauka, right, at The Saxon Hotel in Johannesburg, South Africa, on October 3, 2024, months before their "damaging dispute" exploded into public consciousness. Hector Mujica, head... Prince Harry, center, poses with Sentebale charity chair Sophie Chandauka, right, at The Saxon Hotel in Johannesburg, South Africa, on October 3, 2024, months before their "damaging dispute" exploded into public consciousness. Hector Mujica, head of economic opportunity at is pictured on the left. Morefor Sentebale The Charity Commission launched a regulatory compliance case, examining the allegations and counter-allegations on both sides. Now the regulator has dismissed some major criticisms made by Chandauka, including of bullying and "misogynoir," or racism targeting Black women. But the watchdog did have criticisms for both sides over the "damaging dispute" that played out in public and imposed on the charity what it described as "a Regulatory Action Plan to address governance weaknesses." Prince Harry responded to the ruling by taking a swipe at the Charity Commission's report, with a spokesperson saying it "falls troublingly short in many regards," while Chandauka pointed to Sentebale's optimistic future. In essence, now that the dust has settled, Harry has swerved the most damaging allegations against him but must still face the reality he has lost control of one of his most personal projects, built to keep alive his mother's legacy as an advocate for HIV and AIDS patients. A source told Newsweek: "Prince Seeiso and Prince Harry are absolutely devastated by what Sophie has effectively done, which is a hostile takeover of this charity. "It's a charity that Seeiso and Harry set up 19 years ago and certainly in Harry's adult lifetime it's been his life's work." What the Charity Commission Says At the conclusion of its case, the commission found no evidence of "widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity." That is a blow for Chandauka, who accused Harry of "harassment and bullying at scale" in a Sky News interview in March. And she said in an earlier statement that month: "Beneath all the victim narrative and fiction that has been syndicated to press is the story of a woman who dared to blow the whistle about issues of poor governance, weak executive management, abuse of power, bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir—and the cover-up that ensued." The commission did say though, that it "acknowledged the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally." There was also no evidence of "'over-reach' by either the chair or the Duke of Sussex as patron." The commission criticized the charity on some technical points, including a lack of clarity about the delegation of roles to the chair and processes for managing complaints—not to mention the high-profile public nature of the argument between the two sides. David Holdsworth, chief executive of the Charity Commission, said: "Passion for a cause is the bedrock of volunteering and charity, delivering positive impact for millions of people here at home and abroad every day. "However, in the rare cases when things go wrong, it is often because that very passion has become a weakness rather than a strength. "Sentebale's problems played out in the public eye, enabling a damaging dispute to harm the charity's reputation, risk overshadowing its many achievements, and jeopardising the charity's ability to deliver for the very beneficiaries it was created to serve." Prince Harry Spokesperson's Statement in Full A spokesperson for Prince Harry said in a statement to Newsweek: "The Charity Commission has today announced its findings. "Unsurprisingly, the Commission makes no findings of wrongdoing in relation to Sentebale's Co-Founder and former Patron, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex. They also found no evidence of widespread bullying, harassment or misogyny and misogynoir at the charity, as falsely claimed by the current Chair. "Despite all that, their report falls troublingly short in many regards, primarily the fact that the consequences of the current Chair's actions will not be borne by her—but by the children who rely on Sentebale's support. "Sentebale has been a deeply personal and transformative mission for Prince Harry, established to serve some of the most vulnerable children in Lesotho and Botswana. "For 19 years, its dedicated staff and steadfast supporters have provided vital care to over 100,000 young people across southern Africa, including young people living with HIV/AIDS and those facing mental health challenges. "As custodians of this once brilliant charity, Prince Seeiso [of Lesotho], Prince Harry and the former Board of Trustees helped grow Sentebale from the seed of an idea to—like its namesake—a flowering force for good. "With the original mission of Sentebale firmly in mind—and in honour of the legacy he and Prince Seeiso began—The Duke of Sussex will now focus on finding new ways to continue supporting the children of Lesotho and Botswana." What Sentebale Said After Charity Commission Findings Chandauka said in a statement released to Newsweek: "I appreciate the Charity Commission for its conclusions which confirm the governance concerns I raised privately in February 2025. "The experience was intense, and it became a test of our strategic clarity and operational resilience." "The unexpected adverse media campaign that was launched by those who resigned on 24 March 2025 has caused incalculable damage and offers a glimpse of the unacceptable behaviours displayed in private," she continued. "We are emerging not just grateful to have survived, but stronger: more focused, better governed, boldly ambitious and with our dignity intact." Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on X, formerly Twitter, at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page. Do you have a question about King Charles III and Queen Camilla, Prince William and Princess Kate, Meghan and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@ We'd love to hear from you.
