
BJP vs Congress showdown over Shashi Tharoor's role in Op Sindoor diplomacy
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has found himself at the epicentre of political controversy for being chosen by the PM Modi government to lead a key multi-party delegation abroad in the wake of Operation Sindoor. The nomination of former United Nations diplomat-turned-MP for the role has triggered an intense BJP vs Congress slugfest, with Tharoor caught in the crossfire.advertisementDIPLOMATIC OUTREACH ON OP SINDOORFollowing the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, which killed 26 civilians, the government announced it would send seven multi-party delegations to key global capitals, including UN Security Council member states, to project a united Indian voice against Pakistan-backed terrorism. Each delegation would be led by prominent MPs from across party lines. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, chairperson of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs, is among those leading one of the delegation.Accepting the role, Tharoor said on X, "I am honoured by the invitation of the government of India to lead an all-party delegation to five key capitals, to present our nation's point of view on recent events. When national interest is involved, and my services are required, I will not be found wanting. Jai Hind!"
But what followed was not across-parties consensus — it was political chaos.BJP VS CONGRESS OVER THAROOR NOMINATIONadvertisementThe BJP wasted no time turning Tharoor's inclusion into a point of attack against the Congress.Amit Malviya, BJP IT cell chief, asked, "No one can deny Shashi Tharoor's eloquence... So why has the Congress — and Rahul Gandhi in particular — not nominated him for the delegations? Is it insecurity? Jealousy? Or simply intolerance of anyone who outshines the 'high command'?"Pradeep Bhandari, another BJP spokesperson, echoed the sentiment: "Why does Rahul Gandhi hate every individual who speaks for India, even in his own party?"The Congress had submitted a separate list of four names to the government: Anand Sharma, Gaurav Gogoi, Syed Naseer Hussain, and Raja Brar. According to Congress' Jairam Ramesh, the names were sent in good faith after Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju requested them during a phone call with Congress leaders Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi.Instead, Congress found itself blindsided when a government press release announced Shashi Tharoor — who was not among the four names — as a delegation leader.Jairam Ramesh did not mince words and said, "Congress mein hona aur Congress ka hona mein zameen-aasmaan ka antar hai (There is a world of difference between being in the Congress and of the Congress)."advertisementHe accused the government of "Narad Muni politics," saying, "You cannot include names of MPs without consulting the party. We will not change the four names we have submitted."BJP QUESTIONS CONGRESS PICKSThe BJP further targeted the Congress' nominated names. Malviya termed the inclusion of Syed Naseer Hussain as "shocking", citing past controversies involving his supporters allegedly chanting 'Pakistan Zindabad' slogans — claims based on arrests and forensic reports.Malviya also questioned Gaurav Gogoi's alleged '15-day' visit to Pakistan and accused the Congress of sending leaders facing 'grave allegations' to represent India on sensitive international missions.'What message is the Congress trying to send, and whose interests are really being served?' Malviya asked pointedly.GOVERNMENT PLAYS 'UNITY' CARDAmid the storm, the Narendra Modi government has maintained that the delegation selections were carefully curated for their cross-party representation and oratorical prowess.'A powerful reflection of national unity above politics, beyond differences,' Rijiju said, adding that the goal is to project India's 'zero tolerance to terrorism' narrative globally.Each delegation, according to the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, will be accompanied by seasoned diplomats and will visit around five countries.Other leaders heading delegations include BJP's Ravi Shankar Prasad, Baijayant Panda, JD(U)'s Sanjay Jha, DMK's Kanimozhi, NCP(SP)'s Supriya Sule, and Shiv Sena's Shrikant Shinde.advertisementRIFT WITHIN CONGRESS?Tharoor's growing divergence from the official Congress line on foreign policy may have made him an uneasy fit.At a recent Congress Working Committee (CWC) meeting, senior leaders reportedly warned that "Tharoor has crossed the Lakshman Rekha." Though Tharoor later gave "constructive suggestions" at the meeting, concerns remain over his solo stance on issues like India-Pakistan ties and his willingness to endorse the government's diplomatic moves.'We are a democratic party and people keep expressing their opinions, but this time, Tharoor has crossed the line,' a senior leader was quoted as saying after the CWC meeting.Shashi Tharoor, for his part, made it clear from the beginning that the views he presented were his own."At this time, at a time of conflict, I spoke as an Indian. I never pretended to speak for anyone else. I am not a spokesperson for the party. I am not the government spokesperson. Whatever I have said, you may agree or disagree with that, blame it on me individually, and that's fine," Tharoor said after reports emerged of him being under Congress fire for remarks on Operation Sindoor."I made it very clear that I am expressing my personal views. It was really a contribution to the national discourse, at a time when it was very important for us to rally around the flag, especially internationally. There was a relative lack of our point of view being heard, particularly in the US, Europe, and the Middle East," the Congress leader said."People are entirely free to reject my point of view. I have received no communication from the party," he added.Tune InMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Netanyahu dials Modi, other world leaders over Israeli strikes on Iran; Indian PM urges peace in region
JERUSALEM: In a diplomatic push to garner international support for Israel's attacks against Iran, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke to his Indian counterpart Narendra Modi, among many other world leaders, his office said on Friday. Beginning last night, Netanyahu has held conversations with world leaders, including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Indian Prime Minister Modi and French President Emmanuel Macron, the Prime Minister's Office said in a brief statement. He is due to speak with US President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, it added. "The leaders showed understanding for Israel's defence needs in the face of the Iranian threat of annihilation; the Prime Minister said that he would continue to be in contact with them in the coming days," it added.


Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
HC defers Turkish firm Celebi's plea against revocation of security clearances, to await Delhi HC verdict
The Bombay High Court on Friday deferred till July 10, the hearing on the petition filed by subsidiary of Turkey-headquartered airport ground handling services major Celebi, seeking suspension and annulment of the security clearance cancellation by the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS). The HC decided to adjourn the hearing after it was informed that the Delhi HC judgment on the identical challenge was awaited. The BCAS, amid the backlash over Turkey's support for Pakistan in the India-Pakistan conflict, had last month revoked with immediate effect security clearance of the Indian arm of the Celebi citing 'national security'. The revocation led to airports in India where Celebi group operated including Mumbai International Airport Limited (MIAL), terminating their contracts with the group companies, prompting the subsidiaries to approach the courts. The court was informed that seven airports including those in Mumbai, Delhi and Chennai have terminated services of the petitioner. The MIAL had terminated the contract of Celebi's subsidiary Celebi Nas Airport Services India, which operated at the Mumbai airport. A bench of Justices Burgess P Colabawalla and Firdosh P Pooniwalla was hearing writ plea by Celebi Nas against revocation of security clearances. The Union of India, BCAS, Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), Airports Authority of India (AAI), and the regional office of the Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA) are made respondents in the matter. The bench noted that the issue raised by petitioner was identical to those raised by its sister concern before the Delhi HC and the same was heard and the judgment was reserved, which will be delivered in due course. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta representing the Central government submitted that the present writ plea be adjourned till the Delhi HC pronounces its verdict. The court noted that senior advocate Chetan Kapadia for the petitioner Turkish firm 'did not seriously oppose Mehta's request as the decision given by Delhi HC would certainly have bearing on present matter.' The HC will hear the plea next on July 10. Meanwhile, a single-judge bench of the Bombay HC of Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan on June 13 extended temporary relief granted to Celebi by vacation court. The vacation bench on May 26 had restrained MIAL from taking a final decision on tenders invited to replace Celebi's subsidiary till the matter is heard by the regular court. Justice Sundaresan was hearing two applications by Celebi Nas Airport Services India, filed under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act against Adani group-owned MIAL seeking annulment of its termination of contracts with the petitioner. The vacation bench had directed the MIAL that till regular court hears the matter, a final appointment of replacement operator must not be given an effect. Justice Sundaresan has posted further hearing on arbitration pleas to June 17.


The Hindu
19 minutes ago
- The Hindu
DMK not soft towards AINRC-BJP government in Puducherry, says Opposition leader
Opposition leader and Puducherry DMK convenor R. Siva on Friday denied charges of his party being soft towards the ruling AINRC-BJP government in Puducherry. Addressing a press conference at the Legislative Assembly, he said the party had been in the forefront of organising protests on issues related to power privatisation, New Education Policy, and other anti-people policies of the AINRC-BJP government. 'We have several trump cards against the ruling establishment to remove them from power in the upcoming Assembly elections. We will make it public in the coming days. To begin with, we would be organising a protest in front of the Civil Supplies department next week demanding re-tender for procurement of rice meant for free distribution through ration shops. The government should ensure transparency in procurement and distribution of free rice,' Mr. Siva said. Several misdeeds of the AINRC-BJP government would be made public at the appropriate time, he said adding that the DMK had opposed the anti-people policies of the government. Asked whether the DMK would lead the Opposition alliance in Puducherry, he said electoral strategies were decided by the party leadership in Tamil Nadu. The Puducherry DMK unit would follow the instructions given by the party leadership, he added.