
South African citrus growers face uncertainty amid proposed 30 percent US tariffs
But this winter is very different from previous ones. When I speak to the orchard workers, packhouse managers and various technicians on our family's farm, their concern is clear. I myself, an eighth generation citrus grower, am deeply worried about the future of our community. Storm clouds are on the horizon.
On July 7 the U.S. announced a planned 30 percent tariff on South African imports starting Aug. 1. This came after no final trade deal could be reached between South Africa and the U.S. following the Trump administration's reciprocal tariff announcement of April 2.
Our valley shows how the tariff turmoil can have extremely disruptive consequences. The local citrus farms have proudly been exporting world-class fresh citrus to the U.S. for decades. Especially the mandarins and oranges produced here finds its way onto many U.S. store shelves. American consumers have started to develop a pronounced taste for South African citrus. Since 2017 our exports have almost doubled. The looming 30 percent tariff now threatens these exports. It would make our citrus completely uncompetitive in the U.S. This would not only wreak economic havoc in our community, it would have negative consequences for the U.S. citrus consumer as well.
Organizations such as the Citrus Growers' Association of Southern Africa still believe a mutually beneficial trade deal between the U.S. and South Africa is possible, but time is on nobody's side, with the Aug.1 deadline around the corner.
A practical option for consideration by the U.S. would also be to exempt seasonal fresh produce from these tariffs. Seasonal fresh produce holds a unique space within the current trade turmoil, and an exemption makes sense. Seasonal produce is not like a product produced year-round in a factory. Citrus cannot be 'in-sourced.' South Africa, as a counter-seasonal producer, does not threaten U.S. citrus growers or U.S. jobs. In fact, our produce sustains demand when U.S. citrus is out of season, which benefits U.S. growers when we 'hand over' consumers at the end of our season, around October.
We also add unique varieties to the U.S. market, significantly increasing consumer choice. These varieties cannot easily be replaced by our competitors, such as Chile, Peru and Australia, even though they are not facing tariffs as high as we are.
Disturbing the supply of citrus to the U.S. could also lead to an increase in price for the U.S. consumer. This type of food inflation has consequences. With citrus — a main source of Vitamin C and many other nutrients — there is a health dimension to take into account as well. We help keep America healthy.
The middle of the 2025 citrus season has just been reached. Fruit is being picked, packed and shipped on our farm. Our conveyor belts are humming and the trucks are leaving for the Port of Cape Town, 176 kilometers to the south. In total, South Africa planned to send over 7 million 15-kilogram cartons of citrus to the U.S. this season, but if the tariffs are implemented on the Aug. 1, we will have to deal with a devastating new reality.
Fruit is usually grown for specific markets — meaning everything, from the choice of variety to sizing, from required plant health protocols to the timing of the picking, is market-specific. Because of this, it is not as simple as diverting citrus to another market. Even if some diversion could be managed, increasing supply to other countries could oversupply those markets and collapse the price, with a knock-on effect on the entire citrus industry.
Either way, a 30 percent tariff means hard times ahead for our community. South Africa struggles with high levels of unemployment. The local fear is that a trade setback of this size could tip Citrusdal and the entire Cederberg municipality into extreme poverty and instability. The effect this would have on the already high levels of violent crime in our province is terrible to contemplate.
But the effect is, once again, not only local. South African citrus producers have built up relationships and networks in the U.S. over decades. The tariffs would also mean immense uncertainty for stakeholders in the U.S. fresh produce chain, including logistics. While 35,000 jobs are directly dependent on U.S. citrus exports in South Africa, the Citrus Growers' Association of Southern Africa estimates that almost 20,000 jobs up and down the supply chain in the U.S. are in some way connected to the U.S.-South African citrus trade.
The Olifants River Valley is staring down a completely disrupted citrus season in the face. We have weathered floods, pests, logistical crisis and even political unrest — always securing a supply of high-quality citrus to the U.S. during their summer months. Unless a trade solution is found soon, this winter's storm could very well be the one we'll not weather.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
23 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democrats self-own bragging about inflation shows the left has learned NOTHING
Everybody makes mistakes. Not everyone makes the same mistakes over and over again. Last week, the geniuses in charge of maintaining the Democratic Party's social media picked at a fresh wound — and showed, again, exactly why it lost the 2024 election. The blue team's official X account shared a line chart showing the change in the price of various groceries — meat, dairy, produce, etc. — over time, and asserting that 'prices are higher today than they were on [sic] July 2024.' 'Trump's America,' read the caption. The problem? The last part of the line barely went up. The blue team's official X account, with the caption 'Trump's America,' shared a chart showing the change in the price of various groceries, asserting that 'prices are higher today than they were on [sic] July 2024.' Eric Daugherty, /X And what it actually showed was a massive increase in prices between 2021 and 2024. In other words: over the course of former President Joe Biden's White House tenure. 'I would just advise Democrats not to post about inflation given their track record,' suggested conservative influencer A.G. Hamilton. 'Might save them the embarrassment of having to delete their posts after getting dunked on' — which is exactly what they did. 'This is the gang that couldn't shoot straight!' marveled Fox Business host Stuart Varney. And of course Team Trump got in on the action. The problem with the chart was that it actually showed a massive increase in prices between 2021 and 2024 – when Biden was president. RapidResponse47/X What's notable about the braindead blunder, though, is not the blunder itself. It was that it represented yet another admission, eight and a half months after they surrendered the presidency to Donald Trump for the second time in three election cycles, that the Democrats still haven't made a sincere effort at diagnosing the reasons for their unpopularity — much less addressing them. A new Wall Street Journal poll found that their party continues to suffer as a result — to the point that just 33% of Americans hold a favorable view of it, and 63% view it unfavorably. Both Donald Trump (-7) and the GOP (-11) are also underwater, but may as well be polling as well as ice cream compared to the Democrats. The same holds true of the public's view of various issues; voters still trust the GOP more than the alternative when it comes to the economy, inflation, immigration and foreign policy. If that doesn't wake Democrats up to the provenance of all their political pain, nothing will. The Left has long relied on comforting fallacies to numb the discomfort that accompanies defeat. After 2016, elected Democrats and their media allies insisted that Trump's shocking victory was only possible thanks to Russian meddling. And now, they're laboring under the misimpression that return to power can be attributed to Republicans' superior, but decepting messaging — an almost supernatural ability to compel Americans to believe that which isn't so. If only they could convince the public of the truth, they'd surely prevail. But the cold, hard truth is that it's always been about the substance, stupid — as the unflattering data they so proudly shared last week demonstrates. Kamala Harris was deposited into the dustbin of history because she was the top lieutenant in an administration that had proven a miserable failure long before her boss's implosion last summer. Americans spent the entirety of the Biden years telling pollsters that their lives were demonstrably, palpably worse as a result of historic price hikes. Biden & Co. responded to these pleas for relief by denying the existence of inflation until they couldn't any longer. Then, when they finally did implicitly admit to the effects of the nearly $2 trillion boondoggle they passed in 2021, they slapped the name 'Inflation Reduction Act' on yet another profligate spending bill that every layman in America knew would only compound the problem. There are similar stories to be told about Americans' dissatisfaction with Biden's approach to foreign policy, his abdication of his duty to secure the border, and his championing of a radical social agenda that maintains up is down, left is right, and black is white. Their stubborn refusal to grapple with this incontrovertible truth is also reportedly set to be reflected in an upcoming 2024 autopsy conducted by the DNC. The New York Times reports that it will 'steer clear of the decisions made by the Biden-turned-Harris campaign,' and instead 'focus more on outside groups and super PACs that spent hundreds of millions of dollars aiding the Biden and Harris campaigns through advertising, voter registration drives and turnout efforts.' It's like watching a restaurant serving inedible food invest in new plateware. The gripe has never been with the Democrats' presentation or voters' tastes. It's with the product itself.

USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
Mike Johnson says Ghislaine Maxwell should serve 'life sentence,' opposes potential pardon
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, said he believes Ghislaine Maxwell, a key associate of Jeffrey Epstein currently serving 20 years in prison for conspiring to sexually abuse minors, should face "a life sentence." "If you're asking my opinion, I think 20 years was a pittance," Johnson told NBC's Kristen Welker on "Meet the Press" July 27. "I think she should have a life sentence, at least." His remarks to NBC come as many, including supporters of President Donald Trump, clamor for testimony from Maxwell. Some followers of the case have proposed a pardon in exchange, but Trump told reporters on July 25 he hadn't considered the move. "I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about," the president said. Epstein was charged with sexually trafficking minors and died by suicide while in detention in 2019. Maxwell, his longtime girlfriend, has been accused of recruiting minors for the disgraced financier's predation. Maxwell maintains her innocence and is appealing her 2021 sex-trafficking conviction. Johnson in his interview with NBC reiterated that pardons aren't up to him, telling the outlet, "obviously that's a decision of the president." "I won't get it in front of him," Johnson said. "That's not my lane." But, later in the interview he noted, "It's hard to put into words how evil this was, and that she orchestrated it and was a big part of it." "So, again, not my decision," he added, "but I have great pause about that, as any reasonable person would." The Trump administration for weeks has faced backlash over its handling of Epstein's case. Critics from Democratic lawmakers to prominent Republicans and slices of Trump's voter base accuse the president and other officials of not being transparent with the American people. The speaker has faced his own ongoing Epstein-related criticism, as some House Republicans have zeroed in on the Justice Department's recent review of Epstein's case and are calling for related documents to be released publicly. Democrats in Congress have piled on too. Reps. Ro Khanna, D-California, and Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, introduced a bipartisan measure to force the Trump administration's hand in releasing the federal government's files. Also on "Meet The Press," the pair split on pardoning Maxwell. "That would be up to the president," Massie said. "But if she has information that could help us, then I think she should testify. Let's get that out there. And whatever they need to do to compel that testimony, as long as it's truthful, I would be in favor of." Khanna disagreed, saying Maxwell shouldn't receive a pardon. "Look, I agree with Congressman Massie that she should testify," the California Democrat said. "But she's been indicted twice on perjury. This is why we need the files. This is why we need independent evidence." Contributing: Bart Jansen and Aysha Bagchi, USA TODAY


The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump insists Hamas is stealing food amid Gaza hunger crisis
President Trump on Sunday said Hamas is stealing food that was meant for people in Gaza, telling reporters multiple times that goods are being stolen when pressed on the hunger crisis in the region. The president, while sitting next to President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen in Turnberry, Scotland, was asked for his response to the images of starving children in Gaza. 'When I see the children and when I see, especially over the last couple of weeks people are stealing the food, they're stealing the money, they're stealing the money for the food. They're stealing weapons, they're stealing everything,' the president said. He added, 'It's a mess, that whole place is a mess. The Gaza strip, you know it was given many years ago so they could have peace. That didn't work out too well.' The Israeli military has reported that there is no proof that the Palestinian militant group had systematically stolen aid. Earlier on Sunday, Israel's military said it will start a 'tactical pause' in fighting in Gaza amid mass starvation concerns. Trump said he spoke recently with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, adding, 'I talked to him about a lot of things. I talked to him about Iran.' He said the U.S. would send more aid into Gaza and pressed other nations to contribute as well, suggesting that would be part of his conversation with der Leyen. And, he reiterated the claims about Hamas stealing food. 'It's not a U.S. problem, it's an international problem,' Trump said on Gaza. 'If we weren't there. I think people would have starved, frankly. They would have starved, and it's not like they're eating well, but a lot of that food is getting stolen by Hamas. They're stealing the food, they're stealing a lot of things. You ship it in and they steal it, then they sell it,' he said. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) also insisted that Hamas has stolen the food on NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday and noted that Yechiel Leiter, Israel's ambassador to the U.S., and other Israeli officials told him that Hamas has stolen 'a huge amount' of food since the start of the conflict on Oct. 7, 2023. Trump on Sunday said that the U.S. gave $60 million in aid for Gaza two weeks ago, but said that 'nobody even acknowledged it.' 'Nobody acknowledged it, nobody talks about it, and it makes you feel a little bad when you do that, and no other countries give anything,' he said. He said that Israel has to decide what happens next in the Israel-Hamas conflict in Gaza. 'What's going to happen? I don't know,' Trump said. 'Israel's going to have to make a decision. I know what I'd do but I don't think it's appropriate that I say.' The Trump administration last week said it was leaving Gaza ceasefire talks, blaming Hamas for failing to engage in good faith. Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy for peace missions, said the administration is considering alternative plans to secure the freedom of Israeli hostages held by Hamas and the future governance of the territory.