Trump's trade war puts Australian beef centre stage in Shanghai
At one of the world's largest food trade shows in Shanghai this week, Australia's beef industry was having a moment.
Beef exports to China have been surging this year and according to Meat and Livestock Australia's regional manager for greater China Murray Davis, the orders for grain-fed beef are running hot.
"Australia is absolutely centre stage [here in China] and we are dominating the premium end of the beef market," he said.
"Our major competitor over the last few years has been the United States, but with the trade disputes between China and the US, the US is effectively out of the market at the moment.
While the US and China have walked back from the trade war precipice in recent weeks with a 90-day pause on tariffs, Mr Davis said the friction between the two nations was on show at the SIAL food trade show in Shanghai.
"Our pavilion at SIAL, we had 300 square metres of space and we were swamped with buyers the whole time," he said.
"Right next to it was the United States pavilion which was very quiet, very subdued, and most of the US exhibitors didn't send people over from the United States.
Mr Davis, who is based in Shanghai, said the fundamentals for Australia's beef trade with China were strong.
"There are some economic headwinds here, in that consumer sentiment is a little bit subdued, the stock market is down, property prices are down, but it still remains a 200,000-tonne-a-year [beef] market for us," he said.
"I think no matter what, it's going to remain a very significant market for us in the future."
Meanwhile, Australia's largest cattle company's financial year results, released this week, included plenty of green shoots.
Australian Agricultural Company (AACo) posted an operating profit of $58.4 million, up 14 per cent year-on-year and its total revenue increased 15 per cent to $389.9 million.
Chief executive David Harris said it was a positive outcome during a period of global uncertainty.
He said despite Trump's 10 per cent tariff, North America remained AACo's second-biggest market for its branded beef.
"Business has been good [with the United States]," he said.
"There is no doubting there's been lots of conversations between importers, distributors, customers and ourselves in relation to the tariff.
Mr Harris said while AACo did export some beef to China, it was not a major customer for its brands.
"We're not over-leveraged into China, but because it moves volumes of beef out of other markets, that certainly helps us in other global markets."
Australia is on track to produce a record amount of beef in 2025.
Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) this week showed 2.2 million head of cattle were killed in the first quarter of 2025, up an incredible 20 per cent on the same period last year.
Watch ABC TV's Landline at 12:30pm on Sunday or on ABC iview.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Australian Tesla owners seeking compensation as phantom braking leaves drivers 'completely terrified'
When Dominic Yin bought his Tesla two years ago he didn't think he'd be taken for "a scary ride". A few months after his purchase, he was driving on the highway between Sydney and Melbourne when the car suddenly braked for no apparent reason. He told 7.30 a truck was behind him at the time. "The truck driver behind me pressed (his) horn and (gave me the finger), and I pointed to the car: 'It's not me, it's the car'". The issue is widely known as phantom braking and Mr Yin says it has happened to him numerous times. Some Tesla drivers have reported phantom braking while their car is in autopilot mode, which according to Tesla, "enables your car to steer, accelerate and brake automatically within its lane". It's not entirely autonomous driving, but you can take your foot off the accelerator while the car drives along at a set speed and slows down for other vehicles. Tesla advises drivers that they should keep their hands on the steering wheel at all times. The company also maintains autopilot is designed to make driving safer, but in the US, Tesla has been sued over several deadly crashes in which the system was enabled. The Elon Musk run company has reportedly settled some of these cases but not admitted to any wrongdoing, citing driver error. Last month Tesla shared a video on social media showing an apparent test drive of its semi-autonomous system on Melbourne's streets, and said not even hook turns were a problem. Following a US consumer lawsuit over phantom braking, about 10,000 Tesla drivers in Australia have registered their interest in a class action against the company. The case began in the Federal Court last month, claiming that Australian consumers were misled over phantom braking, battery range and self-driving capability. "The issues that have been reported to us are that vehicles can be driving along on the highway at 100 or 110kph and all of a sudden the brakes are applied suddenly and without reason," class action lawyer, Rebecca Jancauskas told 7.30. "Drivers have reported feeling completely terrified when their vehicles have braked suddenly and it has led in some cases to collisions. "We've had many reports of people who registered for this class action, telling us that they've been driving with their hands on the vehicle, fully alert, and these issues have occurred nonetheless." 7.30 invited Tesla Australia to respond to the claims but it did not reply. The federal infrastructure department is responsible for road safety and told 7.30 it had received only six reports from consumers about braking problems with Teslas over two years. Peter Khoury from the NRMA said Tesla drivers should raise their concerns if they are subject to any phantom braking. "If you are experiencing this occurring in your vehicle, go to the manufacturer immediately because this can be a safety risk if it is occurring," he said. "If you're not satisfied with what the manufacturer has told you or done, you're not powerless in Australia. There is the capacity to notify the Australian government." The Australian class action is seeking compensation for Tesla drivers, claiming they have lost resale value given the problems. Mr Yin said there's "no way" he would have bought his Tesla had he been made aware by Tesla about phantom braking. He wants a full refund or for Tesla to fix the problem. "You're always wondering when (it's) going to happen next," he said. Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Pop star Guy Sebastian's email revealed in Titus Day trial
Guy Sebastian personally negotiated a release from his contract to join manager Titus Day's new company in 2009 before their relationship ultimately soured, a court has been told. Mr Day is standing trial in the NSW District Court accused of embezzling more than $600,000 from the Aussie pop star. It's alleged that Mr Day failed to pay Mr Sebastian performance fees and royalties that were collected by his 6 Degrees talent agency, including $187,000 for performance fees when the Australian Idol winner supported Taylor Swift on her 2013 tour of Australia. Mr Day has denied doing anything dishonest or fraudulent and is fighting the allegations. He has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of embezzlement as a clerk or servant and one count of attempting to dishonestly obtain financial advantage by deception. The court has been told that Mr Sebastian first became involved with Mr Day when he signed with the 22 Management company early in his career. At the time, Mr Day worked for 22 Management, which was owned by Sean Anderson. Then, in early 2009, Mr Day told Mr Anderson that he was looking to form his own company, the court was told on Wednesday. 'He indicated to me that he was looking for something a little bit more than an employee role and whether I was open to a partnership or bringing him in as a partner in the business,' Mr Anderson told the jury on Wednesday. 'I indicated I wasn't quite ready to do that and so he said he was looking to start his own business. And I encouraged him to do it.' And when Mr Day formed 6 Degrees and went out on his own, Mr Anderson said Mr Sebastian followed Mr Day because of their close relationship. 'Guy indicated he had formed a great relationship with Titus and he wanted to follow Titus, which I expected would happen,' Mr Anderson said. 'I didn't have anyone in the business that had the music skills that Titus had, so I then negotiated a release from my contract with Guy and he left shortly after.' The court was told that 22 Management had a written contract with Mr Sebastian, but Mr Anderson had since not been able to find a copy. The court was told that Mr Sebastian's contract with 22 Management was due to expire in April 2010; however, he negotiated a release to join Mr Day when he went out on his own to found 6 Degrees. The jury on Wednesday heard details of a mid-2009 email exchange between Mr Anderson and Mr Sebastian as they negotiated the terms of the singer's exit from his managerial contract. Initially, Mr Anderson proposed that 22 Management be given a percentage of Mr Sebastian's gross income for the next two years – 10 per cent on the first year and 5 per cent on the following year. However, Mr Day replied saying that 22 Management was only entitled to 20 per cent of all gross income up until April 2010 and after that a 'trailing commission' on any work done that was negotiated by Mr Anderson's business. The court was told that 'trailing commissions' were negotiated by managers to cover them for their investment in young and up-and-coming performers in the event they become successful and later leave to join new management. It prompted Mr Anderson to propose new terms, including a 15 per cent split to 22 Management and a 5 per cent split to 6 Degrees as well as trailing commissions. 'Titus should be doing somersaults with this outcome, if I was able to go out on my own and take the marquee client with me and earn commissions from day one, I'd be buying lottery tickets,' Mr Anderson wrote to Mr Sebastian in an email, the court was told. Mr Anderson also asked Mr Sebastian to perform at his 40th birthday free of charge, which he agreed to do as part of their amicable split, the court was told. The terms of Mr Sebastian's contract with 22 Management have been a key part of the trial. During his evidence, Mr Sebastian was grilled by Mr Day's defence about his deal with Mr Day in the early days of his contract. Mr Day's barrister Thomas Woods suggested to Mr Sebastian that he had agreed to 'look after' Mr Day down the track 'by compensating him for the lost commission during this early period' in 2009 when he was only earning 5 per cent. Mr Sebastian, during his evidence to the court last week, denied the assertion. '(Mr Day) wanted more than 5 per cent for that period but couldn't get it because of your arrangement with (22 Management) – you would look after him down the track when you were in a stronger financial position, and that was then what you did. That's what I'm suggesting to you,' Mr Woods said. 'Firstly, that's completely false … their agreement was a 15-5 agreement, and that was between them,' Mr Sebastian replied at the time. 'The concept that in 2014, that where I was already paying a lot of commission to Titus … that seems really ridiculous to me.'
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
After two days of talks, Trump's China trade deal is right back where it started
After almost 20 hours of marathon trade talks across two days, US and Chinese negotiators arrived back at the starting point they had brokered one month ago. Given the fragility of US-China relations and the worldwide consequences of when they sour, any progress along the path of de-escalation is welcome. But the key takeaway from Tuesday's incremental outcome is about as prosaic as the new agreement was underwhelming. Trade wars are easy to start, easy to escalate and extremely difficult to unpick, let alone win. Holed up for two days in London's opulent Lancaster House, officials from both camps emerged late in the evening with what appears, at best, to be a Groundhog Day agreement to wind back the clock to the May 12 tariff ceasefire brokered in Geneva. Unlike last time, there was no joint statement outlining the agreed terms, just a handful of remarks to reporters by the lead negotiators, where the main line of consensus appeared to be on what to call this bare-minimum breakthrough. 'The negotiators have negotiated a handshake agreement to seek sign-off to agree that a previously agreed agreement is still their agreed-upon agreement' Justin Wolfers, US economist 'A framework' for implementing 'the Geneva consensus' is how both US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Chinese Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang referred to the end product of the protracted negotiations. Under the Geneva truce, both sides agreed to scale back their eye-watering tariffs for 90 days – a deal that immediately wobbled when China continued to strangle the export of rare earth minerals and magnets, and the US retaliated with new curbs on semiconductor software and plane engine parts. After the London discussions, there is no solid resolution on these issues, just an in-principle agreement to withdraw the knives.
