Fraudster mum must repay £50,000 she stole from daughters
On Monday, at a proceeds of crime hearing, Swansea Crown Court heard that due to inflation the sum stolen by their "greedy and spiteful" mother and grandfather was now worth about £65,000.Ms Hill died in 2013, when Jessica was 12 and Gemma was 15, and placed the money in a trust managed in part by their mum.But she and her dad lied and said they posted cash in envelopes through the girls' letterboxes.The judge told Hill she stole the money because she was "so annoyed that your daughters received more money than you".Hill put the money in an instant access Barclays Everyday Saver account, despite being advised not to, and both she and her dad had cards to access it. Within 12 month, most of the £50,000 had been withdrawn by the fraudsters, but their crime was only uncovered in 2018 when one of her daughters asked for her money early so she could buy a house with her boyfriend.
After the trial, Recorder Greg Bull KC said Hill had "laundered" some of her daughters' money by paying her partner's mortgage.He said Ms Hill and window cleaner Phillip Lloyd "lived together as man and wife" and she could repay her daughters by raising equity from their home."It is significant that investigations could not reveal what had happened either to that £50,000, or to what had happened to other relatively substantial sums left to Katherine Hill after her mother's demise," he added."She still maintains that she has never received the £50,000. I disbelieve her on that and I find her answer to be totally untruthful."Mr Lloyd is fully aware of what happened to that £50,000 and has probably helped her at least launder it, if not enjoy the fruits of her fraud."
He added that the money was used to pay their mortgage and utility bills, as well as enjoying a lifestyles they would not otherwise be able to afford. Hill was told she must repay £50,000 within three months or face another six months prison while her father was ordered to pay £6,000 for his part in the fraud or face three months in prison.The court heard if neither of the Hills pay, they will be jailed but their debts would not be cleared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
Locals in Epping have welcomed an injunction to block asylum seekers from being housed at a nearby hotel, but raised concerns the decision would only 'kick the can down the road'. Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Gang of six schoolgirls aged 12 and 13 are arrested after 'park assault' on a 13-year-old girl
A gang of schoolgirls aged 12 and 13 have been arrested after an alleged assault on a 13-year-old girl in a park. Police rushed to Wish Park in Hove, Sussex on Friday at around 5.55pm after reports of the attack. The victim was taken to hospital for assessment of her injuries and has since been discharged. Enquiries are ongoing following the arrest of two 12-year-old and four 13-year-old girls, all from Brighton. Chief Inspector Simon Marchant, of the Neighbourhood Policing Team in Brighton, said: 'This was a deeply troubling incident which has understandably caused concern within the local community. 'Our officers have now arrested all of the young people we wanted to speak with in connection with the report, and wider enquiries remain underway. 'We are aware that footage relating to this incident is circulating online, and we continue to urge the public not to share or speculate, as this could affect any future legal proceedings. 'This case is being fully and robustly investigated, and if you have information to report, we ask you come forward and speak with police.'
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government ‘does not have a plan' to accommodate asylum seekers
The Government does not have a plan to accommodate asylum seekers and did not listen to concerns that they should not be housed at the Bell Hotel, the leader of Epping Forest District Council has said. Chris Whitbread, who also leads the Conservative group at the Essex authority, said that failures to improve the system for processing asylum applications were also causing distress 'up and down the country'. His comments came after the council was granted a temporary injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the hotel, which has been at the centre of a series of protests and counter-protests in recent weeks. The interim injunction granted by Mr Justice Eyre means the hotel's owner, Somani Hotels Limited, must stop housing asylum seekers at the site by September 12, but the company could seek to challenge the ruling at the Court of Appeal. Speaking to the PA news agency after the judgment, Mr Whitbread said the injunction marked an 'opportunity for my community to start to return to normal'. A hearing on Friday was told by barristers representing Somani Hotels that the venue previously housed asylum seekers from May 2020 to March 2021, and from October 2022 to April 2024, and that the council 'never instigated any formal enforcement proceedings against this use'. Asylum seekers were then placed in the Bell Hotel again from April 2025. When asked on Tuesday why the council did not previously take legal action, Mr Whitbread said: 'It goes back to 2020 when we were in the pandemic originally, and at that time, it was used for young families, women and children, which is completely different to having it used for single males. 'Obviously, we have always raised our concerns with the Home Office, whether it be the previous government or this government, we raised our concerns. 'This government decided to start using the hotel again without consultation and purely by instruction; they didn't listen to our concerns. 'Five schools are in close proximity, a residential care home, lots of residential homes nearby, they didn't listen to us at all, that is the fundamental difference.' When asked what message he believed this sent from the Government, he said: 'If I am honest with you, I don't think they have actually got a plan. I think that is my real concern. 'We talk about one in, one out, well, that is a gimmick. If you talk about smashing the gangs, that was a gimmick. 'What we really need to see is a government with a serious plan to deal with this problem, and that obviously comes down to processing, where they stay while they are being processed, and actually speeding up the system. 'We are not seeing that at the moment, and that is causing a lot of distress to people up and down the country.' The hotel became the focal point of a series of protests after an asylum seeker housed at the site was charged with sexually assaulting a teenage girl. Mr Whitbread said that while later protests had been 'more peaceful, more bearable but still disruptive' to the community, he had 'never seen anything like what we have seen in recent times'. He said: 'I think what we have done as a council and what my brilliant team of council officers have done is actually take forward what the desire of residents is, to see the Bell closed, but do it in a sensible and proper way, and that is what we're doing.' Mr Whitbread also said that there had been 'no conversations' about the next steps for removing those currently housed at the hotel. Reacting to the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said: 'This government inherited a broken asylum system, at the peak there were over 400 hotels open. 'We will continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns. Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament. 'We will carefully consider this judgment. As this matter remains subject to ongoing legal proceedings it would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage.'
