logo
Saiyaara, And The Taming Of The Tortured-Male-Rockstar

Saiyaara, And The Taming Of The Tortured-Male-Rockstar

NDTV25-07-2025
In Mohit Suri's Saiyaara, a bitter boy meets a guarded girl. He is hurting, and she is hurt. He, a singer, uses music to convey wounds, and she, a writer, uses words to cover injury. He seeks fame, and she wants solitude. As star-crossed as it comes, they are destined for a kind of love that consumes both but heals one; headed for a ruined romance where one survives and the other thrives.
Such stories have a precedent, comprising mostly a man at the centre - talented but obscure, wanting love but chasing heartbreak. The ache baptises him as an artist. Karan Johar's Ae Dil Hai Mushkil (2016) is a telling instance. Snubbed by the woman he loves, the man uses shards of his heart to make music, and earns success. This is such a trope that when the protagonist in Imtiaz Ali's Rockstar (2011) wishes to be a singer, he is prescribed heartbreak. Although Ali designs him as a reluctant rockstar willing to forsake everything for love, his hero eventually gains everything his heart desired at the cost of his heart.
This archetype of a tortured male artist is not a novelty in Hindi films. Guru Dutt's Pyaasa (1957), about a poet awaiting validation from a hostile world till he rejects all, is an early example. There are more, including Suri's own rendition of A Star Is Born in Aashiqui 2 (2013). Ali's Tamasha (2015) has a storyteller bleeding through the mundanity of life. In Abhishek Chaubey's Udta Punjab (2016), a biting take on Punjab's opium problem, the sole artist in the story is drug-addled.
If narratives confirm broken men as a prerequisite for artistry, they also carve specific roles for women to shoulder: the breaker or the healer. She propels the man to triumph or holds his hand through the turbulence of his making. Either way, she plays a part in someone else's journey and occupies limited space even as the succour demanded of her is boundless. She imprints the art, but the artist remains a man.
With Saiyaara, Suri updates the stereotypes.
Krish Kapoor (Ahaan Panday) is a volatile singer. Life has been unfair to him, and he, in turn, has little patience for fairness. His father is an alcoholic, and his band members, wealthier and better connected, get more recognition in the press. Always seething, he is introduced as beating up a journalist for favouritism. Standing on the other side of the scuffle is Vaani Batra (Aneet Padda), a girl so sensitive that she will probably crumble if pushed. Sparks fly.
This World Is A Tragedy
One would assume this is the story, that he is broken enough to be healed. But Krish, being a Mohit Suri hero, is scripted for graver tragedies. And thus it begins: Krish and Vaani gravitate towards each other. She pieces him together, and the colour of his t-shirts becomes lighter with his heart; a faint smile hovers over his lips. Everything fits: he is a narcissist, and she is devotional; she wishes for his success, and he wishes to be successful. Then disaster strikes, one primed to elevate Krish, but which will first crush him: Vaani is diagnosed with Alzheimer's. So far, so Rockstar.
On a trope-y level, the condition makes sense; as a metaphor, it works even better. Afflicted by a disorder that destroys memory, Vaani's fading into oblivion literalises the dispensable function women play in such narratives. But Suri flips the script. He uses the segue of sickness to craft a subversive coming-of-age story where gender roles are defined but not followed.
An Intervention
The swap happens gently, almost against the wishes of the leads. Till Saiyaara is predictable, the characters act derivative. Till the story is imitative, the ticks feel the same. Krish smokes like Kabir Singh, is called "animal" for his flying temper, and falls in love with the eagerness of Imtiaz Ali's heroes. Ditto for Vaani, who is content being a bystander to Krish's success. Yet, whenever they seek to assume these roles, Saiyaara uses the context of tragedy and intervenes. Moments before Krish's big concert, Vaani assures to be a cheerleader only to be disoriented; after Krish readies to go for his band's first concert tour, he runs back, an image that keeps repeating, from the airport to be next to her.
Aneet Padda as Vaani in Saiyaara
These deflections, slight on the surface, rework archaic optics. They allow the girl to bypass conventions and extract an Aditya Chopra hero, prone to seeing the divine in the person he loves, from Sandeep Reddy Vanga's universe of God-complexed protagonists. Saiyaara features a pliant female character whose path to healing assumes agency to be the central story, and a male artist willing to partake in it as the healer.
The Real Protagonist
Suri's filmmaking responds to this. Vaani might be lurking in the background, restricted to mostly reaction shots, but she is the protagonist. The camera is earlier established as her point of view; when she faints, the screen crumbles, and keeps finding her even when the stage is set for Krish. His big moments - a tour in India, a concert in London - keep getting interrupted by her condition. As if she is on the journey and he is playing catch-up. This thought gets reinforced when his acts, hitherto selfish, start being imbued with the care of service. He desires to flourish not for his sake but so that she can spot him from afar. Saiyaara, too, holds out, framing Krish as a rockstar, after teasing with the visual, only when the image pines with the purpose of finding her. So keen is he that grief of her absence, deployed by his predecessors as a license to be a man-child, is wielded by him to be tender, in preparation for a visit.
Such selflessness is atypical of an artist but typical of a lover. Perhaps this explains the allure of Saiyaara. Suri's film tempts with the familiar tale of a misunderstood singer to crack open as a tale of two star-crossed lovers who, altering destiny, head for a remedial romance. Both survive because the other survives. The artistry - she writes, he sings - becomes a means. Songs billow from broken hearts but not as a memento of a finished story, but as an accessory to keep sustaining it. Who knew the tortured male artist is just a simp in disguise?
(Ishita Sengupta is an independent film critic and culture writer from India. Her writing is informed by gender and pop culture and has appeared in The Indian Express, Hyperallergic, New Lines Magazine, etc.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This actor with brown eyes was ready to quit films after 19 flops, until a rejected role turned him into a superstar, his name is...
This actor with brown eyes was ready to quit films after 19 flops, until a rejected role turned him into a superstar, his name is...

India.com

time23 minutes ago

  • India.com

This actor with brown eyes was ready to quit films after 19 flops, until a rejected role turned him into a superstar, his name is...

While the nation cheered Nargis in Mother India, Guru Dutt in Pyaasa, and Dilip Kumar in Naya Daur, Shammi Kapoor was drowning in a series of 19 flops. Backed by the Kapoor name yet overshadowed by his father, Prithviraj and brothers Raj and Shashi, his career seemed doomed. Was he ready to quit it all? Yes. After four disappointing years in films, Shammi was growing fed up. Feeling stuck in the family shadow, even his marriage to Geeta Bali in 1955 didn't help — critics called him 'just Geeta Bali's husband.' He was so disenchanted he considered walking away—possibly to start anew as a tea-plantation manager in Assam. So how did he get the break that changed everything? Here came the twist: filmmaker Nasir Hussain initially approached Dev Anand for a lead in Tumsa Nahin Dekha. When that couldn't happen, he offered the role to Sunil Dutt, who was unavailable. Someone suggested resisting fate: take Shammi Kapoor. Nasir hesitated—but trusted the advice of producer Shashadhar Mukherjee (Kajol's grandfather). Shammi got his shot and turned it into gold. What made Tumsa Nahin Dekha work? On screen, everything clicked: Shammi's electric style, rhythmic dance, quirky dialogue delivery, and charismatic screen presence. Suddenly, the man once pegged as a flop became an overnight star. His look, his swagger, his energy—nothing like it existed before. No one could copy him; he became the trend. Did he continue his reign? Absolutely. The next hit, Dil Deke Dekho, confirmed the trend. Then came Junglee (1961), a blockbuster also directed by Nasir. Over the next decade, Shammi delivered one hit after another: Professor, Bluff Master, Kashmir Ki Kali, Rajkumar, Janwar, Tisri Manzil, An Evening in Paris, Brahmachari, Prince, Tumse Accha Kaun Hai, Andaaz. From 1961 to 1971, he was Bollywood's go-to romantic hero. Did things stay smooth forever? No. In 1969, during the filming of Rajkumar, he was performing a stunt tied with ropes and an elephant. A fall shattered his knee—ending his dancing days. Weight gain and reduced mobility led to fewer hero roles. By the mid‑1970s, he shifted to character parts, starting with B.R. Chopra's Jameer (1975). He even clashed with Chopra over Gumrah, refusing to play a stereotypical husband giving way to an affair, saying 'if I'm the husband, how can he cheat?' The clash damaged that offer. What was his private life like? Shammi's love stories made headlines. His first serious affair was with Nutan, but her family sent her abroad. He also loved Madhubala, but she preferred Dilip Kumar. Fate led him to marry Geeta Bali—until her illness and untimely death ended their bond. Later, he had a relationship with Mumtaz before she married. Other affairs—like with Bina Ramani and Neela Devi—were brief or unfulfilled. How do we sum up his legacy now? Shammi Kapoor's story is a lesson in perseverance: 19 flops nearly broke him, then a single film made him immortal. His unique energy and style defined an era; his comeback created one of the greatest Bollywood icons. Even after tragedy, he reinvented himself on screen and lived on through the love of millions.

A smart pay-per-view model could reshape film distribution economics
A smart pay-per-view model could reshape film distribution economics

Business Standard

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

A smart pay-per-view model could reshape film distribution economics

While Mr Khan's film earned over ₹250 crore in theatres, it reached only 2-3 per cent of the population Business Standard Editorial Comment Listen to This Article In a recent interview with this newspaper, actor and filmmaker Aamir Khan said that his latest movie would release on YouTube's pay-per-view (PPV) platform at ₹100, a move that signals a potential shift in how India consumes cinema. While Mr Khan's film earned over ₹250 crore in theatres, it reached only 2-3 per cent of the population. According to a study by around 70 per cent of theatres nationwide are located in South India and Maharashtra, leaving large parts of the Hindi heartland underserved. The Ficci-EY M&E Report 2025 further highlighted this imbalance, noting a 17 per cent growth

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store