Adobe Firefly and ChatGPT images in WhatsApp mark apps as generative AI hubs
As it becomes clear that a lot of the generative artificial intelligence (AI) usage is shifting to smartphones, AI companies scramble to make their apps more capable, and unlock new ways for users to access. OpenAI's approach sees ChatGPT integration within its WhatsApp bot, for quick image generation without needing to access OpenAI's models on the web or its own smartphone app. Meta's WhatsApp is incredibly popular worldwide, with 1.5 billion daily active users, which gives OpenAI a strong foothold to propel.
Earlier, Perplexity too made its AI available as a chatbot on WhatsApp, which also includes an ability to generate images with text prompts.
A Firefly app, finally
At Adobe Max last year, HT had detailed how the company gave its creative apps a broader feature suite, with AI as the foundation. All of this, defined by their Firefly model. Yet, as time passed, there remained a nagging feeling that Adobe was missing a trick with its Firefly AI suite by not having an app for smartphones. More than anything else, to simply make it easy to access, on a user's phone or tablet.
In this time, coincidentally, AI companies generally made considerable moves to fine-tune AI-enabled content creation. Another illustration of this rapid transition is that just before this year's I/O keynote, Google rolled out updates for the Gemini app across Android and iPhone, unlocking Veo 2 for video generation and new Imagen model for images.
That has now changed. Adobe's Firefly app is now available for iPhones and Android devices. The integrated tools include text prompts to generate a video clip up to 7 seconds in duration and in up to 1080p resolution, text to image as well as generative fill and generative expand that had already found space in Adobe's popular creative tools including Photoshop.
'Our goal with Firefly is to deliver creators the most comprehensive destination on web and mobile to access the best generative models from across the industry, in a single integrated experience from ideation to generation and editing,' says Ely Greenfield, Adobe's senior vice president and chief technology officer. If you are thinking Adobe's simply pushing a case for its own Firefly models (of course it is) and not much else, you'd be very, very wrong.
There are Adobe's own Firefly Image 4 Ultra, Firefly Image 4 and Firefly Image 3. And then there are the third-party models, including Google's Imagen 4, Imagen 3 and Veo 2, as well as OpenAI's GPT Image.
Adobe says the Firefly generative AI ecosystem will be integrating models from Ideogram, Luma AI, Pika and Runway, alongside existing models from OpenAI, Google and Black Forest Labs too — that makes it the first creative platform of its kind, to integrate a large number of third party models too, as users get broader choice of generative styles, aesthetics and specifics such as formats and resolutions.
Subscriptions are priced at ₹499 per month or ₹4,999 per year for 750 monthly credits, and 100GB storage. Generations get synced basis the Creative Cloud account, linking them to other Adobe apps including Lightroom and Photoshop, as well as the consumer focused Express.
OpenAI unlocks more, on WhatsApp
Remember those Ghibli-style images that caught social media feeds by storm, earlier this year? OpenAI's WhatsApp bet sees the image generation capabilities being made available as part of their WhatsApp toolset (1-800-ChatGPT is the number to save in WhatsApp). This is underlined by the company's newest generation GPT-4o model, which natively supports image generation.
There are two broad ways to use image generation within WhatsApp using the GPT-4o model — ask AI to create any image with a detailed text prompt, or upload a photo and describe how a user would want to transform it.
'GPT4o's image generation follows detailed prompts with attention to detail. While other systems struggle with ~5-8 objects, GPT4o can handle up to 10-20 different objects,' the company had said in a statement, when the model was released earlier this year.
OpenAI says ChatGPT on WhatsApp works with all subscription tiers — that is Free, Plus and Pro — but each with differing amounts of usability that will be notified as a user closes in on those rate limits.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
33 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'Like sabzi market': Indian techie blasts 'disrespectful' HR after botched salary negotiations
A frustrated Indian techie sparked a debate on social media over salary expectations after he accused a company's HR department of 'disrespectful' salary negotiations, comparing the experience to haggling in a sabzi market. The post, made in the r/developersIndia subreddit, struck a chord with many in the tech community who say they've experienced similar treatment. The techie, a data specialist with four years of experience, said that the hiring process ended in a lower salary offer than what was initially discussed. The techie said that the NCR-based firm required relocation and in-office presence, prompting him to quote ₹19 LPA during salary negotiations. discussions. However, after all interviews were complete, the company returned with a final offer of just ₹16 LPA. 'This doesn't make sense,' the user wrote, explaining that the new offer would barely result in a meaningful salary increase once taxes and living expenses were considered. 'I hate negotiating like in a sabzi market,' he added. The post quickly attracted comments from fellow tech professionals, many of whom shared the sentiment. "No matter what, always ask for more than you need because HR will always lowball. I have not encountered any HR who gave an offer based on expected compensation," suggested one of them. Another shared, "I have experience with these HRs. They don't have any professional expertise from which they can distinguish good candidates from bad ones. They usually end up choosing low-skilled candidates. Seriously, I hate applying for jobs." A third user suggested, "I have been in a similar situation before. During the first offer, you won't get much hike. So you basically need to stack up multiple offers to get a 100% hike. I followed the same approach a couple of days back." (Also read: Google techie in Bengaluru says moving to 2BHK is the best decision: 'Big chunk of salary goes into rent')
India Today
42 minutes ago
- India Today
Iran asks people to delete WhatsApp, hints that app is leaking location data to Israel military
In the midst of war with Israel, Iran has suffered a number of high-profile assassinations in the recent days. The accuracy of these attacks on high-profile target has stunned not just the Iranian government but also the rest of world. Now, Iran is hinting that its officials might have been targeted on the basis of location data leaked by apps and phones, including through WhatsApp. And the company has issued a directive to its citizens asking them to remove WhatsApp from their phones. advertisementIranian state television on Tuesday called on citizens to delete WhatsApp from their phones. The announcement claimed that the messaging app could be leaking user information to the Israeli military. Although this claim has been strongly denied by the app's parent company, Meta to an Associated Press report, the state TV broadcast warned that WhatsApp is allegedly 'gathering user information' and sharing it with Israel. The platform is currently one of the most widely used messaging platforms in Iran. Although the broadcast offered no concrete evidence, it has stirred growing fears over digital privacy and national security in the country. Commenting on the allegation, WhatsApp described the claims as 'false reports' and expressed concern that such statements could be used as justification to block the platform entirely. 'We are concerned these false reports will be an excuse for our services to be blocked at a time when people need them the most,' the company has also reiterated that it uses end-to-end encryption. This is a security standard many messaging platforms follow to ensure only the sender and recipient of a message can read its contents. 'We do not track your precise location, we don't keep logs of who everyone is messaging, and we do not track the personal messages people are sending one another,' the statement read. 'We do not provide bulk information to any government.'Meanwhile, many experts are pointing out that end-to-end encryption does not eliminate all security concerns. Gregory Falco, a cybersecurity researcher and assistant professor at Cornell University, told the Associated Press that metadata — information such as when a message is sent and to whom — can still be leaked. Such concerns can be particularly troublesome in case there is a tacit or unknown co-operation between American tech companies and different militaries. In the past we have seen tech companies like Google, Microsoft and others work with Israeli government and its military to provide certain services, although tech companies deny that their services are used for military purposes by the same time, Israeli companies like NSO — of Pegasus spyware fame — often target apps like WhatsApp to hack into people's phones, including iPhones. WhatsApp had earlier slammed NSO and had filed cases against in a US court.
Mint
42 minutes ago
- Mint
Pope Leo takes on AI
VATICAN CITY—Two days into his reign, the new American pope spoke softly to a hall full of red-capped cardinals and invoked the digital-age challenge to human dignity he intended to address with the power of his 2,000-year-old office: artificial intelligence. The princes of the Catholic Church listened intently as Pope Leo XIV laid out his priorities for the first time, revealing that he had chosen his papal name because of the tech revolution. As he explained, his namesake Leo XIII stood up for the rights of factory workers during the Gilded Age, when industrial robber barons presided over rapid change and extreme inequality. 'Today, the church offers its trove of social teaching to respond to another industrial revolution and to innovations in the field of artificial intelligence that pose challenges to human dignity, justice and labor," Leo XIV told the College of Cardinals, who stood and cheered for their new pontiff and his unlikely cause. Over the past decade, many of Silicon Valley's most powerful executives have flown to Rome to shape how the world's largest Christian denomination thinks and speaks about their innovations. The leaders of Google, Microsoft, Cisco and other tech powerhouses have debated the philosophical and societal implications of increasingly intelligent machines with the Vatican, hoping to share the benefits of emerging technologies, win over the moral authority and potentially steer its influence over governments and policymakers. While the dialogue has been friendly, the two sides have views that only partly overlap. The Vatican has been pushing for a binding international treaty on AI, which some tech CEOs want to avoid. A number of companies support voluntary ethical guidelines, preferring them to legally binding regulation of AI, which the European Union is gradually rolling out. The Trump administration has rescinded Biden-era AI regulations and has attacked Europe for trying to impose binding rules. Some tech executives reject even broad guidelines. Pope Francis said early in his reign that he barely knew how to use a computer. Yet the more familiar he became with AI, the more concerned he grew. He became a leading global voice on the potential dangers it could pose to humanity, increasingly meeting tech executives to discuss the matter. 'Leo XIV wants the worlds of science and politics to immediately tackle this problem without allowing scientific progress to advance with arrogance, harming those who have to submit to its power," said Cardinal Giuseppe Versaldi, who has known Leo well for many years. This week, the Vatican is hosting executives from Google, Meta, IBM, Anthropic, Cohere and Palantir in its grand Apostolic Palace, as part of a two-day international conference in Rome on AI, ethics and corporate governance co-chaired by David Berger, a partner at law firm Wilson Sonsini that advises some of the largest tech companies, and Pierluigi Matera, a partner at Libra Legal Partners, who works with the Vatican. The pope is expected to deliver a written message to the conference participants, but has yet to have meetings with tech CEOs so early in his papacy. Microsoft President Brad Smith is slated to meet with Vatican officials in Rome this month and Google has been in touch with the Vatican about a potential meeting with Leo, people familiar with the matter said. The encounters could give the companies powering the rise of AI a glimpse of whether Leo will offer friendly counsel or a firm challenge. To understand the roughly decadelong dialogue between the Catholic Church and Silicon Valley's leading lights, the Journal spoke to nearly 30 tech executives, clergymen and the historians and futurists they have consulted. These people described their detailed conversations, often held in secret, over the future of AI. The American pope's invocation of the 1890s is the latest chapter in the Catholic Church's ambivalent relationship with capitalism. Whereas President Trump sees the Gilded Age as a golden era to which the U.S. should return, Pope Leo views it as a warning from history. Leo XIII, who reigned in the late 19th century, was the first pope to systematically confront the social impact of the industrial revolution. Nicknamed 'the Pope of the Workers," Leo pressed governments to pass laws to protect laborers from the ruthless capitalists of the era. Leo XIII's views were profoundly influenced by an American prelate, Cardinal James Gibbons of Baltimore, who told him about the plight of factory workers in the U.S., many of them Catholic immigrants from European countries such as Italy and Ireland. If the Church didn't help labor, Gibbons warned the pope, then godless Communists would fill the void. In a groundbreaking 1891 encyclical called Rerum Novarum—Latin for 'Of New Things"—Leo XIII backed calls for labor unions, living wages and safer working conditions. But he also affirmed the right to private enterprise and property. 'The hiring of labor and the conduct of trade are concentrated in the hands of comparatively few; so that a small number of very rich men have been able to lay upon the teeming masses of the laboring poor a yoke little better than that of slavery itself," Leo XIII wrote. Rerum Novarum laid the foundation for modern Catholic social teaching, inspiring Catholic labor movements. It also influenced a powerful brand of moderate conservative politics in Europe after World War II, which believed in capitalism but with strong guardrails. In recent times, the Catholic Church has become increasingly vocal about inequality and the need for a more inclusive economy. Tech ethics weren't immediately a central concern for Francis—who worried, at times, that the global poor lagged behind in their access to social media. He embraced Twitter, and became known within the Vatican as the 'Snapchat Pope" for the selfies he took with visitors and Catholic faithful. In 2016, the Vatican hosted some of Silicon Valley's biggest names, including Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, Tim Cook of Apple and Google's Eric Schmidt to discuss how technology could be used for good. Francis mentioned to Schmidt that he could use some help with a new Vatican YouTube channel aimed at youth, according to people familiar with the meeting. Schmidt sent a cadre of Googlers to the Vatican for several weeks to assist, but they became frustrated by the slow pace of Vatican bureaucracy, and the channel never materialized. Bishop Paul Tighe, from Ireland, helped organize a series of closed-door conversations between Vatican hierarchy and tech leaders known as the Minerva Dialogues, after a Dominican church in Rome. At first, the conversation was mainly about the promise of growing digitization, but as time went by, the participants began to discuss their concerns about the rising political polarization that came with it, according to people familiar with the meetings. During these years, Francis also began expressing concern over the massacres of the Rohingya people in Myanmar, which had in part been fueled by viral Facebook posts. Over time, tech leaders talked increasingly about coming breakthroughs in AI. 'People were saying to us, 'Look, this is going to raise questions about the future of humanity…and we're interested in talking to all the traditional sources of wisdom,'" said Tighe. In early 2019, Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, then head of the Vatican's Pontifical Academy of Life, said Microsoft reached out about a meeting with the company's president, Brad Smith, to discuss the ethical implications of artificial intelligence. Paglia was intrigued but also wary of Microsoft's intentions. 'In my office people were telling me: This guy wants the Vatican's stamp of approval. Maybe it's about sales," said Paglia. But he agreed to meet Smith, and they hit it off. 'It was almost love at first sight. There was a mutual understanding of the vital importance of this issue," said Paglia. Soon after, the archbishop met the pope with Smith. There was no time for a full briefing. 'Tell me, who is this guy?" Francis asked Paglia as he prepared to greet Smith. To pique the pontiff's interest, the archbishop said Smith was a lawyer who helped immigrants in the U.S. (Smith co-founded a nonprofit that gives migrant children legal assistance.) 'OK, let's go then," Francis replied. 'I couldn't just say, 'He is the president of Microsoft.' I needed to make an emotional impact," explained Paglia. Microsoft had a yearslong relationship with Vatican officials but not at this level. Smith told Francis at length about his vision for AI. 'We see this technology as in service of humanity, not as a successor to it," Smith said in an interview. Paglia and Smith laid the groundwork for guidelines known as the Rome Call for AI Ethics, published in 2020, which corporate signatories including IBM and Cisco pledged to follow. The 12-page pledge committed AI-makers to not violate the privacy or human rights of users or to further discrimination, and proposed that 'those who design and deploy the use of AI must proceed with responsibility." Some AI pioneers, including Google and OpenAI, so far haven't signed up. Paglia hopes to get them on board. The Vatican recognized the potential of AI to do good in areas such as healthcare, education and spreading the faith. There were clearly ethical quandaries to consider. The hope was that clergy and tech leaders could team up to set out principles. In subsequent years, meeting the pope became a rite of passage for rising tech CEOs, including Anthropic's Dario Amodei, Cohere's Aidan Gomez and Markus Pflitsch of Terra Quantum, who called his meeting with Francis the 'Holy Grail." 'There was a more positive sentiment or more or less consensus that we will be able to organize and use classical AI for the good…but we need to put the right governance structures in place," said Pflitsch. Often, the visitors debated with the pope about the nature of technology and the divine, said Father Eric Salobir, a Dominican priest who attended some of the meetings. In one meeting, Francis compared AI's dependency on web content produced in a few languages—largely English—to the story of the Tower of Babel, in which overconfident humans, speaking a single tongue, attempted to build a tower to heaven, prompting God to scatter them and sabotage their creation. During another meeting, the pope warned tech leaders against believing that they understood humans just because their data could predict human behavior: 'You miss their humanity because you cannot reduce the human being to its data," Father Salobir recalled. In 2023, an AI-generated image of Pope Francis wearing a stylish white puffer jacket became one of the first deepfakes to go viral. Many people around the world fell for it. Later that year, Francis warned of a 'technological dictatorship" and called on governments to develop a legally binding international treaty to regulate AI. Addressing the 2024 summit of G-7 leaders, he called AI 'fascinating and terrifying." He said humanity faced a future without hope if 'choices by machines" replaced people's decisions about their lives. In January this year, the Vatican warned in a document on AI that even if the technology had constructive uses, a handful of tech companies could gain wealth and power at the expense of the many. Militaries might race to develop autonomous weapons, lacking in human judgment or morality. Children risked growing up in a dehumanized world, with chatbots as their guides. After Francis died in April, AI was a big topic of discussion among cardinals arriving in Rome to elect his successor. Several European prelates warned that AI was crowding out the space for God in modern life. Some of their colleagues from Africa expressed misgivings about the tech industry's bottomless appetite for minerals buried beneath their soil. They're now waiting to see how Leo will use the church's moral authority to push for strong rules on AI. 'These tools shouldn't be demonized, but they need to be regulated," said Cardinal Versaldi. 'The question is, who will regulate them? It's not credible for them to be regulated by their makers. There needs to be a superior authority." Write to Margherita Stancati at Drew Hinshaw at Keach Hagey at and Emily Glazer at
