logo
Ken Henry wants Australia's media to do a better job

Ken Henry wants Australia's media to do a better job

Ken Henry, a former treasury secretary, wants the media to do a better job.
He says the media has to hold Australia's political system accountable for its failure to deliver a better future for younger Australians.
"Report after report tells the same story," he said last week.
"The environment is not being protected. Biodiversity is not being conserved. Nature is in systemic decline.
"We have whole industries with business models built on the destruction of the natural world.
"We have turned nature against us. Our destruction of the natural environment now poses an existential threat to everything we value.
"I am angry at our failures. But we should all be angry at our collective failure to design economic structures, including environmental regulations, that underpin confidence in a better future for our children and grandchildren," he said.
Dr Henry made those comments at the National Press Club on Wednesday.
But in the Q&A portion of his speech, he singled out the media.
He said none of today's politicians will be alive in 100 years, but younger Australians will have to live in a world that today's politicians leave for them.
He said that unless the media holds the political system accountable for its obligation to deliver a better future for our children, that obligation won't be observed.
"We used to talk about the critical role played by the 'Fourth Estate'," he said.
"It's time that we rebuilt it."
What did he mean by that?
The 'Fourth Estate' refers to the news media.
In Australian society, the first three estates of our democratic state are the parliament (legislature), the government (executive), and the courts (judiciary).
As the so-called fourth estate, the media, is supposed to monitor the behaviour of those three estates to keep them accountable.
Dr Henry's plea last week for Australia's media to remember its crucial democratic role was important to hear.
But it won't be an easy task.
Why is trust in the mainstream media declining? Why are people increasingly turning to the 'Fifth Estate' for their news and analysis?
The Fifth Estate refers to the growing network of alternative and independent news sources, including bloggers, podcasters, and influencers.
It's where a large number of journalists who used to work for legacy media outlets are now working.
A significant amount of the journalistic output from the Fifth Estate is dedicated to documenting the chronic and systemic failures of our Fourth Estate legacy media to tell the truth about today's world.
The phenomenon reflects something bigger and fundamentally broken about the world we're living in.
A fortnight ago, the oldest living former Malaysian prime minister, Dr Mahathir bin Mohamad, who recently turned 100, shared his feelings about where he thinks we're all heading:
"Something has gone wrong with the world, with human civilisation," he wrote.
"For centuries we have been ridding ourselves of barbarism in human society, of injustices, of the oppression of men by men [...]
"But can we say we are still civilised now? Over the last three decades especially, we have destroyed most of the ethical values that we had built up.
"Now we are seeing an orgy of killing. We are seeing genocide being perpetrated before our own eyes. Worse still, the genocide is actually being promoted and defended [...]
"Will we stop? No. We cannot. Because the very people who preached the rights of humanity are the ones to destroy our hard-fought civilisation.
"I hide my face. I am ashamed. Civilisation is no more the norm."
In his speech last week, Dr Henry lamented that we have whole industries with business models built on the destruction of the natural world.
But many of the people running the world's major media companies are deeply financially invested in those destructive industries.
Their media outlets (and think-tanks) have spent decades attacking the scientific community and other media to undermine global efforts on climate change.
For how many decades have they been attacking the CSIRO?
But for the sake of argument, let's assume that Dr Henry gets his wish and the idealised ethos of the Fourth Estate can be resurrected by enough media companies to form a critical mass.
Where can a revitalised Fourth Estate seek its "agreed facts" about the world we're living in, to hold our political system to account for the next few decades?
Thankfully, in 2025, Australia's independent courts are still an accepted source of facts and truth.
We're very lucky to have a legal system that has avoided the corruption of legal systems in other countries.
And in recent weeks, the Federal Court has published a few judgements that should help the Fourth Estate to keep its bearings.
One of those judgements was Pabai vs Commonwealth of Australia, published on Tuesday.
As my ABC colleagues Kirstie Wellauer and Stephanie Boltje wrote, it was the first time an Australian court had ruled on whether the Commonwealth has a legal duty of care to protect its citizens from the impacts of climate change, and whether cultural loss from climate change should be compensated.
Federal Court judge Michael Wigney found the Commonwealth does not owe a duty of care to Torres Strait Islander peoples to protect them from the impacts of climate change or fund adaptation measures.
He also ruled that Australia's greenhouse gas emissions targets were matters of "core government policy" that should be decided by the parliament, not the courts.
He said he had "considerable sympathy" for the Torres Strait Islander peoples' case, but Australian law, as it stood, provided no real or effective avenue through which they were able to pursue their claims on the matter.
"That will remain the case unless and until the law in Australia changes, either by the incremental development or expansion of the common law by appellate courts, or by the enactment of legislation," he wrote.
"Until then, the only recourse that those in the position of the applicants and other Torres Strait Islanders have is recourse via the ballot box."
But Justice Wigney found some other things.
He found that when Australia's government set its emissions reduction targets between 2015 and 2021 — when the federal Coalition was in power — it "failed to engage with or give any real or genuine consideration to what was the best available science" when setting those targets.
"The best available science was and is clear," Justice Wigney wrote.
"To prevent the worst and most dangerous impacts of climate change, it was and is imperative for every country to take steps to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions so as to ensure that the increase in the global average temperature is held to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels, and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.
"Those critical objectives were enshrined in the Paris Agreement, to which Australia is a party.
"The evidence in this case indicated that the emissions reduction targets set by the Commonwealth in 2015, 2020 and 2021 were plainly not consistent with those objectives or its international obligations under the Paris Agreement," he found.
At the Press Club last week, I asked Dr Henry about that finding.
If the media wanted to hold Australia's political system accountable for its obligation to deliver a better future for younger Australians, what hope does it have if Australian governments don't even care about the science?
"What has been missing here is a respect for the science, is a respect for the evidence, is a respect for the truth," Henry replied.
A second important judgement, published earlier this month, was Wertheim vs Haddad.
In that case, Federal Court judge Angus Stewart ruled that a series of lectures delivered by an Islamic preacher, Wissam Haddad, at a Sydney prayer centre in November 2023, must be removed from social media because they contained "fundamentally racist and antisemitic" material.
He found the lectures contravened the Racial Discrimination Act.
"They make perverse generalisations against Jewish people as a group," he wrote.
"Jewish people in Australia in November 2023 and thereafter would experience them to be harassing and intimidating.
"That is all the more so because they were made at the time of heightened vulnerability and fragility experienced by Jews in Australia, but they would also have been harassing and intimidating had they been made prior to 7 October, 2023.
"That is because of their profound offensiveness and the long history of persecution of Jews associated with the use of such rhetoric. Those effects on Jews in Australia would be profound and serious," he wrote.
In his summary of the reasons for judgement, Justice Stewart also had this to say:
"The Court has found that the impugned passages in the interview and the sermon say critical and disparaging things about the actions of Israel and in particular the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza and about Zionists, but that the ordinary, reasonable listener would not understand those things to be about Jewish people in general.
"That person would understand that not all Jews are Zionists and that disparagement of Zionism constitutes disparagement of a philosophy or ideology and not a race or ethnic group.
"Also, political criticism of Israel, however inflammatory or adversarial, is not by its nature criticism of Jews in general or based on Jewish racial or ethnic identity.
"The conclusion that it is not antisemitic to criticise Israel is the corollary of the conclusion that to blame Jews for the actions of Israel is antisemitic; the one flows from the other."
It was an important passage.
It should help Australia's media to think more clearly about one of the most profound conflicts of the 21st century, and to hold Australia's political system to account for its participation in, response to, handling of, and debate about the conflict.
Both rulings from the Federal Court have given the mainstream media a solid foundation to work with, for a revitalised Fourth Estate.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Barnaby Joyce warns future generations facing China ‘threat'
Barnaby Joyce warns future generations facing China ‘threat'

News.com.au

time13 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Barnaby Joyce warns future generations facing China ‘threat'

Nationals maverick Barnaby Joyce says Australia's approach to defence is 'putting the future of your children and grandchildren at threat' amid fears over China's military build-up and aggression toward Taiwan. The warning comes as Talisman Sabre, Australia's biggest war-games, reaches its tail end. Some 35,000 troops from 19 of the country's allies are taking part in the military exercises — drills Taiwan is pushing to be part of in the future. Mr Joyce, a former deputy prime minister, said on Monday Australia's 'strategic ambiguity' on Taiwan must be 'backed up with incredible strength'. 'There's not multiple rules-based orders in the world — there's one,' he told Seven's Sunrise, citing French President Emmanuel Macron. 'If a country wants to be outside that by just taking the South China Sea, by what we've seen with journalists in Hong Kong just (being) taken off the street, with tennis players who disappear if they say the wrong thing. 'We've had a massive build-up of (China's) armed capacity, including their nuclear capacity, and no real explanation as to why and (Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong) brought that to our attention lately.' Mr Joyce went on to say the 'Australian people really haven't grasped exactly what's before us'. 'We need to become as strong as possible as quickly as possible,' he said. 'We really are putting the future of your children and grandchildren at threat. 'China does not believe in a democratic world order. 'They believe in an alternate order that does not include democracy and ultimately … where we lie in that, if we don't get this right, is as a vassal state. 'You will be dominated by economically, socially in your media, by a totalitarian regime.' Adding that Australia is 'not as strong as we should be at the moment', Mr Joyce said the answer was working with allies to bolster collective defence. Bringing Taiwan into the fold would mean Australia needs to 'look like you are strong enough to back yourself in'.

Nearly 400 Indigenous children and teens held in NT police watch houses over six-month period
Nearly 400 Indigenous children and teens held in NT police watch houses over six-month period

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Nearly 400 Indigenous children and teens held in NT police watch houses over six-month period

Almost 400 Indigenous children and teenagers have been held in the Northern Territory's notorious police watch houses over a six-month period, the ABC can reveal. Exactly how long the children were kept in the watch houses may never been known, however, with NT Police admitting they are recording erroneous time-spent-in-custody information. The ABC has obtained nearly 60 pages of confidential NT Police data under Freedom of Information (FOI) laws, tracking youths in custody from August 25, 2024, to March 5, 2025. The Country Liberal Party government was elected on a tough-on-crime platform on August 24. NT Police initially refused to release the data to the ABC, so it had to be sourced through FOI. The data shows there were nearly 870 youth "custody events" in NT police watch houses over the six months. The custody events involved 402 individual youths, some of whom were recidivist offenders. Of the 402 youths, the dataset — which NT Police confirmed was correct — shows 388 were Indigenous. A police spokesperson who confirmed the numbers said all watch houses were "managed through strict policy, procedures and instructions". "The primary consideration in relation to people in police custody is the safety and welfare of the individual," they said. The independent member for Mulka in the NT parliament, Yingiya Guyula, said children in watch houses were being "traumatised in a way that does not encourage rehabilitation". "I have visited the watch house in Palmerston and holding people for days in these conditions is just cruel," he said. The government lowered the age of criminal responsibility from 12 to 10 in October 2024. As of 2024, there were 27,400 people aged between 10 and 17 in the NT. It means around 1.5 per cent of children in that age bracket spent time in NT watch houses over the six months. The statistics cover six NT watch houses, including the Peter McAuley Centre police headquarters in Darwin, Katherine, Tennant Creek, Alice Springs and Palmerston. Some are notoriously overcrowded, with windowless cells and the lights on 24 hours a day. They are meant to be used only as a stopgap place for the youths to be processed after their arrests, before they are delivered to a newly built youth detention centre in Darwin. Last week, the NT's Aboriginal legal aid service NAAJA revealed an 11-year-old girl had been left for a night and two days in the Palmerston watch house. In March, a 15-year-old girl was held in the Palmerston watch house for three nights after the local court ceased after-hours bail reviews for young people. The treatment of children in watch houses in Queensland has also been under scrutiny, with a state police review finding youths were spending an average of 161 hours in the facilities. As part of the ABC's FOI request, NT Police released data logs showing how long each child had spent in custody. The data indicated that, while the vast majority were in custody for less than 24 hours, some had spent up to 25 days at a time inside Palmerston watch house. Others were recorded to have been kept in watch houses for six, seven or eight-day periods. When asked to confirm the accuracy of the data, the NT Police spokesperson said it was erroneous: "The Northern Territory Police Force can confirm that the data provided does not accurately reflect the actual time youths have spent in custody. "While the report you received reflects what was recorded in the system at the time, it does not account for process variations that can affect how custody end times are calculated." The spokesperson said police could not provide an accurate time frame for each of the 870 custody cases, as it would require "a manual analysis of each custody incident". "No youths have been held in police watch houses for 25 days straight," they said. In November 2023, NT Police replaced its decades-old crime data IT software with a new system named SerPro. Initially budgeted at $45 million, the cost of rolling out SerPro increased to $58 million, and it's been plagued with issues since it began operating. Nathan Finn, the president of the NT's police union, said he was not surprised the time-in-custody data was erroneous, considering the issues police faced with the system. "Since the establishment of the SerPro system, we've seen a number of data issues and how that's been calculated," he said. "We've seen this and raised these concerns over a number of periods of time since the implementation of [SerPro]. "[SerPro] probably creates a 25 per cent increase in workload in managing a prisoner … within the custody facility." Mr Finn said it would be unprecedented for youths to be held for weeks at a time in watch houses. "We have youth that are in custody sometimes for two days or three days at maximum, depending on where they're remanded to and the availability of transferring them into a correctional facility," he said. He said the data issues needed to be fixed immediately. "If the police force is receiving this data and it's incorrect, how are they guiding their own policies and procedures?" he said. "How are they managing any risks that are identified, or any concerns that they may have in the custody space?" Mr Guyula agreed that the erroneous data needed to be fixed immediately. "We don't trust the information that we are being given," he said. "The police data shows some children are being held in watch houses for long periods, even weeks. "If the data is not correct, the police need to provide the correct data.

Albanese government moves ahead with election pledge to cap prescription medicines to $25
Albanese government moves ahead with election pledge to cap prescription medicines to $25

SBS Australia

time2 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

Albanese government moves ahead with election pledge to cap prescription medicines to $25

The Albanese government says it will introduce legislation this week to cap the cost of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) prescriptions to $25, down from $31.60 from next year. It means the cost of medicines on the PBS could be reduced by over 20 per cent from 1 January, 2026. Pensioners and concession cardholders will continue to pay just $7.70 for their prescriptions until at least 2030. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said it builds on a pledge for cost of living relief. "The size of your bank balance shouldn't determine the quality of your healthcare," he said. Health Minister Mark Butler said the general patients medicines haven't been this cheap since 2004. In 2024, Australia exported roughly $2.1 billion of medicinal and pharmaceutical products to the United States, Australian Bureau of Statistics data shows. If the US were to put tariffs on medicinal exports, this could make Australian drugs more expensive. Driving down demand could also force manufacturers to move overseas, where the costs of operations are cheaper. The party promised an $8.5 billion boost aimed at strengthening the system and incentivising more clinics to bulk bill. This included $3.5 billion in direct incentives to GPs and medical centres, and $400 million for training more nurses and doctors in primary care settings, outlined in the March federal budget .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store