logo
Senate panel advances more than $1 trillion in government funding for 2026

Senate panel advances more than $1 trillion in government funding for 2026

The Hill21 hours ago
The Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday advanced legislation amounting to more than a trillion dollars in government funding for fiscal year 2026, ahead of a late September shutdown deadline.
The committee approved about $852 billion in discretionary funding for defense programs and roughly $200 billion in discretionary funding for the departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and Education.
Overall, the panel has so far advanced eight out of the 12 annual funding bills for fiscal year 2026, which begins Oct. 1.
Negotiators say the proposed defense funding would amount to an increase of about 3 percent above what President Trump requested earlier this year. That's in addition to the $150 billion defense boost Republicans passed as part of a sweeping tax cuts and spending package to help advance the president's agenda earlier this month.
'We can't build a Golden Dome or restock our munitions or bring back American ship building without a sustained increased investment in all of our national defense, and we can't treat reconciliation like a cure all,' Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who heads the subcommittee that crafted the Pentagon funding bill, said during Thursday's committee meeting.
'I was glad to vote for the one big, beautiful bill, but let's not kid ourselves. It was not the additive defense spending some of us had hoped for,' he said.
The bill funds a 3.8 percent pay raise for servicemembers and a 10 percent bump in pay for junior enlisted servicemembers. The bill also provides $171 billion for the procurement of weapon systems, more than $140 billion for research and development, and about $303 billion aimed at the 'sustainment of operations, weapons, training, and readiness activities,' a according to the committee.
The panel also detailed increases across a number of items, including air and missile defense efforts, munitions, drone and counter-drone capabilities, and shipbuilding that includes $1.9 billion to fully fund Virginia-class subs.
The bill also includes $500 million for Israel Cooperative Programs, which covers the Iron Dome, as well as $800 million for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, which appropriators say was zeroed out in Trump's budget request.
In the annual Labor-HHS funding bill, negotiators were able to agree on about $50 billion in funding for the National Institutes of Health for biomedical investments in research, including billions for Alzheimer's research and the National Cancer Institute, along with boosts for women's and maternal health research.
The bill also includes about $12 billion for Head Start, $8.8 billion for the Child Care and Development Block Grant, more than $3 billion for State Opioid Response Grants and the Substance Use Prevention, Treatment, and Recovery Services Block Grant, along with about $5.5 billion for mental health research, treatment, and prevention.
'This bill also continues our bipartisan record by including a number of priorities from both sides of the aisle like, investments in America's biomedical research, child care, education, mental and rural heath, and continued efforts to combat the opioid epidemic,' Sen. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), who chairs the Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education Appropriations Subcommittee, said Thursday.
Sen. Tammy Baldwin (Wis.), the top Democrat on the subcommittee that crafted the bill, also told reporters ahead of the meeting that it would fully fund the suicide hotline.
'988, the suicide hotline is fully funded, including a $15 million increase for their operations,' Baldwin said. 'We reject the Trump administration and RFK Jr.'s efforts to shut down SAMHSA, in which the 988, and other important mental health and substance use programs are housed.'
Baldwin also said appropriators were 'tightening' language requirements 'that staffing levels at the Department of Education need to be sufficient to meet their missions and that they cannot outsource some of their key missions to other agencies or departments.'
However, senators noted on Thursday that the appropriations bill does not include funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, after Republicans successfully clawed back more than $1 billion in previously approved funding earlier this month.
Many Republicans have strongly defended the cuts, while singling out NPR and PBS, which have received funding from the corporation, for what they perceive as political bias.
'One thing this bill does not do, unfortunately, is fund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. As everyone knows, Republicans rescinded bipartisan funding we provided for CPB in the first ever partisan rescissions package,' Sen. Patty Murray (Wash.), the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, said Thursday.
'It is a shameful reality, and now communities across the country will suffer the consequences as over 1,500 stations lose critical funding,' she said, adding she hopes 'Republicans will join us to restore this funding down the line.'
Baldwin also said during the markup that she believes 'there is a path forward to fix this before there are devastating consequences for public radio and television stations across the country.'
'This cut to local public radio will fall hardest on those in rural areas and stations like WOJB and the North Woods of Wisconsin that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting supports, the infrastructure and systems that support local radio and stations, without it, these stations will close,' she said.
Some Republicans have also raised concerns over the cuts.
'I did vote to move the Labor-HHS bill out of the committee today, even though I have deep concerns about where we are right now,' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), a spending cardinal, said Thursday. She also acknowledged efforts by Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) to secure an agreement with the administration aimed at shielding tribal stations from the cuts, but said she still has questions about the effort.
'We're working with the administration, we're working with the Alaska Public Media folks to ensure that our stations can receive this,' she said. 'But I come from a state where we have half the tribes in the United States of America and of our 26 public radio stations, less than half of them are considered to be tribally owned or serving tribal land.'
Both the House and Senate are well behind on hashing out their annual funding work, as Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' of tax priorities dominated Washington's attention over the past few months.
Senators are pushing to pass their first batch of funding bills across the floor as early as this week, as the chamber prepares to join the House in recess for August.
The House has so far only passed two of its annual funding bills, while the Senate has passed yet to pass any.
Collins said at the close of the meeting on Thursday that the committee 'does plan to continue on a dual track, advancing bills on the floor and through this committee.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Little confidence' US Gaza delegation would see full picture
'Little confidence' US Gaza delegation would see full picture

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Little confidence' US Gaza delegation would see full picture

The visit to Gaza by Trump's envoy was an important gesture to show America cared about the humanitarian situation there amid mounting pressure at home and abroad. It was also "to learn the truth", according to US Ambassador Mike Huckabee, who accompanied Mr Witkoff to an aid site. They gave themselves around five hours to do this. The American delegation will report their assessments back to Washington and "help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza". There's very little confidence in either of those objectives. Images of Mr Witkoff sitting around a table at a calm and ordered aid site in Gaza does not suggest Donald Trump will hear a full picture of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. And America's plans to deliver aid to Palestinians in Gaza has proved deeply flawed in recent months. When Mr Witkoff last visited Israel in May, it was a very different picture. Palestinians were suffering in Gaza and getting killed in airstrikes but deaths were not largely a result of hunger. It was around that same time the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) was launched as the new way of distributing food in the enclave by America and Israel. "GHF delivers more than one million meals a day, an incredible feat!", wrote Mike Huckabee after his visit to site 3 with Trump's envoy. It paints a very different picture to the images and reports we receive on a daily basis of Palestinians getting killed and injured attempting to reach aid at these sites close to areas of conflict. Read More: People in Gaza have told me regularly going to these sites is a last resort because they're so scared - but food is now so scarce for many there is little choice. Not enough aid is getting through and we're hearing reports every day of deaths due to hunger. A UN-backed authority on food crises this week reported the "worst case scenario of famine" is now playing out in Gaza. The UN has decades of experience as humanitarians distributing aid in Gaza yet it seems America is still backing its GHF model run by inexperienced armed security contractors. In light of this, reports that a new plan is being formed for Gaza between the US and Israel don't instill a huge amount of confidence.

Fed spearheads effort to ease 'Basel III endgame' capital requirements, Bloomberg News reports
Fed spearheads effort to ease 'Basel III endgame' capital requirements, Bloomberg News reports

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fed spearheads effort to ease 'Basel III endgame' capital requirements, Bloomberg News reports

(Reuters) -The Federal Reserve has begun developing a new risk-based capital rule aimed at easing the burden on the largest U.S. banks than a Biden-era plan, Bloomberg News reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter. Regulators are largely scrapping the original 1,087-page proposal from two years ago and plan to unveil a new one as early as the first quarter of 2026, the report added. Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman is leading efforts to develop the new rule, that would aim to simplify how banks calculate their capital requirements, according to the report. Representatives of the Federal Reserve declined to comment, when contacted by Reuters. The "Basel III" standard was agreed after the 2007-09 global financial crisis. It includes numerous capital, leverage and liquidity requirements. Regulators across the world have worked for years to implement many of those standards, and the so-called "endgame," agreed in 2017, is the final iteration. These capital requirements serve as a financial cushion to enhance the resilience of these big banks against economic stress and safeguard the broader financial system. The banking industry lobbied for a significantly weaker version of the "Basel Endgame" capital rule under the Trump administration, which was viewed as more favorable compared to the Biden-era approach. The proposed rules, which would apply to banks with more than $100 billion in assets, would overhaul how the largest banks manage their capital, with potential ripple effects on their lending and trading activities. The rules aim to prevent another financial crisis by requiring the largest U.S. banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs, to collectively set aside nearly $1 trillion to absorb potential losses from loans and trading activities. However, banks say additional capital is unnecessary and will hurt the economy, and have aggressively lobbied against the project. Sign in to access your portfolio

California, other states sue Trump over order threatening gender-affirming care providers
California, other states sue Trump over order threatening gender-affirming care providers

Los Angeles Times

time6 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

California, other states sue Trump over order threatening gender-affirming care providers

California and a coalition of other liberal-led states sued the Trump administration Friday over efforts to end gender-affirming care for transgender, intersex and nonbinary children and young adults nationwide — calling them an unconstitutional attack on LGBTQ+ patients, healthcare providers and states' rights. The lawsuit was brought by California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta and officials from 15 other states and the District of Columbia. It challenges a Jan. 28 executive order by President Trump that denounced gender-affirming care as 'mutilation' and called on U.S. Justice Department officials to effectively enforce a ban, including by launching investigations into healthcare providers. The lawsuit notes the Justice Department last month sent more than 20 subpoenas to doctors and clinics that have provided such care nationwide, with justice officials suggesting they may face criminal prosecution. Bonta's office, in a statement, said such efforts 'have no legal basis and are intended to discourage providers from offering lifesaving healthcare that is lawful under state law.' The lawsuit asks a federal court in Massachusetts to vacate Trump's order in its entirety for exceeding federal authority and undermining state laws that guarantee equal access to healthcare. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday. Trump made reining in transgender rights a key promise of his presidential campaign. Upon taking office, he moved swiftly to do so through executive orders, funding cuts and litigation. And in many ways, it has worked — particularly when it comes gender-affirming care for minors. Clinics across the country that had provided such care have closed their doors in response to the threats and funding cuts. That includes the renowned Center for Transyouth Health and Development at Children's Hospital Los Angeles, one of the largest and oldest pediatric gender clinics in the U.S. The clinic told thousands of its patients and their families that it was shuttering last month. Other clinics have similarly closed nationwide, radically reducing the availability of such care in the U.S. Republicans and other Trump supporters have cheered the closures as a major win, and they praised the president for protecting impressionable and confused children from so-called woke medical professionals pushing what they allege to be dangerous and irreversible treatments. Bonta said in the Friday statement that Trump and his administration's 'relentless attacks' on such care were 'cruel and irresponsible' and endangered 'already vulnerable adolescents whose health and well-being are at risk.' 'These actions have created a chilling effect in which providers are pressured to scale back on their care for fear of prosecution, leaving countless individuals without the critical care they need and are entitled to under law,' Bonta said. Mainstream U.S. medical associations have supported gender-affirming care for minors experiencing gender dysphoria for years. They and LGBTQ+ rights organizations have accused Trump and his supporters of mischaracterizing that care, which includes therapy, counseling and support for social transitioning, and can include puberty blockers, hormone treatment and, in rarer circumstances, mastectomies. Queer advocates, many patients and their families say such care is life-saving, alleviating intense distress — and suicidal thoughts — in transgender and other gender-nonconforming youth. They and many mainstream medical experts acknowledge that gender-affirming care for young people is still a developing field, but say it is also based on decades of solid research by medical professionals who are far better equipped than politicians to help families make difficult medical decisions. However, as the number of children who identify as transgender or nonbinary has rapidly increased in recent years, that argument has failed to take hold in many parts of the country. Conservatives and Republican leaders have grown increasingly alarmed by such care, pointing to young people who changed their minds about transitioning and now regret the care they received. 'Countless children soon regret that they have been mutilated and begin to grasp the horrifying tragedy that they will never be able to conceive children of their own or nurture their children through breastfeeding,' Trump's executive order stated. Trump and others have escalated tensions further by spreading misinformation about kids being whisked away from school to have their gentials mutilated without their parents' knowledge — which is not happening. The battle has played out in the courts, in part as a state's rights issue. In June, the Supreme Court ruled that conservative states may ban puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender teens, with the court's conservative majority finding that states are generally free to set their own standards of medical care. The Trump administration, however, has not taken the same view. Instead, it has aggressively tried to eradicate gender-affirming care nationwide, regardless of state laws — like those in California — that protect it. Trump's Jan. 28 executive order, titled 'Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation,' claimed that 'medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children under the radical and false claim that adults can change a child's sex through a series of irreversible medical interventions.' It defined children as anyone under the age of 19, and said that moving forward, the U.S. wouldn't 'fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another,' but would 'rigorously enforce all laws that prohibit or limit these destructive and life-altering procedures.' The states' lawsuit focuses on one particular section of that order, which directed Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi to convene state attorneys general and other law enforcement officials nationwide to begin investigating gender-affirming care providers and other groups that 'may be misleading the public about long-term side effects of chemical and surgical mutilation.' The section suggested those investigations could be based on laws against 'female genital mutilation,' or even around a 1938 law known as the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which authorizes the Food and Drug Administration to regulate food, drugs, medical devices and cosmetics. On July 9, Bondi announced the Justice Department's subpoenas to healthcare providers, saying doctors and hospitals 'that mutilated children in the service of a warped ideology will be held accountable.' On July 25, The Times reported that Bill Essayli, the Trump administration's controversial pick for U.S. attorney in L.A., had floated the idea of criminally charging doctors and hospitals for providing gender-affirming care, according to two federal law enforcement sources who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal. The targeting of gender-affirming care is part of a wider effort by the administration to eliminate transgender rights more broadly, in part on the premise that transgender people do not exist. On his first day in office, Trump issued another executive order declaring there are only two sexes and denouncing what he called the 'gender ideology' of the left. His administration has sought to limit the options transgender people have to get passports that reflect their identities, and the Justice Department has sued California over its policies allowing transgender girls to compete against other girls in youth sports. Many transgender Americans are looking for ways to flee the country. Still, many in the LGBTQ+ community fear the attacks are only going to get worse. Among those who are most scared are the parents and families of transgender kids — including those who believe their health records may have been collected under the Justice Department's subpoenas. One mother of a Children's Hospital patient told The Times last month that she is terrified the Justice Department is 'going to come after parents and use the female genital mutilation law ... to prosecute parents and separate me from my child.' Bonta is leading the lawsuit along with the attorneys general of Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts and New York. Joining them are Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and the attorneys general of Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Wisconsin.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store