Nationwide, NatWest, Lloyds customers issued HMRC warning
But while you're counting the cash at the end of the term, you could be hit with a tax demand because HMRC views the interest from these accounts as income within a single year.
Got a #sidehustle? 💸
We're here to help you get your tax right. ✅
Click below to check if you need to tell us about your side hustle income today. ⬇️https://t.co/D56rzpHInt pic.twitter.com/bDOVZauouv — HM Revenue & Customs (@HMRCgovuk) June 4, 2025
For some savers, the final payout could nudge them over the tax-free threshold, triggering a tax event. However, it's key to remember that this doesn't apply to cash ISA accounts, which remain tax-free up to £20,000.
The current tax-free interest earnings cap for basic-rate taxpayers sits at £1,000 annually. Those on the higher-rate can pocket up to £500 without owing tax, but additional-rate taxpayers aren't afforded any tax-free interest allowance.
Laura Suter, personal finance director at AJ Bell, told the Star: "Many people won't realise that [fixed rate accounts] could leave them with a tax headache in the future."
She added: "You are taxed on the interest on your savings when it is accessible by you.
"So if you pick a fixed-rate savings account that pays out all the interest at maturity, for tax purposes all of that interest will be counted in one tax year.
Recommended reading:
"This means that the interest from just one account could take you over your Personal Savings Allowance on its own."
Ms Suter suggested getting an account where interest is paid out monthly or annually instead.
She continued: "This means it is spread across different tax years.
"Or you can opt for a fixed-term ISA savings account, where you won't pay any tax on the interest."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Tax agency deploys AI to monitor social media for tax fraud
By It's the latest revelation of a government body using AI for its decision-making and processes. But if you abide by the rules you won't have to worry about AI snooping on your Instagram posts. The tax office is adamant AI tools are only used for social media monitoring in criminal investigations and with legal oversight. This isn't a new process – AI has been used to monitor social media accounts for 'years', HMRC says. But this fresh revelation has sparked a wave of concern from experts and politicians who say there is a risk AI could get it wrong - and accuse innocent households of evading tax, the Telegraph reports. An HMRC spokesman said: 'Use of AI for social media monitoring is restricted to criminal investigations and subject to legal oversight. AI supports our processes but – like all effective use of this new technology – it has robust safeguards in place and does not replace human decision-making. Greater use of AI will enable our staff to spend less time on administration and more time helping taxpayers, as well as better target fraud and evasion to bring in more money for public services.' AI is currently used to 'streamline' administrative tasks at the Revenue including internally using chat assistants to allow better access to information and also to summarise calls for advisers so they can cut down the time it takes to wrap up a call. It's thought the use of AI in the Revenue will become widespread on the quest to rake in more money as it was last month revealed AI tools will spread to 'everyday' tax processes. It is hoped this will pull in an additional £7billion for the tax office. One of HMRC's new processes will be using AI tools to identify suspected tax evaders and nudge them to pay what they owe. It says AI tools will allow its staff to focus on more complex work instead of replacing jobs – it says it will hire some 5,500 compliance staff.
New Statesman
3 hours ago
- New Statesman
Rachel Reeves was right about non-doms
Photo byLast spring, Britain's newspapers and money-watchers promised a mass exodus of wealth. Labour's plan to scrap the 'non-dom' tax status, Henley & Partners warned, would drive high-net-worth individuals from Britain in droves. Henley, who make money selling passports to the globally mobile rich, said the scale would be historic, a fiscal catastrophe in the making. Within days, the spectre of a millionaire migration was front-page fact. Rachel Reeves's first fiscal move as chancellor would unravel before it began. HMRC's new payroll data has proven otherwise. The number of top earners on PAYE, the best real-time proxy for high-income residents, has not collapsed. In fact, receipts from that group are holding up. There is no sign of the disproportionate departures Henley forecast, or the domino effect of rich following rich out of the UK. Crisis averted. It is a small but pointed vindication for Reeves. The non-dom reform is still forecast to raise billions over the next five years. For once, the 'wealth will flee' mantra collided with hard numbers and lost. Henley has now softened its claims, dropping 'exodus' from its vocabulary. Yet the moment passed months ago; the initial campaign did its work, and it is much easier to plant a headline than to uproot it. That asymmetry between how fast a narrative moves and how slowly facts arrive should worry Reeves more than any yacht in Monaco. The Treasury got lucky. On income, HMRC can produce monthly PAYE data, which means she had facts to fight fiction. On wealth, no such armour exists: we govern wealth in a data desert. The UK does not have a live, comprehensive picture of who owns what. The Land Registry records transactions, but overseas owners can be hidden behind shell companies or trusts, and beneficial ownership filings are riddled with gaps. Companies House has only just begun to verify directors' identities. Offshore holdings sit beyond the line of sight. Even the Office for National Statistics must rely on household surveys that the very wealthy rarely complete – meaning the top tail of the Sunday Times Rich List is easier to read than any official distributional table. If income taxation is conducted with spreadsheets, wealth taxation is based on back-of-envelope estimates. This matters because income is not the only, or even the primary, source of economic power. A salaried professional in London pays income tax and National Insurance on almost all of their earnings. A landlord, by contrast, pays capital gains tax at lower rates when they sell a property, and can hold appreciated assets untaxed for decades. The gap endures because the political will to close it is as absent as the data needed to do so. HMRC knows every inch of your payslip, but they know very little about a millionaire's investment portfolio. It should be obvious that the ultra-rich are not maintaining their lifestyle through their 9-5 wage. Without better data, these imbalances are easier to ignore, and harder to challenge. The gains in wealth are real – property wealth has risen by £1.6 trillion in a decade, and the top 1 per cent hold a third of UK net wealth – but we lack the infrastructure to say, with authority, where that wealth sits and in what form. In the absence of clarity, those statistics can be disputed, delayed, or dismissed. That leaves any move to tax wealth on a more equal footing with work exposed to the same lobbying tactics that failed over non-doms, but without PAYE receipts to fight back. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The political opportunity here is unignorable. The non-dom episode showed that a robust policy, grounded in plausible revenue estimates and implemented without theatrics, can survive scare stories. Extending that logic to wealth would mean two things: first, investing in the infrastructure to know what we are taxing; and second, closing the gap between how we treat earnings from work and earnings from assets. This is an argument for an investment in information. Without it, ministers are left defending abstractions against fiction. With it, they can decide whether taxing capital gains like income is worth the political capital, or whether tightening inheritance tax loopholes is worth risking a few seats in the South East. The lesson Reeves will take from the HMRC release is that the rich did not run. But it should also be that knowing what the rich are doing with their wealth is politically useful. Imagine having that same clarity over who owns £10m townhouses through shell companies, or who holds vast portfolios via offshore trusts. Labour's second full budget in office will set the tone for the rest of its term. Governing by myth – about investment strikes, welfare fraud, or rich flight, invites those myths to govern you in return. Governing by data wonkery, on the other hand, does not guarantee a better day for Labour's press office, but it at least allows policy to survive its first contact with reality. As the Treasury gears up for an Autumn of tax rises, this is a political lifeline worth investing in. Reeves should treat the non-dom figures as a prompt to build the institutional arsenal she will need for bigger battles ahead. [See also: Let the non-doms leave] Related
Daily Mirror
7 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Money expert explains how to turn £25 a week into £1,300 'without lifting a finger'
We all know how important it is to have savings, but sometimes it can be tricky to know where to start - however Tynah Matembe, founder of Money Matix has shared her advice for those looking to make their money work harder Think saving's just for rich people or money nerds? Think again. Even chucking a tenner a week into a savings account can snowball into something serious. It's not about how much – it's about how often. Consistency is king. Here's the deal: banks love regular savers, and there are easy ways to save without even knowing. One of the best ways is to simply set up a standing order, and suddenly you're eligible for the top interest rates. We're talking juicy deals that beat letting your cash sit dead in your current account. And don't roll your eyes at 'interest' – that's free money just for having a bit of discipline. It comes after thousands of Brits to get shock letter from HMRC after drastic new tax rule comes into force. While your mate's blowing £6 a day on fancy coffee, you're quietly building a pot that could pay for a holiday, a house deposit, or bail you out in a crisis. However you may be still sceptical, so imagine if you save just £25 a week, that's £1,300 a year – without lifting a finger after you set it up. Add interest? Boom – even more. And if rates go up? You win again. Regular saving isn't boring – it's powerful and it's how smart people get ahead. So, skip one takeaway a week, set up that direct debit, and start building your financial safety net. Because when life throws you a curveball – or a golden opportunity – you'll be glad you've got cash in the tank. There is also an easy rule to follow to make your oney work harder. If you want your money to be in a good place, it's important not to blow it all at once on just day-to-day stuff. Following the 70:10:10:10 rule can help. At MoneyMatiX, we swear by it. Spend no more than 70% of your cash, stash away at least 10% for savings, pump another 10% into investments to grow your wealth, and don't forget to have fun or give back with the last 10%. Balance is everything - follow this and watch your money game go from zero to hero. Take your morning Starbucks, for example. Ditching that daily Tall Latte on your way to work could save you a staggering £851 a year. That's a holiday, your energy bill paid, or the breathing room and emergency fund sorted. The bottom line? You don't need to be wealthy to invest wisely - you just need to start today. And finally, remember volatility is normal. If your pension pot has dipped recently because of Trump's tariffs war uncertainly with the Government's plan, don't panic. Markets go through ups and downs – but investing and certainly investing in a pension is a long-term game, and history shows they do recover.
