UK, Australia To Sign 50-Year Treaty To Build Nuclear Submarines
Britain and Australia announced they will sign a cooperation treaty to build Australian nuclear-powered submarines and welcomed a review by President Donald Trump's administration of the United States' role in the trilateral defense deal.
Britain's Defense Secretary John Healey and Foreign Secretary David Lammy met Friday with their Australian counterparts Richard Marles and Penny Wong in Sydney for an annual bilateral meeting.
Marles said he and Healey will sign a 50-year treaty Saturday that will underpin bilateral cooperation on building an Australian fleet of submarines powered by US nuclear technology.
"It is as significant a treaty as has been signed between our two countries since federation," Marles said, referring to the unification of several British colonies to form the Australian government in 1901.
The three-way alliance was announced in 2021 to contend with growing Chinese military might in the Asia-Pacific region. It would deliver Australia at least eight submarines including three to five second-hand US Virginia-class submarines. Britain and Australia would cooperate to build their own SSN-AUKUS submarines.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is reviewing the pact, known by the acronym AUKUS, that was entered into by US President Joe Biden's administration. There are concerns that the US won't provide Australia with its first Virginia-class submarine by the early 2030s as planned because US submarine-building was behind schedule.
Marles and Healey declined to speculate on whether Britain and Australia would continue with jointly building submarines if the US pulled out when questioned at a press conference.
"Australia and the U.K. welcome the review because we see this as a chance for a new administration to renew their commitment to AUKUS. And that's what we expect," Healey said.
"Any sort of hypotheticals that you suggest simply aren't part of the picture," Healey added, referring to the prospect of Britain and Australia proceeding without the US
The Australian government confirmed this week it had paid the US a second $500 million installment on the AUKUS deal. The first $500 million was paid in February.
The submarines are expected cost Australia up to $245 billion.
The meeting comes as 3,000 British military personnel take part in the largest military exercise ever conducted in Australia.
More than 35,000 military personnel from 19 nations are taking part in Exercise Talisman Sabre, which began in 2005 as a biennial joint exercise between the U.S. and Australia.
Marles and Healey will inspect the British aircraft HMS Prince of Wales at the northern port of Darwin on Sunday. The carrier is in Australia to take part in the war games.
Lammy said the carrier's arrival in Darwin was meant to send a clear signal to the world.
"With our carrier strike group docking in Darwin, I think we're sending a clear signal, a signal of the U.K.'s commitment to this region of the world. Our determination to keep the Indo-Pacific free and open, and that we stand together," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
27 minutes ago
- Economic Times
S&P, Nasdaq again close at record highs, trade choppy
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel The S&P 500 edged higher to eke out a record high close for a sixth straight session on Monday, while the Nasdaq also advanced to a closing record in choppy trade as investors gauged the U.S.-EU trade pact and prepared for a week of major market catalysts.U.S. President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen unveiled atrade frameworkon Sunday, slashing EU import tariffs to 15% - half the previously threatened rate that was scheduled to take effect on August 1. Still, France denounced the deal as a "submission."The deal is the latest announcement in recent days on U.S. trade agreements with countries such as Japan and Indonesia. Top U.S. and Chinese economic officialsresumed talksin Stockholm to resolve a trade war between the world's two largest economies."It's feel-good in the sense that it doesn't represent Armageddon, if the draconian tariffs went into place," said Scott Welch, chief investment officer at Certuity in Potomac, Maryland."But it's much too soon to pass judgment on the long-term effects on how that will play out. It's better than the alternative for sure, and so I hope they continue."The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 64.36 points, or 0.14%, to 44,837.56, the S&P 500 gained 1.13 points, or 0.02%, to 6,389.77 and the Nasdaq Composite gained 70.27 points, or 0.33%, to 21, benchmark S&P 500 index has now notched six straight daily closing records, en route to its 15th closing record of the year. Stocks have rebounded strongly from a selloff that began in early April when Trump announced a slew of enthusiasm over the potential for AI technology has helped lift stocks, along with the realization of some trade pacts and early indications corporate earnings season may be better than now await a policy announcement from the Federal Reserve on Wednesday. The central bank iswidely expectedto keep U.S. rates unchanged even as Trump has ramped up pressure on Fed Chair Jerome Powell to lower borrowing on deck this week were a slew of corporate earnings, including results from heavyweights Meta, Microsoft, Amazon and Apple, which could sway broader investor sentiment in either with the Fed meeting and earnings, a number of economic indicators are scheduled to be released this week, including the Personal Consumption Expenditure report (PCE) - the Fed's preferred inflation measure - and the government payrolls report to gauge how tariffs may have affected consumer prices and the labor climbed 3.89% after J.P. Morgan upgraded the stock to "overweight" from "neutral" and said investors should "just buy it".Energy, up 1.15% was the best performing S&P sector on the session, buoyed by a jump of more than 2% in oil prices while real estate, down 1.75%, and materials , off 1.44%, were the worst issues outnumbered advancers by a 1.81-to-1 ratio on the NYSE, and by a 1.48-to-1 ratio on the S&P 500 posted 26 new 52-week highs and five new lows, while the Nasdaq Composite recorded 68 new highs and 54 new on U.S. exchanges was 17.58 billion shares, compared with the 17.84 billion average for the full session over the last 20 trading days.
Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How do Chinese analysts view speculations of Trump visiting Beijing in September?
Long-time China watchers and foreign affairs experts know that reports of Chinese leaders travelling abroad or a foreign leader visiting Beijing are only confirmed when they come from China's state-run Xinhua news agency. Since rumours of US President Donald Trump being invited to attend a September 3 military parade in Beijing first appeared in the media nearly a month ago, Xinhua has neither denied nor confirmed them. According to reports published in China, Japan's Kyodo News Agency first reported on a possible visit. The Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson denied having 'any information on the matter' on June 30. However, the speculations resurfaced after Moscow confirmed that Russian President Vladimir Putin will attend the event on July 21. A Reuters story ('Trump may travel to China to meet Xi in 'not-too-distant' future') on July 22 said Trump was likely to attend the ceremony commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War 2. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov had said that Russia was also open to discussing the possibility of holding talks between Putin and Trump, should the latter visit Beijing. Amid speculations of a potential high-level meeting involving Putin, Trump, and Chinese President Xi Jinping, London's The Times newspaper also reported that Beijing may be positioning itself to host a trilateral summit. What has also fuelled the rumours are comments from Trump in January, when he was sworn in as President for the second time, and after he spoke with Xi in June amid the tariff war, about his interest in visiting China shortly. China's media landscape differs from most countries, as the Chinese Communist government exerts significant control over news outlets. While the internet also has restrictions, discussions on online forums and websites still help get an idea of Chinese perspectives. Recently, some scholars and strategic affairs analysts in China weighed in on Trump's potential visit in September: *First, it is seen as necessary for the leaders of China and the United States to sit down and exchange their views on the bilateral relationship and their ideas on the evolving world order. This comes amid turmoil in the Middle East, the Russia-Ukraine war, as well as important recent issues in the bilateral ties, such as tariffs. *Second, the military parade is also a means for China to display and project its military strength to the outside world. It may make Trump re-evaluate the relative capabilities gap between the countries and could be more conducive to the future development of the two countries, some Chinese scholars have said. *Third, China has formally called the event the 80th anniversary of the 'War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression' in recent years. It could help enhance the status and role of China's wartime endeavours in World War 2 (called the 'World Anti-fascist War'). An article penned under a popular Chinese social media blog account, Fox Condolence, and re-circulated by the digital news platform recently wrote: 'If Trump can also come, there will be a historic scene of China, the United States and Russia celebrating the victory of the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression together. This is the first time in 80 years since the war, and it will be held in Beijing. This will undoubtedly greatly enhance China's influence in the world.' *Fourth is the view that calling Trump may be necessary, since he has not held in-person meetings with Putin and Xi since July 2018 and November 2019, respectively. Two weeks ago, in an interview with a Chinese news daily, Professor Gao Zhikai, Deputy Director at the Centre for China and Globalization (CCG) in Beijing, claimed to be the first in China to propose that Trump be invited in September. His main reason was, 'Trump is a short-term phenomenon in US politics, China must try and keep him [Trump] in good humour.' As soon as the Japanese media broke the news of Trump's possible visit, the political elite and media in the United States began to warn the President against it. Chinese scholars have also made a note of these views: *First, there is a view in the US that China's invitation to Trump is a calculated effort to present the country as America's equal on the global stage. Vincent C. Chen, a senior executive in Taiwan's information and communications technology industry, wrote in The Hill that the visit may attempt to convey a vision of 'co-governance of the world.' *Second, he argued that the parade was not a symbol of peace, nor was it aimed at merely commemorating a historic victory. 'It is a deliberate display of military strength, to project the narrative of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) superiority and signaling strategic rivalry with the U.S.', Chen wrote. *Third is the view that the visit would actually help enhance China's role in the war. Writing in Mandarin for the German news agency, Deutsche Welle, a well-known Chinese political affairs commentator, Deng Yuwen, wrote: 'In the Western narrative, China's eight-year war of resistance and huge sacrifices were not crucial to defeating fascism… China has always wanted to reverse the Western-dominated narrative framework of World War II history, but the effect is not obvious.' *Fourth, while analysing reactions in both China and in the US to Beijing's possible invitation to Trump, Singapore-based digital political weekly, ThinkChina, observed: 'Trump sharing the stage with the leaders of two authoritarian states – in the eyes of the West – would trigger strong domestic backlash. Criticism would not come just from the Democrats, but also from the China hawks within the Republican Party. Going against the bipartisan consensus on containing China could come at a political cost for Trump.' Chinese analysts also struck a note of caution, noting that the Communist Party must consider the leaders of the Global South countries, who would likely be invited to the parade as well. As Deng Yuwen has pointed out, if Beijing treats Trump with higher courtesy, will they question China's narrative as an advocate of such countries? This may weaken its influence and appeal in the Global South, where it has made vast investments over the years. Hemant Adlakha teaches Chinese at the Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi. He is also Vice Chairperson and an Honorary Fellow, Institute of Chinese Studies (ICS), Delhi.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Australia shares dragged by miners, banks; investors await inflation data
July 29 (Reuters) - Australian shares slid on Tuesday as miners and financial stocks weighed on the benchmark, while investors await the local inflation data due on Wednesday. The S&P/ASX 200 index dropped 0.3% to 8,672.8 points by 0040 GMT. It had closed 0.4% higher on Monday. The domestic quarterly inflation report is likely to provide guidance to investors on whether the Reserve Bank of Australia would tilt towards a rate cut at its meeting next month. The last rate cut was in May, when the central bank lowered it by 25 basis points to 3.85%. On the Sydney bourse, investors tread cautiously with heavyweight financials spearheading a dip in equities. The sub-index fell about 0.7% to record its steepest intraday percentage fall in a week. The country's "big four" banks were down between 0.8% and 1.1%. Miners slipped as much as 0.9% to their lowest level since July 21, and were set for their fourth straight session of losses as iron ore prices tumbled. Minerals producer Liontown Resources shed over 1% after reporting a sequential drop in its quarterly revenue. Gold stocks piled on the losses, falling about 1.4% to hit their lowest level since July 9, as bullion prices took a hit following the U.S.-European Union trade accord that lifted the dollar and risk sentiment. Bucking the trend, however, were energy stocks that rose 0.6% as oil prices extended gains, lifted by hopes of improved economic activity after the U.S.-EU deal. Woodside Energy rose 1.3% to hit its highest level since June. Separately, the company said it will take over operatorship of the Bass Strait oil and gas assets from ExxonMobil, unlocking an estimated $60 million in synergies. New Zealand's benchmark S&P/NZX 50 index fell 0.2% to 12,882.22 points. (Reporting by Adwitiya Srivastava in Bengaluru; Editing by Harikrishnan Nair)
