US lawmakers allege that OnePlus phones transmit data to Chinese servers without user consent
A pair of US lawmakers have called on the US Department of Commerce to investigate OnePlus over allegations that the company's devices transmit data to Chinese servers without user consent, according to a report by Reuters . This is a bipartisan effort, with Republican Representative John Moolenaar (MI) and Democratic Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi (IL) spearheading the calls for an investigation.
There's no actual data to go along with these allegations, but the lawmakers claim to have seen documentation by a "commercial company" that suggests OnePlus participates in the aforementioned practice. The initial report suggests "potential transfers of sensitive personal information and screenshots." The word "potential" seems to be doing a lot of heavy lifting here.
That brings me to a question. If this is serious enough to warrant an official investigation by the DoC, why hasn't the government warned US residents to stop using OnePlus devices? That would seem like a no-brainer. Instead, we just got some vaguely alarming language and allegations . Engadget has reached out to OnePlus and will update this story when we hear back.
There's only one thing for certain here. OnePlus is indeed a Chinese company, leaving it open to the types of allegations that have plagued TikTok and its parent company ByteDance. The primary reason behind the on-again/off-again TikTok ban is that the company's Chinese ownership could allow the foreign government to access user data and influence American citizens.
Just like with the allegations against OnePlus, there's no actual evidence that ByteDance engages in any nefarious practices. TikTok does collect user data, but studies indicate that it doesn't go above and beyond American companies like Meta and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
22 minutes ago
- Newsweek
'Insanity': Democrats Call Out Republican SNAP Cuts Proposal
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Senate Democrats accused their Republican colleagues of rewarding waste in government spending with a proposal that would delay SNAP cuts for at least a year for states with high error rates. Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat from Minnesota, said she will force a vote on the proposal for food stamps, which she called the "most absurd example of the hypocrisy of the Republican bill". The package includes new 80-hour-a-month work requirements for many adults receiving Medicaid and SNAP, including older people up to age 65. Parents of children 14 and older would have to meet the program's work requirements. "If they keep it high for another year, they get another [year] of delay. Insanity reigns. Rewarding errors," Klobuchar posted to X, formerly Twitter, as the Senate votes on President Donald Trump's One, Big, Beautiful Bill. The issue centers on an exemption for Alaska from SNAP cuts in the bill. Klobuchar said the proposal to extend up to a two-year delay to all states with high error rates is intended by Republicans to "bury their help for Alaska" in the bill. The exemption and other provisions for the state were secured by Alaska's Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski, who has not yet signalled if she will support the final package. Other Democrats commented on the proposal. "So the states that waste the MOST money get no cuts," Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, posted to X. "Up is down." Senator Brian Schatz, a Hawaii Democrat and chief deputy whip, said the propsal "is exactly why bills that are done in a rush with no hearings at all are always a mess." "GOOD NEWS IF YOUR STATE HAS A HIGH ERROR RATE FOR SNAP YOU DONT GET SNAP CUTS FOR A YEAR AND IF YOU KEEP YOUR ERROR RATE HIGH YOU GET ANOTHER YEAR WE ARE CUTTING WASTE FRAUD AND ABUUUUUUUUUSE," Schatz posted to X. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow. This article includes reporting by The Associated Press.
San Francisco Chronicle
43 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Senate Republicans seek support for Trump's big bill in overnight session
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate is slogging through an overnight session that has dragged into Tuesday, with Republican leaders buying time as they search for ways to secure support for President Donald Trump's big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts while fending off proposed amendments, mostly from Democrats trying to defeat the package. An endgame was not immediately in sight. Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota is working for a last-minute agreement between those in his party worried the bill's reductions to Medicaid will leave millions without care and his most conservative flank, which wants even steeper cuts to hold down deficits ballooning with the tax cuts. Thune declared at one point they were in the 'homestretch' as he dashed through the halls at the Capitol, only to backtrack a short time later, suggesting any progress was "elusive.' At the same time House Speaker Mike Johnson has signaled more potential problems ahead, warning the Senate package could run into trouble when it is sent back to the House for a final round of voting, as skeptical lawmakers are being called back to Washington ahead of Trump's Fourth of July deadline. 'I have prevailed upon my Senate colleagues to please, please, please keep it as close to the House product as possible,' said Johnson, the Louisiana Republican. House Republicans had already passed their version last month. It's a pivotal moment for the Republicans, who have control of Congress and are racing to wrap up work with just days to go before Trump's holiday deadline Friday. The 940-page 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' as it's formally titled, has consumed Congress as its shared priority with the president. In a midnight social media post urging them on, Trump called the bill 'perhaps the greatest and most important of its kind.' Vice President JD Vance summed up his own series of posts, simply imploring senators to 'Pass the bill.' The GOP leaders have no room to spare, with narrow majorities in both chambers. Thune can lose no more than three Republican senators, and already two — Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who warns people will lose access to Medicaid health care, and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who opposes raising the debt limit — have indicated opposition. Tillis abruptly announced over the weekend he would not seek reelection after Trump threatened to campaign against him. Attention quickly turned to key senators, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, who have also raised concerns about health care cuts, but also a loose coalition of four conservative GOP senators pushing for even steeper reductions. And on social media, billionaire Elon Musk was again lashing out at Republicans as 'the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' for including a provision that would raise the nation's debt limit by $5 trillion, which is needed to allow continued borrowing to pay the bills. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said his side was working to show 'how awful this is.' 'Republicans are in shambles because they know the bill is so unpopular,' Schumer said as he walked the halls. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found 11.8 million more Americans would become uninsured by 2034 if the bill became law. The CBO said the package would increase the deficit by nearly $3.3 trillion over the decade. Senators to watch Few Republicans appear fully satisfied as the final package emerges, in either the House or Senate. Tillis said it is a betrayal of the president's promises not to kick people off health care, especially if rural hospitals close. Collins had proposed bolstering the $25 billion proposed rural hospital fund to $50 billion, but her amendment failed. And Murkowski was trying to secure provisions to spare people in her state from some health care and food stamp cuts while also working to beef up federal reimbursements to Alaska's hospitals. They have not said how they would vote for the final package. 'Radio silence,' Murkowski said when asked. At the same time, conservative Senate Republicans proposing steeper health care cuts, including Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, filed into Thune's office for a near-midnight meeting. The Senate has spent some 18 hours churning through more than two dozen amendments in what is called a vote-a-rama, a typically laborious process that went on longer than usual as negotiations happen on and off the chamber floor. The White House legislative team also was at the Capitol. A few of the amendments — to strike parts of the bill that would limit Medicaid funds to rural hospitals or shift the costs of food stamp benefits to the states — were winning support from a few Republicans, though almost none were passing. Sen. Mike Crapo, the GOP chairman of the Finance Committee, dismissed the dire predictions of health care cuts as Democrats trafficking in what he called the 'politics of fear.' What's in the big bill All told, the Senate bill includes $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, according to the latest CBO analysis, making permanent Trump's 2017 rates, which would expire at the end of the year if Congress fails to act, while adding the new ones he campaigned on, including no taxes on tips. The Senate package would roll back billions of dollars in green energy tax credits, which Democrats warn will wipe out wind and solar investments nationwide. It would impose $1.2 trillion in cuts, largely to Medicaid and food stamps, by imposing work requirements on able-bodied people, including some parents and older Americans, making sign-up eligibility more stringent and changing federal reimbursements to states. Additionally, the bill would provide a $350 billion infusion for border and national security, including for deportations, some of it paid for with new fees charged to immigrants. Democrats fighting all day and night Unable to stop the march toward passage, the Democrats as the minority party in Congress are using the tools at their disposal to delay and drag out the process. Democrats forced a full reading of the text, which took 16 hours, and they have a stream of amendments. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, raised particular concern at the start of debate late Sunday about the accounting method being used by the Republicans, which says the tax breaks from Trump's first term are now 'current policy' and the cost of extending them should not be counted toward deficits. She said that kind of 'magic math' won't fly with Americans trying to balance their own household books. ___
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
AI companies see open source as a strategic advantage: Analyst
Lian Jye Su, chief analyst at Omdia, talks about the rush to go open source among Chinese AI companies, especially on the back of Deepseek's success, and how that positions them in the global AI race with the US.
