Rate increases, colder temps behind N.B. Power bill spikes, review finds
A spike in New Brunswick energy bills to start the winter was due to higher power costs and freezing temperatures, according to a third-party review.
N.B. Power CEO Lori Clark told reporters Friday that she understands the findings may be of little comfort to those who struggled to pay their bills this winter, but she hopes the results will provide some level of confidence in the embattled utility.
"Having the trust and confidence of New Brunswickers is important to the utility," Clark said. "It's one of the most important things for the utility.
"This report today should give customers confidence that our metering and billing systems are working properly, and that smart meters actually provide a tool for them to help manage their energy usage over time."
The assessment of N.B. Power bills by auditing service KPMG found that bills were about 25 per cent higher in December 2024 than the previous year. Of that increase, 13 per cent was based on a rate increase that took effect in April 2024 and 12 per cent was due to consumption.
KPMG staff told reporters during a technical briefing that the figures line up with frosty temperatures, which were 11 to 16 per cent colder than the prior December. According to the report, there was a "statistically significant correlation between weather temperatures and power consumption."
WATCH | Cold temperatures driving power costs:
Cold temps, higher rates behind steep climb in December power bills, review says
32 minutes ago
Duration 2:02
Billing periods were also an average of 1.24 days longer than the year before, and there were 68 per cent fewer outage hours than the same period the year prior. Billing cycles have fluctuated from 28 days to 31 days, but the utility says it plans to make them the same in future.
Clark said the utility wants to find ways to lessen the burden of recent rate hikes on customers and is launching several initiatives with that aim.
"We do know that the results of this will not make it any easier for some of those customers who are struggling to pay their bills to actually pay those bills," Clark said.
"We know in New Brunswick that we have some of the lowest rates in Canada, but because of the high dependence on electric heat that our customers have some of the largest bills. So there are certainly some actions that we can take to help customers manage their consumption."
Clark reiterated N.B. Power's commitment to applying "time of usage" metering once smart meters are installed across the province, likely next year.
"Time of usage" billing will allow customers to opt in to a differential rate structure, where they pay more for power during peak times but a lesser rate outside those periods.
466 accounts got closer look
To conduct its review KPMG analyzed 466 customer accounts, comparing December 2024 bills to December 2023 and November 2024.
Of those, 275 did not have their meter changed in the last year, 46 had a winter peak in the last five years within 10 per cent of the consumption recorded in December 2024, and 33 had similar consumption levels to their peers following the change in meter.
Another 92 customers had consumption levels 30 per cent or more higher than the previous year. KPMG recommended that N.B. Power contact those customers to see if there were other factors to help explain the sudden spike.
Overall, the review found that there were 67 million more kWh used in December 2024 than in December 2023. The pre-tax costs to residential customers were $20 million higher, with roughly half being due to higher rates and half due to higher consumption.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cision Canada
3 days ago
- Cision Canada
Canadian companies leaving productivity gains on the table by not effectively adopting new technology Français
TORONTO, June 6, 2025 /CNW/ - While Canadian companies have been making technology investments to improve productivity, insufficient investments in their people have limited effectiveness and held back productivity gains, finds new KPMG in Canada research. KPMG recently surveyed 250 business leaders across Canada to understand what actions they were taking to improve their operations in response to the trade war with the U.S. The results found that most had stepped up investments in technology to make their organizations more efficient and productive – and are seeing positive returns – but nearly two-thirds (63 per cent) say their employees aren't using new technologies effectively – holding back full returns on their tech spend. "Investing in new technology tools and platforms can do wonders for an organization's productivity by streamlining processes, workflows and tasks," says Stavros Demetriou, Partner and National Leader of KPMG in Canada's People and Change practice. "The latest Stats Can data shows Canada has made productivity gains in each of the last two quarters, but this increase still trails improvements in the U.S. over the same period. "Unless Canadian organizations undertake effective employee education and adoption plans, their people will barely scratch the surface on what the technology can do to make them more productive, and our gap to the U.S. and others will continue to widen." Although nearly all (89 per cent) respondents say they're investing in upskilling employees, over half (53 per cent) say their company doesn't invest enough in employee training, workshops or continuous learning opportunities, and nearly six in 10 (56 per cent) say their organization lacks the internal resources and talent needed to implement and use technology effectively. Survey highlights 63 per cent of 250 Canadian business leaders say technology isn't the productivity problem, their employees just aren't using technology effectively 89 per cent say they're investing in upskilling employees 53 per cent say their organization doesn't invest enough in employee training, workshops or continuous learning opportunities 56 per cent say their organization lacks the internal resources and talent needed to implement and use technology effectively 74 per cent of respondents believe AI will solve their productivity challenges 74 per cent say they underestimated the challenges of digitization (e.g., changing processes, working habits, etc.) 88 per cent say they need better processes in place to encourage their workers to use technologies, including case studies and incentives 87 per cent s ay their company could do a better job of creating a culture that encourages people to share ideas and take risks, fostering innovation and creativity. 86 per cent say they hope that more digital savvy younger generations will help our company become more productive through the easier adoption of new technologies Mr. Demetriou notes that while three-quarters (74 per cent) of respondents believe AI will solve their productivity problem, the same proportion (74 per cent) admit they have underestimated the challenges of implementing new technologies such as AI. "An underappreciation of the impact of things like changing processes and working habits could explain why employees are not fully equipped to harness new technologies to their fullest potential," he says. "There's a common belief that digitally transforming your company is primarily a technology upgrade exercise, but the reality is that technology implementation is just one part of a journey – digital transformation is just as much about advancing and elevating the workforce. It's a continuous, iterative process that, if done correctly, leads to higher productivity and innovation, and the ability to navigate the future more confidently," he adds. Ineffective training Megan Jones, National HR and Workforce Transformation Lead at KPMG in Canada, notes that nearly nine in 10 respondents say they need better processes in place to encourage their workers to use technologies, including case studies and incentives. "Often, when organizations implement new tools and technologies, they don't completely understand or appreciate the full capabilities of these investments. As a result, employees are simply not adequately prepared to maximize the benefits these can bring to their jobs or customers. In some cases, organizations provide full training, but it's too technical or poorly delivered. Effective training and upskilling need to be targeted, relevant, engaging, and frequent. Much like exercising consistently to build muscle, technology training must happen regularly to make the workforce stronger and more agile," she says. Ms. Jones notes that almost nine in 10 (87 per cent) respondents acknowledged their company could do a better job of creating a culture that encourages employees to share ideas and take risks, fostering innovation and creativity. She recommends organizations provide incentives for employees to experiment with technology and explore new use cases for it. "Regular workshops or dedicated 'days' where employees are encouraged to play around with AI and develop new solutions can go a long way in sparking innovation. Also, showcasing wins by employees in one area of the business could help spark new ideas in other parts of the organization," she says. The digital divide Most respondents (86 per cent) hope that a more digitally-savvy younger generation will help their company become more productive through the easier adoption of new technologies such as AI, Web3, data and analytics, quantum and edge computing. Lewis Curley, a Partner in KPMG in Canada's People and Change practice, says differences in workforce composition, skills and attitudes can create additional considerations for an organization's technology program, but organizations that engage all employees early in the journey as well as training and upskilling will have more success in leveraging new technologies such as AI and increasing overall productivity. "If an organization is looking to implement AI, they must engage the entire workforce right from the beginning. If some employees don't feel like they are part of the journey, they might disengage from the process, lose trust in AI, or worry that the technology will replace them, which could deter them from using it," he says. "Everyone has a role in a company's digital transformation, and every single employee – from the CEO to the most recent hire – plays a part in making their organization more productive, so transparency, communication and engagement are crucial." About the KPMG in Canada Productivity Survey KPMG in Canada surveyed 250 business leaders in all industry sectors across Canada between May 9 and May 20, 2025, on Sago's premier business panel, using Methodify's online research platform. Thirty-one per cent lead companies with annual gross revenue between $500 million and $1 billion, 25 per cent report revenue between $100 million and $300 million, 22 per cent have revenue between $300 million and $500 million, 12 per cent between $10 million and $100 million, and 10 per cent, over $1 billion. No companies under $10 million in annual revenue were surveyed. Over half (52 per cent) of the companies are privately held, 28 per cent are owned by private equity firms, 18 per cent are publicly traded with headquarters in Canada, and 2 per cent are foreign-owned subsidiaries. KPMG LLP, a limited liability partnership, is a full-service Audit, Tax and Advisory firm owned and operated by Canadians. For over 150 years, our professionals have provided consulting, accounting, auditing, and tax services to Canadians, inspiring confidence, empowering change, and driving innovation. Guided by our core values of Integrity, Excellence, Courage, Together, For Better, KPMG employs more than 10,000 people in over 40 locations across Canada, serving private- and public-sector clients. KPMG is consistently ranked one of Canada's top employers and one of the best places to work in the country. The firm is established under the laws of Ontario and is a member of KPMG's global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a private English company limited by guarantee. Each KPMG firm is a legally distinct and separate entity and describes itself as such. For more information, see For media inquiries: Alannah Page National Communications and Media Relations KPMG in Canada 306-934-6255 [email protected] Roula Meditskos National Communications and Media Relations KPMG in Canada 416-549-7982 [email protected] SOURCE KPMG LLP
Globe and Mail
4 days ago
- Globe and Mail
Tariffs distract from the real financial war – one that Canada is losing badly
America's trade offensive may be incoherent and reckless, but the endgame has always been relatively clear: to revive U.S. manufacturing by ransacking trading partners of investment capital. It's not very neighbourly, and it could easily backfire, but it's also working, in one sense at least. Corporate Canada is in a state of paralysis. Business investment is being choked off by tariff chaos. And the country's manufacturing sector was among the world's weakest last month. There's a war for investment capital under way and Canada's losing. 'There's a finite pool of capital and once it's been cannibalized, it's never coming back,' said Stephen Johnston, director of Omnigence Asset Management in Calgary. 'Time is of the essence.' The country sorely needs the business-level investment that has been lacking for years, in things like plant and equipment, and productivity enhancing technology. The problem is, the Trump administration has so effectively poisoned the investing climate in Canada that businesses are in no position to be ambitious. More than half of business leaders in Canada recently surveyed by KPMG said they had already cut into their capital investment and R&D budgets over the next year. A majority also reported reductions in sales outlooks. Analysis: Trump's trade chaos has foreign creditors backing away from Canada 'American tariffs have put a stranglehold on revenue and are cutting off the funds earmarked for continued investment,' KPMG said. Manufacturers look especially vulnerable. On Monday, S&P Global published a snapshot of factory activity across 25 different countries in the month of May. Canada ranked dead last. A slowdown in May was to be expected, after U.S. importers accelerated their purchases in prior months before tariffs took effect. 'There is reason to be worried in the medium term as well, given repeated threats from the U.S. administration on Canadian factories,' Matthieu Arseneau, National Bank's deputy chief economist, wrote in a note. U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to 'permanently shut down' auto manufacturing in Canada. And this week's doubling of metals tariffs has piled more misery onto Canadian steel and aluminum producers. Algoma Steel Group Inc. said the new tariffs could make the company's U.S. business unviable. From investing to real estate, here's how you can Trump-proof your wallet Blame for the ills of Canadian industry, however, does not fall solely on Mr. Trump's shoulders. Business investment in Canada has been declining for years. Spending on R&D has been dismally low. The country's factories now contribute less to global manufacturing value added than Ireland's, which has about one-eighth the population and little of Canada's energy abundance. The past 20 years have seen a 'profound atrophy of Canada's manufacturing base – unmatched across the industrialized world,' Stéfane Marion, chief economist at National Bank, wrote in a recent note. Most economists blame excessive regulation. Regulatory requirements for Canadian manufacturers have risen by about 40 per cent since 2005, according to Statistics Canada. 'The perception of Canada is that it's hostile to capital,' Mr. Johnston said. 'I speak to foreign capital allocators all the time, and they would not touch Canada with a 10-foot pole.' Reducing internal trade barriers is a top priority for businesses, KPMG poll shows That clearly needs to change if Canada is going to turn the page on its over-reliance on the U.S. economy. Business leaders themselves acknowledge the need to be bolder. The KPMG survey showed that 92 per cent agreed that boosting investment in technology and innovation was needed to 'build a more resilient, prosperous economy.' They also called on policy makers to remove interprovincial trade barriers, improve tax competitiveness, and reduce regulation to expedite major projects. Perhaps what is needed above all else is urgency. There is clearly momentum at the political level to course-correct the domestic economy. With a capital war upon us, implementation is crucial in a country not known for being economically nimble.
Globe and Mail
5 days ago
- Globe and Mail
With Trump's budget bill looming, here's how U.S. foreign withholding tax works
Canadian investors may not be aware that when they earn income from a foreign investment, they may also be effectively paying a withholding tax to a foreign country. As countries cannot collect taxes from non-residents directly, most will hold back part of the income a foreign investor receives from a company incorporated in that country. 'It's just the simple way to make sure the government gets their tax,' says Karl Dennis, partner and national leader of the U.S. corporate tax team for KPMG in Canada. Now, a provision in U.S. tax legislation passed by the House of Representatives threatens to raise taxes on investors in Canada and in other countries that impose taxes, such as a digital services tax, that the U.S. deems unfair to U.S. corporations. Under section 899 of U.S. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill, Canadians who hold U.S. securities or invest in U.S. companies through Canadian investment funds could see the rate of U.S. foreign withholding tax on dividends they receive rise significantly. At this point, cross-border tax experts have different interpretations of just how much the increase would be. Some understand the bill as increasing the rate of U.S. foreign withholding tax by a maximum of 20 percentage points, either to 35 per cent from the 15 per cent rate available under the Canada-U.S. tax treaty, or to 50 per cent from the 30 per cent statutory foreign withholding tax rate when a taxpayer is ineligible for the treaty rate. Others interpret the ceiling as 50 per cent, or a maximum of 20 percentage points above the statutory rate of 30 per cent, starting from the treaty rate of 15 per cent, where applicable. Tax experts say they're monitoring the progress of the bill and suggest the provision could be revised before its possible enactment. John Natale, head of tax, retirement and estate planning services, wealth, at Manulife Investment Management, says investors should speak with their financial advisors or tax advisors rather than sell U.S. investments solely because of the proposed legislation. 'Sometimes, people are eager or panic,' Mr. Natale says. Here's a brief overview of how U.S. withholding tax currently affects Canadian investors based on the types of investments and where those investments are held. (The tax implications for U.S. citizens who live in Canada aren't addressed in this article, as those investors would be treated differently.) Under the Canada-U.S. tax treaty, the U.S. imposes a withholding tax of 15 per cent on dividends paid from U.S. companies to Canadian investors, which is half the default rate of 30 per cent under U.S. tax law. To access the reduced treaty rate, a Canadian investor holding U.S. investments in a non-registered account needs to complete a U.S. W-8BEN form. The withholding tax applies to dividends but, in general, not to interest from bonds or savings accounts, or to capital gains realized on the sale of U.S. investments. (One exception is real estate: Canadians pay U.S. taxes on interest earned from U.S. rental property and on capital gains from selling U.S. real estate.) In a non-registered, taxable account, a Canadian investing directly in U.S. companies is subject to U.S. withholding tax on the dividends they receive. When a Canadian invests in a Canadian mutual fund or exchange-traded fund that invests in U.S. equities, the fund itself is the taxable entity in terms of U.S. withholding tax. The fund then distributes the foreign dividend income to the unitholder and reports the amount of foreign withholding tax. For example, a Canadian investor who is allocated $100 in U.S. dividends would receive $85, with the financial institution remitting $15 to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. The financial institution would then issue a tax slip – either a T3 or a T5 – reporting $100 in foreign dividends and $15 of foreign tax paid. The investor would then report the $100 dividend on their income tax return and claim a foreign tax credit for $15. Under the proposed U.S. tax bill, the withholding rate would increase by five percentage points for every year the foreign country continues to charge an 'unfair' tax. (Cross-border experts have different interpretations on whether the increases would max out at 35 per cent or 50 per cent, where a treaty rate of 15 per cent is available.) Josée Baillargeon, director of taxation policy at the Securities and Investment Management Association, says it's unclear whether any additional taxes imposed under section 899 above the treaty rate would be eligible for a foreign tax credit or a deduction from income in Canada. 'We're currently seeking clarification on this matter from the Canada Revenue Agency,' Ms. Baillargeon said in a statement sent by e-mail. The U.S. doesn't recognize the tax-deferred status of Canadian registered plans that aren't retirement accounts, such as the tax-free savings account (TFSA), the registered education savings plan (RESP), the registered disability savings plan (RDSP) and the first-home savings account (FHSA). That means Canadians who invest in U.S. companies or hold Canadian mutual funds and ETFs that invest in U.S. equities held in TFSAs and RESPs are subject to U.S. foreign withholding tax on dividends, just as they would be if they held those investments in a taxable account. However, as these plans are tax-sheltered accounts in Canada, the Canadian investor doesn't receive a tax slip reporting the foreign dividends and foreign withholding tax, nor can they claim the foreign tax credit in Canada to offset the withholding tax. That means the 15 per cent U.S. withholding tax is a net cost to the investor that can't be recovered. The U.S. does recognize RRSPs, RRIFs, life income retirement accounts (LIRAs) and life income funds (LIFs) as retirement accounts and tax-deferred accounts. That means Canadians who invest in U.S. companies, or who hold ETFs listed on a U.S. exchange that invest in U.S. equities, are exempt from U.S. withholding tax on the dividends they receive. Adam Seliski, partner, international tax and transaction services with EY Canada, says it's unclear whether retirement accounts would continue to have access to their exempt status if section 899 were enacted. 'That's something we're monitoring very closely,' Mr. Seliski says. Even under current rules, the retirement account exemption isn't available for Canadian investors who hold Canadian mutual funds and ETFs that invest in U.S. equities. Canadian U.S. equity funds held in retirement accounts are subject to U.S. withholding tax, and investors don't have access to a foreign tax credit to offset, representing a drag on fund performance. While there may be an advantage to holding a U.S. investment directly in a registered retirement account in terms of avoiding U.S. foreign withholding tax, Canadian investors who own U.S. assets must also consider annual Canadian foreign reporting obligations, U.S. estate tax implications, and the cost of currency conversion.
