"Acute Shortage Of Judges" Leading To Cases Going Unheard: High Court
New Delhi:
The Delhi High Court has highlighted the "acute shortage of judges" with respect to the population and the litigation quantum due to which several matters remain unheard.
The high court said that on account of overflowing dockets, it was unable to decide appeals within a reasonable period of time and when some matters remain unheard, it is "extremely painful" for the judge.
The court's remarks came while hearing a plea by a cheating and forgery case convict, seeking permission to travel abroad to attend a club assembly of Rotary Club in Almaty, Kazakhstan and Georgia for his social ties and business growth.
"In my considered view, since on account of overflowing dockets, this court is unable to decide the appeals within a reasonable period of time, the right to even leisure trips to certain extent ought not be declined," Justice Girish Kathpalia said.
The court permitted the man to travel abroad from May 1 to May 11 upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs 5 lakh with one surety of the like amount.
It said the events like club assembly of Rotarians are more in the form of general get-togethers where social and business relations are developed.
"On account of acute shortage of judges as compared to the general population and the litigation quantum, for a long time, the list of regular matters does not reach till the end of the day of hearing.
"Rather, many times even beyond 05:00 pm when the courts rise for the day, some of the matters remain unheard, which is extremely painful for the judge. In such an uncertain atmosphere, depriving the applicant/ appellant of free movement, even if to enjoy leisure trips cannot be justified," Justice Kathpalia said.
The court noted that the man's appeal challenging his conviction in the cheating and forgery case, was filed in the high court in 2019 and admitted by the previous judge, to be heard at its turn as a regular matter.
The man's counsel submitted that he was earlier also allowed to go abroad and that being of 67 years of age, there was no scope of his fleeing from justice.
The counsel for CBI told the court on an earlier occasion, the man was denied permission to travel abroad as it was a leisure trip and contended that if he was allowed to leave the country, he might not return.
While allowing the man's plea, the high court said the court must be conscious about ensuring the return of the applicant to face the pending legal proceedings which can be done by imposing appropriate conditions on him.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
34 minutes ago
- India Today
Lokayukta arrests senior Karnataka official for taking Rs 1.5 lakh bribe
A senior official of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) was caught red-handed on Friday for allegedly accepting a bribe of Rs 1.5 lakh, officials accused, Narendra Kumar (51), who serves as a survey supervisor at KIADB Bengaluru, was arrested following a trap laid by Lokayukta investigation was initiated after a complaint by an individual named Ravi, who alleged that Kumar demanded a bribe to 'prepare a sketch' and get it The Lokayukta police have registered a case and are conducting further January this year, Hassan City Municipal Commissioner TN Narasimha Murthy was caught by Lokayukta officials while accepting a bribe of Rs 1.5 lakh from a contractor. Along with him, an engineer named Venkatesh, was also sting operation was conducted after a contractor, named Sunil Kumar, filed a complaint alleging that Murthy had demanded the bribe to clear a bill. Lokayukta officials laid a trap and nabbed the Commissioner as soon as he accepted the a parallel operation in Bengaluru in January, the Lokayukta arrested the Office Superintendent of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Hall-5, for accepting a bribe of Rs 60,000. IN THIS STORY#Karnataka
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Top Naxal With Rs 45 Lakh Bounty Killed In Chhattisgarh Encounter
Last Updated: The encounter was a part of an ongoing crackdown against Naxal insurgents in the region. Amid the ongoing anti-Naxal operation, security forces have gunned down a top Naxal commander, Bhaskar, in the National Park area of Bijapur district in Chhattisgarh. The deceased Naxal had a bounty of Rs 45 lakh on him. According to IG Bastar, an AK-47 rifle, explosives, other weapons, and a significant quantity of ammunition have also been seized during the encounter. The encounter was a part of an ongoing crackdown against Naxal insurgents in the region, and officials believe this is a significant blow to Maoist operations in the area. The encounter was being carried out as part of the encounter by personnel from the state police's Special Task Force (STF) and District Reserve Guard (DRG) as well as the CRPF's specialised unit CoBRA, said Inspector General of Police, Bastar Range Sundarraj. 'After the exchange of fire stopped, the body of a Naxalite, along with one AK-47 rifle and other explosives, weapons, and ammunition was recovered from the encounter site. Preliminary identification suggests the body is of Bhaskar alias Mailarapu Adellu, a special zonal committee (SZC) member of the Telangana State Committee (TSC) of the outlawed Maoists," he said. 'Bhaskar, a resident of Adilabad district in Telangana, was the secretary of the Mancherial-Komarambheem (MKB) division of the TSC of Maoists. He carried a reward of Rs 25 lakhs in Chhattisgarh and 20 lakhs in Telangana," the IG added.
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Vice President Dhankar demands investigation into 'cash haul' incident involving Justice Yashwant Varma
Chandigarh (Punjab) [India], June 6 (ANI): Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar on Friday expressed concern over the recent cash controversy involving former Delhi High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma. A substantial amount of unaccounted cash was discovered at Justice Varma's residence after a fire broke out in mid-March. The incident has sparked widespread debate and scrutiny. He questioned the absence of an investigation into the issue and why no FIR was registered for the same. The Vice President said, 'A painful incident happened in mid-March in Delhi at the residence of a sitting judge. There was a cash haul, obviously tainted, unaccounted, illegal. And unexplained!... It appeared in the public domain after 6-7 days....' Interacting with members of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association in Chandigarh today, the Vice-President further added, 'I have raised the issue. Ultimately, is that the answer if a motion is brought to remove a judge? If there has been a crime, a culpable act shaking the foundations of democracy -- the rule of law, why wasn't it punished? We have lost more than three months, and the investigation has not been initiated. Whenever you go to court, they ask why the FIR was delayed.' Earlier on March 22, the Chief Justice of India constituted a three-member committee, comprising Justice Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Justice GS Sandhawalia, Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, and Justice Anu Sivaraman, Judge of the High Court of Karnataka, to examine the allegations against Justice Yashwant Varma, a sitting judge of the High Court of Delhi. The committee concluded its investigation and presented its findings in a report dated May 3. Referring to the same, Dhankar questioned if the committee has 'a constitutional sanction.' 'Does the committee of judges have a constitutional sanction? Does it have statutory sanction? Can this report result in any outcome? Can this report, by itself, be actionable? If a judge removal mechanism is there, the Constitution says this removal mechanism can be initiated either in the Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha. This is the only way. Then this committee cannot substitute for an FIR investigation...,' Dhankar said. He stressed that 'even the President and Governors' are immune to prosecution 'till they are in office', and that no other body is provided with this immunity. The Vice President further hoped that an FIR would be filed soon. 'I find it very soothing and must congratulate you that the bar associations in the country are active on it. I hope an FIR is filed,' Dhankar stated. On April 5, Justice Yashwant Varma was sworn in as a judge of the Allahabad High Court under unusual and contentious circumstances. Departing from the customary public ceremony, his oath-taking was conducted privately, a decision that has garnered significant scrutiny. This development coincides with an ongoing investigation into allegations concerning the recovery of partially burnt sacks of cash at his residence weeks prior. Despite his formal induction, Justice Varma has not been assigned any judicial or administrative responsibilities, according to court insiders. His transfer from the Delhi High Court to the Allahabad High Court has been met with scepticism, particularly following the filing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court. The PIL urged the Chief Justice to defer the swearing-in until the inquiry reached its conclusion. The controversy has elicited strong reactions from the legal community. The Allahabad High Court Bar Association has openly criticised the Collegium's decision, expressing its disapproval through a strongly worded letter addressed to the Chief Justice and other judges. The association condemned the appointment, declaring, 'We are not a dumping ground,' and called for enhanced transparency and accountability in judicial appointments. As the inquiry progresses, Justice Varma's future role within the Allahabad High Court remains uncertain. Legal experts and observers continue to monitor developments closely, as the situation has raised broader concerns regarding judicial integrity and the processes governing appointments within India's judiciary. According to the official website of the Allahabad High Court, Justice Varma obtained his Law degree from Rewa University in 1992 and was enrolled as an Advocate on August 8 of the same year. Throughout his career, he primarily practised civil law, handling cases related to Constitutional Law, Industrial Disputes, Corporate Matters, Taxation, Environmental Issues, and related fields. He served as special counsel for the Allahabad High Court from 2006 until his elevation in 2012. (ANI)
