logo
Pediatric Pickleball Injuries Surge in 2024

Pediatric Pickleball Injuries Surge in 2024

Medscape2 days ago
TOPLINE:
A recent study showed that pediatric pickleball injuries increased sharply in 2024, with facial injuries being the most common. Younger children faced higher risks for lacerations, whereas older players experienced more joint injuries.
METHODOLOGY:
Researchers analyzed pickleball-related injuries in pediatric patients (average age, 12.7 years; 61.4% boys) presenting to emergency departments during 2014-2024, representing an estimated 3011 injuries nationally during this period.
Researchers conducted narrative searches to identify cases and categorize injury mechanisms.
Of 66 patients with information on race, 78.8% were White, 13.6% were Black or African American, and 7.6% were Asian.
Injuries were defined as nontraumatic if they resulted from a medical or environmental cause without an external force (eg, sunburn). Traumatic injuries were further subclassified based on the type of external force, including falls, being hit with a paddle, being hit with a ball, noncontact trauma, or unknown causes.
TAKEAWAY:
Most injuries occurred in teenagers (57.4%) and only 4% of the injuries resulted in hospitalizations; 58.4% of the cases were reported in 2024.
Lacerations were the most common injury (23.8%), followed by fractures (13.9%), sprains (12.9%), and abrasions/contusions (10.9%). Facial lacerations (18.8%), sprained ankles (8.9%), and concussions/closed-head injuries (6.9%) were the most frequent specific injuries.
Older patients had an increased risk for dislocation (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; P = .03) but were less likely to have lacerations (OR, 0.84; P = .03) or concussions (OR, 0.75; P = .02) than younger patients.
The most common injury mechanism was collision with a paddle (34.4%), followed by falls (27.8%). The odds of noncontact trauma increased with age (OR, 1.33; P = .01).
IN PRACTICE:
Age-related differences in injuries call for "specific prevention strategies" including "lighter paddles and optional headgear for younger children to potentially reduce head trauma, and strength training or technique-focused interventions for older children to help mitigate joint injuries," the study authors wrote. They added "prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies and to monitor evolving injury patterns as participation continues to grow across pediatric age groups."
SOURCE:
The study was led by Michaelangelo Coppa, BS, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. It was published online on July 25, 2025, in the American Journal of Emergency Medicine.
LIMITATIONS:
Reliance on narrative text due to the absence of a dedicated National Electronic Injury Surveillance System code may have led to underreporting or missed cases. Exclusion of non-ED encounters potentially biased the sample toward more severe injuries. Additionally, the limited clinical details, small sample size, and absence of interventions or long-term outcomes restricted the generalizability of the study findings.
DISCLOSURES:
The study did not receive any funding, and the authors reported no competing interests.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New study finds coffee is good for you, but there's a catch
New study finds coffee is good for you, but there's a catch

Fast Company

timean hour ago

  • Fast Company

New study finds coffee is good for you, but there's a catch

Coffee drinking has been studied for decades as researchers have aimed to answer one burning question: Is it good for you? Or is it better to stick to joyless drinks like, you know, tap water and mint tea? While there have been cases for just about every argument, one recently published study in The Journal of Nutrition just added another check in the 'healthy' column. Of course, there's a catch. You have to drink your coffee in a specific way. For the study, researchers at Tufts University analyzed the coffee-drinking habits of 46,332 Americans from 1999 to 2018. They found that drinking a cup of coffee each day has some major effects in terms of lowering mortality rates. One cup of joe per day was linked to a 16% lower risk of death, not just related to cardiovascular disease, which has been well-documented, but from any cause. More coffee is better, too—but not too much more. Drinking two to three cups per day showed a 17% lower risk of mortality. More coffee than that didn't offer any additional health benefits. However, these benefits didn't apply to all coffee drinkers across the board. The benefits were most pronounced in those who drank theirs sans cream and sugar (or with a very little amount of sugar). The ones who added cream and sugar had the same rates of all-cause mortality as those who tended toward non-coffee drinks. Essentially, the more cream and sugar added, the lower the benefits. 'Coffee is among the most-consumed beverages in the world, and with nearly half of American adults reporting drinking at least one cup per day, it's important for us to know what it might mean for health,' said Fang Fang Zhang, senior author of the study and a professor at Tufts. 'The health benefits of coffee might be attributable to its bioactive compounds, but our results suggest that the addition of sugar and saturated fat may reduce the mortality benefits.' Given that there is so much research around coffee, we always have to take findings with a grain of salt (and sans sweetener), but the good news does seem to be adding up for regular coffee drinkers. A study earlier this year similarly found lower rates of premature death for morning coffee drinkers. Another published in June 2025 found that coffee drinking is linked to healthy aging, particularly in women.

Carolyn Hax: Parent balks at teen's pursuit of career credential in high school
Carolyn Hax: Parent balks at teen's pursuit of career credential in high school

Washington Post

time2 hours ago

  • Washington Post

Carolyn Hax: Parent balks at teen's pursuit of career credential in high school

Adapted from an online discussion. Dear Carolyn: Our daughter's high school has a technical program that would allow her to take classes toward becoming a Patient Care Technician by graduation. Her goal is to become a pediatric nurse. The problem is that it would require her to drop an elective (chorus) that I know brings her much joy and I think is very beneficial to her mental health. Most of her friends are from her various choral activities. She just seems so young to be making decisions on a career path already. Full disclosure: I was a chorus kid and it was one of the few positive things for me in high school, so I realize this is coloring my view a bit. I also KNEW I wanted to become a teacher — until I actually pursued that track in college and realized it was NOT for me. The pressure put on these kids is immense. I just want her to enjoy her high school experience. She will have time to pursue her degree and certifications after graduation. But is it our call to make? I worry about her resenting us if we deny her this track, but worry more about her mental health if she no longer has chorus as an outlet and bringer-of-joy. — Worried Worried: First, drop the chorus rope. You're too invested. She can decide its value to her, and knows where to find it again if she regrets quitting. Second, lose the 'too soon' inflexibility, because there are unicorn kids who really do know what they want. Third, she could love this program for its inherent value — and it could, paradoxically, take pressure off her and be better for her mental health if it's a good group of kids, gives her a clear set of standards and sense of purpose, and aligns with her interests. Fourth: It could rule out more than chorus, though, so look carefully. If 'core' courses get squeezed out, then she may need to pick them up later if she changes to a more liberal arts path. It's not insurmountable, but it's still better to know going in. Fifth, can she enter this track late? Leave it early? Where have its graduates gone next? Have you asked the school these things? Sixth, err on the side of trusting your kid. You do have the parental last word, but at her age it's time to save that for emergencies. So gather all the intel you can, primarily about what SHE wants, then proceed as if it's a schedule, not a destiny. Readers' thoughts:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store