Family of Epstein accuser Giuffre urge Trump to keep Maxwell in prison
Photo:
AFP
The family of deceased
Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre
is urging US President Donald Trump not to grant clemency to Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite serving a 20-year prison sentence for helping Epstein abuse underage girls.
Giuffre's family also said it was "shocking" to hear Trump say this week that Epstein had poached Giuffre from the Mar-a-Lago club, where she worked at the spa in 2000.
The family said Trump's comment raised questions about whether he was aware of
Epstein's sexual abuse
at the time.
Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing.
Giuffre said she
was a victim of Epstein's sex trafficking
from 2000 to 2002, starting when she was 16.
She died by suicide in April at age 41.
Prince Andrew, Virginia Giuffre, and Ghislaine Maxwell posing for a photo in 2001 when Giuffre was 17.
Photo:
HANDOUT / AFP
Trump has given some of his most expansive public comments yet about his falling out with Epstein.
The family's statement comes as Trump has faced pressure to make public documents from the federal investigations into Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, and his longtime girlfriend Maxwell, who was convicted of sex trafficking in 2021.
Deputy US Attorney-General Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal lawyer, last week
met with Maxwell
.
Maxwell's lawyer David Markus has called on Trump to grant her relief, but Trump has said he has not thought about whether to pardon her.
"The government and the President should never consider giving Ghislaine Maxwell any leniency," Giuffre's family said in the statement.
"Maxwell destroyed many young lives."
A senior Trump administration official said no leniency for Maxwell was being given or discussed.
Ghislaine Maxwell pictured with her partner at the time, sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Photo:
AFP / US District Court for the southern district of New York
"That's just false," the official said.
Markus did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump and Epstein socialised in the 1990s and 2000s, before what Trump has called a falling out.
Speaking to reporters on Air Force One on Tuesday, Trump said he told Epstein to "stay the hell out" of Mar-a-Lago after finding out Epstein was poaching Trump's workers, including Giuffre.
"He stole her," Trump said.
In their statement, Giuffre's family said Maxwell recruited her from Mar-a-Lago in 2000.
An aerial view of Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
Photo:
Joe Raedle / Getty Images / AFP
The family said that was years before Epstein and Trump had their falling out, pointing to a 2002 New York magazine article in which the president was quoted calling Epstein a "terrific guy" who liked women "on the younger side".
"It makes us ask if he was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal actions," Giuffre's family said, referring to Trump's Air Force One comments.
Asked by a reporter on Thursday if he knew why Epstein was taking his employees, Trump said he did not.
"I didn't really know really why, but I said if he's taking anybody from Mar-a-Lago, if he's hiring or whatever he's doing, I didn't like it and we threw him out," Trump said.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement Trump had been responding to a reporter's question about Giuffre and did not bring her up.
"President Trump kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of his club for being a creep to his female employees," Leavitt said.
At Maxwell's trial in 2021, Juan Alessi, the former manager of Epstein's Palm Beach home, testified that he drove with Maxwell to meet Ms Giuffre at nearby Mar-a-Lago.
He said he then saw Giuffre at Epstein's home for the first time that evening, and saw her at the home many times thereafter.
- Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Counting the costs of tariffs
What an arbitrary and unfair world. While New Zealand might not be stung as badly as many others, it is still being penalised by capricious and unjust tariffs. This nation has virtually no tariffs (about 0.8%) on goods from the United States, while US-owned giants like Meta, Microsoft and Google extract billions of dollars through tax avoidance. New Zealand, long a close friend internationally, has been forced to tread carefully around US President Donald Trump. It recently welcomed an FBI office in Wellington and has held back on pledging recognition of Palestinian statehood. Nonetheless, the baseline 10% tariff imposed by the US earlier this year rises to 15%. Why? New Zealand recorded a trade surplus with the United States last year. If food prices had not been high, or if New Zealand had imported a few US aircraft, the balance might have been reversed — and the 10% might have stayed, as it has for Singapore and Australia. However, the US might still have made dismantling Pharmac a condition of a better deal. It is, of course, futile to appease bullies. There are effectively no real negotiations. Mr Trump issues decrees, and only afterwards might there be limited room to move. The might of China may have muscle, especially because of the US debt it holds. Puny New Zealand is simply too small. If there were just a little fairness, New Zealand could also apply 15% to US imports. Nobody, however, is seriously proposing that. New Zealand has staked its reputation and its interests as a trading nation on free trade. It also dares not provoke the Trump tactic of responding with another ratchet of the rack. It says much about the state of play that wily Foreign Minister Winston Peters and others advocated keeping this country's head down. Mr Trump has so many big fish to fry — discussions are continuing with China and the European Union on the trade front alone — this seemed the wisest course. In a flurry of action, New Zealand's head trade official is now off the Washington, and Trade Minister Todd McLay will follow. Unsurprisingly, there is scepticism that this will do much good. Previously, such efforts failed to reduce steel and aluminium tariffs, and tiny New Zealand will struggle to receive much air or ear time at the highest levels. Politically, however, it makes the government look as though it is doing something. Despite Labour's criticism of poor tactics, it is doubtful whether proactive and public lobbying in Washington would have made any difference. The resulting 15% tariff matches that applied to US allies Japan and South Korea and is slightly lower than much of Southeast Asia. However, it is higher than the rate for fellow beef exporters Argentina and Uruguay. The US is also New Zealand's largest wine export market. Wine receipts are expected to suffer, and F&P Healthcare, one of New Zealand's largest companies with manufacturing in Auckland and Mexico, will be disadvantaged as it competes with a major US rival. Exporters were reconciling themselves to 10%, and 15% might not sound excessive. But it represents a 50% increase on the earlier amount and is far harder to absorb. The result will be lower returns for exporters and higher costs for consumers, while the US collects tariff revenue. Trade Minister Todd McLay estimates the tariff cost to exporters at an additional $500 million. Fortunately, this coincides with strong global food demand and prices. Unfortunately, it comes at a time when the New Zealand economy is struggling to recover from prolonged doldrums. Although not catastrophic, it dents confidence and removes another brick as the government tries to rebuild economic growth and salvage its electoral prospects. The US has overtaken Australia as New Zealand's second-largest export market, worth $9 billion last year, though still well behind China. New Zealand will bear the costs of President Trump's disruptive trade policies, both directly through tariffs and indirectly through their dampening effect on US and global growth.
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
UK government looking at harsher punishments for people smugglers
United Kingdom correspondent Lucy Thompson spoke to Lisa Owen about the UK's government looking to introduce harsher punishments for people smugglers, as well as moves to evacuate sick children from Gaza. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
NZ Herald
12 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Russia, China hold war games, Japan voices security worries
Some of the vessels from Russia and China taking part in the three-day exercise that began on Sunday in an area near to Japan and South Korea. Photo / Vanguard Intel Group Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Already a subscriber? Sign in here Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen. Some of the vessels from Russia and China taking part in the three-day exercise that began on Sunday in an area near to Japan and South Korea. Photo / Vanguard Intel Group Russia and China are staging mock combat drills and other war games near Japan and South Korea in a sign of strengthening military ties. Though pre-planned, the joint naval exercises that began on Sunday came a day after President Donald Trump moved United States nuclear submarines closer to Russia in response to inflammatory comments from Russia's former President Dmitry Medvedev. The Joint Sea-2025 drills were launched in waters near Vladivostok, Russia's largest port on the Pacific Ocean, according to a statement from China's Defence Ministry. Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, will be participating in the three-day exercises. This will include 'submarine rescue, joint anti-submarine, air defence and anti-missile operations, and maritime combat', followed by naval patrols in 'relevant waters of the Pacific'.
