CalAssist Mortgage Fund provides $105M in aid for California Disaster Survivors
The fund provides grants of up to $20,000 to cover three months of mortgage payments for eligible homeowners. The state has allocated $105 million for the program.
'California is extending this ongoing support to disaster victims in Los Angeles and beyond, by assisting with mortgage payments to relieve financial pressure and stress as families rebuild and recover,' Governor Gavin Newsom said in a press release.
The grants do not need to be repaid and will be sent directly to mortgage companies, minimizing the steps required for processing and allowing homeowners to focus on recovery.
Major fires, floods, and other government-declared disasters or states of emergency that occurred between January 2023 and January 2025 are qualifying events for the grants, including the Eaton and Palisades fires that burned thousands of homes.
Research by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, which analyzed wildfire losses in California between 2017 and 2021, found that nearly 40% of damaged homes were underinsured by more than $100,000, and more than 1 in 5 had shortfalls exceeding $200,000.
The prevalence of these types of insurance gaps, combined with the emotional and financial toll of losing a home, highlights the importance of programs like the CalAssist Mortgage Fund.
'Homeowners whose home was destroyed in a recent fire, flood or other disaster deserve support in their recovery. We know that recovery takes time, and the state is here to support,' Newsom said in the release.
The California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) is administering the program.
In addition to the mortgage grants, CalHFA is also providing $25 million in housing counseling support through its National Mortgage Settlement (NMS) Housing Counseling program. This program is designed to help homeowners understand their options, complete applications, and navigate the recovery process.
To be eligible for financial assistance through the CalAssist Mortgage Fund, an applicant's primary residence must be a single-family home, condo, or permanently affixed manufactured home. Properties with up to four units are included.
Disaster survivors must also have an active mortgage or reverse mortgage, and the property cannot currently be in foreclosure.
Applications for the CalAssist Mortgage Fund open on June 12, 2025. Homeowners are encouraged to apply as soon as possible before funds are exhausted.
Steps to Apply
For more information on eligibility and the application process, visit CalAssistMortgageFund.org. Disaster survivors who need assistance can also call 1-800-501-0019 between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday.
The LA County Department of Consumer and Business Affairs' foreclosure prevention expert can help homeowners facing difficulty paying their mortgage. You can also discuss other relief options with a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)-certified housing counselor.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California voters support EV tax incentives, but are wary of sales mandates says poll
California drivers don't want to lose their electric vehicle tax incentives, but even voters in one of the bluest states are wary about reviving plans to phase out gas cars. Voters are split down the middle on whether California should stick to its guns on its Trump-blocked plans to phase out sales of gas cars by 2035, according to an exclusive POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll. Only 46 percent of the more than 1,400 registered voters surveyed said they support the policy, while 47 percent said no. Yes, there was an obvious partisan split: 60 percent of Democrats said they backed the phase-out, compared with 40 percent of independents and 31 percent of Republicans. But the results offer a note of caution for Gov. Gavin Newsom, who directed the California Air Resources Board to start writing new vehicle emissions rules after Republicans revoked the state's sales mandates for cars and heavy-duty trucks in June. 'None of us really like the idea of government intervening to take something away from us,' said Dan Sperling, a former California Air Resources Board member and director of the University of California, Davis' Institute for Transportation Studies. 'That's even the most liberal of us.' Poll respondents are more bought into Newsom's plan to backfill the soon-to-be-defunct $7,500 federal EV tax credit. Nearly two-thirds — 64 percent — said they would support state-funded tax incentives once the federal subsidy ends Sept. 30, as part of the Trump administration's ongoing attacks on clean energy policy. That question again showed a partisan divide, with 80 percent of Democrats saying they back the approach, compared with 60 percent of independent voters and just 43 percent of Republicans. But the overall result bolsters Newsom's push to backfill incentives that the Biden administration used to coax drivers off fossil fuels, as he suggested using cap-and-trade revenues last year and directed state agencies to consider in a June executive order. But Jack Citrin, a veteran political science professor at UC Berkeley and partner on the poll, said a closer look at the poll results shows that Democrats need to keep affordability in mind. He pointed to the fact that 28 percent of respondents said they'd support new EV incentives only if gas prices aren't impacted and another 20 percent said they should be reserved for low-income buyers, reflecting the fact that cost of living was the top concern of voters polled. And 64 percent of respondents said gasoline prices are putting a significant, extreme or moderate burden on their household budgets. 'That reflects a concern with the cost of all of this,' Citrin said. 'Yes, we're for environmental protection. Yes, we're for all of this, just as long as it doesn't cost a lot.' The poll comes as state agencies released a joint report Tuesday with recommendations for countering Trump's assault, calling on lawmakers to bolster tax incentives, improve charging infrastructure and regulate facilities that attract polluting trucks, but offering few specific timelines or dollar figures. CARB Chair Liane Randolph framed the report — which Newsom asked for in his June order — as a first step in the state's defense against a hostile federal government. 'Clean air efforts are under siege, putting the health of every American at risk,' she said during a press briefing. 'California is continuing to fight back and will not give up on cleaner air and better public health.' Sperling called the report a surprisingly 'modest document,' and said it lacks the specificity he hoped to see. 'The word I would use is disconcerting,' Sperling said when asked about where California stands in its fight against Trump. The POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll was fielded by TrueDot, the artificial intelligence-accelerated research platform, in collaboration with the Citrin Center and Possibility Lab at UC Berkeley and POLITICO. The public opinion study, made possible in part with support from the California Constitution Center, was conducted in the field between July 28 and Aug. 12. The sample of 1,445 registered voters was selected at random by Verasight, with interviews conducted in English and Spanish, and includes an oversample of Hispanic voters. The modeled error estimate for the full sample is plus or minus 2.6 percent. The policy influencer study was conducted from July 30 to Aug. 11, among 512 subscribers to POLITICO Pro, and the modeled error estimate is plus or minus 3.7 percent. Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO's California Climate newsletter.
Politico
10 minutes ago
- Politico
California voters support EV tax incentives, but are wary of sales mandates says poll
That question again showed a partisan divide, with 80 percent of Democrats saying they back the approach, compared with 60 percent of independent voters and just 43 percent of Republicans. But the overall result bolsters Newsom's push to backfill incentives that the Biden administration used to coax drivers off fossil fuels, as he suggested using cap-and-trade revenues last year and directed state agencies to consider in a June executive order. But Jack Citrin, a veteran political science professor at UC Berkeley and partner on the poll, said a closer look at the poll results shows that Democrats need to keep affordability in mind. He pointed to the fact that 28 percent of respondents said they'd support new EV incentives only if gas prices aren't impacted and another 20 percent said they should be reserved for low-income buyers, reflecting the fact that cost of living was the top concern of voters polled. And 64 percent of respondents said gasoline prices are putting a significant, extreme or moderate burden on their household budgets. 'That reflects a concern with the cost of all of this,' Citrin said. 'Yes, we're for environmental protection. Yes, we're for all of this, just as long as it doesn't cost a lot.' The poll comes as state agencies released a joint report Tuesday with recommendations for countering Trump's assault, calling on lawmakers to bolster tax incentives, improve charging infrastructure and regulate facilities that attract polluting trucks, but offering few specific timelines or dollar figures. CARB Chair Liane Randolph framed the report — which Newsom asked for in his June order — as a first step in the state's defense against a hostile federal government. 'Clean air efforts are under siege, putting the health of every American at risk,' she said during a press briefing. 'California is continuing to fight back and will not give up on cleaner air and better public health.' Sperling called the report a surprisingly 'modest document,' and said it lacks the specificity he hoped to see.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who will run for president in 2028? Betting odds say...
Gamblers are already hedging their bets on who will win the 2028 presidential election. With more than three years to go until the next presidential election, bettors at Polymarket are already making their predictions as to who will win the 2028 election for the White House. According to Polymarket's betting odds on Monday afternoon, Vice President JD Vance has a 28% chance of winning the 2028 election while California Gov. Gavin Newsom trails with a 16% chance. According to Polymarket's betting odds, U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) has a 9% chance of winning the White House, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has a 7% chance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio has a 6% chance. This comes as speculation has swirled over who will take over President Donald Trump's MAGA movement after leaving office and over who will be the next leader of the Democratic Party. Trump suggested earlier this month that Vance is the 'most likely' candidate for the 2028 GOP nomination. According to Polymarket, Vance has a 53% chance of winning the GOP nomination in 2028. Rubio trails with a 10% chance, followed by MAGA loyalist Steve Bannon with a 5% chance. Trump, who is constitutionally barred from running for president again, still received a 4% chance in the betting markets for the GOP nomination. Polymarket's bettors also give Newsom a 20% chance of being the Democratic Party's nominee. Meanwhile, Ocasio-Cortez has a 13% chance and Buttigieg has an 8% chance, according to the betting market as of Monday. The latest betting odds come as Newsom has amped up his criticism of Trump in recent weeks by trolling him on social media platform X. Many pundits speculate that Newsom is gearing up for a presidential run after his time as governor ends in 2027. A recent Emerson College poll asked voters about possible matchups between Vance and potential Democratic contenders in the 2028 presidential election. The poll found Vance had a slight advantage over three possible rivals, including former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and California Gov. Gavin Newsom. The tightest hypothetical race was between Vance and Buttigieg, according to the poll. The vice president received 44% of support while Buttigieg clinched 43%. Another 13% said they were undecided. In hypothetical matchups with Ocasio-Cortez and Newsom, Vance had a 3-point advantage. Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to
