Defence failed to properly investigate bribery allegations against Australian navy contractor officials, audit finds
Defence also determined a senior official involved in finding a supplier to take on a $700m maintenance and upkeep contract – who took a job offer with the winning contractor in the middle of the process – did not give rise to a conflict of interest.
The report from the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO), released on Friday, details a series of failings in defence's decade-long management of the navy ships, worth more than $3.5bn in contracts from 2014 to 2032.
The federal government auditor assessed the management of two navy ships, known as Canberra class amphibious assault ships or landing helicopter docks, since 2014 to determine whether they were value for money, performing as expected and if contract rules were being followed.
The ANAO determined defence's failure to manage contracts effectively led to critical failures, including during humanitarian operations after the 2023 Vanuatu cyclones.
The two ships, HMAS Canberra and HMAS Adelaide, were delivered in 2014 and 2015 by BAE with more than 1,000 'defects and deficiencies' covering their communication, radar, combat management and sewage systems, the report found.
In 2017, a remediation program was established, and in November 2019 the ships were accepted into full service with six 'significant residual deficiencies'.
Total power failures and urgent defects prevented the ships from being deployed to Tonga in 2022 and Vanuatu in 2023 for humanitarian aid for periods of time.
Navy officials remarked during senior-level meetings in 2023 on the 'catastrophic failures' impacting the navy's reputation with 'the community, the government and international partners [US, UK]' as well as 'their confidence in the navy to operate nuclear submarines', the ANAO noted.
There were also shortcomings in how defence managed fraud and corruption allegations, the report found.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The report revealed that in September 2022 two anonymous whistleblowers accused the maintenance contractor, Naval Ship Management (NSM), of bribery and kickbacks for potential subcontractors.
The allegations surrounded the maintenance period before one of the ships was sent to Tonga for relief aid in January 2022. The whistleblowers also made allegations of 'sub-standard' work and that invoices were submitted and paid for before tasks had been completed.
The ANAO said the allegations were referred to the defence's navy shipbuilding group and the integrity division three weeks later, but a formal investigation did not proceed due to a lack of further information.
Defence officials met with NSM to discuss the allegations in October 2022. NSM disclosed that a similar complaint in 2021 had been the subject of an investigation, which had upheld allegations of poor procurement practices and favouritism towards certain subcontractors. NSM's report did not cover the kickback or bribery allegations.
An extract of NSM's 2021 report was provided to defence. A briefing note provided to the chief of navy in April 2023 referred to NSM's response to the 2021 allegations as being of the 'highest order' and a 'thorough, appropriate and sufficiently independent investigation to satisfy a standard that would be acceptable to the Commonwealth'.
Nevertheless the brief concluded the incidents did not constitute a notifiable incident, which the ANAO report said was inconsistent with policy.
The ANAO said defence did not request additional contract risk assessments or management plans after the allegations.
In another example, the ANAO found the integrity of a $700m maintenance contract had been compromised in 2018 as companies tendered submissions to win the job.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
A senior defence official involved in the procurement phase declared a conflict of interest on 24 September 2018 – four days before the tender for market closed – revealing they had 'active negotiations with NSM for a job opportunity they 'were likely to take''. The official had also been approached months earlier by NSM for information related to the contract offer.
Defence determined the job offer was not a conflict of interest, but the official was barred from the process two days after declaring the conflict of interest.
On 28 September the senior official, then still employed by defence, was listed as one of NSM's key personnel if awarded the contract. By November, the official was negotiating on the contract with defence on behalf of NSM.
The ANAO said NSM did not seek written approval for the former official's inclusion against contracting rules, and defence took no action once it became aware of the former official's involvement.
Defence acknowledged the findings and agreed to all nine of the ANAO's recommendations to improve planning efforts, document-keeping and adhering to contracting management rules.
In a statement to Guardian Australia, a defence spokesperson said it took all allegations of fraud and unethical conduct seriously and had a 'zero tolerance policy'.
The spokesperson added shipbuilding and sustainment were 'complex activities' and defence would continue to improve its processes.
'Defence recognises that appropriate management and identification of conflicts of interest in procurements is paramount to achieving the highest levels of probity and ethical procurement standards,' they said.
The spokesperson said the ANAO's report acknowledged there had been some improvements in recent years.
A spokesperson for Babcock, which fully acquired NSM in 2022, said it acknowledged the ANAO's report. It said 'the subsidiary has operated under Babcock's global procurement framework, which reflects a continued commitment to transparency, compliance, and best practices in service of our customers and the national interest'.
A spokesperson for BAE Systems said it had 'delivered on its contractual obligations' and 'addressed all concerns raised by the Commonwealth, with all matters resolved in 2021'.
The office of the defence minister, Richard Marles, was contacted for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
How Ukraine can cope with the US pause on crucial battlefield weapons
The decision by the United States to pause some weapons shipments to Ukraine has come at a tough time for Kyiv: Russia's bigger army is making a concerted push on parts of the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line and is intensifying long-range drone and missile attacks that increasingly hammer civilians in Ukrainian cities. Washington has been Ukraine's biggest military backer since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of its neighbor on Feb. 24, 2022. But the Trump administration has been disengaging from the war, and no end to the fighting is in sight, despite recent direct peace talks. Here's a look at Ukraine's options following the U.S. pause of some arms deliveries: Specific weapons needed from U.S. Amid recurring concerns in Kyiv about how much military support its allies can supply and how quickly, Ukraine has raced to build up its domestic defense industry. The country's output has gradually grown, especially in the production of more and increasingly sophisticated drones, but Ukraine needs to speedily scale up production. Crucially, some high-tech U.S. weapons are irreplaceable. They include Patriot air defense missiles, which are needed to fend off Russia's frequent ballistic missile attacks, but which cost $4 million each. That vital system is included in the pause, and many cities in Ukraine, including Kyiv, could become increasingly vulnerable. A senior Ukrainian official said Thursday that Patriot systems are 'critically necessary' for Ukraine, but U.S.-made HIMARS precision-guided missiles, also paused, are in less urgent need as other countries produce similar assets. 'Other countries that have these (Patriot) systems can only transfer them with U.S. approval. The real question now is how far the United States is willing to go in its reluctance to support Ukraine,' he told The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because of sensitivity of the subject. The official said that Patriot missiles exist in sufficient numbers globally, and he said that accessing them requires political resolve. 'There are enough missiles out there,' he said, without providing evidence. He also stated that Ukraine has already scaled up its domestic production of 155 mm artillery shells, which were once critically short, and is now capable of producing more than is currently contracted. 'Supplies from abroad have also become more available than before,' he said. Backup plan Amid at times fraught relations with U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has been enlisting greater European help for his country's arms manufacturing plans. European countries don't have the production levels, military stockpiles or the technology to pick up all the slack left by the U.S. pause, but Zelenskyy is recruiting their help for ambitious joint investment projects. Draft legislation to help Ukrainian defense manufacturers scale up and modernize production, including building new facilities at home and abroad, will be put to a vote in the Ukrainian parliament later this month, Defense Minister Rustem Umerov announced this week. Zelenskyy said last month that major investments will go to the production of drones and artillery shells. 'The volume of support this year is the largest since the start of the full-scale war,' he said about commitments from foreign countries. Under Trump, there have been no new announcements of U.S. military or weapons aid to Ukraine. Between March and April, the United States allocated no new help at all, according to Germany's Kiel Institute, which tracks such support. For the first time since June 2022, four months after Russia's full-scale invasion, European countries have surpassed the U.S. in total military aid, totaling 72 billion euros ($85 billion) compared with 65 billion euros ($77 billion) from the U.S., the institute said last month. Big battlefield problem Without Patriot missiles, as well as the AIM-7 Sparrow air-to-air missile and shorter-range Stinger missiles that are also included in the pause, Ukrainian cities likely will take a bashing as more Russian missiles pierce air defenses. On the front line, Ukrainian troops haven't recently voiced complaints about ammunition shortages, as they have in the past. They have always said that during the war, they have never had as much ammunition to as their disposal as Russian forces. The army faces a different problem: It's desperately short-handed. It's turning to drones to compensate for its manpower shortage, and analysts say the front isn't about to collapse. Asked about the timing of the U.S. pause, the Ukrainian official emphasized the need for stable, reliable supply lines. 'This is war — and in war, steady deliveries are always crucial,' he said. ___ Barry Hatton reported from Lisbon, Portugal. ___
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
The brave Ukrainians are keeping the West safe from Putin. The US is self-harming
As the world focuses on Iran and admires the overwhelming superiority of US military firepower, the Russian president has comparatively quietly – given that war is a noisy business – expanded his campaign in Ukraine, mounting attacks towards Sumy and Kharkiv, and has made the heaviest yet missile assault on civilian targets. There was a false hope that after the US president apparently secured a ceasefire between Israel and Iran, and a proposed cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hamas, that we would see him turn his mercurial dealmaking urges back towards Ukraine. Sadly it looks as though nothing could be further from the truth, as the US announces a halt to weapons shipments to Ukraine. With around $66bn of military hardware already gifted to Ukraine, the US is by a distance the largest and most significant donor, but no more. Whatever excuses the White House uses, nobody really believes that the most powerful military machine ever seen on Earth is genuinely running out of ammunition. This is a sure sign that President Trump at least is only interested in appeasing the America First movement who put him into power for a second time. He may well feel that he has now done enough as a peacemaker in the Middle East to win his seemingly much desired Nobel Peace Prize, and be reluctant to get involved once more with the seemingly intractable warfare between Ukraine and Putin. Perhaps the doom mongers and Trump haters are correct and the Kremlin really does have some sort of hold or at least influence on the White House. For sure, Trump has scolded Putin as you would a naughty but favourite child, and his close advisors have seemed closer and more friendly to the Russian tyrant than the Ukrainian president, who is trying to save his very nation. There could not be a clearer indication that it is now Europe that must enable Ukraine to get a just peace deal with Russia. This is not unreasonable and the combined military power of European countries significantly overmatches that of Russia. We should act in the knowledge that Putin respects power and exploits weakness. Europe has the financial and industrial muscle to easily out-wrestle the Kremlin and make it clear that they can never take Ukraine. Unfortunately, not only has Trump run for the hills over Ukraine but our own Prime Minister, who recently offered bold rhetoric and seemed ready to don his own combat kit and charge the Russian hordes, is now fighting internal battles as his Party's ultra-left try to take this country back to the dark ages. The legions of Russian propaganda bots are salivating over the news today. Their messaging, coming in torrents, is believed by too many even in this country – just look at the comments section to this piece! But we should not believe them. The tyrant Putin and his rickety petro-state do not have the strength to overcome a united Europe, still one of the economic powerhouses of the world economy. We must be resolute, and clear that we will yield no more. We must replace the ammo that the US wants to keep for its own – for all that giving munitions to Ukraine has proven to be a far more cost effective way of standing Putin off than normal conventional deterrence. Slava Ukraini!
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Deputy head of Russian Navy killed by Ukraine in Kursk area, says Moscow
July 3 (Reuters) - Major General Mikhail Gudkov, deputy head of the Russian Navy and a former commander of a marine brigade fighting against Ukraine, has been killed in action, depriving Moscow of one of its most senior officers, the Russian military said on Thursday. Gudkov, who was handed a top military honour in the Kremlin by Russian President Vladimir Putin in February, was killed on Wednesday "during combat work in one of the border districts of Kursk region," the Defence Ministry said in a statement. Unofficial Russian and Ukrainian military Telegram channels had earlier reported that Gudkov had been killed, along with other servicemen and officers, in a Ukrainian missile attack on a command post in Russia's Kursk region, which borders Ukraine, with a U.S.-made HIMARS missile. Reuters could not independently verify how Gudkov, 42, lost his life. In charge of the navy's coastal and land forces, including marine units, he is one of the most senior Russian military officers to have been killed since Moscow launched its full-scale war against Ukraine in 2022. At least 10 other senior Russian commanders have been killed in action or assassinated by Kyiv since the start of the war. There was no immediate comment from Ukraine, which accused Gudkov and his subordinates of committing various war crimes, something Moscow denied. In the far eastern port city of Vladivostok, the home base of Russia's Pacific Fleet, mourners left flowers near an outdoor portrait of Gudkov, part of a photo exhibition celebrating officers Russia regards as military heroes. Oleg Kozhemyako, governor of the Primorsky region which includes the port, said in a statement that Gudkov, whom Putin appointed deputy commander-in-chief of the navy in March, had been killed "carrying out his duty as an officer" along with others, and expressed his condolences to the dead men's relatives. Attached to his statement was a video showing him awarding Gudkov a military honour and images of Gudkov - set to a patriotic Russian song - on the battlefield. "When he became deputy chief of the navy, he did not stop personally visiting the positions of our marines," Kozhemyako said on Telegram. Before his promotion to the navy's top brass, Gudkov had led a marine brigade of Russia's Pacific Fleet, which had fought in Ukraine and had fought in Kursk too. Parts of Kursk were seized by Ukrainian forces in a surprise offensive in August 2024 before Russia said earlier this year it had driven them out.
