Why the flip is an English council trying to ban swearing?
Age: It never gets old.
Appearance: Anywhere people experience surprise, anger, distress, mild incredulity or a shortage of adjectives, except in Thanet.
Thanet? Where the @&^% is Thanet? It's a peninsula on the north-eastern tip of Kent, including the seaside towns of Margate, Ramsgate and Broadstairs.
Why can't you swear there? Because Thanet district council doesn't want you to.
I see. And how do they plan to @&^%ing stop me? With a public spaces protection order (PSPO).
What's that? In effect, it's an Asbo with a geographic boundary, in this case allowing police to issue fines of £100 to anyone 'using foul or abusive language in such a manner that is loud and can be heard by others and cause either alarm or distress' in a designated area.
I prize my right to free expression highly, but a hundred quid is a lot of money. It's only £60 if you pay within 14 days.
When does this come in? It hasn't yet but, if the council passes the measure, the PSPO could be in place for three years.
Has anyone tried to ban swearing before? Many times over many centuries. The Profane Oaths Act of 1745 introduced fines for the 'horrid, impious and execrable vices of profane cursing and swearing'.
I meant more recently. Thanet district council tried it only last summer.
What happened then? It ditched the idea after the Free Speech Union (FSU) threatened to make it the subject of a judicial review.
And what's happened since? A rise in antisocial behaviour on the seafront has prompted the council to try again.
I thought swearing was supposed to be good for you. It's true that studies have shown swearing can improve your mood, make you more impervious to pain and increase muscle performance during exercise.
And yet Thanet wants to ban it. According to Ch Insp Ian Swallow of the Kent police, this PSPO is specifically designed to target abusive language that is threatening and escalates trouble. 'This is not a reference to casual swearing,' he said.
I should effing hope not. Anyway, it's just the latest in a long line of attempts to curb foul language since PSPOs were first introduced in 2014.
Did any of them work? Hard to say. Salford outlawed swearing in 2016, but dropped the measure in 2019. In that same period, 15 other councils used PSPOs to ban foul language. In some places, they received public support and, in others, people campaigned against it.
Do say: 'One really ought to be articulate enough to cause people distress without swearing.'
Don't say: 'A hundred pounds? Holy $£*!.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Nothing has been done to tackle violence against women – son of murdered artist
The son of an artist who was murdered in a random attack as she walked her dog has said 'nothing has actually been done' to tackle violence against women. Claire Knights, 54, from Upstreet near Canterbury, was walking back from a beach near Minnis Bay in Kent when she was ambushed, sexually assaulted, and beaten to death by a stranger on August 23 2023. Harrison Lawrence Van-Pooss, 21, was jailed for life with a minimum term of 25-and-a-half years in February – but on Friday, judges sitting at the Court of Appeal increased his minimum term to 31 years, having found his original sentence 'unduly lenient'. The court heard Van-Pooss had been dismissed from his job the day before Ms Knights' murder for upskirting a woman at the pub where he worked, and is believed to have camped out overnight on the beach at Minnis Bay waiting for a lone woman to attack, The Times further reported. Ms Knights' son, Elliott Knights-Sloane, now 26, found his mother's body hidden in a dyke two days after she was reported missing. He told The Times: 'No son should have to find their mum in such a situation. 'I felt crushed that her life was taken away in such horrific circumstances. 'She was an incredible mum, a role model for me. She was just coming back from the beach.' Mr Knights-Sloane further told The Times he 'really struggled' with the lack of public outcry surrounding his mother's murder, adding: 'Why aren't people more incensed that someone can be walking their dog and that this can happen to them?' Reflecting on how the issue of violence against women and girls appears to have dropped down the agenda, he said: 'Nothing has actually been done to change anything. 'There's nothing that makes any women safer, or solves anything, other than telling them, 'You shouldn't be out on your own. Don't walk the dog. Look at what you're wearing.'' Also speaking to The Times, criminologist David Wilson warned that 'overkill' – when an assailant uses disproportionate force to control and overpower a victim, potentially resulting in death – is on the rise. 'Now, it's relatively common,' he said. 'What has changed is the mainstreaming of misogyny. 'A lot of young men are influenced by incel culture, the toxic manosphere, the sense of entitlement that women should be available to them, that they should take what is naturally theirs — to overpower and have sex with them.'
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Gregg Wallace: I'm not a groper, sex pest or flasher
Former MasterChef host Gregg Wallace has pledged to clear his name following his sacking from the BBC and said: 'I'm not a groper, a sex pest or a flasher.' The 60-year-old defended himself and described being grouped with sex offenders Jimmy Savile and Huw Edwards as 'horrific'. In his first interview with The Sun at his home in Kent, he said his aim in speaking out was not 'to play the victim'. Wallace lost his job following complaints from a number of women over the years. 'There's so much that I want to say, and so much that I want to put right, if I can,' he said. 'I'm not saying I'm not guilty of stuff, but so much has been perceived incorrectly. Things that really hurt me and hurt my family.' The former TV star, who did not take a fee for the interview, added: 'I'm not a groper. 'People think I've been taking my trousers down and exposing myself – I am not a flasher. 'People think I'm a sex pest. 'I am not. 'I am not sexist or a misogynist, or any of it. 'There never were any accusations of sexual harassment. 'I have seen myself written about in the same sentence as Jimmy Savile and Huw Edwards, paedophiles and sex offenders. 'That is just so, so horrific.' 'I don't expect any sympathy' Wallace, who is married to wife Anna and has a six-year-old son, Sid, said he was still learning about himself and had done so over the past eight months as he was diagnosed with autism back in January. 'I know I have said things that offended people, that weren't socially acceptable and perhaps they felt too intimidated or nervous to say anything at the time,' he said. 'I understand that now – and to anyone I have hurt, I am so sorry. 'I don't expect anyone to have any sympathy with me but I don't think I am a wrong 'un.' A total of 45 of 83 complaints have been upheld in the wake of a report into Wallace's behaviour by law firm Lewis Silkin. The complaints were made by 41 people and during the course of his career he worked with 4,000 people, who were cast, crew and production; 0.5 per cent of people had criticised him. But he admitted the figure was too high. He also lent his support to former MasterChef co-host John Torode and said: 'He's not a racist.'
The Sun
2 days ago
- The Sun
Yobs to be fined £100 after council crackdown on swearing in public
YOBS swearing in public can be fined £100 after a council introduced a law to stop 'foul language'. They are also banned from 'excreting bodily fluid', boozing in public and taking legal highs. 1 Thanet council in Kent said the rules apply to all public spaces in Margate, Ramsgate, Birchington-on-Sea and Broadstairs. A bid to bring in the restrictions last summer was halted after the Free Speech Union threatened to take legal action. On Thursday councillors approved the public space protection order. A council spokesman said: 'There was strong support, with a majority of respondents indicating agreement.' Cllr Heather Keen said: 'We've listened and these measures are designed to reassure residents and set clear expectations around acceptable public behaviour in Thanet. "It crucially provides us with the tools to intervene earlier which we hope will successfully prevent situations from escalating. "The overwhelming support from local people, businesses and the police during the consultation process is evidence that these measures are welcomed. "Every year our residents tell us feeling safe is a top priority. "I'm proud to say that we've listened and hope this serves as a reminder that antisocial behaviour will not be tolerated in Thanet."
