The Public internet is a bottleneck for blockchain — DoubleZero CEO
Public internet infrastructure is the critical speed and performance constraint on high-throughput blockchain networks, according to Austin Federa, co-founder and CEO of DoubleZero, a project developing high-speed fiber optic communication rails for blockchains.
'The downside of the public internet is it was never built for high-performance systems. It was always built for this sort of relationship of one big server talking to one little server,' Federa told Cointelegraph in an interview at Consensus 2025. The executive explained:
'We have validators all around the world. Rotating leader schedules all the time. And then they switch from having to be massive consumers of data to extremely massive broadcasters of data. So that means that they need huge amounts of resources both on ingress and egress.'
The executive added that the constraint posed by public internet infrastructure is now the limiting factor in blockchain performance and not compute power or software development.
Networks like DoubleZero will make blockchains faster, decrease spreads in decentralized finance (DeFi) trades, lower transaction fees, and open up new use cases for blockchain networks that were previously unavailable due to communication infrastructure constraints. DoubleZero co-founded by Austin Federa in 2024
Austin Federa left the Solana Foundation to establish the DoubleZero Protocol in December 2024. The goal of the project is to reduce latency, the time it takes for data to travel in a network, and bandwidth — the maximum data traffic a network can handle at once.
In April 2025, DoubleZero conducted a validator token sale to sell token purchase agreements to interested node operators seeking to become validators for the network.
The token sale was only available to accredited investors and already active validators on high-throughput blockchain networks including, Solana, Celestia, Sui, Aptos, and Avalanche.
DoubleZero's team is aiming to launch its public mainnet in the second half of 2025, following a successful $28 million capital raise.
Federa told Cointelegraph that the increasingly high throughput of blockchain networks and the overall development of the industry has necessitated the building of dedicated, high-performance communication infrastructure to meet demand from increasingly sophisticated projects.
Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/public-internet-bottleneck-blockchain-networks-double-zero
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Crypto Insight
7 hours ago
- Crypto Insight
SEC's 2025 guidance: What tokens are (and aren't) securities
The US Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Corporation Finance (CorpFin) released a comprehensive statement on April 10, 2025, outlining what companies need to disclose when offering or registering crypto asset securities. This statement (the SEC's 2025 guidance) aims to reduce ambiguity regarding classifications of crypto tokens under US securities laws. It updates how the Howey test is used and introduces a clearer system to tell the difference between security tokens and non-security tokens. The Howey test is a decades-old framework used to determine whether a crypto asset qualifies as a security. Four criteria that the test applies are investment of money, an expectation of profit, a common enterprise and reliance on the efforts of others. A major highlight of the SEC 2025 guidance is the 'reasonable expectation of profit' criterion. The SEC emphasizes that if token buyers expect profits based primarily on the efforts of a centralized team or promoter, the token is likely a security. The SEC noted, 'Where entrepreneurial efforts drive price appreciation, tokenholders effectively invest in a common enterprise.' The guidance also introduces a three-pronged framework: Initial sale context: Whether the token was marketed as an investment Whether the token was marketed as an investment Ongoing use: If the token provides functional utility on a decentralized network If the token provides functional utility on a decentralized network Issuer influence: Degree of control retained by the founding team or foundation. Tokens with no expectation of profit, like Ether after the Merge, or stablecoins backed by real, transparent reserves, usually don't count as securities. But tokens tied to governance rights or revenue sharing could still be classified as securities, depending on how they work. Did you know? The Howey test was first used in 1946. Despite being older than the internet, it still shapes whether digital assets qualify as securities today. The SEC's 2025 rules say crypto tokens are likely securities if they act like investment contracts. This means tokens sold with promises of profits, driven by a central team's efforts, will be categorized as securities. The SEC's 2025 guidance outlines specific scenarios in which crypto tokens will likely be classified as securities. These typically involve projects that are still centrally controlled, promote profit expectations, or offer limited utility at the time of sale. Below are the common characteristics that may trigger securities classification: ICOs with profit-centric marketing: Tokens launched through initial coin offerings (ICOs) are a major target, especially when the project team markets them based on future price appreciation or project success. Tokens launched through initial coin offerings (ICOs) are a major target, especially when the project team markets them based on future price appreciation or project success. Profit-sharing governance tokens: Governance tokens that offer dividends, revenue sharing or protocol profits can be classified as securities due to their resemblance to traditional investment contracts. Governance tokens that offer dividends, revenue sharing or protocol profits can be classified as securities due to their resemblance to traditional investment contracts. Utility tokens with financial incentives: Even so-called utility tokens may qualify as securities if buyers are led to believe the tokens will increase in value or offer financial benefits. Even so-called utility tokens may qualify as securities if buyers are led to believe the tokens will increase in value or offer financial benefits. Legal precedents from court rulings: In the LBRY case (2023), the token was ruled an unregistered security. Similarly, the Ripple case determined XRP's institutional sales were securities, while public sales were not. Tokens with centralized control or pre-mining: The SEC warns that tokens that are pre-mined, centrally managed or promoted with value-growth promises lack decentralization and are likely to fall under securities regulation. In 2025, the SEC stressed that tokens controlled by a core team, pre-mined or limited in supply with promises of value growth will likely be securities. These tokens often aren't decentralized enough or lack user utility at the time of sale, reinforcing their classification under federal securities laws. The SEC's 2025 rules say crypto tokens aren't likely securities if they are used like tools or goods, not for making money. These tokens let you use a platform's services, like in-game items, digital access or nontransferable membership credits, and aren't pitched as investments. While the SEC's 2025 guidance focuses on investor protection, it also recognizes that not all tokens meet the criteria of securities. Tokens that are decentralized, utility-driven or serve non-investment purposes may fall outside the scope of securities laws. Below are key characteristics that reduce the likelihood of a token being classified as a security: Fiat-backed stablecoins with transparent reserves: Stablecoins that are 1:1 backed by fiat currency, regularly audited and designed for payments rather than investments are generally not viewed as securities by the SEC. Stablecoins that are 1:1 backed by fiat currency, regularly audited and designed for payments rather than investments are generally not viewed as securities by the SEC. Layer-1 utility tokens for network operations: Tokens like Ether, Solana and Avalanche are used to pay gas fees and validate transactions, not for profit-seeking. Their decentralized validator networks and functional utility lower the chances of being labeled securities. Tokens like Ether, Solana and Avalanche are used to pay gas fees and validate transactions, not for profit-seeking. Their decentralized validator networks and functional utility lower the chances of being labeled securities. Lack of profit marketing and central control: Tokens that aren't marketed with profit promises or don't rely on a central team for value growth are less likely to be securities. Their value is derived from network use, not speculation. Tokens that aren't marketed with profit promises or don't rely on a central team for value growth are less likely to be securities. Their value is derived from network use, not speculation. Decentralized and open-source governance: Projects that are community-driven, open-source and have distributed control over rewards or updates support non-security classification. These traits show the token functions as a digital tool, not an investment contract. Did you know? Under the 2025 guidance, tokens with genuine utility on decentralized networks may escape securities classification. It is a major shift from earlier years of the 'if it moves, it is a security' rule. The SEC's 2025 guidance for the crypto industry marks a pivotal moment, offering much-needed clarity on which tokens are classified as securities. It will reshape how projects launch, how tokens are traded and how platforms manage regulatory risk. For token issuers: Follow rules, register or change your approach The SEC's 2025 rules push token issuers to check whether their tokens count as securities. If tokens are promoted for profits or controlled centrally, issuers may need to register with the SEC or redesign tokens to focus on use and decentralization. Not following rules could lead to penalties, lawsuits or removal from platforms. New projects should plan for legal reviews from the start. For investors: Fewer tokens, but safer markets Investors might find fewer tokens available, especially if they are seen as unregistered securities. Tokens in legal trouble or those flagged by the SEC could be removed or restricted on exchanges. While this might limit quick-profit chances, it could make markets safer by cutting down on scams or risky projects. For exchanges: Stricter rules and more warnings Crypto exchanges, both centralized and decentralized, will likely set stricter standards for listing tokens, requiring more legal checks and more explicit risk warnings. US platforms may avoid tokens labeled as securities to steer clear of trouble. Exchanges might also need to register as securities brokers or alternative trading systems, raising costs and responsibilities. Did you know? The phrase 'reasonable expectation of profit' is the central point in the SEC's 2025 rules. If you expect a token's value to rise in the future and profit from it, it is a security. The SEC's 2025 rules still provide some confusion, especially for tokens that seem like both tools and investments. For example, governance tokens don't directly pay profits but affect decisions that boost protocol income. If tokenholders gain from rising prices due to treasury earnings, fees or staking rewards, they might be considered securities. Decentralized finance (DeFi) and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) make things trickier. Many DAOs act like decentralized companies, handling funds, giving out rewards or teaming up with businesses. This raises questions like when does a community-run project act like a centralized company, or does voting protect it from securities laws? To deal with this, legal opinions and SEC no-action letters are the key. A strong legal memo can support a project's claim that its token falls outside securities law, though it does not guarantee immunity. Meanwhile, SEC no-action letters, in which the agency agrees not to pursue enforcement, offer clarity but are rare and context-specific. The 2025 rules clarify, but classifying tokens depends on each case, needing careful steps through changing legal, tech and financial worlds. Legal and compliance experts appreciate the more explicit token classification rules, which help projects evaluate risks. However, many note that the guidelines still allow subjective interpretations, particularly regarding decentralization and governance tokens. Industry groups and developers worry the rules may hinder crypto innovation in the US. They argue that focusing on 'profit expectations' and issuer control might wrongly label decentralized projects as securities, even without active promoters. For example, Coinbase legal officer Paul Grewal stated in a letter to the SEC's Crypto Task Force on March 19, 2025, that some crypto activities, like token airdrops and selling tokens with clear uses, shouldn't be treated as securities transactions. He contended these activities don't involve raising money or promising profits based on a company's ongoing work, so traditional securities laws may not apply to these decentralized actions. At the 'SEC Speaks' event in May 2025, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce expressed concern about the commission's tendency to rely on enforcement actions rather than clear rulemaking. The SEC Speaks conference is an annual event where the SEC provides updates on its current initiatives and priorities. Peirce noted that this approach creates legal uncertainty and practical difficulties, complicating compliance for cryptocurrency firms and potentially hindering innovation. Supporters of the SEC's approach believe the guidance promotes investor protection and regulatory consistency, especially after years of confusion. Critics, however, see it as regulation by enforcement, claiming it burdens startups and creates legal uncertainty. For instance, legal analyst Jake Chervinsky noted that the SEC had indeed issued helpful guidance on crypto. Anderson PC, a boutique law firm, on the other hand, termed the SEC crypto guidance a flop, arguing that it wasn't clear who the rule applied to. The SEC's 2025 cryptocurrency guidelines differ significantly from the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation in their scope, structure and approach. The SEC's rules focus on applying the Howey test to determine what tokens are securities. Decisions about what tokens are and aren't securities are made on a case-by-case basis. On the other hand, MiCA provides a detailed legal framework that divides crypto assets into clear categories such as utility tokens, asset-referenced tokens and e-money tokens. It sets specific licensing and operational rules for each category, ensuring clarity for issuers and service providers. Unlike the SEC, MiCA does not broadly assume all tokens are securities and focuses on consumer protection, market integrity and stablecoin regulation. Overall, while the SEC's approach is more enforcement-driven and investor-risk focused, MiCA is rule-based, offering a clearer compliance path for the European market. Source:
Crypto Insight
a day ago
- Crypto Insight
South Korea crypto industry to win no matter snap election outcome
South Korea's crypto scene will gain either way in the country's presidential elections, as both candidates have run on pro-crypto platforms, pledged to ease regulations and expand crypto access. South Koreans will head to the polls on June 3 to elect a new president in a snap election to replace Yoon Suk-yeol, who was impeached and removed from office over his attempt to declare martial law in December. Currently leading the polls is Lee Jae-myung of the center-left Democratic Party, who is up against staunch conservative and People Power Party nominee Kim Moon-soo. Lee has proposed legalizing spot crypto exchange-traded funds and wants to allow South Korea's $884 billion national pension fund to invest in cryptocurrency. He has also advocated for wider issuance of a stablecoin backed by the South Korean won as part of modernizing the country's financial system and stemming capital outflows. 'We need to establish a won-backed stablecoin market to prevent national wealth from leaking overseas,' he said during a policy discussion in May. 'I will create a safe investment environment so that young people can build assets and plan for the future.' Lee also aims to ease strict banking rules that require crypto exchanges to partner with licensed banks to offer fiat services. Kim also supports legalizing spot crypto ETFs and backed Lee's proposal, showing rare bipartisan alignment. He has also pledged to ease regulations and expand crypto adoption. Simon Seojoon Kim, the CEO of Seoul-based venture capital firm Hashed Ventures, told Bloomberg that with all the major candidates supporting pro-crypto policies, 'the country's crypto investors face a clear win regardless of the election outcome.' A Gallup Korea poll on May 28 showed 49% of respondents favoured Lee, while 36% said they would vote for Kim. Urgency for clear regulations The urgency for clear regulation stems from South Korea's high retail crypto participation. Stricter regulations were implemented in July 2024 to impose strict requirements on exchanges, including potential life sentences for criminal violations. On May 20, the country's Financial Services Commission finalized sweeping new measures, introducing new guidelines for nonprofit crypto sales and stricter listing standards for exchanges. South Korea's Democratic Party also launched a Digital Asset Committee focused on developing cryptocurrency policies and promoting industry growth in May. South Korea has one of the world's most active crypto markets, and daily trading volumes on crypto exchanges sometimes exceed the country's major stock indexes, with user numbers recently surpassing 16 million. Source:
Crypto Insight
2 days ago
- Crypto Insight
Traders shift to short-term tactics in response to tariffs — Web3 CEO
Traders are increasingly pivoting to quick, short-term profit-taking strategies, in response to US President Donald Trump's trade tariffs, rather than letting their positions run, according to Arrash Yasavolian, CEO and founder of the Bittensor-based Taoshi AI-enhanced trading platform. In an interview with Cointelegraph, the CEO said the tariffs have created headline-driven volatility across financial markets that can shift sentiment, often oscillating between extremes in a single day. This has made markets far more difficult to trade. Yasavolian added: 'Trading behavior has essentially changed to be more intraday — when you have your profit, you just take it when you can get it. So, behavior is essentially cutting confidence on further upside or downside if you are taking a position on longing or shorting.' 'That is the kind of behavior we have witnessed and we have shifted to this strategy internally as well,' the CEO told Cointelegraph. Although the initial volatility has subsided and markets have somewhat recovered from the initial Trump tariff shock, a cloud of uncertainty still hangs over all risk-on markets as traders and investors grapple with the shifting macroeconomic landscape. Trade tariffs shake investor confidence and maximize economic uncertainty Crypto investors are watching negotiations between the US and China for any sign of a lasting trade deal, which analysts predict will cause a sustained price rally in altcoins and Bitcoin. On May 25, President Trump announced a delay in tariffs on European Union (EU) goods, extending the tariff deadline to July 9. Crypto markets reacted positively to the news, with the price of BTC climbing by over 3% in an intraday move. 'The EU and US share the world's most consequential and close trade relationship. Europe is ready to advance talks swiftly and decisively,' president of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen wrote in a May 25 X post. Despite the political reassurances of productive trade talks and a potential resolution to the tensions, some analysts say that any progress in negotiations, tariff exemptions, or softening of the rhetoric is illusory, with much of it presented for political optics. Source:
