Gareth Sheridan accuses people in Sean Gallagher ‘circle' of coordinated attack
Mr Sheridan made the claims about his former business partner at his campaign launch in Dublin city centre.
Advertisement
Mr Gallagher left Mr Sheridan's multimillion-euro pharmaceutical company, Nutriband, after serving as chairman from 2017 until 2021.
Presidential candidate Gareth Sheridan at the official launch of his campaign at The Shelbourne hotel in Dublin (Cate McCurry/PA)
Mr Gallagher previously contested the presidential election in 2011 and again in 2018.
Launching his campaign at the five-star Shelbourne hotel, Mr Sheridan said he had something he wanted to bring to the attention of the press.
'There seems to be somewhat of a coordinated attack taking place on my character by people associated, and in Sean Gallagher's circle,' he told reporters.
Advertisement
'I'm not saying for a moment that Sean is behind this or is involved in any way.
'You know, at MacGill (Summer School) a couple of weeks ago, he actually encouraged participation, asked the media to be nice to candidates that were brave to come forward and encouraged candidates to put their name in the ring.
'Hopefully that's still the case. But some of you in the room know what I'm talking about. That's all I'll say on that.
'For a couple of days now, we've been receiving essentially copy and paste question lists with minimal time to respond from various different outlets with the exact same questions. Something just seems a little off.'
Advertisement
He added: 'Let me just give you, hopefully for the last time, a little bit of context on the relationship between myself and Sean.
'Sean was chairman of my company, Nutriband, which I founded for a number of years around 2017/2018 through to the point that we were able to achieve our Nasdaq listing in 2021.
'Leading up to a Nasdaq listing, it was strongly advised by our shareholders, investors and board that we had a chairman with capital markets experience. We proposed this to Sean. We asked him to voluntarily step aside on the same remuneration, and we will put Serguei Melnik as chairman, who had 20-plus years of capital market experience.
'At this point, communication broke down. At the next shareholder meeting, Serguei was voted in by the majority of our shareholders, and he has been in the position of chairman.
Advertisement
'I wish Sean nothing but the best in whatever he's working on now.
'Perhaps somebody is taking our break-up a little bit worse than me.'
The 35-year-old was also critical of the state's failure to resolve the housing crisis, saying it is driving young people out of the country.
Mr Sheridan, who has lived in the US for more than 10 years, said his goal is to 'make Ireland home again' for those who have emigrated.
Advertisement
Describing himself as a 'multi-millionaire pharma tycoon', he claimed there has been a 'complete ignorance' of Article 45.2 of Ireland's Constitution, which refers to Irish citizens having an adequate means of livelihood.
The married father of one said he held the event in the Constitution Room of the luxury hotel as it is where the 1922 constitution was drafted.
Mr Sheridan said that while he is not a single issue candidate, he believes housing is an 'anchor' for every issue the country is facing.
'We have healthcare problems in the country because we can't afford to keep our nurses and doctors here because they can't afford to live close to the hospitals and clinics they serve,' he added.
'We have education problems because teachers can't afford to live close to the schools and communities they're supposed to serve.
'We used to value ourselves on being the land of 100,000 welcomes. We are now, statistically, on a yearly basis, the land of 100,000 departures.'
Mr Sheridan added: 'Now as president, I'm not going to grab my hammer and start building houses, but I will champion the issue over the course of my campaign.
'My ideal goal here is that we can claim to make Ireland home again. And this is something that is very important to me.'
Mr Sheridan, who has a net worth of 16.5 million dollars (€14.1 million), which includes 16 million dollars in Nutriband shares and 500,000 in cash, said he understands the value of a euro.
He said he went through a 'very gritty entrepreneurial journey', which was not a 'fairy tale'.
'I've made the phone calls home asking for help with rent,' Mr Sheridan added.
'I understand the value of the euro. I'll never take that for granted, because I didn't have it at one point.
'I think we have to be careful that we don't get into a position as well, that if an entrepreneur that's aspiring in this country makes a success out of an idea that they have, that all of a sudden it's a negative, right?
'The company worked out well, and the company is going to be extremely impactful for thousands of lives a year when that FDA (US Food and Drug Administration) approval comes. I'm very proud of that. By no means I will be handed that success.'
Mr Sheridan said he is confident he has a 'path to a nomination', and said the support has been 'overwhelming'.
The Dublin native said he has the support in Tipperary and Laois county councils but would not disclose which other councils have indicated their support.
Mr Sheridan, who owns a house in Utah and rents a property in Dublin, said that former Irish president Mary Robinson was a 'big reason' why he decided to put his name forward to run in the upcoming election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Claire's collapses into administration putting 2,150 jobs at risk
Claire's falls into administration with 2,150 jobs at risk , Claire's had appointed administrators after struggles with online competition. Author, Tom Espiner & Faarea Masud Role, Business reporters, BBC News 13 August 2025 Fashion accessories chain Claire's has collapsed into administration in the UK and Ireland, putting 2,150 jobs at risk. The company has 278 shops in the UK and 28 in Ireland but has been struggling with falling sales and fierce competition. Claire's said all outlets will continue trading while it considers "the best possible path forward". Its administrators from Interpath said they will "assess options for the company", which could include selling the business to "secure a future for this well-loved brand". Claire's chief executive Chris Cramer said the "difficult" decision to appoint administrators allows its stores to remain open. Claire's had been particularly popular for its ear piercing services and was a common stop in the early 2000s for tweens and teens during weekend shopping trips in malls across the world. Its stores were known for their colourful selection of hair bands, earrings, jewellery, and occasionally for toys like slime and fluffy toys. The company will no longer be issuing refunds, nor accepting online orders. It will also not be delivering orders which have not yet shipped, but says customers are only charged on dispatch of items, so customers with outstanding online orders should not be out of pocket. Claire's said that, in cases where it cannot issue refunds, customers should check with their card issuer for other avenues for refunds. 'Part of my childhood' Caitlin, 21 (left) and Amy, 16 (right) from Oxfordshire were shopping at Claire's in central London on Wednesday and said the news was "quite sad because people have been going there since they were little." "It's a part of my childhood personally, said Caitlin, said she used to go a lot when she was around 11 years old. "It's aimed towards younger people and I don't know that there's something else on the market that does that. It's like a rainbow of things in there and I don't think a kid's going to be doing online shopping." They both came out of the shop not having bought anything as Amy had second thoughts about getting a piercing. 'Increased competition' The move in the UK comes after it filed for bankruptcy in the US earlier this month, where the firm said it was suffering from people moving away from bricks-and-mortar shops. The firm has $690m (£508m) of debt. The company operates under two brand names, Claire's and Icing, and is owned by a group of firms, including investment giant Elliott Management. Similar to its UK administration process, the firm said all of its US shops will remain open until an alternative future is found. Claire's is the latest casualty in several shop-heavy firms who have suffered from the decline of the High Street as people move more towards shopping online. In its US filing, Mr Cramer blamed "increased competition, consumer spending trends and the ongoing shift away from brick-and-mortar retail" for the declaration of bankruptcy, as well as "debt obligations" and wider economic turmoil. He said on Wednesday that it was a "challenging period" and that "in the UK, taking this step will allow us to continue to trade the business while we explore the best possible path forward". Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown, said the popularity of the Claire's brand had "waned". While stores were once great for brand recognition, she said younger people now pay more attention to brands making their mark online. "The chain is now faced with stiff competition from Tiktok and Insta shops, and by cheap accessories sold by fast fashion giants like Shein and Temu," she said. Other analysts said many accessory shop chain like Claire's have been hit by US President Donald Trump's tariffs imposed on China and its neighbours. "A lot of that category is sourced from Asia, and any increase in import costs hits hard when your price points are low and margins are tight," retail analyst Catherine Shuttleworth said at the time of Claire's US bankruptcy filing. Get in touch Do you work for Claire's? Have you been impacted by the issues raised in this story? Contact form
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Golden walls — the fanciest finish for your palazzo (or semi)
As building materials go, there's none quite so luxurious as marble — conjuring visions of Greco-Roman temples and the stately grandeur of the Taj Mahal. However, there's another technique that exploits the sheen and durability of marble — without the colossal weight. Marmorino Venetian plaster is an ancient technique that combines slaked lime and marble dust (the marmorino of the name) for a polished, breathable, timeless finish. Perucchetti Studio introduced this type of plaster to the UK in 1970 and since then the company's work has featured everywhere from Chelsea dining institution Daphne's and the Pall Mall home of Berry Bros & Rudd wine merchants to London City Airport and the Royal Academy, as well as residential projects in homes, castles and palaces from Perth in Australia to Mumbai including Ardross Castle in Inverness-shire, Mayfair House and many properties whose owners closely guard their anonymity. In use since the Greco-Roman and Byzantine periods, the technique that came to be called marmorino found new life in Renaissance Venice, through Venice's trade with the East. It is applied to a surface — except some metals and glass — in thin, multiple layers using a steel trowel or spatula. Each layer is smoothed and burnished, creating a polished, marble-like finish with subtle depth and texture. Despite its Venetian roots, Perucchetti's headquarters are in London. 'In general, the Venetian plaster we apply, using the ancient recipes obtained from the archives in Venice, has not been bettered by modern day ready mixed plasters,' Natascha Boldero, the creative director of Perucchetti tells us. With a background in the study of Byzantine art, Boldero was one of Perucchetti's first clients in the 1970s — and went on to buy the company some years later from the artist Mauro Perucchetti, who founded the company. 'Modern plasters simply do not have the depth and quality of a bespoke mix of plaster. We maintain a traditional application using our very fine materials creating very many different textures.' Although the materials have changed a little over the centuries — with the introduction of modern pigments, for example, Perucchetti maintains the traditional, painstaking method of applying its finishes to surfaces. 'We have been much copied by others,' explains Boldero, 'but they fail to have the intricate knowledge we have in these historical finishes.' To achieve this the company has 18 plasterers who have all been trained in-house by both Boldero and Perucchetti's master plasterers. The Renaissance Venetians introduced pigments to marmorino, including the ludicrously expensive, highly valued lapis lazuli, used by painters from Mantegna to Caravaggio. Before this, marmorino was principally made of crushed Istrian stone mixed with lime putty producing a velvety white finish or a natural terracotta hue. 'The master plasterers in Venice experimented with these raw materials and developed the mixes we use today over centuries. They cured their own lime for many years. As the lime ages, linseed oil is mixed and stirred creating the richest texture of very fine Grassello di Calce,' Boldero explains. • Read more luxury reviews, advice and insights from our experts Perucchetti continues the tradition by producing finishes in everything from jet black to gold and shimmering white. 'Our colour range is infinite, and we can add carbon of diamond, mother of pearl or real liquid gold, to name a few precious materials, to create a unique finishes that are sublime,' Boldero explains. Colours can be either opaque or translucent, depending on the amount of pigment included and the number of layers used. 'Each finish is unique to the client's requirements or our imagination.' All of Perucchetti's work is bespoke, so prices and time scales vary according to the finish used and the size of the job. Classic marmorino starts at £180, with Grassello di Calce starting at £200. Another benefit of Marmorino Venetian plaster as decorating material is that, in the hands of a skilled artisan, it can mimic any number of other textures for both interiors and exteriors — stone, wood, leather, textiles — while remaining lightweight. 'Hence its extensive use on the palaces of Venice where weight is an issue, as most buildings are built on wooden piles,' says Boldero. These days, however, rather than palazzi, the finish is more likely to be found lightening the load of private planes and yachts — though, again, clients guard their anonymity. 'We can achieve about 30 different finishes using our own mixes depending on the textures that are required,' Boldero explains. 'But within those finishes we can create very different looks by adding minerals and metallics etc within the plaster.' Inspiration for new finishes can strike in unusual places. Boldero was even inspired by the eruption of the Eyjafjallajokull volcano in Iceland. 'After going to Iceland and having the opportunity to fly over the volcano I created our Lava Flow collection of volcanic plaster finishes,' she tells us. 'This involved adding some precious minerals such as real liquid gold which created the most extraordinary organic textures with an underlying reflection from the gold.' Applied correctly, Marmorino Venetian plaster is extremely durable and can last for centuries — although it's best if it doesn't sit in water. 'Think of the external finishes on all the buildings in Venice,' notes Boldero, 'they are marmorino, though some look weathered they have withstood centuries of all weathers, including being flooded.' Venetian plaster may be an ancient technique, but it's moving in new directions. Where once the finish was prized for its reflective sheen in the soft glow of candlelight, matt finishes are the new frontier that designers are working with — all achieved by the expert flick of a trowel.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The handshake that shook the world: Why Putin left grinning and Trump insisted he'd stood firm after three-hour meeting to change history
In the end, the 'Don and Vlad' show ended without a big finale. After nearly three hours behind closed doors in Alaska, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin emerged like heavyweight prize fighters who had fought each other to a standstill. They proceeded to talk briefly to the millions watching with bated breath on TV but revealed no specifics of what they had discussed. The only conclusion for those in Kyiv, and in European capitals, was that the encounter had ended in stalemate, and there would be no immediate ceasefire in the Ukraine war. Putin spoke first, and seemed the happier, jauntily inviting Trump to Moscow for another meeting. He and Trump had reached an 'understanding,' Putin said, as he ominously warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' Trump called the summit 'very productive' but said there were a 'couple of quite big' issues not agreed. He later seemed more optimistic and rated it '10/10.' For Trump, it was undoubtedly a historic achievement to get Putin to the negotiating table at all, and a starting point for what may be a long road to peace, and a Nobel Prize. But for Kremlin watchers it looked like Putin had achieved his two main goals - a return to the world stage, and buying more time to make military gains in Ukraine. By agreeing to the meeting Putin avoided further impending U.S. sanctions, and by then not agreeing to a ceasefire he kicked the diplomatic can down the road. Putin's troops are currently advancing in Ukraine, so it was always going to be to his advantage to delay Trump's demands for a ceasefire, and seek a better deal later. Indeed, on the eve of the summit Putin bombed Ukraine yet again with a ballistic missile, and his troops advanced six miles towards the eastern town of Dobropillia. The starting points for the summit had never been entirely promising. Putin wanted Ukrainian territory but the extent of his demands had been shrouded in uncertainty, due in part to apparent previous misunderstandings with Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff. Trump was prepared for 'land swaps' but had agreed not to make any commitments without the approval of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not invited. Zelensky wanted a ceasefire before any discussion on territory. Meanwhile, European leaders wanted post-war security guarantees for Ukraine. And Putin wanted Ukraine membership of NATO ruled out, which was a diplomatic non-starter. However, for Ukraine, and its European allies, there was some relief that no harm was done in Alaska. They had feared a repetition of Yalta, the 1945 conference where Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin decided the fate of European counties without them being represented at the negotiating table. Russia occupies about one fifth of Ukraine, including large parts of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, areas rich in coal and gas, and other minerals like lithium. With Zelensky not in Alaska, he and European allies were concerned about a 'Yalta 2,' with Trump handing over parts of Ukraine's territory to Putin. Trump's detractors had also cast him the role of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain at Munich in 1938. Last month, he lamented: 'We get a lot of bulls*** thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.'" Chamberlain gave the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia to Hitler and then infamously claimed that he had achieved 'peace for our time.' The following year, the world was at war. Trump showed in Alaska that he is no Chamberlain. Instead, he is a man with a strong dislike for people trying to pull the wool over his eyes. Last month, he lamented: 'We get a lot of bulls*** thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' There was also no repeat of the 2018 meeting in Helsinki when Trump was widely criticized for siding with Putin over his own intelligence agencies, denying that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election. In Alaska, there was also no repeat of the 2018 meeting in Helsinki when Trump was widely criticized for siding with Putin over his own intelligence agencies, denying that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election. Unlike Helsinki, Trump took the decision not to meet Putin alone this time. Instead, he brought into the room a diplomatic 'good cop' and 'bad cop'. The 'good cop' was Witkoff, who has built up a rapport with Putin over several long meetings. The 'bad cop' was Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has in the past savaged Putin as a 'thug and gangster.' In one sense, just being in Alaska was a victory for Putin, a man responsible for launching the largest land war in Europe since 1945. He is, officially, an internationally wanted war crimes suspect after a warrant for his arrest was issued by the International Criminal Court in March 2023. The summit allowed him to become the first Russian leader to set foot in Alaska since Tsar Alexander II sold it to the U.S. in 1867. Trump effectively brought him in from his three-and-a-half year exile as a global pariah. Despite the challenges the summit had begun in a hopeful atmosphere. On the tarmac at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Trump's Air Force One sat next to Putin's so-called 'Flying Kremlin,' an Ilyushin Il-96-300PU aircraft. Trump disembarked first and played the perfect host, standing at the end of an ultra-long red carpet as Putin descended the steps and walked briskly toward him. The American leader applauded Putin on his walk and then deployed what body language experts call a 'clasp and yank' handshake - gripping Putin's hand and pulling the Russian toward him. Putin resisted the power play and stood his ground as they locked hands for 20 seconds, with Putin telling Trump he had come to 'help.' As they walked up another stretch of red carpet, past two parked U.S. jets, there were pats on the back and a few pleasantries. Putin paused and gazed up as there was a flyby of a B2 bomber and four F-35 fighter jets. He looked impressed. The two men then stood on a stage over the words 'Alaska 2025.' Trump's carefully choreographed welcome was upended when an American reporter yelled at Putin: 'Will you stop killing civilians? Putin shrugged pointed to his ear as if couldn't hear. They then headed toward Trumps armored limousine, 'The Beast.' Putin appeared to chuckle as he got in the back with Trump for what was likely to be their only one-on-one encounter. After they arrived at the venue for the meeting they sat with advisers for photographs. Putin again appeared rattled as a reporter yelled: 'Mr Putin, will you commit to a ceasefire? Will you commit to not killing any more civilians?' He cupped his hands to his face and appeared to mouth 'I can't hear you.' Ahead of the meeting, Putin sought to smooth Trump's ego, praising his 'energetic and sincere efforts to end the conflict.' On top of that, he offered a carrot, that a deal could lead to talks on 'strategic offensive arms control,' a clear reference to a potential nuclear arms deal. Russia and the United States have by far the biggest arsenals of nuclear weapons in the world. The last remaining pillar of nuclear arms control between the two countries is the New Strategic Arms Reduction (New START) treaty, which expires in February. But, as Trump found out, pushing Putin into a ceasefire will be an uphill struggle. Not all wars end at the negotiating table. According to research by the Hague Center for Strategic Studies between 1946 and 2005 only 30 percent of wars between countries ended in a ceasefire, and only 16 percent in a peace agreement. It found 21 percent ended in a decisive victory, and 33 percent in some other form like a stalemate or ongoing low-level conflict. When there was a negotiated settlement in 50 percent of hose cases the counties were at war again within five years.
