Who is Vikas Barala? BJP MP's son in news over key Haryana appointment; criminal proceedings still underway, outrage follows
Haryana
has appointed
Vikas Barala
, an accused in the stalking and attempted abduction of the daughter of a former Haryana bureaucrat, as assistant advocate general in the office of advocate general (AG), Haryana.
The AG Haryana-headed screening committee that recommended his appointment included Mani Ram Sharma, special secretary, home department, as nominee of additional chief secretary (home), legal remembrancer Ritu Garg, and two retired judges - Darshan Singh and H S Bhalla.
Son of former Haryana BJP president and Rajya Sabha MP Subhash Barala, Vikas will be representing Haryana's govt before judicial platforms in Delhi, including the Supreme Court.
The appointment order was issued by the Haryana home secretary on July 18. He is among seven law officers appointed by Haryana's govt for the state's legal cell in Delhi.
A total of 96 law officers of the rank of additional advocate general, senior deputy advocates general, deputy advocate general and assistant advocates general, were appointed by the state on July 18 to represent the state before the Punjab and Haryana high court at Chandigarh and in Delhi.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
15 most beautiful women in the world
Topgentlemen.com
Undo
Vikas Barala did not respond to TOI's calls for his comments. Usually, those affiliated with the ruling party are appointed law officers and their tenure is co-terminus with the party in power.
The criminal trial against Vikas is on before a Chandigarh court, with the next hearing on Aug 2. Prosecution evidence is being recorded at this stage of the trial.
According to the complaint, on Aug 5, 2017, Vikas Barala and his friend Ashish had allegedly followed a bureaucrat's daughter and tried to stop the car of a senior Haryana bureaucrat.
The girl called Chandigarh police, who apprehended the youths and filed a case against them under IPC 354D (stalking) and the Motor Vehicle Act.
Later, police added two more sections for attempted kidnapping and arrested the accused, who eventually made bail. Vikas's father, Subhash Barala, was then Haryana BJP president.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Malegaon Blast Case: Asaduddin Owaisi slams Sadhvi Pragya's acquittal, ‘shoddy' probe — ‘made terror accused an MP'
AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi expressed disappointment over the acquittal of seven accused in the Malegaon blast case on Thursday. He launched a scathing attack over the acquittal of former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur (Sadhvi Pragya), saying, "The world will remember that it [government] made a terror accused a Member of Parliament." He held "deliberately shoddy investigation/prosecution" responsible for the acquittal of the seven accused, including Sadhvi Pragya. "The Malegaon blast case verdict is disappointing. Six namazis were killed in the blast and nearly 100 were injured. They were targeted for their religion. A deliberately shoddy investigation/prosecution is responsible for the acquittal," Owaisi posted on X. He asked if the Centre and the Maharashtra government would "appeal the judgement the way they swiftly demanded stay in the Mumbai train blasts acquittals." "17 years after the blast, the Court has acquitted all of the accused for lack of Maharashtra's 'secular' political parties demand accountability? Who killed the 6 people?" Owaisi said. He went on to allege that in 2016, "the then prosecutor in the case Rohini Salian went on record to say that NIA had asked her to 'go soft' on the accused." "Remember, in 2017, NIA had tried to get Sadhvi Pragya acquitted. The same person would go on to be a BJP MP in 2019," Owaisi said. The AIMIM MP further noted that "Karkare had uncovered the conspiracy in Malegaon & was unfortunately killed by Pakistani terrorists in the 26/11 attacks. The BJP MP went on record saying that she had cursed him and his death was a consequence of his curse." "Will NIA/ATS officers be held accountable for their faulty investigation? I think we know the answer. This is the 'tough on terror' Modi government. The world will remember that it made a terror accused a Member of Parliament," Owaisi said. On September 29 2008, six people were killed and 95 others injured when an explosive device strapped to a motorcycle detonated near a mosque in Malegaon City's Bhikku Chowk. Originally, 11 people were accused in the case; however, the court ultimately framed charges against seven, including former MP Sadhvi Pragya. While acquitting seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case on Thursday, the special NIA court observed mere suspicion cannot replace real proof and that there was no cogent or reliable evidence to warrant conviction. 'No religion teaches violence, the court said. Terrorism has no religion, but the court cannot convict on mere perception,' it observed. Earlier, the Bombay High Court had acquitted all the 12 accused in the 7/11 2006 Mumbai train blast case, saying the prosecution utterly failed to prove the case and it was "hard to believe the accused committed the crime". The Supreme Court had later stayed the Bombay High Court's judgement on a plea filed by the Maharashtra government. A bench of Justices MM Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh clarified that the stay order would not affect the accused persons' release from jail. During the hearing, the Solicitor General of India (SGI) Tushar Mehta, appearing for Maharashtra, had sought a stay of the Bombay High Court judgement by contending that certain findings of the said verdict will affect other cases being probed by Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA).
Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Migration, religion, language: Bengal's new political churn
A lot of working-class settlements across Indian cities – including the national capital Delhi and its suburbs of Noida and Gurugram, Mumbai and others in states where the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is in power – have seen special drives to detect what the Indian state believes are illegal Bangladeshi migrants. At the receiving end of the drive are thousands of poor, blue-collar Bengali speaking Muslims. Whether or not they are illegal Bangladeshis in India is something which is difficult to ascertain. Even the authorities have been able to flag only a miniscule proportion of these people as illegal Bangladeshis. But that's cold comfort; the chilling effect and inconvenience this drive has unleashed on Bengali speaking Muslims in these cities has affected a lot more people. To be sure, poor Bengali Muslims are not the only kind of underclass to have faced police harassment in India. There are a lot of examples, from evictions in large cities to the police siding with perpetrators of caste violence in villages, where the poor are more likely to suffer at the hands of the law-and-order machinery. However, in many such cases, the poor are also able to fight back by political mobilisation. More often than not, it is by cutting deals with politicians (in return for votes) than direct agitational recourse. This is roughly what political scientist Partha Chaterjee has termed as 'political society' where the poor, even though they are in violation of some laws, are able to preserve their interests by leveraging their votes. The current crackdown against so-called Bangladeshis (read Bengali Muslims), however, is different. The recourse to 'political society' insurance in the place where the crackdown is taking place is not really an option. The BJP is not interested in votes of Bengali Muslims or Muslims generally. In fact, the BJP being in power is something which is always despite rather than because of the Muslim vote. The 'political society' which is sympathetic to the cause of these people – the anti-BJP political spectrum in West Bengal – does not have jurisdiction in this matter. The ruling Trinamool Congress, which is the overwhelming recipient of Muslim votes in the state of West Bengal, has been extremely vocal on the targeting of Bengali speaking Muslims which is currently underway. But the best Mamata Banerjee and her government can offer these people is a right to stay safely in the state of West Bengal. The irony is, these people would have never left if their home state – assuming most of them are from West Bengal and not Bangladesh – had the kind of economic opportunities which have attracted them to more prosperous, growing and therefore income generating cities outside West Bengal. Also Read: Bengal migrant worker alleges torture by Haryana police; minister visits him The helplessness involved here is particularly damning for Mamata Banerjee. The BJP has polled almost 40% of the vote share in the past three Lok Sabha and assembly elections held in West Bengal since the 2019 Lok Sabha one. The Trinamool Congress, however, has managed to win each of these elections with a greater vote share than the BJP. Given the fact that almost 30% (it was 27% in 2011 census) of West Bengal's population is Muslim and assuming that they do not vote for the BJP, one can deduce that the BJP already has the support of the majority of Hindus in the state of West Bengal. The only reason it cannot defeat the Trinamool is the latter's support among Muslims. In fact, the rise in Trinamool's footprint in Muslim-dominated regions of north Bengal – it has come at the cost of the Congress and the CPI (M) in the post-2014 period – suggests that there has been a Muslim consolidation behind the Trinamool with the BJP's rise in the state of West Bengal (more on this later). While Muslim support in West Bengal is crucial for Banerjee's and her party's survival in the state, she can do precious little to prevent their harassment in BJP-ruled states where these Muslim migrants go in search of better income opportunities. If this asymmetry continues, Mamata's political capital among the Bengali Muslims is bound to diminish although the chances of Muslims deserting her or her party are still pretty low. There is nothing more demoralizing for a politician than not being able to do something for their core voter base facing persecution. Two more questions need to be asked before concluding this column. What does this persecution mean for India's larger political economy? Free migration for the underclass has been the biggest engine of (relative) upward mobility in post-reform India. It is the most effective engine of trickle-down growth in India's small pockets of opulence where high-income middle-class settlements employ many blue-collar workers either directly (domestic helps etc.) or indirectly (myriad forms of manual labour). This is also a process which has largely been caste and religion agnostic so far. Adding a linguistic and religious caveat to these opportunities introduces an in-built inequality in this engine which did not exist earlier. Also read: Caught between identity, survival: Tale of a Gurugram exodus Bengal has always had a high share of Muslims in the population and Bengali Muslims have been migrating for a long time in India. What explains this new zeal to stereotype (if not outright persecution) them now? Until 2019, which is when the BJP became a close number two in the state, Muslims were part of both sides of the political aisle in the state and were divided along the fault line of the so-called 'party-society' than the typical secular-communal binary in most Indian states. What is happening in Bengal today is bringing it closer to an Assam kind of polity. The BJP already has an edge among Hindus in Bengal and is trying hard to take it beyond a critical threshold by portraying the Muslim as a foreigner. When a state has a 70%-30% population divide between the majority and minority community and the balance is more equal in large parts of the state (if one were to exclude parts like the tribal majority districts of West Bengal bordering Jharkhand and Odisha) then a communal divide in politics can be an extremely dangerous and even destabilising force. For all its failures and inadequacies, the CPI (M) which ruled the state from 1977-2011, the early years of which saw a far more unstable refugee/migration problem in West Bengal, was successful in preventing communalism in the state's politics. Political competition, as well as political violence in the state, was religion agnostic. While a status-quo-ante in terms of return of the religion agnostic 'party-society' model is extremely unlikely in West Bengal, business as usual will be increasingly tested in the days to come because of the fundamental asymmetry facing the Bengali Muslims and their party of choice. To see the ongoing 'anti-Bangladeshi' drives in BJP ruled states without this larger perspective will be missing the woods for the trees. Roshan Kishore, HT's Data and Political Economy Editor, writes a weekly column on the state of the country's economy and its political fall out, and vice-versa
India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Glad Trump stated facts: Rahul Gandhi backs 'dead economy' remark on India
Congress leader and Lok Sabha Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday backed former US President Donald Trump's scathing remarks on the Indian economy, calling it a "dead economy" and slamming the Modi government for its alleged Trump's comment, Gandhi said, 'Yes, he is right, everybody knows this except the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister. Everybody knows that the Indian economy is a dead economy. I am glad that President Trump has stated a fact. The entire world knows that the Indian economy is a dead economy. The BJP has finished the economy to help Adani.'advertisementA day after slapping India with sweeping trade penalties, chief among them a 25 per cent tariff on nearly all imports, US President Donald Trump unleashed a blistering tirade against New Delhi's ties with Moscow, deriding both nations as "dead economies" and brazenly declaring he "does not care" what India does with Russia. Gandhi also alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi works solely for businessman Gautam Adani. 'PM Modi works only for one person: Adani. This (India-US trade) deal will take place, and PM Modi will do exactly what Trump says. The main issue sitting in front of India today is that the government has destroyed our economy, defence and foreign policy. They are running this country into the ground.'The Congress MP raised sharp questions about the government's silence in response to Trump's multiple claims. 'The main question is, Trump has claimed 30–32 times that he made a ceasefire. He also said that 5 Indian jets had fallen. Trump now says that he will impose 25 percent tariffs. Why is PM Modi not able to give an answer? What is the actual reason? Who has control in his hands?' Gandhi on his social media platform Truth Social, announced the imposition of a 25 percent tariff along with additional penalties on Indian imports starting August 1. He cited India's continued oil imports from Russia and what he called 'longstanding trade barriers' as the primary reasons.'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high — among the highest in the world — and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers of any country,' Trump Indian government, while reacting to the tariff imposition, said it is studying the implications and remains hopeful of finalising a fair bilateral trade agreement.- EndsTune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Donald Trump#Rahul Gandhi#Narendra Modi#United States of America#Tariffs
