Four Emory University students faces immigration record termination
The Brief
Emory University discovered that SEVIS records for three alumni and one current student were unexpectedly terminated by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, affecting their legal immigration status.
The termination of SEVIS records can lead to immediate loss of legal status, requiring affected individuals to leave the U.S. or apply for reinstatement, raising concerns about federal actions impacting noncitizen students.
Emory's ISSS is providing support to affected individuals and has created a FAQ document to assist with immigration compliance, while the university continues to monitor the situation closely.
ATLANTA - Emory University confirmed that four members of its international community have been affected by the unexpected termination of their immigration records by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
The incident raises concerns about the legal status of students and alumni in the U.S. on student visas.
What we know
According to a message sent Thursday by Interim Provost Lanny S. Liebeskind, Emory's Office of International Student and Scholar Services (ISSS) discovered on April 8 that SEVIS records for three alumni and one current student had been terminated without prior warning. The alumni were still under Emory's immigration sponsorship as part of their post-graduation practical training, while the student remains enrolled at the university.
Dig deeper
The SEVIS system, or Student and Exchange Visitor Information System, is a federal database used to monitor international students and scholars on F-1 and J-1 visas. Termination of a SEVIS record typically results in the immediate loss of legal immigration status and can trigger significant consequences, including the need to leave the country or apply for reinstatement.
The incident follows similar terminations reported at other U.S. universities, highlighting growing concern over federal actions impacting noncitizen students.
What they're saying
"Upon learning of these terminations, ISSS reached out to the affected individuals to provide support," the university said.
Emory officials say they are continuing to monitor the situation closely and have pledged to communicate directly with any additional students or scholars who may be affected.
ISSS, part of the Global Engagement office led by Vice Provost Jane Gatewood, has also created a Frequently Asked Questions document to assist those navigating the complexities of international travel and immigration compliance.
"As we continue to navigate this rapidly changing environment together, please strive to take care of yourselves and each other," Liebeskind wrote. "Remember that Emory has resources to support your well-being."
The Source
The details in this article come from a letter from the Interim Provost Lanny S. Liebeskind, Emory's Office of International Student and Scholar Services (ISSS) to students.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Feds charge another Chinese citizen with smuggling biological materials for lab work
Another Chinese citizen is facing smuggling charges from the federal government, the third in a week, this time accused of bringing biological materials related to roundworms into the U.S. for her work at a University of Michigan laboratory. Chengxuan Han is charged with smuggling goods into the United States and making false statements, according to a criminal complaint in U.S. District Court in Detroit. She is to make an initial appearance June 9 in federal court. No attorney is listed for her in court records. Han is pursing a doctoral degree from the College of Life Science and Technology in the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, China, according to an affidavit filed with the complaint. From September 2024 to March, it indicated, she was listed as the sender of four packages of concealed or mis-manifested biological material addressed to two people associated with a lab at U-M. The affidavit did not name the lab or individuals, but it indicated the lab studies sensory biology, including mechanosensation, thermosensation, chemosensation, photosensation and nociception, and focuses on sensory transduction, sensory processing and sensory regulation of aging. The court filing indicated that Han's offer letter from U-M states she was invited as a visiting scholar to the lab. One recipient of the packages is listed an active member of the lab, and the other is listed as a member of the faculty and staff of the Life Sciences Institute at the university, according to the affidavit. More: Detention hearing adjourned for Chinese citizen accused in fungus smuggling case More: Feds: Chinese citizens charged with smuggling harmful fungus for research at U-M The packages did not contain the correct documentation and were not imported per correct U.S. Department of Agriculture or U.S. Customs and Border Protection regulations, according to the affidavit. Han arrived at Detroit Metro Airport from Shanghai on a J-1 visa June 8 and customs officers conducted an inspection and interview. She denied sending the packages to members of the lab, according to the affidavit, but when pressed, admitted to shipping them, with the materials from her research lab at the Chinese university. She initially told customs officers the packages were plastic cups, instead of petri dishes, the affidavit indicated, and a book "(omitting the envelope with suspected biological materials concealed in it.)" She then admitted sending packages containing "nematode growth medium 1 (NGM) (in the petri dishes) and plasmids (in the envelope)," according to the affidavit. In the filing, the FBI agent wrote that it was unlikely the petri dishes solely contained NGM, which is used to cultivate nematode worms in lab settings, because it is readily available and inexpensive in the U.S. Customs officials also found that she deleted the content of her electronic devices three days before arriving in the U.S., according to the affidavit. It indicates that she told authorities she deleted the content to "start fresh" while in the U.S. Eastern District of Michigan U.S. Attorney Jerome Gorgon, Jr. stated in a release that the alleged smuggling "is part of an alarming pattern that threatens our security. The American taxpayer should not be underwriting a (People's Republic of China)-based smuggling operation at one of our crucial public institutions." John Nowak, acting director of field operations for customs and border protection, added: "The guidelines for importing biological materials into the U.S. for research purposes are stringent, but clear, and actions like this undermine the legitimate work of other visiting scholars." Last week, Yunqing Jian, 33, and her boyfriend, Zunyong Liu, 34, were charged with conspiracy, smuggling goods into the United States, false statements and visa fraud in a separate case unsealed June 3. They are accused of smuggling a fungus that causes a disease in wheat, barley, maize and rice so that Liu could research the pathogen at a U-M lab where Jian works. Jian is being held pending a detention hearing June 13 in federal court. Liu is accused of smuggling the fungus into the country at the airport in clear plastic baggies in his backpack July 27. Customs officers denied him entry and processed him for expedited removal back to China, according to an affidavit in that case. Prosecutors indicated in a news release that the fungus is Fusarium graminearum, which scientific literature classifies as a potential agroterrorism weapon. It causes "head blight," a disease of the crops, and is responsible for billions of dollars in economic losses worldwide each year. The toxins the fungus produces can cause vomiting, liver damage and reproductive defects in livestock and humans, it indicated. The federal government also has charged a former U-M student from China, Haoxiang Gao, with voting illegally in the 2024 presidential election, then fleeing the country a day before President Donald Trump took office in January, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office. Contact Christina Hall: chall@ Follow her on X, formerly Twitter: @challreporter. Support local journalism. Subscribe to the Free Press. Submit a letter to the editor at This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Feds charge another Chinese citizen with smuggling biological materials
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Claims Swirl Around Russian Su-35S Flanker Shootdown
Unconfirmed reports claim that a Ukrainian F-16 was responsible for shooting down a Russian Su-35S Flanker fighter over the weekend. If the latest claim proves to be true, this would be the first time an F-16 has shot down a Russian aircraft, a mission it was originally designed to do some 50 years ago. While we don't know for sure what was responsible for bringing down the Russian jet, there's no doubt that the F-16 is becoming an increasingly important part of the Ukrainian Air Force's arsenal, for both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. Who did this? — Ukrainian Air Force (@KpsZSU) June 7, 2025 An official claim of the destruction of the Su-35S — one of Russia's most modern combat aircraft — was posted by the Ukrainian Air Force on June 7. On the social media platform X, the claim was accompanied by a silhouette of a Su-34 Fullback strike aircraft — a different but related jet. Meanwhile, a brief statement on the Ukrainian Air Force's Telegram channel said the Su-35S was downed 'as a result of a successful operation in the Kursk direction.' That the Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS) lost a Su-35S in a morning operation on the 7th seems beyond doubt. Imagery shared online shows a crash site, indicating the loss of a Su-35S, although the cause remains unclear. One video is taken from one of the helicopters involved in the search-and-rescue effort for the pilot. Based on open-source imagery, this would be the eighth example of the Su-35S lost in combat since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Footage of a Russian Air Force Su-35 fighter burning on the ground after a successful shootdown over Kursk by the Ukrainian Air Force. — OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) June 7, 2025 Flattened Russian Su-35 fighter sitting in a Kursk field after being shot down by the Ukrainian Air Force yesterday. — OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) June 8, 2025 It's notable that the Ukrainian Air Force, while claiming the destruction of the jet, didn't state the weapon that brought it down. While it may have been a crewed fighter, the Ukrainian Air Force is also responsible for long-range surface-to-air missiles that have previously taken a toll on Russian aircraft operating in their own airspace. According to unverified claims, which appear to have first been published in the German newspaper Bild, the Su-35S was shot down by an F-16. Furthermore, the same source claims that targeting data was provided by a Saab 340 airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft, at a distance of around 200-300 kilometers (124-186 miles) from the Russian fighter. At this stage, there's no confirmation that the Saab 340 AEW&C, two of which have been pledged to Kyiv by Sweden, have actually arrived in Ukraine. Provided the claims are true, and once again, they are entirely unverified at this point, the F-16 would have worked alongside the AEW&C platform in a way that TWZ outlined when it was first confirmed that the radar planes were being supplied to Ukraine: '[The] Saab 340 AEW&C will be able to work as a fighter control asset, detecting targets, prioritizing them, and then assigning them to the fighters for interception. The same data can, of course, also be passed on to other air defense assets. However, the F-16 and Western-supplied ground-based air defense systems are most relevant in this regard, since the radar plane is fitted with the NATO-standard Link 16 datalink communications system.' 'Link 16 will allow the operators onboard the twin-turboprop Saab 340 AEW&C aircraft to provide a real-time air defense 'picture' and targeting data to compatible systems in the air and on the ground, essentially filling a critical node in a modern integrated air defense system (IADS).' The characteristic 'balance beam' radar fairing on the upper fuselage of the aircraft carries the Saab (previously Ericsson) Erieye active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar. This can detect a variety of air and sea targets at ranges of up to around 280 miles, with the aircraft typically operating at an altitude of 20,000 an F-16 downed a Su-35S without AEW&C support, that would arguably be even more impressive. This would also mark the first air-to-air kill by an F-16 in Ukrainian service (other than drones and cruise missiles). Meanwhile, Ukraine has so far lost three F-16s, although it's not clear how many of these were due to enemy engagements. The most recent loss was last month, in an 'emergency situation' that the Ukrainian Air Force said happened after the pilot 'destroyed three air targets and was working on the fourth, using an aircraft cannon.' The pilot is said to have taken the fighter away from a settlement before successfully ejecting. 'Thanks to the prompt work of the search and rescue team, the pilot was quickly found and evacuated,' the Ukrainian Air Force added. 'The pilot's well-being is satisfactory, he is in a safe place, his life and health are not in danger. A commission has been appointed to objectively clarify all the circumstances, and it has already begun work.' In April, Ukrainian F-16 pilot Pavlo Ivanov, 26, 'was killed in battle defending his native land from the invaders,' the Ukrainian Air Force stated at the time. In August 2024, F-16 pilot Oleksiy Mes died during what was, at that time, Russia's largest aerial barrage of the war. Before his F-16 went down, Mes, who went by the callsign 'Moonfish,' shot down three Russian cruise missiles and a one-way attack drone, the Ukrainian Air Force claimed at the time. Oleksii Mes', a pilot of the Ukrainian Air Force, heroically fought his last battle in the skies. On August 26, during a massive russian missile and air strike, Oleksii shot down three cruise missiles and one strike UAV. He saved countless Ukrainians from deadly russian… — Ukrainian Air Force (@KpsZSU) August 29, 2024 In all, around 85 operational F-16s have been promised to Ukraine. That total includes 24 from the Netherlands, 19 from Denmark, and 12 from Norway (with the same country providing 10 more that will be used for spare parts), while Belgium says it will supply 30. Of this grand total, it should be noted that at least some of the jets are not being sent to Ukraine but are instead being used for training Ukrainian pilots, primarily at the European F-16 Training Center (EFTC) in Romania. The U.S. is now donating airframes it says are not airworthy, which you can read more about here. Generally, few details have been released about how Ukraine is using its F-16s, although official and unofficial imagery reveals specific details of load-outs used in operational air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. The type has also been flying combined air operations and has been noted on various occasions lobbing Small Diameter Bombs (SDB). Provided that an F-16 downed the Su-35S, it would have almost certainly used an AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM). This is the aircraft's primary air-to-air weapon, carried alongside the AIM-9X Sidewinder and the earlier AIM-9L/M Sidewinder infrared-guided air-to-air missiles. The same missiles are also used by Ukrainian F-16s flying regular counter-drone and counter-cruise-missile sorties. As regards AMRAAM, even before F-16s were delivered to Ukraine, TWZ noted some of the advantages this missile would bring for the Ukrainian Air Force: 'Considering Ukraine's air force is being haunted by the long-range R-37 air-to-air missile, which Russian aircraft are firing at Ukrainian aircraft at great distances to limit their own risk, giving Ukraine a longer stick — any longer stick — would certainly be prized. It is what Ukrainian fighter pilots seem to believe would make the biggest difference, too.' Ukrainian Air Force F-16AM Fighting Falcon returning from a combat air patrol, having expended one of its AIM-120C-series AMRAAM missiles. Appears to be the first confirmation that Ukrainian Falcons are sporting the more advanced and longer-ranged C-series AMRAAMS. — OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) February 11, 2025 There is also the very real possibility that it was a ground-based air defense system used by the Ukrainian Air Force to bring down the Russian jet. In the past, the Patriot air defense system, in particular, has been used to down fixed-wing tactical aircraft and helicopters flying within Russian airspace, and it has reportedly successfully targeted aircraft at a range of around 100 miles. Starting in May 2023, Ukraine began pushing forward Patriot batteries to reach deep into Russian-controlled airspace. Most dramatically, a string of Russian aircraft was downed over Russian territory that borders northeastern Ukraine. In December 2023, Ukrainian Patriot operators used similar tactics against tactical jets flying over the northwestern Black Sea. Regardless, after many months of waiting for the F-16 and repeated refusals from Washington, Ukraine has rapidly introduced the type to operational service. A Ukrainian F-16 pilot has given an interview for the first the interview, the F-16 pilot, whose name is withheld for security reasons, revealed that he regularly conducts aerial reconnaissance flights over Russian targets and troops. Nearly every day, he carries out… — WarTranslated (@wartranslated) March 26, 2025 It was less than a year ago that the F-16 was first confirmed as being in the country, and since then, the type's mission scope has expanded. Ukraine is clearly grappling with the challenge of introducing an altogether new, Western combat aircraft, differing in many respects from its Soviet-era equipment. Regardless of whether or not an F-16 was involved in the demise of the Su-35S at the weekend, the type's significance in the air war is only set to grow, as experience builds and additional examples are delivered. Contact the author: thomas@
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
1 dead in multi-vehicle crash on I-240 in Asheville
ASHEVILLE, N.C. (WSPA) – A man died over the weekend in a multi-vehicle crash on Interstate 240 in Asheville. The Asheville Police Department identified 41-year-old Zachariah Robert Cosgrove as the victim in the crash near Exit 1B on Saturday, June 7. Investigators said Cosgrove was driving a 2015 Jeep Wrangler in the westbound lanes. Around 2:52 p.m., it was reported that Cosgrove was changing lanes when he collided with a Pontiac Firebird. The crash caused the Jeep to roll over and subsequently collide with a 2018 Ford F-150 traveling in the same direction, according to officers. The F-150 also overturned as a result of the impact. Police said Cosgrove was not wearing a seatbelt at the time of the crash and was ejected from the vehicle when it rolled. He was taken to a nearby hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries. Officers said a passenger in the Jeep was also taken to the hospital for minor injuries. Police did not share the conditions of the other drivers involved in the crash at this time. The crash remains under investigation by the Asheville PD. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
