US to extend China tariff pause another 90 days
The extension came only hours before midnight in Beijing, when the 90 day pause was set to expire, CNBC reported on Monday, citing a White House official.
The White House did not immediately respond to Al Jazeera's request for comment.
Earlier on Monday, Trump said he has been 'dealing very nicely with China' as Beijing said it was seeking positive outcomes.
If the deadline had passed, duties on Chinese goods would have returned to where they were in April at 145 percent, further fuelling tensions between the world's two largest trading partners.
While the US and China slapped escalating tariffs on each other's products this year, reaching prohibitive triple-digit levels and snarling global trade, both countries in May agreed to temporarily lower tariffs at a meeting between negotiators in Geneva, Switzerland.
But the pause comes as negotiations still loom. Asked about the deadline on Monday, Trump said: 'We'll see what happens. They've been dealing quite nicely. The relationship is very good with [China's] President Xi [Jinping] and myself.'
'We hope that the US will work with China to follow the important consensus reached during the phone call between the two heads of state,' said Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian in a statement.
He added that Beijing also hopes Washington will 'strive for positive outcomes on the basis of equality, respect and mutual benefit'.
In June, key economic officials convened in London as disagreements emerged and US officials accused their counterparts of violating the pact. Policymakers again met in Stockholm last month.
Even as both countries appeared to be seeking to push back the reinstatement of duties, US trade envoy Jamieson Greer said last month that Trump will have the 'final call' on any such extension.
Ongoing negotiations
Kelly Ann Shaw, a senior White House trade official during Trump's first term and now with Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, said she expected Trump to extend the 90-day 'tariff detente' for another 90 days later on Monday.
'It wouldn't be a Trump-style negotiation if it didn't go right down to the wire,' she said.
'The whole reason for the 90-day pause in the first place was to lay the groundwork for broader negotiations, and there's been a lot of noise about everything from soybeans to export controls to excess capacity over the weekend,' she said.
Ryan Majerus, a former US trade official now with the King & Spalding law firm, welcomed the news.
'This will undoubtedly lower anxiety on both sides as talks continue, and as the US and China work toward a framework deal in the fall. I'm certain investment commitments will factor into any potential deal, and the extension gives them more time to try and work through some of the longstanding trade concerns,' he said.
For now, fresh US tariffs on Chinese goods this year stand at 30 percent, while Beijing's corresponding levy on US products is at 10 percent.
Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump has slapped a 10-percent 'reciprocal' tariff on almost all trading partners, aimed at addressing trade practices Washington deemed unfair.
Markets are relatively flat on the news of extension. The Nasdaq is down by 0.07 percent, the S&P 500 is down 0.08 percent. Meanwhile, the Dow Jones Industrial Average is down by about 0.4 percent at 3:30pm in New York (19:30 GMT).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump-Putin meeting: Key takeaways from Alaska summit
In the lead-up to his much-touted Friday summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, United States President Donald Trump expressed confidence in his ability to make concrete progress towards securing a ceasefire in Ukraine at the meeting. Putin received the red carpet treatment as he was met with a lengthy handshake by Trump as he deplaned at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson military facility in the Alaskan city of Anchorage. The warm greeting set a congenial tone for what were always going to be tough negotiations. But there was a more subdued atmosphere a few hours later as Trump and Putin departed on their respective planes – with no clear breakthrough on the war in Ukraine. Here are some key takeaways from their meeting: 'No deal until there's a deal' While the meeting was anticipated to take about seven hours, it wrapped up in less than three. Trump and Putin addressed a gathering of journalists after the talks with relatively brief pre-prepared statements. Neither leader took any questions. Putin said his country is committed to ending the war, but the conflict's 'primary causes' must be eliminated for an agreement to be long-lasting. Putin also warned Ukraine and the European Union against throwing a 'wrench in the works' and cautioned against attempts to use 'backroom dealings to conduct provocations to torpedo the nascent progress'. A relatively subdued Trump praised the 'extremely productive meeting', in which he said 'many points were agreed to'. He said there is a 'very good chance of getting there' – referring to a ceasefire – but conceded that there remain sticking points with Moscow, including at least one 'significant' one. He cautioned that it's 'ultimately up to them' – referring to Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. 'There's no deal until there's a deal,' he said. And there was none by the time Trump and Putin left Alaska. A PR coup for Putin The Russian leader has become an increasingly maligned and isolated figure in the West since waging war on Ukraine in February 2022. But on Friday, that ended, with a red carpet welcome, a flypast by US fighter jets and warm applause from Trump. Putin himself seemed pleased, grinning out the window as he drove off the tarmac with Trump in the presidential Cadillac limousine known as 'The Beast'. 'For three years they [Western media] have been talking about Russia's isolation, and today they saw the red carpet that greeted the Russian president in the United States,' Maria Zakharova, spokesperson for the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, gloated after the summit, on Telegram. Talking business Before the meeting, it was widely anticipated that Putin would attempt to dilute peace talks with talk of bilateral trade and cooperation. Trump had asserted that there would be no discussion of business with Putin until the pair had made substantive progress on bringing about a ceasefire in Ukraine. This plan, however, seems to have been derailed somewhat, with the Russian president saying in his post-meeting statement that the pair discussed their collaboration in the areas of tech and space. 'It's clear that US and Russian investment and business cooperation has tremendous potential. Russia and the US can offer each other so much. In trade, digital, high-tech and in space exploration, [and] we see that Arctic cooperation is also very possible,' he told reporters. Russia has previously tried to pitch its vast reserves of rare earth minerals – critical for several cutting edge sectors – to the US to broker a breakthrough. Next up: Another meeting – and pressure on Ukraine As Trump thanked Putin for his time, he said he hoped they would meet again soon. Putin quickly responded by saying, in English with a laugh, 'Next time, in Moscow'. 'I'll get a little heat on that one, but I could see it possibly happening,' he said in response. Trump has previously asserted that he hopes to host a trilateral meeting on ending the war in Ukraine very soon, this time attended by Ukraine's Zelenskyy, too. In Alaska, the US leader said he would now call NATO officials and Zelenskyy to discuss the meeting. In an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity after the meeting, Trump was asked how he rated the summit on a scale of 10. He described the meet as a '10 out of 10'. 'We got along great,' he said. Then, he emphasised the importance of the Ukrainian leader agreeing to a deal. 'Now, it's really up to President Zelenskyy to get it done. And I would also say the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit. But it's up to President Zelenskyy,' he said, adding that he'll attend the next meeting 'if they'd like'. 'Make a deal,' he said, in a message apparently for Zelenskyy.
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Why is South Africa's army chief under fire for backing Iran?
South African Army Chief General Rudzani Maphwanya is facing backlash in his home country following the release of alleged comments he made during an official visit to Iran, which analysts say could further complicate the already turbulent relations between South Africa and the United States. The comments, which appeared to suggest that Iran and South Africa have common military goals, come at a time when Pretoria is attempting to mend strained relations with US President Donald Trump to stabilise trade. Last week, a 30 percent trade tariff on South African goods entering the US kicked in, alarming business owners in the country. That's despite President Cyril Ramaphosa's attempts to appease Trump, including by leading a delegation to the White House in May. Here's what to know about what the army chief said and why there's backlash for it: What did the army chief say in Iran? Meeting with his Iranian counterpart, Major-General Seyyed Abdolrahim Mousavi in Tehran on Tuesday, Maphwanya is reported to have stated that the two countries had close ties, according to Iran's state news agency, Press TV and the Tehran Times. 'Commander Maphwanya, recalling Iran's historical support for South Africa's anti-apartheid struggle, stated that these ties have forged a lasting bond between the two nations,' the Press TV article read. According to Tehran Times, he went on to say: 'The Republic of South Africa and the Islamic Republic of Iran have common goals. We always stand alongside the oppressed and defenceless people of the world.' Maphwanya also reportedly condemned Israel's 'bombing of civilians standing in line for food' and its 'ongoing aggression in the occupied West Bank', Tehran Times reported. His visit, the publication quoted Maphwanya as saying, 'carries a political message', and comes 'at the best possible time to express our heartfelt sentiments to the peace-loving people of Iran'. On the other hand, General Mousavi hailed South Africa's genocide case against the 'Zionist regime' at the International Court of Justice, and said that the effort was aligned with Iran's policies, according to Press TV. He also condemned the US and Israel's military and economic actions against Iran as 'violations of international laws and norms'. He added that Iran's army is prepared to deliver 'a more decisive response in the event of renewed aggression', Press TV reported. How has the South African government reacted? President Cyril Ramaphosa's office on Thursday clarified that the president was not aware of General Maphwanya's visit to Iran, although such a trip would normally be approved by the Ministry of Defence, not the president's office. Ramaphosa appointed Maphwanya as army chief in 2021. The general, in apartheid-era South Africa, served in the army wing of the African National Congress (ANC), which started as a liberation movement, and commanded a parliamentary majority until 2024. Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya, at a press briefing, said the general's decision to visit Iran was itself badly timed. 'At this period of heightened geopolitical tensions and conflict in the Middle East, one can say the visit was ill-advised, and more so, the general should have been a lot more circumspect with the comments he makes.' He added, 'We are in the delicate process of resetting political relations with the US, but more importantly, balancing the trade relationship in such a manner that the trade relationship is mutually beneficial.' Similarly, the Ministry of International Relations and the Defence Ministry dissociated the government from the army chief's alleged comments. 'It is unfortunate that political and policy statements were reportedly made…The minister of defence and military veterans [Matsie Angelina Motshekga] will be engaging with General Maphwanya on his return,' a statement by the Defence Ministry on Wednesday read. Meanwhile, the Democratic Alliance (DA) party, one of the four parties that form the South African coalition government, is calling for the army chief to be tried in a military court on grounds of 'gross misconduct and a flagrant breach of the SANDF [South African National Defence Force] Code of Conduct.' 'According to Iranian state media, General Maphwanya went far beyond his constitutional and professional mandate, pledging 'common goals' with Iran, endorsing its stance on Gaza, and calling for deeper strategic alignment,' the DA said in a statement on Thursday. 'Such political statements are explicitly prohibited for serving officers, violate the SANDF's duty of political neutrality, and undermine the constitutional principle of civilian control over the military,' the party added. Why is there backlash over the alleged comments? The US and South Africa's relations are at their lowest in decades, making this a particularly sensitive time, analysts say, as it follows June's 12-day war between Iran and the US-Israel coalition. President Trump slapped a 30 percent tariff on South African goods entering the US as part of his wide-ranging reciprocal tariff wars in April. The US is a major destination for South African goods such as cars, precious metals and wine. Trump's main gripes with Pretoria include South Africa instigating a genocide case against Israel, the US's ally, at the International Court of Justice, amid the ongoing war in Gaza. He earlier accused South Africa of strengthening ties with Iran. Trump has also wrongly claimed that white South Africans are being persecuted in the country under the majority Black leadership of the ANC, the country's main political party to which President Ramaphosa belongs. He also claims South Africa is confiscating land belonging to whites. White South Africans are a wealthy minority and largely descendants of Dutch settlers. Afrikaner governments controlled the country under the racist apartheid system until 1990. South African wealth, particularly land, continues to be controlled disproportionately by the country's white population. In recent times, fringe, extremist Afrikaner groups claiming that whites are being targeted by Black people have emerged, pointing to cases of white farmers being attacked by criminals on their farmland. Elon Musk, Trump's one-time adviser before their public fallout in June, had also made claims of white persecution and claimed that the South African government's business laws were blocking his internet company from operating in the country. He was referring to laws requiring that foreign businesses be partly owned by Blacks or other historically disadvantaged groups, such as people living with disabilities. The South African government denied Musk's accusations. In early May, Trump's government admitted 59 white 'refugees' in a resettlement programme meant to protect them. Previously, the US, under former President Joe Biden, was at loggerheads with South Africa over its close ties with Russia and its vocal criticism of Israel. The latest incident echoes a 2022 scandal when a sanctioned Russian cargo ship called the Lady R docked at Simon's Town Naval Base in the Western Cape, said analyst Chris Vandome of think tank Chatham House. The US alleged at the time that South African military supplies were loaded onto the ship and used in the Ukraine war, claims South Africa denied. 'It lies with South African foreign policy formation and the lack of clarity and consistency around it that has created this confusion whereby people think they are saying things in line with what the nation thinks,' he said. How has South Africa tried to appease the US? On May 21, President Ramaphosa led a delegation to the White House in a bid to 'reset relations' with Trump and hopefully secure lower tariff deals. At the heated meeting, however, Trump refused to back down from his claims of white persecution, despite Ramaphosa clarifying that South Africa was facing widespread crime in general, and that there was no evidence that whites in particular were being targeted. South Africa, during the meeting, offered to buy US liquefied natural gas and invest $3.3bn in US industries in exchange for lower tariffs. The delegation also agreed to a review of the country's business ownership laws. However, Trump's 30 percent tariffs went into effect last week. Analysts say it could put up to 30,000 South African jobs at risk, particularly in the manufacturing and agricultural sectors. Meanwhile, Ramaphosa's government promised to take further action to ease the burden on manufacturers and exporters. On Tuesday, Trade Minister Parks Tau told reporters that South Africa has submitted a revised proposal to Washington, without giving details. General Maphwanya's pronouncements this week, therefore, 'couldn't have come at a worse time' for South African diplomatic ties with the US, security analyst Jakkie Cilliers of the International Security Institute said, speaking to South African state TV, SABC. 'For the chief of the national defence force to pronounce so clearly and so unequivocally at this time is remarkably politically sensitive,' Cilliers said, adding that the general could be asked to resign upon his return. What has General Maphwanya said? Maphwanya, who the presidency said has returned to the country, has not put out public statements on the controversy. It is unclear how the government might sanction him. President Ramaphosa is set to meet with the army chief for briefings in the coming weeks, a presidency spokesperson said.
Al Jazeera
3 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump, Putin end short summit without ceasefire deal in Ukraine
US President Donald Trump's meeting with Russia's Vladimir Putin ended in Alaska without a deal on halting Moscow's war on Ukraine, but it did give the Russian president a 'diplomatic win' after years of being shunned by the West, observers said. The Russian president was greeted with a red carpet and a warm handshake from President Trump on arrival at a US airbase in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday as both leaders arrived for talks aimed at ending the war in Ukraine. It marked President Putin's first time stepping on Western soil since he ordered the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and was notable in its welcoming atmosphere compared with the frosty reception a hostile Trump laid on for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House in February. Taking to a stage to deliver remarks after they spoke behind closed doors for less than three hours, the two leaders said they had made progress on unspecified issues, offering no details and taking no questions from a phalanx of assembled international reporters and television cameras. A visibly upbeat Putin was the first to speak, telling how he had greeted Trump on his arrival in Anchorage with the lines: 'Good afternoon, dear neighbour', owing to the geographic closeness of Alaska to Russia. 'We are close neighbours, and it's a fact,' Putin said. Putin said his meeting with Trump was 'long overdue' and that he 'hoped the agreement that we've reached together will help us bring close that goal and will pave the path towards peace in Ukraine '. 'We expect that Kyiv and European capitals will perceive that constructively and that they won't throw a wrench in the works,' Putin said. 'They will not make any attempts to use some backroom dealings to conduct provocations to torpedo the nascent progress,' he said. Trump then thanked Putin for his 'very profound' statement, adding that the two had a 'very productive meeting '. 'There were many, many points that we agreed on. Most of them, I would say. A couple of big ones that we haven't quite got there, but we've made some headway,' Trump said. 'So there is no deal until there is a deal,' Trump said, adding that he will now call up NATO as well as President Zelenskyy and others to brief them on the meeting. 'It's ultimately up to them,' the president said. 'Many points were agreed to,' he continued, without providing any details. 'There are just a very few that are left; some are not that significant, one is probably the most significant,' Trump said without elaborating. 'But we have a very good chance of getting there. We didn't get there, but we have a very good chance of getting there.' There was no immediate reaction from Kyiv to the outcome of the summit, described as 'anticlimactic'. Ukraine's opposition lawmaker Oleksiy Honcharenko said on the Telegram messaging app after the talks: 'It seems Putin has bought himself more time. No ceasefire or de-escalation has been agreed upon.' Al Jazeera's Kimberly Halkett, reporting from Anchorage, Alaska, said President Trump is likely to come in for criticism for a summit that 'all became much ado about nothing'. 'The only achievements that were actually made was that the Russian president has been able to continue his war, which we know is now a war of attrition and which each day favours the Russian side,' Halkett said. 'He has bought time,' she said. Also reporting from the summit, Al Jazeera's diplomatic editor, James Bays, said Ukraine's European allies – who had been pushing for concrete steps to come out of the meeting, such as a ceasefire – will likely see the meeting as 'a big win for President Putin'. 'And it does beg all sorts of questions about where the diplomacy on Ukraine goes,' Bays said. Trump ended his remarks at the news conference on Friday by telling Putin, 'I'd like to thank you very much, and we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon.' To which Putin quickly chipped back: 'Next time, in Moscow.' Trump then responded, saying that he might 'get a little heat on that one' but that he could 'possibly see it happening'.
