Eltropy platform adds integrations
0
This content is provided by an external author without editing by Finextra. It expresses the views and opinions of the author.
This expanded ecosystem equips CFIs to boost operational efficiency and deliver more valuable experiences for their members and customers.
Eltropy One Platform integrates with popular Core, Loan Origination System (LOS), Account Opening System (AOS), Collections, Customer Relationship Management (CRM), Payments, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Unified Communications as a Service (UCaaS), and Contact Center as a Service (CCaaS) providers. These integrations allow financial institutions to streamline workflows and better serve their communities.
"Our goal is to provide CFIs with the tools they need to operate effectively and connect meaningfully with their members," said Ashish Garg, Co-founder and CEO of Eltropy. "Reaching 50 integrations is an important milestone and shows that we're building a connected ecosystem that supports the diverse needs of financial institutions. It means our customers can achieve more within a single platform, reducing complexity and increasing efficiency."
"When we started this journey in 2020, Symitar was our only integration partner," said Prasad Shroti, SVP of Solutions and Strategy at Eltropy. "To see us reach over 50 integrations just five years later is a significant milestone. It shows our commitment to building the connected ecosystem that CFIs need. I'm proud of the progress we've made and the value this creates for our customers."
To make exploring this extensive network of connections simpler, Eltropy has launched its new Integration Hub. This professional space showcases all 50+ Eltropy integrations, thoughtfully organized with easy-to-navigate categories and a section highlighting the most recent and most popular integrations, simplifying how financial institutions explore Eltropy's connected ecosystem.
The expanded suite of integrations includes key systems that drive various aspects of financial operations. Among the most widely adopted and new integrations are:
• Corelation: Supports real-time alerts and insights for smarter engagement.
• Fiserv Portico: Keeps members informed with timely alerts and transaction tracking.
• Encompass: Accelerates lending and reduces loan abandonment.
• MeridianLink Consumer, Portal, Opening, and Collect: Enhances loan closings, accelerates lending, streamlines account opening, and manages delinquency spikes.
• Origence: Improves borrower experience and speeds up funding.
• Sync 1 Systems: Drives faster loan closures with borrower texts and secure document sync.
• Temenos (LOS & Collections): Simplifies digital lending workflows and scales empathetic outreach for collections.
• AKUVO: Automates empathetic outreach for collections.
• DocuSign: Supports secure e-signatures.
• MessagePay: Boosts engagement and reduces delinquency rates.
• SWIVEL (An SWBC Company): Helps drive on-time payments.
• Alkami: Connects with members on their terms and drives conversions.
• Access Softek, CU*Answers, Lumin Digital, Mahalo Banking, Apiture: Digital banking integrations that boost agent productivity, scale service, and personalize support.
• Salesforce Marketing Cloud and CRM: Maximizes first call resolution and secures interactions.
• Smarsh and Jack Henry Synergy: Streamline content management and ensure compliance.
• IDgo, illuma, Plaid: Provide instant and secure identity verification and account verification.
These integrations address critical areas for community financial institutions, including core banking, lending, account opening, collections, customer relationship management, payments, and digital banking. Eltropy's open APIs allow for continued integration with a growing network of technology partners.
Partnering with Eltropy offers several advantages for financial institutions:
• Member Engagement: Personalize interactions to improve member experiences.
• Operational Efficiency: Streamline workflows across member services, contact centers, marketing, and lending.
• Scalable Solutions: Expand technology offerings with solutions designed for credit unions and community banks.
• Innovative Partnership: Collaborate on solutions for financial institution challenges.
• Growth and Revenue: Drive value through competitive referral and reseller programs.
Eltropy remains focused on providing solutions that allow financial institutions to thrive in an evolving environment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
17 minutes ago
- Auto Blog
Walmart's ‘Excellent' Dual Dash Cam Is on Sale for $65, and the ‘Footage Is Crystal Clear'
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. View post: Walmart Has a Rooftop Cargo Carrier on Sale for $33, and It's 'Built to Last' View post: Monterey Car Week Is an Extravagant Celebration of All Things Cars: Here's How Mine Went Autoblog aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission. The road can be a risky place, but there are plenty of car accessories that help make it safer. And that includes dash cams, like this bestselling one from Walmart that's 60% off right now. The Odrey Dual Dash Cam is on sale for $65, which is $95 off the original $160 price tag. It boasts over 500 five-star ratings at Walmart and shoppers say it's 'excellent' and a 'fantastic investment for anyone who values safety while driving.' Odrey Dual Dash Cam, $65 (was $160) at Walmart Everybody wants 4K quality for their TVs, but what if you could get it with your dash cam? That's a reality with Odrey's front camera, while the rear view camera features 2.5K resolution. This allows you to clearly see your surroundings on the road and have crisp, clear footage from your camera recordings. Accessing those video feeds is a breeze too, as Odrey has a user-friendly app available via Android and iOS devices. Best of all, this dash cam is easy to install and can even record while you're not driving at a lower resolution, giving you a sense of security 24/7. 'The footage is crystal clear, and the night vision works exceptionally well,' one shopper said. 'The installation was straightforward, and it provides peace of mind knowing I have a reliable record during my drives. Great investment!' 'Just what I was looking for,' another reviewer began. 'It has great video quality, resolution, and color. Setup was incredibly easy, both physically and connection-wise. The app interface was easy to navigate, very simple. Its quality is great while everything else was very simple. Very satisfied with this.' The Odrey Dual Dash Cam is a Walmart bestseller with tons of rave reviews, meaning it's highly recommended and could potentially sell out fast. Take advantage of the 60% markdown ASAP before this dash cam deal dashes away. About the Author Daniel Donabedian View Profile
Auto Blog
17 minutes ago
- Auto Blog
That EV You Just Bought Probably Has Too Much Range
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. A new study indicates that EV owners aren't making frequent use of their car's full range capacity. Data from more than 40,000 EVs shows that owners are leaving range on the table in their daily routines, but the trend in the automotive industry is just the opposite – automakers continue to add range to their EVs through larger batteries and higher-density battery cells. EV Owners Aren't Using All That Range Source: Mercedes-Benz Research from a startup focused on 'providing more transparency and confidence in electric car transactions,' Recurrent, shows that owners aren't using more than 80% of their EVs' range. You might argue that's the point. After all, people don't go out every day and use all 27 gallons of gas in their car. It's silly to assume an EV owner should be going out and using all 325 miles of range in their car. All that range is nice when you need it, and provides more of a safety net than a smaller battery does. However, Recurrent argues that's a problem on its own, as larger batteries significantly increase cost. By providing your email address, you agree that it may be used pursuant to Arena Group's Privacy Policy. We may receive compensation. According to the study, an EV with 300 miles of range likely won't see more than 22 percent of its battery used in a day. Electric cars with an EPA-estimated range of between 350 and 375 miles will only average around 40.9 miles per day, and EVs with more available range do typically get driven further by their owners. Those with an EPA range of 100-125 miles see about 22.2 miles per day. The weighted average comes out to 12.6% of an EV's battery being used daily. Even the most range-rich owners still leave 88%+ of their range unused most days. Recurrent There's a few possible reasons: for one, the extra range is a sort of 'safety blanket,' and owners do still cite range anxiety as their largest concern before buying an EV. That changes after the purchase happens, and another Recurrent study has shown that range anxiety declines the longer you've owned and driven an EV. Only 22% of owners feel they have anxiety over range after owning their EVs. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Bigger Batteries May Not Be The Solution EVs Need Here's the problem: the quest for range in the automotive industry will also drive up costs. A bigger battery costs more to make because it uses more materials, and automakers will adjust prices to keep their margins intact. Consumers will pay more for range they don't use but a few times a year, in the event of, say, a long road trip, if ever. There's another issue: buyers are seeking affordable cars, and admittedly, some automakers are racing to provide them. Ford has just announced a new, cheap electric truck. It'll have a smaller battery and less range, not unlike Slate, another upcoming cheap truck with less-than-average range. But plenty of other automakers seek to pile on range through solid-state batteries and larger traditional battery packs, hoping to help pacify the 48% of EV buyers who say they're worried about range. More than anything, what the industry has right now is an education problem. About the Author Chase Bierenkoven View Profile
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Dr. Phil sued by Christian broadcaster for ‘reprehensible conduct' in $500 million deal: ‘Years-long fraudulent scheme'
The fraught bankruptcy proceedings for Dr. Phil McGraw's 'anti-woke' Merit Street Media have taken another dramatic turn as his broadcasting partner is suing the company and McGraw for fraud and breach of contract. The lawsuit filed by the Trinity Broadcasting comes just a month after Merit Street filed for bankruptcy and sued the Christian television network, accusing TBN of 'sabotage' because it 'reneged on its obligations and abused its position as the controlling shareholder of Merit Street.' Meanwhile, the countersuit by TBN – which was filed in Texas court on Tuesday – comes as Dr. Phil and his production company Peteski attempted to halt the Chapter 11 proceedings for the year-old Merit Street, claiming the legal costs of going bankrupt were too expensive. The effort to halt the bankruptcy follows the Professional Bull Riders accusing Dr. Phil of engaging in a 'bad faith' Chapter 11 filing as the bull-riding league tries to collect on the $181 million it claims is owed to them by Merit Street. 'The response to TBN legitimately and lawfully defending itself from Peteski and McGraw's bad-faith attacks is to cry foul because they do not like the true facts that they themselves now regretfully put at issue before this Court, revealing McGraw's true illicit intent and wrongful conduct which he self-described as a 'gangster move' and as '11th-hour poker,'' TBN and its attorneys state in the complaint. 'TBN now asserts its affirmative claims against Peteski and McGraw related to the years-long fraudulent scheme that they developed and executed to fleece TBN, a not-for-profit corporation, to enrich McGraw, his associates and affiliates,' the lawsuit alleges. 'TBN is confident that the truth will set it free, and result in Peteski and McGraw being held accountable for their reprehensible conduct.' Merit Street has accused TBN of failing to live up to the terms of their agreement, specifically citing the inability to secure national television distribution for the Dr. Phil-led channel. 'These failures by TBN were neither unintended nor inadvertent,' Merit Street alleges in its complaint. 'They were a conscious, intentional pattern of choices made with full awareness that the consequence of which was to sabotage and seal the fate of a new but already nationally acclaimed network.' However, TBN – which at one point owned 70 percent of Merit Street – counters that it was McGraw who created a 'false sense of urgency' when he approached the broadcaster about cutting ties with CBS and starting up his own network. All the while, TBN alleges, the MAGA-boosting TV psychologist lied about viewership numbers, advertising revenues, back catalogs, and production costs in order to quickly secure a highly lucrative $500 million, 10-year deal from the network. 'Among other things, McGraw falsely represented to TBN that CBS would pay him $75 million per year to renew his contract and TBN must (1) immediately sign some form of binding agreement with Peteski and (2) immediately pay him $20 million as a gesture of good faith to show TBN's ability to pay and commitment to the deal,' the complaint states. 'Anything less, McGraw claimed, would be a 'deal killer.' TBN relied on McGraw's false assurances and proceeded with the requested urgency.' Dr. Phil, who had hosted a syndicated television show for roughly 20 years at that point, also told Trinity that he 'wanted to change networks because of what he perceived to be CBS's censorship,' explicitly saying: 'I don't want snot nose lawyers telling me what I can and can't say on TV.' McGraw also allegedly said that he was looking to move his show from California to Texas, where TBN is located, in order to lower production costs by avoiding California regulations and cutting payroll by ridding himself of union-based employees. At the same time, in order to further entice Trinity into a deal, Dr. Phil represented that he owned the entire 21-year media library for his syndicated show and that TBN would have access to it at no additional cost. However, according to the complaint, McGraw hired dozens of employees from his previous show despite the agreement to slash production costs. On top of that, TBN alleges, Peteski – which owned the other 30 percent of Merit – failed to make payments on its interest in the company. Furthermore, while the agreement called for Dr. Phil to produce 160 90-minute episodes of his new primetime show to be aired on Merit Street, TBN claims McGraw never made good on that promise, instead keeping the program in its current hour-long format. A spokesperson for McGraw, meanwhile, stated that the host recorded 214 new episodes of Dr. Phil Primetime, adding that 'to say otherwise is absolutely false.' Elsewhere in the complaint, Trinity claims that McGraw demanded more money – despite TBN already expending tens of millions of dollars establishing his show on the new network – after the broadcaster asked to use the library content to fill out airtime on Merit Street. 'This, among other things, prompted TBN to press McGraw to live up to his representation that he would contribute the Dr Phil Show library to Merit Street,' the lawsuit states. 'Despite his previous representations, McGraw and his attorneys at Manatt informed TBN for the first time that McGraw would not contribute any old episodes of the Dr. Phil Show to Merit Street for Peteski's 30% or otherwise,' the complaint continues. 'Instead, McGraw brazenly demanded that TBN pay him $100 million to obtain a 50% interest in the media library.' As for Merit Street's bankruptcy, which was filed last month, TBN says the Chapter 11 proceedings weren't approved by its board members while accusing McGraw of plotting to use the bankruptcy to start a new media venture and snag the license for his show. Meanwhile, the bankruptcy judge presiding over the case said on Tuesday that the Chapter 11 proceedings will continue for now, adding that the court will decide on September 2 whether to dismiss the filing or convert it to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. 'The judge has initially sided with Trinity Broadcasting Network and Professional Bull Riders, stating that Merit Street is at fault for delaying the case by resisting discovery and it is therefore not going to fund what Trinity and PBR call a 'giant litigation war chest' for the company's professionals,' Sarah Foss, Head of Legal at Debtwire, explained to The Independent. 'The discovery resistance may be tied to reputational concerns from Dr. Phil, and what might be revealed in text messages or emails that come out in the discovery process,' Foss continued, adding: 'Notably, the judge overseeing the bankruptcy denied a request from Merit Street's bankruptcy counsel, Sidley Austin, to withdraw from the case before that hearing, despite being owed $3.7m in unpaid legal fees and a lack of funds to pay the lawyers for their work representing the company at the hearing.'
