logo
Xi and Putin rewrite past and future together at Victory Day parade

Xi and Putin rewrite past and future together at Victory Day parade

Times08-05-2025

Russia is preparing for a Victory Day parade that will showcase a renewed alliance with China.
President Putin has said his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, will be the 'main guest' at the parade on Friday, which will gather those world leaders who have resisted western pressure to shun Russia over the war in Ukraine.
Xi flew on Wednesday from Beijing for an extended four-day visit both sides said would cement the growing ties between the two nations, which are even more reliant on each other as a result of President Trump's volatile, America-first international policies.
Trump has seemingly backed away from trying to enforce a peace deal on Ukraine that is favourable to Putin's demands. Meanwhile, he is still attempting to put pressure on China over trade, despite agreeing to allow Scott Bessent, the Treasury secretary, to meet the Chinese vice-premier, He Lifeng, for initial talks about tariffs at the weekend.
Confirming Xi's long-rumoured visit to Moscow, a Chinese government spokesman said: 'We believe the important common understandings between the two presidents will further deepen political mutual trust, add new substance to strategic co-ordination, promote practical cooperation in various fields, bring more benefits to the two peoples and contribute more stability and positive energy to the international community.'
Putin was blunter about the charm offensive with which he intended to greet Xi, whose economic as well as diplomatic support has become vital thanks to tough western sanctions after the invasion of Ukraine. He said he would make it a 'special visit' for the Chinese leader.
'We will prepare a good and eventful programme,' Putin said last month. 'He will be our main guest.' There will be more than 20 other world leaders present but none from western Europe or the US.
Among other foreign leaders to have arrived in Russia on Wednesday was Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, president of fellow Brics member Brazil, along with President Maduro of Venezuela.
Aleksandar Vučić, the president of Serbia, also flew to Moscow in a visit that is likely to draw the ire of the EU. While the Balkan country has long-held aspirations of joining the bloc, it also maintains close ties with Russia and a shared aversion to Nato since its involvement in the Kosovo war.
Before the pageantry, and hours before a self-declared Russian three-day ceasefire was set to begin, a slew of Ukrainian drone attacks closed airports across Russia — including Moscow's airport for the third day straight — leaving 60,000 passengers stranded, according to local officials.
The plane carrying Xi, however, managed to touch down without issue on Wednesday morning.
China and Russia have had an up-and-down relationship with each other since the Second World War — and with the memory of the war itself. While Stalin's support was vital for Chairman Mao eventually to win the Chinese civil war in 1949 and establish his domestic political dominance, the two Communist Parties fell out in the 1950s and 1960s and China quietly took America's side in the Cold War.
Since America's 'pivot to Asia' under President Obama, Russia and China have patched up their relationship, seeing themselves as natural allies in the face of American 'regime change' policies.
That has led to a re-evaluation by China of the significance of the war itself. It is officially known as the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, a sign of the different historic focus on the conflict in China, which Japan invaded in the 1930s, and anniversaries until recently were not the focus of major celebrations.
The Communist Party, then hiding out in the hills of northwestern China, played a relatively small role compared to the then dominant Kuomintang or Nationalists, whose exhausted remnants were driven out four years later.
Military parades were reserved for the anniversaries of that 'Liberation' until 2015, when President Xi ordered the marking of the 70th anniversary of Japan's defeat.
That was apparently an attempt to reintroduce nationalist as well as ideological fervour to the Chinese people, as well as to capture continuing anti-Japanese sentiments. But Xi has also subtly tried to use the shared suffering of Russia and China in the war to bolster his competing vision of global governance to the much-criticised 'American hegemony'.
The two countries suffered by some distance the most deaths in the war, around 20 million in China, and even more in Russia, together accounting for more victims than the rest of the world put together. The Chinese government spokesman called the two countries 'the two main theatres' of the war and said they had made 'historic contributions to secure the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War, save their respective nations from demise, and also save the future of mankind.'
Twenty years ago, few mentions of the war in English-language Chinese sources went without a reference to Chinese co-operation with the United States and its 'Flying Tigers' air force supply missions over the Himalayas. Now they are far more likely to focus on tales of China's own resilience.
In Xi's view, stressed by editorials in state media this week, the shared Russian and Chinese experience of invasion and suffering in the world war is directly linked to support for the United Nations, created in its wake. Xi's affirmation of solidarity with Putin on Friday is thus an implicit rebuke to any attempt by America to undermine the UN or global institutions more generally, or to assert its own pre-eminence within them.
Putin meanwhile has used the Russian version of war history to back up his own claims to be 'de-Nazifying' Ukraine.
President Trump, of course, has added his own unique voice to the historiography, saying America 'did more than any other country, by far, in producing a victorious result', according to a social media post. 'I am hereby renaming May 8 as Victory Day for World War II and November 11 as Victory Day for World War I,' he said. 'We won both wars, nobody was close to us in terms of strength, bravery, or military brilliance…'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Xi Jinping's time up?
Is Xi Jinping's time up?

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

Is Xi Jinping's time up?

Stories about Xi Jinping's father, Xi Zhongxun, are blowing up on social media. He died in 2002, so why the interest in him now? The weird fact is that Xi Zhongxun is being talked about in the West because he is not being talked about in China. Omission is the perverse way that one learns about what is really going on in the opaque world of Chinese Communist party (CCP) politics. China-watchers live on scraps. Xi Zhongxun was a big cheese in his own right. Born in the north-west's Shaanxi province, he was an early member of the youth league of the CCP. After meeting Mao Zedong at the conclusion of the Long March, which ended up in his home province, he quickly rose through the party ranks. After making a success of his governorship of Guangdong Province, where he set up one of the first of Deng Xiaoping's 'Special Economic Zones', Xi Zhongxun was promoted to the politburo in 1982. His official obituary describes him as 'an outstanding proletarian revolutionary', who was 'one of the main founders and leaders of the revolutionary base areas in the Shanxi-Gansu border region'. In short, Xi Zhongxun was an early hero and 'big beast' of the CCP. He passed his 'red genes' on to Xi Jinping, the primus inter pares of the 'princelings' who have come to dominate China's politics over the past decade. As such, it was no surprise that at the recent inauguration of the Revolutionary Memorial Hall in Shaanxi, it was planned to name it after Xi Zhongxun. But it didn't happen. At the last minute, in a low-key ceremony, his name was not only expunged from the title but omitted entirely from the memorial. A similarly strange story attaches to the 40-episode drama series Time in the Northwest, which followed Xi Zhongxun's life story. This unashamed glorification of President Xi's family, slated to be shown in primetime on CCTV, China's main state broadcaster, was dropped after two episodes. Is it a coincidence that the expunging of Xi Zhongxun has come to light while Xi himself seemingly disappeared from public view in the last two weeks of May? Chinese institutions are always alert to changes in the political wind – no more so than the state media. Recently China-watchers have detected subtle changes. Xi, usually on every front page of the People's Liberation Army Daily, has been much less prominent. Shen Ming-Shih, a director of the Institute for National Defence and Security Research in Taiwan, has observed 'a noticeable decline in the official references to Xi'. In the past, Xi has been described as the 'eternal core of the party'. As recently as December, the People's Liberation Army Daily wrote that decisions should 'rely on a single voice of authority'. Now it praises the virtues of 'collective leadership'. In addition, Shen has pointed out that academics at Peking University and South China University of Technology have not been punished for writing essays critical of Xi's policies. Remarkably, Hu Jintao, Xi's predecessor and faction opponent, who, in front of the world's press, was humiliatingly manhandled out of the CCP's 20th National Congress in October 2022 by Xi's bodyguards, seems to be making a comeback. On 19 May, the People's Daily and Xinhua News both published articles using Hu catchphrases that reference 'scientific, democratic and law-based decision-making'. Wen Jiabao, the supposedly billionaire former Chinese premier, is another elder who is reportedly on manoeuvres. In May, the usual monthly politburo meeting did not take place. Furthermore, Xi has not been present at high-level meetings of the Central Military Commission (CMC) of which he is chairman. His place has been taken by General Zhang, who is not a Xi faction member. CMC chairmanship is central to the power of a CCP General Secretary. CCP elders are disillusioned by a leader who has assumed dictatorial powers but is deemed to have failed Uncertainty about the direction of the People's Liberation Army has contributed to the rumours of change in China's leadership. Hei Weidong, vice-chairman of the CMC and a member of Xi's Fujian faction, was suddenly arrested in April. Xi was governor of Fujian Province in the late 1990s. In November last year, another of Xi's Fujian clique, Admiral Miao Hua, who was head of the CMC's Political Work Department, was put under investigation for 'serious violations of discipline' – the usual newspeak for corruption. On 30 April, he was dismissed. Other Xi generals have reportedly been removed from their posts. In the realm of economic management there are also signs of discontent. It is widely recognised that Xi's repressive handling of the Covid pandemic was catastrophic. In the end it was public protest that forced him to end lockdown. By Chinese standards, post-Covid recovery has been anaemic. A property crash has destroyed consumer confidence and has also landed provincial governments with unsustainable levels of debt. Graduate unemployment has risen sharply. Many are fleeing to the West to find employment. A sense of malaise has cast a pall over China's younger generations. As a recent émigré Chinese dissident, who, like her friends, disparagingly refers to Xi as 'the village headman', confided to me: 'I realise that I was fortunate to live in a golden age of freedom and prosperity. Now it is over.' A sign of Xi's diminishing power is the increasing redundancy of the economic posts he held. The Central Financial and Economic Affairs Commission, which he chairs, has been meeting only sporadically. Foreign direct investment (FDI), which was a main contributor to the explosive economic growth of China after Deng's liberalisation of the economy in the 1980s, has collapsed. Beijing's State Administration of Foreign Exchange reported that FDI in 2023 was the lowest for 30 years. Inevitably a high proportion of blame for capital flight is being put on Xi's 'wolf-warrior' approach to diplomacy, itself an abandonment of Deng's 'softly, softly' approach to the expansion of China's global power. Who has been moving against Xi? Apart from elements within the army, who are thought to oppose military action against Taiwan, the 'princelings', many of whose offspring now reside overseas with the billions that their families have squirrelled away, are thought to be conspiring against the President. Most importantly, the party elders are disillusioned by a leader who has assumed dictatorial powers but is deemed to have failed. In China the elders act like an informal Areopagus, which in extremis checks the power of the executive. Willy Wo-Lap Lam, a Hong Kong-based scholar, has concluded that Xi's 'ability to shape policy in the financial, foreign affairs and other arenas has been truncated'. Lam speculates that 'Xi might be driven out of office this year'. Similarly, Cai Shenkun, a long-standing China-watcher, has reported that CCP leaders have already decided that Xi must step down: 'It's almost certain that an arrangement will be made to allow Xi and his inner circle to withdraw gracefully from the political stage. Once new leadership takes over, a new approach to governance will follow.' In a similar vein, Yao Cheng, a former officer in the CCP navy who deserted and fled to America in 2016, has speculated that Xi will retain 'only the ceremonial title of China's Chairman, before fully retiring at the 21st National Congress [in 2027]'. Xi's two-week disappearance in May seemed to support the theory that he has already been frozen out. So, did his reappearance on 4 June when he met Belarus leader Alexander Lukashenko lay to rest the rumours of his political demise? Quite the opposite. The meeting, which was abnormally held in Xi's house, was strangely subfusc and devoid of normal protocols. Reporting was delayed and brief and did not feature any quotations from the President. The press photographs were lifted from Belarusian media as though Chinese reporters and photographers were not allowed to be present. If the rumours of Xi's defenestration are true, why the delay and subterfuge? The answer may lie in the fact that there is no obvious successor. No surprise here, seeing as, during his 12 years in power, Xi has put his clique in most senior positions. Zhang Lei, a well-connected, US-based YouTuber, has speculated that the CCP elders are casting around for a successor. Her sources suggest that Wang Yang, a liberal 'non-princeling' member of the Politburo Standing Committee of the CCP from 2017 to 2022, has been sounded out. The demise of Xi has been predicted before and there can be no certainty that the recent waves of rumours are accurate. Even if they are true, it remains possible that Xi could stage a comeback and put his enemies to flight. However, given the dire problems facing China and the indifferent performance of its leader, it seems quite plausible that forces within the CCP have had enough of the dictatorial Xi, who, just two years ago, had presumptuously declared his intention to rule until 2032. If Xi falls, or indeed has already fallen, the consequences for Taiwan and US-China relations could be dramatic – and possibly beneficial to both.

'No Kings Day' protests expected to draw millions of people across 1,800 cities
'No Kings Day' protests expected to draw millions of people across 1,800 cities

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

'No Kings Day' protests expected to draw millions of people across 1,800 cities

The protests are planned in cities across all 50 states and Puerto Rico as well as several countries abroad, including Colombia, Germany, Italy, Malawi, Portugal and the United Kingdom, according to organizers This weekend, millions of people across the United States are set to attend over 1,800 "No King's Day" protests in response to President Donald Trump's military parade in Washington D. C. on Saturday. The demonstrations are planned in cities across all 50 states and Puerto Rico, as well as several countries abroad, including Colombia, Germany, Italy, Malawi, Portugal and the UK, according to organisers. These protests are expected to be the largest demonstrations against the Trump administration since he took office in January. ‌ The aim of these protests is to counter Trump's 250th anniversary U.S. Army parade scheduled to take place in the nation's capital on Saturday, which coincides with his 79th birthday. The event, which officials project will cost between $25-$45 million and cause upwards of $16 million in damages to the city streets, will see hundreds of military tanks and aircraft roll through the streets of Washington, D. C, reports the Mirror US. ‌ Protest organisers said: "On June 14-Flag Day-President Trump wants tanks in the street and a made-for-TV display of dominance for his birthday. A spectacle meant to look like strength. But real power isn't staged in Washington. It rises up everywhere else,". "No Kings is a nationwide day of defiance. From city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, we're taking action to reject authoritarianism-and show the world what democracy really looks like. We're not gathering to feed his ego. We're building a movement that leaves him behind." Organisers stress that the demonstrations will remain peaceful and have cautioned participants against bringing weapons or instigating altercations with any objectors. The most significant protests are anticipated in several major cities, including Atlanta, Charlotte, Chicago, Houston, New York City, Philadelphia, and Phoenix. The organisers have clarified that there will be no protest in Washington D.C. to avoid potential conflicts with the MAGA movement. "We want to create contrast, not conflict," Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of Indivisible, one of the partnering organisations for the protest, stated. "The choice to hold No Kings events in every city but D.C. is a deliberate choice to keep the focus on contrast, and not give the Trump administration an opportunity to stoke and then put the focus on conflict." ‌ In the meantime, anti-ICE demonstrations that started on Friday in Los Angeles are continuing into their sixth day with no apparent conclusion. President Trump has ignited a fierce dispute with California Governor Gavin Newsom following his decision to send 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to LA to address the pro-immigration protesters. The Pentagon revealed the deployment of troops to the city came at a cost of $134 million. Their arrival on Sunday was met with widespread criticism, with many arguing it disrupted the previously peaceful atmosphere. ‌ California Governor Newsom's office responded by filing a motion to block Trump's decision to send in troops. Nationwide, over 25 cities have been the site of anti-ICE protests, according to NBC News. In a separate event, thousands are expected to attend a mass in Chicago on Saturday, where Pope Leo XIV will deliver an address to young people in his hometown. The Women's March movement is also organizing a protest, dubbed 'Kick Out the Clowns,' with over 320 events planned and more than 13,000 people set to attend. On their website, the group stated, "June 14 is our chance to reflect the absurdity of the MAGA regime and the clowns who lead it." This latest wave of civil unrest echoes the widespread protests seen in 2020, including the 'Black Lives Matter' movement against police brutality and systemic racism, as well as the 'Women's March' in response to the #MeToo movement during Trump's first inauguration in 2017.

US Senate rejects bids to block arms sales to Qatar, UAE
US Senate rejects bids to block arms sales to Qatar, UAE

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

US Senate rejects bids to block arms sales to Qatar, UAE

WASHINGTON, June 11 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate on Wednesday blocked resolutions that would have halted more than $3 billion in military sales to the governments of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. The Senate voted 56-39 against considering legislation that would have blocked the $1.9 billion sale of armed drones and associated equipment to Qatar. The vote was largely along party lines, with Trump's fellow Republicans opposing the effort to stop the sale and most Democrats backing it. The 100-member chamber later voted by the same 56 to 39 margin against an effort to block a $1.6 billion sale to the UAE of helicopters and other equipment. Backers of the resolutions of disapproval said they opposed the sales for reasons including Qatar's offer of a luxury jet as a gift to Trump and an agreement for a firm backed by the Emiratis to use a stablecoin launched by Trump's World Liberty Financial crypto venture. Connecticut Democratic Senator Chris Murphy, a lead sponsor of the resolutions, called the agreements a corruption of U.S. foreign policy. The embassies of Qatar and the UAE did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Senator Jim Risch, the Idaho Republican who is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, described both countries as reliable partners to the U.S. and dismissed the resolutions as partisan politics.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store